I can sit here and do a refutation point by point but that’s a PRAAT. Instead I think the last paragraph is more insightful. He uses the word “worldview” which has a very different meaning in fundie than most outsiders think.
For fundies a worldview isn’t something that develops as a result of one’s experiences, knowledge, and beliefs. Rather it’s the opposite. A proscriptive set of ideas or beliefs that one must then apply to interpret the world. That’s how he can talk about a “Christian Worldview, an “atheist worldview”, etc. That’s why to Ken there can be no neutrality and why the scientific method simply doesn’t compute for him.
It’s also why he can claim things to be religions when they aren’t (that and taking a quote from a SCOTUS opinion out of context). If religion is simply about beliefs than by that analysis yes it’s a religion. By that same analysis science becomes a religion. But, religions aren’t about individual beliefs, they’re a type of group activity. The extent to which groups of atheists can take on aspects of religion is obviously a longer more complex topic that I don’t have the expertise to analyze.
Unfortunately, this doesn’t just stop with Ken. It how they justify their attacks on education.