#sexist

The woman-haters, man-haters, and non-binary-haters

Pomidor Quixote and Mr Justice Hayden #sexist #wingnut dailystormer.name

[From "British Judge Says Sex With Wife is a “Fundamental Human Right” and Everyone Loses Their Minds"]

The Jewish media puts sex everywhere to make people think about it constantly, but the Jews also make heterosexual sex much more difficult to achieve by introducing convoluted ideas about “consent” and about what marriage is supposed to be.

One man is taking a stand against that bullshit. This judge is bringing old ideas and common sense back into the discussion about the role of marriage in our society, and he’s doing all of that by… saying that a husband should be able to have sex with his wife.

RT wrote:

A British judge has invoked the ire of online commentators, activists and politicians after remarking that it was a man’s “fundamental human right” to have sex with his wife during an already controversial court case.

I cannot think of any more obviously fundamental human right than the right of a man to have sex with his wife… I think he is entitled to have it properly argued,” senior High Court judge Justice Hayden was quoted as saying during a preliminary hearing on a case involving a married couple of 20 years.

The wife has learning difficulties and her condition is deteriorating, prompting social services to raise the alarm about the potential for sexual abuse in the relationship as they felt the woman was no longer able to make decisions about whether she consented to sexual relations. Social services ultimately brought the case to the Court of Protection in London.

The husband has pledged to no longer sleep with his wife but prosecuting lawyers are still pushing for a court order barring sexual relations to prevent the woman from being raped.

Let’s get something out of the way first: all women have learning difficulties. It’s just a matter of how severe those difficulties are.

That said, if she can say yes or no to a question such as “do you want some ice cream?” or “do you feel like watching a movie?” then she can absolutely consent to sex.

This whole “consent” thing is a retarded Jewish invention that overcomplicates basic male-female interaction. If a woman doesn’t want to have sex, she resists, if she wants to stop having sex while having sex, she makes it known. If she for some reason decides to pretend to be okay with having sex while not feeling like having sex, then that’s her problem. Literally something that happens in her mind that can’t be measured or proven.

The insanity of this story is augmented by the fact that even though the poor husband pledged to no longer sleep with his wife, prosecutors still push for a court order to officially make him unable to have sex with his wife.

Do you understand how insane that is?

If a man can’t have sex with his wife, why does he have a wife?

[...]

The idea about marriage that most people have in their subconscious was put there by tales of old, by their grandfathers, and by the Jewish social-engineering media machine.

If marriage doesn’t ask anything from women, and gives them half of your stuff or more whenever they please, it not only does nothing to stop relationships from breaking down but it actually provides incentives for relationships to break down.

These whores will destroy your life if you let them.

The moment they feel they’ve secured you, that you have no alternative front-hole, and that you’re socially and legally prohibited from looking for their replacement… that’s the moment they’ll decide to stop having sex with you. Sex will become less and less frequent. She’ll never be “in the mood,” she’ll always be tired or with headache. She’ll never treat you the same. She’ll look at you with disdain. She’ll resent you. She’ll feel trapped by you even though you’re the one that’s really trapped. She’ll feel you’re abusive even though she’s the one being abusive.

She’ll file for divorce and she’ll take as much from you as she possibly can, and then she’ll tell everyone you know about how terrible you are. She’ll go fuck some loser that can’t compare to you but that will have more than you because she’ll share the stuff she took from you with him, and they’ll laugh at you every time you go get your kids on the weekends.

Your kids won’t understand why daddy looks so poor now while mommy and her new boyfriend seem so well off. You’ll want to explain to them… but you won’t be able to. You wouldn’t even know where to start.

As time passes, you’ll see how your own kids prefer mommy’s boyfriend. They’ll tell you how funny he is, how many great things they do together, and how much time they spend together. Every time you send them back to her house… you’ll feel like a shadow. An empty human husk trapping the echoes of the man that you once were and mixing them with the cries of the man that you wanted to be.

All because you thought marriage meant something other than your doom.

jazavac #sexist incels.is

(what is the female sex drive)

It's an instinctive need to acquire the highest quality seed possible while ensuring the survival of the offspring. Anything that she instinctively sees as signs of quality seed will be seen as attractive. Dual mating strategy and betabuxxing comes in when the quality male doesn't want to take care of the offspring. Today, it only comes down to looking good because provider males became unnecessary and people have sex for gratification, not reproduction.

Modus Coperandi #sexist incels.is

(what is the female sex drive?)

foids sex drive is just as visual as mens. that's why chad wins.
it's all about how you look.
if you don't look sexually arousing you will never be able to witness a truly horny foid.

foid sexuality seems to be dependable on her state of mind, the thoughts your image causes in her is what matters.
if you fuck a foid and all she thinks about is how she is gonna decorate the apartment while you plow her pussy, she will never orgasm.

foids seem to be unable of selective thinking. so if you show a flaw it will instantly occupy their mind.
foid culture is one of constant mogging and bragging.
if you do something un-normie the first thing she thinks will be: "I'm gonna tell my friends about this!"
lots of foids have no ego. they're merely extensions of their in-group thinking.

so what really matters for you: don't be ugly + don't be obviously abnormal.

foid sexuality is a mind game. it's not about physical contact.

ultimately to be long term successful you need to become a part of her fantasies.
which will obviously never happen for creatures like us.

Various incels #sexist incels.is

(what is the female sex drive?)

(Animecel2D)
Seeing a chad

(LordDylan)
Feeling dominated by chad, foids are so shallow they all have the same preference.

(Napoleon de Geso)
Femoid sex drive is outdated, they choose primitive chad instead of evolved gracile man like Elliot

(Hikikomori)
I'm not sure that it matters, we're incels and will never pleasure them anyway.

(CrookedOzCel)
They want low inhib thugmaxxed gigachad to beat the shit out of them

(Macrocephalus)
Being treated like a piece of meat by a very good looking man

Some incels #sexist #psycho reddit.com

Re: twoxroasties wants you to be a compassionate cuck when your wife cucks you, births some chad's spawn, bails on you, and then leaves you to raise chad's spawn. women are a meme.

image

(C0nserve)

I had my suicide planned in case the day he would realize I wasn't worthy of his love because of my genetics would come

Roastie on leddit experiences 1% of the hardships of incel lifestyle and wants to rope already

(Brainlaid)
If you ever ascend, DNA test your kids.

Anyway, women don't have consciousness or empathy, she just isn't fucking capable of putting herself in someone else's shoes. It's all about how SHE FEELS and what happens to her.

(Administrative_Worth)
In their minds, them tricking yiu into rasing offspring is actually moral. You see that kid needs resources, it's a kid, it's pure, it's innocent, it deserves fulfillment. Plus she knows it's hers. Therefore she has even more bond to see it succeed and receive resources. Always get your kids tested. Honestly even chad should. Believe me, women cheat, a lot. If they think they can get away with it, and the guys worth it, they cheat. Fact of life.

(Deoxysxx)

I cant even call that man a cuck, he is more of a man than the real father

I'm happy to read this comment in this sub. I also wouldn't leave a little child behind if I have taken care of it for so many years. Cuck or not, if people can show mercy to random people through charity, then you can take care of one more kid. It's not the kid's fault.

Random charity does not mean being legally financially tied against your will to a person you were deceived into believing was your biological offspring. Don't even compare the two. They are nothing alike.

(grilledcheesaroo)
I can. He is a fucking cuck that willingly took unnecessary stress & partially ruined his own life over a whore's bastard daughter.

And you're no better, you fucking cuck. If you don't kick both the whore & her cheat trophy out; you are a fucking cuck. I have no respect for either.

His older parents tried speaking sense into this father but they raised a soft little feminized wimp.

(41PercentIsNotEnough)
Lmao all the comments defending him, this sub is infested by normies, fakecels, and cucks

Andrew Anglin #sexist #wingnut #psycho dailystormer.name

[From "British Politician Sargon of Akkad Calls for Women to be Raped"]

"100% deal with it."

UKIP candidate Carl Benjamin stands by his comments that he "wouldn't even rape" a female Labour MP and tells Sky's @KateEMcCann to "deal with it".

Get more on this story here: http://po.st/5WnwrX

8:00 PM - Apr 18, 2019

You might remember Sargon of Akkad from YouTube.

And you may have been thinking “what the heck happened to that lad?”

Well, he’s a politician now.

And he is based and redpilled, and is calling for women to be raped.

This is quite awesome.

Aside from exterminating Jews, the main thing that I have always wanted was for women to be raped. For years, we have not had a single politician in a Western country that was willing to call for women to be raped – even while this is a very popular position in Middle Eastern countries.

It’s yet to be seen if Sargon will be able to enact his policy of rape once elected, or if he will pull a Donald Trump and build a few miles of groping and call it rape.

What is certain is that Sargon will win the election for Prime Minister of the UK based on the promise that women will be raped.

Rape has overwhelming popular support as a policy among the public, with up to 98% of people supporting it. However, thus far, no politician in the West has had the nerve to run on a rape platform.

I salute Sargon of Akkad, and wish him the best.

The Daily Stormer is officially endorsing Sargon of Akkad as Prime Minister of the UK.

RealRice #sexist incels.is

Hmm, well let's think about it logically.
I cannot think or comprehend of anything more cucked than having a daughter. Honestly, think about it rationally. You are feeding, clothing, raising and rearing a girl for at least 18 years solely so she can go and get ravaged by another man. All the hard work you put into your beautiful little girl - reading her stories at bedtime, making her go to sports practice, making sure she had a healthy diet, educating her, playing with her. All of it has one simple result: her body is more enjoyable for the men that will eventually fuck her in every hole.
Raised the perfect girl? Great. Who benefits? If you're lucky, a random man who had nothing to do with the way she grew up, who marries her. He gets to fuck her tight pussy every night. He gets the benefits of her kind and sweet personality that came from the way you raised her.
As a man who has a daugher you are LITERALLY dedicating at least 20 years of your life simply to raise a girl for another man to enjoy. It is the ULTIMATE AND FINAL cuck. Think about it logically

Orlov #sexist incels.is

Having a daughter is the worst thing that can happen to a man

Just imagine it, you feed and nurture this fucking thing with a hole for years just so it can grow up and become a cum dumpster for Chads and normies. You feed your baby girl, teach her how to walk, talk, she goes to expensive schools... and then she hits puberty, goes to high school and college and she randomly swallows gallons of cum at parties and thinks she is smart and strong and emancipated for doing it.

Only thing worse than that is having multiple daughters. Females are worthless scum, you nurture them just so they can betray you and whore themselves out. If you have a daughter you are raising a play toy for Chad and normie-scum. There's really no decency in it whatsoever, even if she is a straight-a student she is still a fucking degraded whore who would let Chad shit in her mouth just for validation.

SlayaCaleb88 #sexist incels.is

The Different types of Chads and Staceys

I have pretty much seen enough in my life to narrow them all down to this

CHADS:

Conservative/Christian/Self Righteous Chad(my most hated one)

These Chads are most likely people with top genetics that love that piece of shit called Jesus, most notably (Paul Joseph Watson, Alex Jones, Ben Shapiro,) they will often say incels are entitled and spoiled rotten, bashing incels makes them feel stronger and morally superior.

Party/Jock/Celebrity Chad

These ones are just your typical hollywood produced Chads, they bully incels because they think its fun to do.


Abusive/Criminal/Tough Guy Chad

These people are what women piss their panties with cum thinking about are great guys, only the deadshit fucked up foids go for these types of Chads, these are the type of Chads that the Conservative Chad does not want his daughter around.


STACEYS:

Rich Girl/Celebrity/Popular in Highschool Stacey (Higher Tier Foids)

These are foids that have been living on recruit dificulty most of their life and have never gone thru hardship, they only want the top guys to fuck.


Normal average looking women that still count as staceys (they aren't ugly or hot)

These chics are what most of our looksmatch are at, they are just average foids.

BECKY'S (Society is real fucked up thinking these foids deserve any one)

Bash the Fash Becky:
This is your typical foid that loves to get up on a soapbox and be an activist for some ideology that can easily be debunked, mostly feminists as well.

Beta Orbiter Becky:
This is just some below average looking foid that gets Incel Tears hard, not even I would go for any of these fucking disgusting animals.

Autistic Becky: (Now this one really fucking makes me angry)

Why the fuck should an Autistic Becky with my fucking looksmatch be able to get any fucking guy? Autism doesn't even exist for these types of foids and its a joke to them really, This goes to show how easy women have it compared to men.

HumanTrash #sexist #psycho incels.is

[LifeFuel] Every second a foid dies somewhere in the world

Just thinking about this makes me feel so much better, right now when you are reading this a filthy chad-worshiping cunt dies somewhere :feelsautistic: Doesn't matter if it's a baby or a 120-years old granny, they are all whores and they will all die.

David J. Stewart #sexist jesusisprecious.org

A man has veto power to decide who his wife doesn't have as friends, but the courts view that as abuse. Biblically, a man is to rule over his wife with Christ's love, but he is still her boss when he doesn't love her as he ought. If we only obeyed the government when our leaders are perfect, we'd have total anarchy. If a wife doesn't clean the house, her husband is the only one who can rebuke her. Who else is going to do it? The court's consider that as “domestic abuse.” A feminist psychologist would diagnose such a lazy wife with “posttraumatic stress,” blaming the husband for picking on his wife. No psychologist will diagnosis a woman with lack character; but rather, send her to a psychiatrist for a drug prescription. This is how “the system” works. Literally, a wife can slack off and shirk her wifely duties and a husband has no recourse of action.

Is it any wonder why men don't want to get married these days? Think about it! A man's wife can deny him sex, refuse to cook him a meal, refuse to get him a drink, refuse to clean the house, refuse to do anything, and there's absolutely NOTHING he can do about it. Yet, she can easily obtain a free (government pro-bono paid) lawyer simply be alleging “abuse,” drag him into court, and the judge will crucify him. This is not justice! Destroying marriages is not helping society. Courts never require a couple to undergo a mandatory year of counseling before considering a divorce. The reason why is because the banksters can't steal your home if you call off the divorce. The reason why is because the New World Order can't succeed if your marriage is restored. CPS can't steal your children if mom and dad have a happy marriage. And the truth is, the heathen world can offer no real help for your struggling marriage, because they reject the holy God of the holy Bible. Psalms 1:1-2, “Blessed is the man that walketh not in the counsel of the ungodly, nor standeth in the way of sinners, nor sitteth in the seat of the scornful. But his delight is in the law of the LORD; and in his law doth he meditate day and night.” The Bible has all the answers!

SaintElliot #sexist reddit.com

[OP of "You all are proof of evil female nature and all of you deserve to get raped by me"]

Your efforts to belittle our suffering and mocking us will not go unpunished. Females being alone and not being able to get chad is not comparable to real inceldom. Making fun of our ideology/philosophy and comparing your chad craving to our incel suffering in an effort to belittle inceldom is truly evil. It is a crime that can not be forgiven. All of you evil whores deserve to get raped and destroyed by me. Inceldom is a serious condition exclusive to men that needs to be resolved as soon as possible. It needs to be taken seriously and not get mocked or belittled. Even the claim that females can be incel belittles inceldom. Females claiming to be incel is an insult to real incels and the suffering they have to endure. Inceldom is serious. It is not a laughing matter. Inceldom kills, killed and will kill again. You, whores, are truly evil and disgusting. If you really claim to be incel then there would be no problem if I raped all of you fatass whores. That is what you disgusting slobs deserve. All of you are evil. Evil needs to be hated and destroyed. All of you deserve getting raped then shot by me. What you people do right now is a crime against inceldom and incels. This subreddit is a travesty and an abomination. I hate each and every single one of you with the very core of my being.

EconomicsofSex #sexist reddit.com

The male sexual revolution

The sexual revolution should have favoured men. After all, casual sex was now possible without the fear of getting the girl pregnant or having to marry her. Yet there was one thing screwed men over: Women don’t want casual sex as much as men want. Thus, the price of pussy remained as high as before while the price of cock went down to an all time low. Because of this we need a male sexual revolution break the female privileg.

To fix this there are two possibilities: Lower the price of pussy or increase the price of cock. I already talked about how we need to get rid of some fetishes in order to stop making women think they are entitled to Chad without bringing anything g to the table. How we have to talk about lowering the price of pussy.

The best way for this are sexbots. Why swipe through 30 bots on Tinder and then jump through some hoops when you can have an artificial pussy right at home? The effort/reward balance is way better for sexbots then for a hookup.

Of course prostitution is also a way but this has some serious downsides. Not only is it dangerous in terms of getting STD or being robbed, but it is also expensive. It is a band-aid for as long as it takes to get actual working sexbots.

David J. Stewart #fundie #conspiracy #wingnut #sexist #homophobia #pratt jesusisprecious.org

And so, don't be an idiot and think that Donald Trump as U.S. President is going to MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN! It won't happen. My friend, America will NEVER be great again until we turn back to a holy God...

America will NEVER be great again until we once again believe the Gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ.
America will NEVER be great again until we repent and turn back to the God of the Holy Bible.
America will NEVER be great again until we burn Hollywood's cesspool of iniquity to the ground.
America will NEVER be great again until we dismantle Las Vegas (aka, “SIN CITY”) completely.
America will NEVER be great again until we eliminate the filth and covetousness on the internet.
America will NEVER be great again until we get rid of all the illicit gambling casinos and strip clubs.
America will NEVER be great again until we spend more time with God and family than the television.
America will NEVER be great again until we do away with the Federal Reserve Banks and fiat money.
America will NEVER be great again until we bring the King James Bible back into America's classrooms.
America will NEVER be great again until we bring the King James Bible back into America's churches.
America will NEVER be great again until we stop indoctrinating children with the satanic lies of Evolution.
America will NEVER be great again until we burn all the counterfeit Bible revisions in our churches.
America will NEVER be great again until we stop voting for the lesser of two evils, and not vote for evil at all.
America will NEVER be great again until we prosecute the CIA for trafficking drugs into the United States.
America will NEVER be great again until we stop allowing people to get divorced for any reason at all.
America will NEVER be great again until we bring back the tens-of-millions of lost jobs from foreign slave labor.
America will NEVER be great again until we drain the swamp in Washington DC and elect honest leaders.
America will NEVER be great again until we stop the sexual exploitation of youth through the music industry.
America will NEVER be great again until we stop supporting manmade Illuminati Israel since 1948.
America will NEVER be great again until we America's women forsake feminism and start obeying their husbands.
America will NEVER be great again until men forsake Hooters, Playboy and internet porn and start thinking pure.
America will NEVER be great again until we start moving toward rural living instead of big city urbanization.
America will NEVER be great again until we make same-sex abominations illegal, and stop gays from adopting children.
America will NEVER be great again until we stop letting Globalists exploit the U.S. toward World Government.
America will NEVER be great again until we stop lawyers and judges from raping citizens, bilking them financially.
America will NEVER be great again until we get away from big government and big cities, which promote indifference.
America will NEVER be great again until we enforce border security and ship millions of illegal aliens back home.
America will NEVER be great again until we start rehabilitating prison inmates instead of locking them away.
America will NEVER be great again until we run the ungodly manure-spreading newsmedia out of the country.
America will NEVER be great again until we restore state's rights and limit the power of federal government.
America will NEVER be great again until we get back to little league and recreation, instead of kids parked in front of TV.
America will NEVER be great again until we return to the Christian principles upon which our nation was built.

I could list a thousand more things wrong in the U.S. today. We've lost so much in America! I think our country is doomed, because once sin infests a nation, only one of two things can turn it back to righteousness: 1) Bible-preaching, or 2) God's judgment. Since pastors don't preach anymore, and counterfeit Bible revisions have flooded into the churches, and “the simplicity that is in Christ” (the Gospel, 2nd Corinthians 11:3) has been replaced with false repentance, and churches are supporting manmade Illuminati Israel (thus consequently supporting the New World Order), it appears that all hope is gone, and only God's judgment can save us now!

Boy Scouts allow homosexual scout leaders. That is sickening! If you go fishing, officers and park rangers can confiscate everything you own if you don't know that you are required to pay for a fishing permit. I think that ruins America! Due to liability, many organizations are reluctant to host little league games and other fun activities for children. And now with the pedophile problem—which is a direct consequence of removing the Bible from the schools, Playboy magazine, sensual rock music, feminism, dying churches, homosexuality, the lies of Evolution, the evil influences on television, divorce (no father in the home), Hollywood and the general moral downfall of America—everyone is paranoid about their neighbours these days! How could America ever be great again in such a wicked climate? Everything is deteriorating quickly with a domino effect. We haven't seen anything yet. The daily news already cannot keep up with the abundance of heinous crimes being committed across America. Americans have become extremely covetous and materialistic. Psalms 135:15, “The idols of the heathen are silver and gold, the work of men's hands.”

Anti-Feminism Australia #sexist #wignut antifeminismaustralia.com

Make Australia great again — Pauline Hanson for PM!

Feminists are scared, very scared. They know their days are numbered and a big change is coming. Trump winning the US presidential election has shown that people have had enough. They have had enough of political correctness and feminism that plagues the USA.

Feminists have brought this upon themselves by pushing their female supremacist movement too far. Did they really expect it would last forever? Over the past few years, there has been a growing backlash against feminism. Read the comments (if they haven’t yet been disabled) of any man bashing news article in Australia and it will be full of backlash. Ten years ago you’d be lucky to see one or two comments against feminism. Today you will see hundreds, and they make up the majority of the comments.

Perhaps the most important thing of all is the rise of women against feminism. In the US election, a whopping 53% of white women voted for Trump. This came as a huge shock to feminists, and they didn’t realise just how many women are now against feminism. In the Anti-Feminism Australia group at least half of our admins are now women. We have many female members in the group and have also noticed a huge increase in the number of women joining our movement. There are also Facebook groups such as “women against feminism” which has over 42,000 members.

Feminists know the game is over when women are “betraying the sisterhood” in droves. This makes them angrier than anything else. An anti-feminist woman is probably equivalent to 5 anti-feminist men in terms of damage to the feminist movement. If feminists can’t even get their fellow sisters on their side anymore, what hope do they have?

So getting back to the victory of Trump. How does this affect feminism in Australia? Because the people of Australia have now seen that if Trump can become president of the USA, then surely Australia can have a Trump like president as well. Australians are sick of politicians who pander to the needs of women just to win female votes.

Australia needs an anti-feminist, MRA, straight talker Prime Minister to clean up all the misandry in this country. Who is the best person for the job? I would personally say Mark Latham but since he is no longer in politics, our best chance is now Pauline Hanson. Pauline Hanson’s popularity has surged since the last Australian election, and continues to grow. This puts her in the best position to become Prime Minister of Australia in the next election. You may laugh now but I can assure you if the victory of Trump is possible, we could easily see Pauline Hanson as the next Prime Minister of Australia.

In this video, Pauline Hanson congratulates Trump and says she is thrilled with his victory.

Pauline Hanson congratulates Trump

Last night on the ABC show Q&A, one feminist in the audience asked the panel if Pauline Hanson is likely to ever become PM. The audience burst out in laughter, and feminists on the panel respond with a firm “no”. Laugh it up now feminists, because that’s exactly what people did with the idea of a Trump president. I can’t wait to see all those feminist tears once Pauline Hanson becomes PM.

Feminist asks if Pauline Hanson will ever be PM

Although Pauline has never stated it, she is clearly an anti-feminist and a Men’s Rights Activist. She has liked a few of my anti-feminist comments that I’ve left on her page using the page name of “Anti-Feminism Australia”. She has also promised that she will make child custody laws fairer on men, address the male suicide epidemic, and help male victims of domestic violence.

Pauline Hanson claims women make frivolous DV complaints

Feminists have shown they are desperate for a female President/Prime Minister, just because they have a vagina. So you can just imagine the mental gymnastics and conflict going on inside their head if Pauline Hanson were PM. On one hand they want a female PM, but on the other hand they hate the fact she is an anti-feminist and MRA.

In my opinion, having a female anti-feminist PM is probably even better than having a male anti-feminist one. Why? Because women against feminism can get away with a whole lot more and can’t be accused of being a “misogynist” or a “woman hater”. Feminists will have a strong urge to call Hanson a “misogynistic pig”, but realise they can’t because she’s a woman. So what will they do? Blame it on the patriarchy or “internalised misogyny” so they can still find a way to blame men.

Be afraid feminists, be very afraid. Your days are numbered.

Please support “Pauline Hanson for PM” Facebook page.

MAKE AUSTRALIA GREAT AGAIN! PAULINE HANSON FOR PM!

SaintElliot #sexist reddit.com

Hammer therapy and female organ transplant clones

It is known that incels are angry/unstable/depressed/stressed because of inceldom. I came up with a solution to that. Incels should first sleep then bash the heads of brain-dead female clones in for therapeutic purposes. This should be called hammer therapy. This way we would get to release our hate against females without harming other people. The clones would be made braindead so no harm would come to another person and we would get our revenge from the female gender because they doomed us to the incel fate. After the incels bashed the heads of the female clones in with hammers their organs will be used for people who wait for organ transplants. We will be the executioners for organ transplant clones. These braindead female clones would help society and incels way more than actual females. Nothing would get wasted and all problems would get solved.

Anon #sexist dalrock.wordpress.com

Situations like this really put the laughable notion of ‘women entrepreneurs’ and women as business leaders into perspective as the fiction that it is.

The entire set of quotes from the last three articles show that the thoughts that go through the minds of these twats are so far removed from what even a competent middle-manager would think, let alone a hard-charging entrepreneur, that the difference is even greater than that between a child and an adult..

50% of CEOs are not women? This is proof that anything more than 5% means that there is a thumb or ten on the scale in favor of women as AA tokens—.

Vox Day #sexist voxday.blogspot.com

[In July, Kathryn B. H. Clancy and her co-authors Robin G. Nelson, Julienne N. Rutherford and Katie Hinde published a survey of 666 field-based scientists in the journal PLoS One and reported that 26 percent of the female scientists surveyed had been sexually assaulted during fieldwork.]

Of course, the push to encourage women in science is only going to cause more such sexual assaults to take place, which is one more reason why it is a bad idea. Science doesn't need more women, especially if more women in the field are going to help transform otherwise good male scientists into rapists and sex criminals.

SaintElliot #sexist reddit.com

Incel organ donors should be allowed to sleep with recently deceased females

Sex is a female resource. Organs are a human resource. I came up with a system that would exchange these resources in a way everybody would benefit. The pussy of females can be used even 2 days after their death. Their sexual resources get wasted with the current system and people often die because there aren't enough organ donors. Incels that are organ donors should be allowed to have sex with recently deceased females. This way female sexual resources would not be wasted even in death. Incels would be encouraged to donate organs and more potential lives would be saved. The incel suffering would be reduced. Nobody would be harmed. The number of organ donors would increase. Nothing would get wasted. It would be like biological and sexual recycling. Female sexual resources would not get wasted and they would be used to help incels. If this proposal came true it would be killing two birds with one stone.

CH #sexist archive.is

Politics is downstream of the sexual market (which is why electoral puzzles like women voting in greater numbers for the gibs and virtue signaling party is best explained as a biological repercussion of human sexuality).

All politics is gonadal. Given this reality, the most effective political persuasion techniques are those that evoke the ancient rhythms of the sexual market. Converting deeply gay, male Hillary partisans to The Trumpening is not likely in the cards but, if sufficiently shamed and ostracized by effective COPROP that leverages the power of anxiety over one’s sexual market status, many nominal males who plan to vote for Inmate Hillary can be dissuaded from exercising their right to notarize the featherweight class of their shrunken scrotes.

[...]

Even faggy Millennial manlets with incipient bitch tits will feel a cringe of shame if they are forced to identify with the beta lapdog in the bottom pic.

Just as a healthy and strong society with rock-ribbed shitlord norms can keep gays far enough in the closet that their petri dish flamboyance doesn’t creep out the kids, so can a fearless embrace of immutable and omnipotent sexual market law — and the exploitation thereof — cow mincing betaboys from pulling the lever for thecunt.

One sackless wonder at a time. Eventually, if enough manginas fear shitlord ridicule more than SJW shrieking, their self-respect will do the swelling their ovaries can’t do.

Vox Day #sexist voxday.blogspot.com

The primary contribution any woman can make for science is to stay completely out of it. No matter how good she is, no matter how smart she is, she cannot possibly compensate for the complete devastation and distraction she is going to leave in her wake over the course of her career among the socially and sexually hapless gammas who might have otherwise happily spent decades slaving away in the laboratories.

holocaust21 #sexist blogger.com

The problem is the general public haven't heard your message. They only hear the feminist message so they believe feminism. Even people who end up taking a more MRA stance are brought up and indoctrinated under feminism so they will take a lot of feminist dogmas as being facts when they are infact lies.

You need to get your message out there to all of Norway (and the world, for that matter)! Make yourself into a brand like Milo Yiannopoulis (but less of a twat). What I'm trying to figure out is how the fuck he does it. I get the impression he has some inherited wealth and "hangs around a lot of really rich people". I'm not sure how he pulls off the latter part though. I think he also earns a lot through ad revenue on Breitbart. But in any case how does he attract so much attention?

Rudy Giuliani #wingnut #sexist occupydemocrats.com

Rudy Giuliani’s fall from grace as “America’s Mayor” to shill for Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump has been a tragedy to observe. The once socially moderate Giuliani is now a rabid neo-conservative who appears on national television to disparage women without so much as a second thought.

While appearing on ABC’s “This Week” with George Stephanopolous, Giuliani was grilled about the recent revelations from the New York Times that Donald Trump lost over $900 million in 1995 and as a consequence may not have paid any income taxes for the last 20 years. The depths of Trump’s financial ruin, however, are not known as Trump continues to refuse to release any of his tax information. Rather than be appalled by this revelation, as millions of taxpaying Americans rightly are, Giuliani attempted to spin Trump’s tax debacle as an indicator of Trump’s intelligence level.

After delving into the realm of the absurd, Giuliani, who looked like a deranged asylum patient, took an unnecessary shot at women around America for no reason other than he’s a misogynist who once announced he was divorcing his wife in a press conference without first telling her. Style and class for America’s shadow mayor. Giuliani spit out:

"Don’t you think a man who has this kind of economic genius is a lot better for the United States than a woman."

The comment by Giuliani offers the belief shared by Trump and all of his supporters that women are, and forever shall be, second class citizens. Trump has vowed, “I would be the best for women”, but female voters think otherwise as they are supporting Clinton 51 percent to 34 percent. Unbeknownst to Trump the demographics in American politics have changed since pre-1920 , when the 19th Amendment was ratified which gave women the right to vote, and Trump’s continued derision of women will be his downfall.

The Anti-Feminist #sexist google.no

Regarding my thought over teenage girls being taken to retirement homes, regular readers may recall that I’ve expressed the same sentiment several times in the past, and I explicitly stated that in an ideal humane world, 16 year old girls would gladly visit retirement homes to give the old codgers blowjobs as part of community minded service. I also state in this very article that such a world is likely impossible given female sexual psychology. Not even a deranged femi-hag with poor reading skills could concievably believe that I am ‘encouraging’ teachers to take their underage pupils to retirement homes to have illegal sex with the residents.

Psychopathic Vanity Award

"I have body image issues, therefore, girls worldwide should have to grow up without their eyes."

PorphyriosMalik #sexist #psycho reddit.com

BrokenIndigoCrayons recently made a thread entitled "95% of female newborns should be blinded by doctors" and I have to confess that I agree with him.

Usually that's the point where normies show up to "debate" us. They want to refute our "arguments" and react surprised when we accuse them of attacking us, "I'm not attacking or belittling you, we're just having a discussion".

But there is no debate to be had:

* I don't want to be laughed at.
* I don't want to be looked at with disgust.
* I don't want to be compared to Chad.
* I don't want to be afraid to go out in public.
* I don't want women to see me.

All of that (and some more) can be summed up in the sentence "Women should be blinded at birth".

These feelings are real. They are not up for discussion. You don't get to tell me what my lived experience is. You don't get to tell me how I am allowed to feel.

Arguing that me not wanting women to see me is not real, that me not wanting women to see me is not true, that me not wanting women to see me makes me a horrible person is not ok. There is no "just having a discussion", you are attacking and belittling me at every step of your stupid "arguments".

Are normies really so delusional that they cannot see how they are reinterpreting an expression of vulnerability and emotion as some kind of proposal for political action that must be debated and stopped? Don't they recognize that every step of these strawman discussions is about denying our incel experience?

Most of the "discussion" on this subreddit involves one person laying out their hurt and feelings while another person does his or her best to invalidate them one by one in the spirit of what he or she either believes or at least pretends to be believe to be a reasoned discussion. That's not how successful communication works.

Eivind Berge #sexist eivindberge.blogspot.com.au

The insidious power of metaphors

Thanks to the hateful campaign to demonize Brock Turner as a rapist, I think I better understand how sexual hysterias work. Firstly, it needs to be pointed out that Brock Turner is not actually a rapist, even by the legal definition in California:

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/stanford-rape-case-brock-turner-victims-statement-a7074246.html

He is guilty of digital penetration, and not even a violent one at that; just taking advantage of the woman's intoxicated state. So why are people so absurdly hysterical about this minor sexual assault? Why do they demand to punish it as if it were rape? I disagree that it should be criminal at all, since the woman got drunk willingly and went along with it, but even if you agree with the law, it was far removed from rape.

I think people react to the metaphor rather than reality. Feminist propaganda has been so successful that "sexual assault" is now synonymous with "rape" in the mind of the mob, and so rape is all they can see in their imagination. It was recently shown that the meaning of words are stored in the same place in the brain across individuals:

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v532/n7600/abs/nature17637.html

Feminists have managed to hijack the semantic mapping of "rape" and meld it with "sexual assault," so now all it takes to create mass hysteria is to accuse sexual assault. This is also how statutory rape works, and how feminists have even managed the absurd feat of creating the concept of female rapists and female sex offenders. These are all about metaphors, and metaphors are all you need to create lynch mobs and criminal convictions alike, after legal reforms which are also based on metaphors rather than reality.

Because the meanings of words have so extreme consequences when they are enshrined in criminal law, and even when they aren't, it is important not to let the metaphors get out of hand. One thing we need to make absolutely clear is that rape can only be performed with a penis. A real penis. Brock Turner didn't use his penis -- just his fingers -- and women by definition don't have penises so they can't be rapists. If you don't see this, then you are in thrall of metaphors rather than reality and need to break the spell. And we need to turn back the feminist legal reforms which have already so unreasonably expanded the definition of rape in many jurisdiction.

Pill Scout #sexist archive.is

If women had genius IQs what would they do with that potential? But there's not a lot of motivation for nature to grant woman with great intelligence when she only needs to fend off danger from her young, and leave all the heavy lifting to the man.

At least that's my theory as to why testosterone + IQ is the formula for STEM genius. A woman could have high test and this testosterone-induced STEM type genius, but she would also reach a point of looking too masculine for her own good. Perhaps this is why they say when it comes to heritability of IQ, the woman's IQ is not as significant as the man's IQ in relation to the potential IQ of their offspring. She carries the potential for genius in her genes, but for a female it's not that necessary to have abstract supercomputer levels of problem-solving skills when you're oriented toward more pragmatic needs as opposed to sitting in a dark corner pondering astronomical, borderline schizophrenic things.

Michael Augustus #sexist returnofkings.com

Women Would Rather Be Raped By Invaders Than Stuck With Beta Males

She is dying for you to put her in her place, beneath you. A woman wants to be conquered, she wants to submit to power, she wants to give up control, but first she has to test to see if “it” exists within you. To submit to a lesser man is rape, to submit to a superior man is harmony. Feminism and other female SJW endeavors are societal shit tests. If you fail, they’ll push the boundary again, and again, and again… If you give them an inch, they’ll take a mile.

The female imperative was never supposed to be 100% successful, though. Eventually, some man somewhere is supposed to not put up with her shit and put her in her proper place: beneath him and one half-step back. A woman’s job is to see you fail. For if you fail, you were never “worthy” in the first place. Western culture is now embracing that very failure.

The Beta That Broke The Western Cultures’ Back

Betas occur naturally in the wild, but over the past several decades, governments, corporations, media, and academia have attempted to artificially manufacture them en masse beyond natural levels with the assistance of female nature (stated earlier). They’ve indoctrinated man into believing blue pill sexual strategy that women despise. They’ve stripped fathers from the home and had females infiltrate male spaces containing masculine role models. And they’ve legally restrained a man’s ability to discipline and properly set boundaries in the home, the very same discipline and boundaries that women instinctively seek. All with the proud help of women.

So what’s left? A whole generation of men raised by women and the state, taught to be pussies and supplicate to females and authority.

Now, the feminization of man has hit critical mass and women’s amygdalas notice. Women are unknowingly witnessing their own creation and are left disgusted, wondering, “Where have all the ‘good men’ gone?” Now women are seeking another tribe…

The Invaders

“[…] women actually want strong male authority figures in their life.

But will deny it until the day they die.

If they admitted to it, it would allow non male authority figures (beta men) to emulate alpha qualities.

They want men that just get it. Even if that means takeover of Western European / u.s. Culture by Islamic militants.”

• /u/antariusz (Source)

Europe is currently witnessing female nature being expressed freely on a societal level without a civilized, masculine balancing factor. The truth of the matter is, women have no in-group loyalties. Whoever the powerful are in that moment, women drift their way with their asses bent over, knees quivering, and legs dripping with tingle juice. They want to be conquered, but they don’t care by who. Whether it’s daddy government, her father, a boyfriend, Chad Thundercock, violent criminals, or a horde of rapefugees doesn’t matter.

In times of war, women are constants. Men and boys are killed off, but women are simply transferred and assimilated into the new tribe to be the sperm receptacles of the victors.

Observing the weakness of many European men, women want a different set of male suitors. They call this initiative “diversity” or “multiculturalism.” In plain terms, women want to import men they perceive to be powerful and masculine to replace the weaklings they are stuck with. Women LOVE playing multiple men against each other to battle for her vaginal affections. It’s basically the plot of a every rom-com and romance novel.

Thanks to the 1984 police state, politicians and social media titans like Angela Merkel and Mark Zuckerburg, that new tribe so happens to be the biggest group in history to never reform itself to Western society: Muslims (over 2 billion of them). They give absolutely zero fucks about Western Civilization and their inhabitants. They never back down. These people are not just willing to die and be imprisoned to defend their beliefs, but kill: “There is no law, but that of Allah.”

This is attractive to women. Women LOVE violent males. Women love their conviction. It’s extremely arousing to them. The fact that it’s backed by a mental illness doesn’t matter. These Muslim immigrants are violent, they don’t break frame, and are becoming powerful. That’s seen as masculine. That’s sexy.

Most modern Western man doesn’t stand a chance. Rape and sexual assault has skyrocketed since immigrants have been allowed to settle into Europe, yet women and feminists were silent on the subject. Why? Because they would rather live under the threat of rape by invaders than settle with skinny beta manginas protesting at slut walks and minoring in gender studies. There are even instances where European girls refused to report their immigrant sexual assailants in the name of multiculturalism and fighting Islamophobia or just because they felt bad for them. But that’s bullshit. The power of the rapists gave her tingles and then she tried to rationalize it.

Conclusion

With Open Gates: The forced collective Suicide of European Nations - Watch with Audio below

You see that, betas of Europe? That’s your future.

The only thing saving North America from being Cologne, Sweden, or Britain is that there are two oceans separating us from Africa and the Middle East. But Obama seeks to change that by importing thousands of Syrians into small traditional family towns (view: Roosh’s video). Not to mention the education system, specifically the colleges here, are getting brainwashed to the max with anti-white “diversity.”

Betas of the United States and Canada? Keep it up, and women will encourage the same thing to happen here, embracing the enemy with open legs.

Bob #sexist bobstruth.blogspot.com

Anonymous: Bob, when a "man" rapes a woman, he is telling her he has no respect for her as a person.

Bob: Anonymous, when a female refuses sex with a man, she's telling him that she has no respect for him as a man. She receives what she does to others. Of course he won't respect her.

greginaurora #sexist google.no

Women make babies.
Men make Civilization.

Without Women, Mankind dies.
Without Men, Mankind reverts to nothing more than very smart animals.

But there’s a catch. Women care nothing for Civilization. A woman’s life is consumed by sexual desire for her one-true Alpha-love, and the empty chattering with other women that composes everything important in her thoughts and actions. Even her children are nothing more than an afterthought.

Men, by contrast, can be happy in nearly sexless, nearly loveless lives, totally devoted to the maintenance of Civilization. If they’re Betas. And if Civilization itself spurns them?

They burn it all to the ground and revert everything back to animalism. Who’s to stop them? Civilization only exists because they themselves wish it so. And when their great love betrays them, they destroy it. With finality.

And those Betas are both the only ones whi truly understand that, and the only ones who care.

Rollo Tomassi #sexist therationalmale.com

Next to the (abstract) terms of ‘Alpha’ and ‘Beta’, SMP and SMV are two of the more contentious placeholders for manosphere concepts. SMP is Sexual Marketplace and SMV is used to represent the relative Sexual Market Value of an individual within that SMP. There’s a lot to consider when when we attempt to define just what that ‘marketplace’ entails, but the point of contention for critics is that by valuating a person based on a perceived market state we dehumanize that individual. For those uninitiated to Red Pill concepts, a complete denial of any sexual marketplace is usually the first retort.

“People are People and everyone is special” or some variation of the nebulous individual’s uniqueness needing to be held as the benchmark for each case of ‘value’ are the common refrains. Even denying an observable, measurable marketplace altogether for fear of being ‘judgemental’ is part of the Red Pill critic’s predictable counter to the idea of a sexual marketplace.

However, the latent purpose of this denial is really a ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ tactic that keeps players ignorant of the system they exist in. Just as with the 49th Law of Power, deny the game exists and you can better play it.

As with all Red Pill truths, the awareness of where one fits into the scheme of the SMP, and accepting the sometimes cruel realities of it can be a bucket of cold reality for men (and women). The simple truth is that our capacity to valuate various stimuli in our environment has been a survival-beneficial adaptation for us.

Ismail Berdiyev and Archpriest Vsevolod Chaplin #sexist #fundie #psycho telegraph.co.uk

Two prominent religious leaders in Russia have provoked outrage after suggesting female genital mutilation could help reduce sexual promiscuity.

The scandal erupted on Wednesday when Vsevolod Chaplin, a former spokesman for the Russian Orthodox Church, rushed to the defence of Ismail Berdiyev, a senior Muslim cleric from Dagestan who said “all women” should be subjected to the practice to eliminate sexual depravity.

Mr Berdiyev, chairman of the Coordination Centre of North Caucasus Muslims, made the controversial comments when asked to comment on a report into the practice published earlier this week.

“All women should be circumcised so there would be no debauchery on earth, so that sexuality is minimised,” Mr Berdiyev, a prominent figure in Dagestan, told a correspondent from Interfax, a Russian news agency.

“The Almighty created woman to bear and raise children,” he added. “[Circumcision] would not affect that. Women would not stop giving birth. But there would be less promiscuity.”

He went on to clarify that although Islam does not prescribe the practice, “it is necessary to reduce female sexuality. If it was done to all women, it would be very good.”

Mr Berdiyev was commenting on a recent study that found female genital mutilation is common in remote mountain villages in Dagestan, a predominantly Muslim region in Russia’s north Caucasus.

Research by the Russian Justice Initiative, an NGO, found that in areas where the practice continues female genital mutilation tends to be carried out on girls up to three years old, without anaesthetic and often in unsanitary conditions.

The researchers said most cases they came across involved removal, or part-removal, of the clitoris and labia.

Archpriest Chaplin, one of the most prominent Orthodox priests in Russia, rushed to the mufti’s defence after outraged headlines splashed across Russian media and social networks.

“What feminist howling!” he wrote in a Facebook post defending the right of minorities to preserve religious traditions.

“Circumcising all women probably isn’t necessary. Orthodox women don’t need it because they are not promiscuous,” he wrote.

“Of course God created women to bear and raise children. Feminism is a lie of the 20th century,” he added.

Jim #wingnut #elitist #sexist blog.reaction.la

We may reasonably suppose that the first six civilizations were founded by high IQ peoples. Their homelands are now all occupied by low IQ peoples, as for example Egypt and the Indus Valley. And any smart people currently in the vicinity of the Indus valley are descended from foreign invaders who conquered a low IQ population that had lost or was losing the capability to operate cities and irrigation.

The Maya created writing and the positional number system, and used it to accurately predict the motions of the moon and sun. Their descendents were for the most part homeless nomads, their largest city being two hundred mud huts. Their great cities were abandoned, even when they commanded key resources. The descendants of the Maya are obviously incapable of operating a great civilization, indeed, without white rule, could not even have cities, or political units larger than tiny tribes with poorly defined territories. They wound up running naked through the jungle with pointy sticks to the extent that they had any jungle.

You would think that positive eugenics is natural in a civilization. The smartest people get to the top, command and effectively utilize all the good stuff, so have more surviving children. And sometimes it does work like that.

But if the smart people are the ruling and fertile people, they will proceed to ensure that their smart children get all the top jobs. This will disturb the topmost rulers, who would like to have limitless freedom to appoint obedient people to the good jobs, regardless of ability, and more importantly, regardless of family. In particular, they would like the freedom to not appoint the sons of powerful rival families. If you have a bunch of fertile smart industrious men inserting their kids into the top jobs, then you wind up with aristocratic or semi aristocratic system. The Bishop is succeeded by the Bishop’s son, which bothers the pope no end. The colonel is succeeded by the colonel’s son, which bothers the general, which bothers the King. One drastic solution, popular in China, is to give the top jobs to eunuchs. You want a top job, have to give up your man parts. Note the striking similarity with today’s political correctness, which requires metaphorical castration of males, and prefers literal castration of males.

Affirmative action for women makes a lot more sense when we recall that working women, unlike working males, do not reproduce, therefore will not be succeeded by their children. If you are a ruler, able (aristos) fertile patriarchal families are a problem, working women and eunuchs are the solution. And if the very smartest women are not all that bright, all the better, will be less capable of plotting against you. So the smartest females do not reproduce. Even if working women are substantially less productive than working men, working men are threat, working women are not a threat. Similarly any measures to prevent the affluent white male children of affluent white males from getting ahead. Such measures are rationalized in the name of social justice, but such measures give the most powerful more power.

From the point of view of the emperor, eunuchs are a better solution than working women, since eunuchs are substantially smarter than women, and have zero offspring, not merely near zero offspring.

A system of rule by the best (aristos) will, if the best are fertile, tend to become hereditary or semi hereditary. Thus patriarchy plus meritocracy will give rise to aristocracy, because affluent patriarchs have numerous sons, the meritocrats start running the system as a job placement program for their numerous sons, and the Pope will not be happy. Conversely, when the King tries to do stuff to make it less hereditary, he is apt to make the best less fertile.

One would suppose the mandarinate to be eugenic, and indeed China, unlike other civilizations, has not become a low IQ wasteland. But mandarin exam was corrupted to select for grinds rather than smarts. Any test can be gamed. The more that scoring high in the test matters, the less predictive of accomplishment it is. Thus selecting people on the accomplishments of their family and recent ancestors is apt to produce more accurate predictions than over reliance on an examination system. If the outcome of an IQ test has little direct effect on your career, it will accurately predict accomplishment. If you hand out nice jobs on the basis of an IQ test, considerably less so. If nice jobs are handed out on the basis of the test, the test is apt to become a marathon of rote memorization, which is what happened with the Chinese mandarinate exam. But for obvious reasons, emperors were unenthusiastic about handing out nice jobs on the basis of family accomplishment, for accomplished families are rivals.

Fertility in our civilization is of course massively dysgenic, because women are artificially placed in the workforce and education, with the most able women being most forcefully helicoptered into courses and jobs far beyond their ability.

As “Smart and Sexy” demonstrates, our mandarinate exam (the SAT and LSAT) has been jiggered to avoid selecting too heavily for ability. If, however, our mandarinate exam was fixed as proposed in “Smart and Sexy”, and if we had patriarchy, our civilization, like the Chinese, could avoid becoming a desolate wasteland of low IQ savages running through the woods with sharp sticks. And it would not be hard to make our mandarinate exam better than the traditional Chinese mandarinate exam.

The Chinese communist party currently selects on test results, on family accomplishment, and on individual accomplishment. This is likely to give substantially better results than the traditional Chinese mandarinate exam. Unfortunately they also are affirmative actioning women, probably for the same reasons we are, and this is producing significant dysgenesis in China.

Matt Forney #sexist mattforney.com

I am smarter than nearly all the girls I’ve ever known.

That’s not arrogance talking: it’s the truth. Out of all the girls I’ve known, maybe three were at least as smart as me, and of that three, one is more intelligent than me. All the rest were my intellectual inferiors. I don’t hold it against them; in fact, when I run across girls who tout their “intelligence,” I feel nauseous, like I’m dealing with a pack of overeager Mormon missionaries.

One of the most dangerous delusions of modern America is the idea that girls are desirable because of how smart they are. Indeed, the idea that intelligent girls even exist in significant numbers is ridiculous. Puffed up by you-go-grrl propaganda from the media, their heads filled with lies from the universities, every girl who can spell her own name suddenly thinks she’s Einstein. Worst of all, girls think that being able to spell their own names entitles them to a good man, even when they’re bossy, defiant and lacking in feminine graces.

This is laughable.

The reality is that truly intelligent females are rare, and most girls who consider themselves “smart” are not. More importantly, the idea that men should find female intelligence attractive is as preposterous as expecting them to find hermaphroditism sexy. A girl’s most important aspects will always be her beauty, her charm and her willingness to please, with intelligence so far down the list that it might as well not be on the list.

Yet thanks to white knights artificially pumping up the egos of every girl in America, men are made to feel like freaks for considering a girl’s bust size to be more important than her ability to regurgitate Marxist tripe.

Here are my reasons why female intelligence is a fraud.
1. Few girls are actually intelligent.

This is the most important thing to know: intelligence is largely a masculine attribute. IQ testing has consistently shown that while men and females have the same mean intelligence, men have a wider standard deviation while females cluster around the middle. In layman’s terms, this means that there are more intelligent men than there are intelligent girls. At the same time, it also means that there are more unintelligent men then unintelligent girls, which is why the short bus tends to be a sausage fest. The “dumb bimbo” stereotype is a fiction invented by ugly girls.

Turns out that “boys go to Jupiter to get more stupider, girls go to college to get more knowledge” was at least half true.

This is why it’s a waste of time for smart men to cast about for a girl who is their intellectual equal: she simply doesn’t exist. You have a better chance of talking Zooey Deschanel and Ellen Page into a threesome than finding a girl who can match you in knowledge, life experience and all-around brains. You do find the occasional woman who can hold her own with men, but these exceptions don’t disprove the rule, any more than the existence of Kim Peek disproves the fact that most autistics are hand-flapping retards.

What’s really awful about this situation is that the mainstream media, invested in hiding the truth, blame men for not being able to find the right girl. “You’re looking in the wrong places.” “Intelligent, classy girls don’t hang out at bars.” “Maybe you just attract the wrong kinds of people.” They can’t simply admit that females are the passive sex, built for raising babies and not much else, because doing so might hurt girls’ self-esteem— and we can’t very well have that, now can we?
2. Girls are intellectually inferior.

Several months ago, I was on Twitter killing time when some teenage girl started sending rude and insulting Tweets at me because she was offfeeennnded at my article on why most girls shouldn’t bother going to college. I initially ignored her, but when she continued to harass me, touting her “4.0 GPA” and how smart she was, I clicked through to her profile and did a little research. Turns out that this oh-so-intelligent young lady was spending $58,000 a year to major in acting. Furthermore, while she was not unattractive—she had a good bone structure, a cute face and huge— tracts of land—she was at least twenty pounds overweight, so several of my followers started calling her fat. What was her response?

She started sending pictures of herself to me in an attempt to prove she wasn’t fat.

This girl wasn’t stupid; she was clearly four or five points above the mean female IQ. But not only did she massively overrate her intelligence, she was unwilling to accept that maybe, just maybe, she had made some poor choices in life.

That is the modern “intelligent” girl; an intellectual vacuum. Her life one great big fraud from beginning to end. Despite her vaunted “smarts” and her belief that she can “do anything,” she doesn’t major in math, engineering, computer programming or any discipline that requires actual work. No, she picks a soft major like English, education or ethnic studies, where there are no standards and you can pass any nonsense in for a grade so long as you sound authoritative. She rationalizes her choices by saying that she wants to “help the children” or she’s “interested in learning,” despite the fact that all American education does is teach people to memorize Marxist nonsense and repeat it back word for word.

Claiming that girls are intelligent because they earn the majority of degrees is like saying that parrots are intelligent because the majority of them can mimic human speech.

When she graduates, assuming she isn’t spat right back into the service industry, she’ll go to work as a government bureaucrat, HR commissar, paralegal or other profession that contributes nothing to society. She’ll complain about the pay gap even as she takes every day off she can because her “head hurts” or she “needs some time off with the girls.” She’ll whine about the lack of girls in management roles even as she plans to quit her job when she has kids— but not until she’s in her thirties, of course.

After all, she wants to “have fun” first and “get it out of [her] system” before she settles down.

But it’s in her choice of hobbies that the modern “smart” girl truly exposes her vacuity. She doesn’t spend her free time reading science textbooks or perfecting her chess game: she TiVoes Teen Mom and obsesses over Lena Dunham’s cleavage. If she reads books at all, she limits herself to trashy mainstream thrillers like The Hunger Games or textual pornography like Twilight. Her weekends are spent pumping chumps for peach daiquiris at the dive bar and getting pumped by every stud who stirs her loins. Even so-called “nerd girls” are phonies, as their “nerdiness” extends to playing video games once in a blue moon or re-Tweeting charlatans like Neil deGrasse Tyson.

The only thing separating her from a ghetto baby momma is the ability to form complete sentences.

Face it: the vast majority of girls are as hollow as a drum. The three or four surplus IQ points that college-educated girls have are wasted on them, because all they’re used for is rationalizing a life of mindless consumption and sluttiness. If the modern West is a cesspool, girls are its most devoted coprophages, gulping down runny diarrhea by the bucketload with forced smiles on their faces.
3. Girls know that their “intelligence” is a lie.

As loudly as they brag about their “strength” and “independence,” girls know inside that their credentials are worthless in the eyes of men. Go back to that chubby acting major who started insulting me on Twitter. Me pointing out that her degree was worthless didn’t faze her, nor did my reminding her that she was wasting sixty grand a year for it. It was calling her fat—insulting her looks—that wounded her most deeply.

And she was so insecure that she resorted to begging for validation from me, a man she considered a “misogynist.”

The vagina is the perfect representation of the nature of females. An empty vessel, a hole, a void with no identity of its own. Without a man to fill her with his essence, she is as useless as a crabapple rotting on the sidewalk. Only by taking that essence deep inside her can she mature and become the woman she was meant to be. And filled with the wrong essence, she becomes an intellectual Typhoid Mary, mindlessly infecting others with her diseases of the mind.

That’s the problem with girls today: they’re so full of bullshit that their eyeballs are brown.

That bullshit is pumped into their skulls by men. Every advance in “women’s rights” occurs only because men allow it to occur. Women’s suffrage was only passed into law in the U.S. because leftist Protestants in the Republican Party wanted to ensure an electoral majority for Prohibition and other “social purity” policies. Sexual liberation only happened in the sixties because cowardly draft-dodging hippies, knowing they could not compete with real men for the affections of feminine women, encouraged girls to slut it up so they could get laid. The mass entry of girls into college and the workforce was instigated by corporate capitalists in order to drive down wages and smash workers’ rights.

If at any point, men had collectively told girls no, they would have quieted down and gone back to the kitchen like they were told.

So it is with the myth of female intelligence. Girls believe they are smart, worldly and cultured because men lie and white knight for them. The gelded father telling his little princess that she can be whatever she wants to be, the slack-wristed orbiter who writes sweet nothings on her Facebook posts, the hipster nancyboy who claims he wants an “equal”: they are the enemy. Without them, the Katerinas of America would gladly kneel to their Petruchios. Because these genetic discards cannot compete with legitimate men, they encourage degeneracy in the vain hope of getting their dicks wet.

Spraying the hollyhocks with lye is the only way they can propagate their diseased seed.

As men, it is our responsibility to bring girls back to their proper place. To lead them into their natural roles as wives and mothers. We men do not choose or reward girls for their clown college degrees, their meaningless cubicle jobs, or their supposed “intelligence.” We reward them for their willingness to please us and make us happy, and in doing so make themselves happy. No amount of phony education or career “success” will scratch that deep itch in a girl’s soul: the desire to serve a man.

Not a “guy,” not a “male”: a man.

Inside every Strong, Independent Woman™ is a suppliant girl yearning to break free. I say we give that girl a hand.

Henry Makow #fundie #conspiracy #sexist #kinkshaming #homophobia henrymakow.com

The following examples are evidence of Cabalist satanic possession:

1. The exaggerated place of romance and sex in our culture is unnatural and unhealthy. Essentially, romantic love is a surrogate religion. The loved one has replaced God as the object of our love. Almost all music is devoted to extolling her imaginary qualities, adoration mostly motivated by sexual attraction. "Relationships" are hyped as essential to personal development which they are not. Society is besotted by young fertile females, who are idealized and fetishized. The vagina is the Holy Grail. Orgasm is a Holy Sacrament. The result is a mass psychosis, co-dependence and male impotence.

2. The divorce of sex from love, marriage and procreation. Anonymous sex degrades all relationships to the level of sex appeal. This is characteristic of the homosexual disorder. The cocaine for sex addicts, pornography, is widely available. 70-80% of teenage boys watch online porn regularly. Girls must behave like porn stars to be loved. The sexualization of children takes place and eventually, acceptance of pedophilia. This is gradually killing heterosexual relations. Occult possession takes the form of obsession with sex.

Sexual intercourse is a means to an end not an end in itself. It is intended to bond and build marriage and families. Anything else is perversion.

3. Feminism and the war on marriage and family. Heterosexuality is based on the exchange of female worldly power for male worldly power expressed as love. Thus female empowerment neuters both sexes. Feminism's hidden agenda is for women to have careers instead of marriage and children. Only Satanists would pit men against women, and undermine the love of husband and wife, and mother and child.

4. Gender bending - the relentless media promotion of
masculinity for females & femininity for males is Occult. "Gay rights" is a disguise for
a vicious attack on heterosexual identity and values, based on marriage and family. The aim is to replace heterosexual norms with homosexual norms. This has already happened. Look at what has happened to "dating." Courtship has been partly replaced by "hooking up." Charities openly discriminate against boys and promote female empowerment in order to destabilize traditional culture.

5. Incessant wars have no purpose other than to increase the wealth and power of the Illuminati and undermine nation states. All wars are contrived by the Illuminati to kill off natural leaders and demoralize, degrade and destroy humanity. Ironically, they are used as an excuse for Illuminati "world government."

6. Naturalism. Erasing the line between spirit and matter by pretending man's Divine spirit doesn't exist. Characterizing people strictly in terms of physical lusts and needs with a reductive focus on defining ourselves in terms of carnal desire and bodily functions.

7. The dumbing down of the public through sports, entertainment and a defective education system. The espousal of collectivist over individualistic values. Modern art, including painting, film and music, border on fraud.

8. The pervasive idea that Truth is relative and cannot be known. God is Truth. Knowing and obeying God is the essence of religion.
The attempt to marginalize scientists who affirm an universal intelligence at work in nature. The general effort to make scientific results conform to "political correctness" i.e. Satanic coercion.

9. The mainstreaming of gambling (i.e. stock speculation) under the guise of "investing." Now when they are not watching porn, millions are fixated on stock fluctuations. Lust, whether sex or greed, is the tool of satanic possession. (See my "Stock Market Porn" scroll down)

10. Multiculturalism, migration and diversity are underhanded attacks on the European heterosexual Christian heritage of the West.

My whole website is devoted to this topic. The point is — mankind is satanically possessed.

Eivind Berge #sexist google.no

Facebook is evil

This week we learned that Facebook has kicked out Rune Øygard because he is a convict of the victimless sex crime of having a consensual sexual relationship with 14-15-year-old girl (there is nothing really unusual about this criminal case, which just shows run-of-the-mill misandry and sex-hostility at work, but it received a lot of publicity in Norway because Øygard is a politician). It turns out that Facebook has an actual policy against convicted sex offenders. To me, this crosses the line and demonstrates unambiguously that Facebook is an evil instrument of political correctness, in the business of enforcing feminist sexual taboos. I believe a private company such as Facebook should have the right to exclude anyone they want, of course, but this policy raises the issue of whether it is a good idea for us to spend so much of our time there. The issue is our willingness to give them power over us. Facebook's ostracism hurts because we have trusted them with too much power and now they abuse that trust, but the fundamental problem is our gullibility. The moral is: Don't make yourself too dependent on any morally corrupt entity. This is an inherent risk of centralized platforms, so we should probably try to avoid these whenever possible

onedaily #sexist isitnormal.com

Just speaking from my own experience here. I dont believe in platonic relationships. Unless the guy is gay or impotent. No just impotent, because gay guys would still do it. LOL..

My ex had a lot more guy friends than girl friends. Also her "best friend" was a guy, she told me this in the beginning. I trusted her but in the back of my mind was still a bit leery.

For good reason. She slept with her best friend and another friend. Who knows how long they have been sleeping together, but I was not there to find out. I was gone real fast.

Bottom line a guy will always want to fuck his girl friends, he's hoping to be that shoulder to lean on. Or just hang out get drunk and have casual sex as if its nothing.

David J. Stewart #fundie #sexist jesus-is-savior.com

Nudity is a sin, whether male or female; but especially for the females since men are sexually aroused by sight. No women or girl should ever strip naked for any reason in public. Beaches are some of the most wicked places in the world.

Hawaii and other warm tourist destinations are spiritually dangerous places because of nudity. Women wear skimpy bathing suits that reveal 100% of their body. You can see their buttocks clear through the bikini. Many of them expose their teats, because there's no bra padding. Perhaps you say, “Boy, you have a dirty mind.” No, I have a man's mind. And you're an idiot if you disagree with the Bible. God is a holy God. Holiness is moral perfection. Public nudity is immoral and causes lust, fornication, adultery and all manner of sexual sins. Colossians 3:5-6, “Mortify therefore your members which are upon the earth; fornication, uncleanness, inordinate affection, evil concupiscence, and covetousness, which is idolatry: For which things' sake the wrath of God cometh on the children of disobedience: In the which ye also walked some time, when ye lived in them.” Modest dress is important to God and ought to be important to you. If it's not, get your wicked heart right with God!!!

thoughtsandreplies #homophobia #sexist #fundie thoughtsandreplies.tumblr.com

[ Heterosexual marriage has its downsides, too, you know. The currently-high divorce rate is a great example of this, as is the high rate of adultery amongst heterosexuals. But does that mean that heterosexuality, in and of itself, is wrong? Of course not. So why think that homosexuality is wrong, then, just because it has some downsides? It seems like the only real argument you have against homosexuality is that it goes against the Bible. But since when is everyone required to follow the Bible? ]

There is a reason there is no such thing and never will be any such thing as ‘gay marriage’. Because marriage is definitively the bringing together of a man and a woman to secure to their children their natural parents.

David Blankenhorn’s Protecting Marriage to Protect Children Sept 19, 2008
Marriage has always been a partnering of opposites, male and female, and to pretend two gays can be married is to not know what marriage is. 


HeroicNews: Why Marriage can Never be Gay, Dec 28, 2013


It is critical for healthy child rearing to have stable consistent parental relationships from either side of gender dimorphism. Daughters need respectable fathers to learn to expect to be treated with respect. Boys need mothers to teach them the value of respecting the weaker sex. And children learn by watching all the time their parents, without their even realizing it. And absent the dynamics of a opposite sex relationship a hideous void rends asunder their formative years. 

CBS News: Kids of gay parents fare worse, study finds, June 12, 2012


The divorce rate statistic that’s been going around for the past few decades is actually a wanton deception. Thomas Sowell explains it best:

“In a given year, the number of divorces may well be half as large as the number of marriages that year, but this is comparing apples and oranges. The marriages being counted or only those marriages taking place within the given year, while the divorces that year are from marriages that took place over a period of decades. To say that half of all marriages end in divorce, based on such statistics would be like saying that half the population died last year if deaths were half as large as births. Just as most people were neither born nor died last year, so most marriages did not begin or end last year. “-Thomas Sowell’s The Vision of the Anointed

CNS News: How Does Gay Marriage Hurt Us? Here’s How! June 17, 2014


Marriage is a religious and cultural institution and just like most people in western society know nothing of how fundamental the Christian world view has shaped our society, so too are most ignorant of how Marriage supports society.

To garner the beginning of an understanding just look at the repercussions of the destruction of the Black Family. [which btw was on the rise when the socialism of the Great Society destroyed it]

Just as you cannot demonize heterosexual relationships because of their particular failures, you cannot attribute homosexual relationships with successes they are by nature incapable of achieving, specifically because of the natural differences of the sexes which cultural revolutionaries so ardently try to deny the existence of— 

Masha Gessen Gay Marriage Activist, “Marriage shouldn’t exist” Apr 23, 2013


It seems like the only real argument you have against homosexuality is that it goes against the Bible. But since when is everyone required to follow the Bible?

Take note, and look back at the exactly ZERO times I brought up the Bible. 


In my previous post I explained the morality of LIBERTY, the definition of mental illness, and various statistics. In this post I’ve explained the nature of marriage & why homosexuality must fall short [gender dimorphism] marriage’s relevance to child rearing, faulty divorce statistics, and noted the definitive repercussions when the family is dissolved. [We absolutely know that a child is less well off without both a father and mother, period].

Nowhere did I ever suggest an ironfisted theocracy. =/ I said, in toto, Liberty trumps your feelings. & Homosexuality is unhealthy. 

You seem to be inventing what you think I’d say rather than reading my words. =/

As you can’t get that much clear, I don’t see the point in distinguishing between universal nature of one thing [homosexuality] and the failings of another [marriage] within individual instances and or trends in a relatively small time segment of cultural revolution. =/ 

Humans are by nature flawed. To point out the nature of homosexuality and it’s unachievable virtues, and those same virtues found redonkulously in TradMarriage is not to overlook the failings in particular TradMarriages.

Of course [since you brought up the Bible out of the blue] ancient Jewish wisdom teaches that love of yourself is only the basis on which to grow. The Golden Rule: Love thy neighbor as thyself, is the next step. And courage requires reaching out to ‘other’s. 

In homosexuality this natural development of human morality is squashed. Getting along with a life partner so different as to be another gender altogether is the natural means to forcing human growth. 

And just fyi, the likes of J.D. Unwin have studied anthropological matters which to me suggest the probability that fidelity in TradMarriage relates to measures of advancement in civilization itself. 


BUT without the Bible you really have no idea where we would be, AT ALL. Classical Liberalism was of Christian derivation, esp. the Christian Philosophy called “Scottish Common Sense”. There never would have been any kind of abolition movement. The world before Jewish laws of the old testament giving indentured servants specific legal rights shows only a glimpse of what the imminent pagan world was like. They had to institute laws against child/human sacrifice because it was a real normal thing going on. 


Every Atheist in the world cannot lift himself off of his intellectual belly without the moral foundation of Christian pluralism.The golden rule is the basis for the non aggression principle. Civil rights are derived from Natural Law a Biblical concept. 

F. Roger Devlin #sexist toqonline.com

[A review of Charles Murray's "Coming Apart"]

The products of the entertainment industry still usually validated American norms. Subjects such as abortion and homosexuality were never touched upon in television shows, only rarely and disapprovingly in movies. Most liberals were willing to say that extramarital sex was wrong. Only three and one-half percent of American families were headed by a divorced parent. In many neighborhoods, houses were left unlocked and children could go about unsupervised.

But American women had “much to be outraged about,” the author tells us, such as being expected to marry and have children! If Murray gets portrayed as a ‘hard-rightist,’ it is only because presenting data honestly is now all such a designation requires or implies.

...

Murray writes that “being a single mother is tough, and it is appropriate to sympathize with women who are in that situation.” He does not say it is appropriate to be sympathetic to the manchildren of Fishtown, and most readers will be left with the impression that what they need is a good kick in the pants. Yet I wonder whether the same factors did not produce the undesirable behavior of both men and women that he notes today.

In the America of 1963, a high school graduate might expect to find a job which would allow him to marry and permit his wife the leisure to stay home raising a few children. He could buy a freestanding house and a car, and still afford to take the family on a two week vacation every summer. The wife would have been reared with a view to preparing her for the duties of marriage and motherhood; she may even have taken ‘Home Ec’ in school.

Then gradually, beginning in the 1960s, women became convinced marriage was an imposition to be ‘outraged’ about. Helen Gurley Brown began whispering in their ears that an independent career path could be filled with exciting romances involving attractive men, free of the ‘drudgery’ to which marriage consigned their mothers. The family income was abolished in favor of ‘equal pay for equal work.’ The law was changed to permit women to divorce their husbands unilaterally and without grounds. (Wives are responsible for around ninety percent of divorces.)

None of this much affects the men at the top of the income and status hierarchy. They make enough money that even women with personal incomes perceive them as supporters and are willing to marry them. If a wife leaves after the baby is born, child support payments are manageable and a replacement wife is easily found.

The Fishtown girls who might have married working men in 1960 may well be earning more than such men today just by sitting at desks entering data. They can obtain higher quality sperm from more desirable men without submitting to the constraints of lifelong monogamy; the ‘ex’ and/or the taxpayer is made to provide for any resulting children. They even enjoy the sympathy of male commentators for the terrible hardship all this supposedly represents. Is it any wonder such women are reluctant to devote their lives to raising the children of ill-paid construction workers?

The contemporary Fishtown man, his wages reduced by female competition and the ever-decreasing market value of upper-body strength, has correspondingly slim chances of earning enough to make himself an acceptable suitor to any woman with an income of her own. These men are not ‘retreating from the marriage market’; they are being driven from it as a matter of deliberate policy.

Even if a particular working class man beats the odds and finds a girl to marry, he cannot expect the satisfaction of supporting her; she may well end up supporting him. And what self-respecting man wants to end up like that poor sap uselessly tagging along behind his wife who just bought all the groceries?

But this is still not the worst. Prospective husbands stand a good chance of losing everything in the divorce settlement within a few years of the wedding. Child support is not so easy when it must be paid through low-skilled labor. Even if you avoid being jailed as a ‘deadbeat dad,’ you will certainly not have enough left over to contemplate a second marriage.

In short, the American dream of a home and family through honest labor is now far out of reach for an increasing number of low-status men. Under these circumstances, what is such a man to do with his life? I’d say an unconstrained bachelor existence with plenty of time for amusements looks very much like a rational choice. The male commentariat may make you out to be a bum, but that sure beats years of performing all the hard work traditionally required to support a family and then not getting the family.

Aristotle understood that certain virtues have social presuppositions: liberality, for example, can hardly be expected from persons living hand-to-mouth. Male industriousness, I would suggest, also presupposes certain social arrangements. Monogamy and the family wage system give you the Irish immigrant who strives to make gentlemen of his children with every blow of his axe; liberated women earning equal pay for their equal work bring forth the men of the Sunshine Club.

So single motherhood and the decline in male industriousness our author describes cannot be spirited away simply by getting men and women to the altar. ‘Outrageous’ though it may seem to a generation steeped in feminist propaganda, the natural economic basis of marriage must also be restored. White men are programmed by evolution to be providers. If you deliberately rearrange society to render this function superfluous, do you have any right to complain when men stop knocking themselves out to perform it?

GeorgiaGuyinAtlanta #sexist #fundie christianforums.com

Personally, I don't feel that most women would submit to any man's authority, as most are of a reprobate mind. Therefore, they put unrealistic expectations on a man, claiming that "if this man loved me the way Christ loved the church", I'd submit. It doesn't work that way. A woman is to submit to her husband in all things. She is to obey him. God's word says so much. Modern women, even many, perhaps a majority that attend church, claim that they'd never submit, or they claim they'd submit if he is worth submitting to. God tells you frankly to submit. The man doesn't have to pat your ego and be all lovey-dovey dough-eyed with you to show you that he loves you, or for you to support him.

Sandy Rios #sexist rightwingwatch.org

On her radio show Tuesday, American Family Association official Sandy Rios criticized Deshauna Barber, the newly crowned Miss USA, for praising gender equality in the military at Sunday’s pageant.

During the Miss USA pageant’s question-and-answer segment, Barber, an Army Reserve officer, was asked about the Pentagon’s decision to make all combat jobs available to women.

Barber called the decision “an amazing job by our government to allow women to integrate into every branch of the military. We are just as tough as men— As a commander of my unit, I am powerful, I am dedicated and it is important that we recognize that gender does not limit us in the United States Army.”

Rios mocked Barber’s response, saying, “So, as a woman, just so you know, cause I say so, I am just as tough as a man, I am powerful, and gender does not matter in the American military. You see the trend? Just, you know, I think it, so it is. I mean, this is incredible fantasy, and it’s just so unhealthy.”

David J. Stewart #fundie #homophobia #sexist #conspiracy jesusisprecious.org

Worldliness in the Churches

The Young Earth heresy has crept into most of the churches today. So also has the Zionist heresy crept into the churches over the past century. It is a popular belief that Martin Luther was a great man of God, but he taught the heresy of Baptismal Regeneration. Martin Luther is not in Heaven. Mr. Luther was a liar! I saw one guy at a Baptist church with an Old Testament strapped to the side of his head. It looked like a ring box. He said that he wanted God's Word close to his head. My friend, the Bible says to hide God's Words in your heart, not strapped to the side of your head. You need to memorize God's Word, which you very likely won't do if your church uses dozens of Bible versions. Which one should you memorize? All of them? What a bunch of bullcrap in our churches today!!!

A spoke with an associate pastor recently who said he attended a pro-homosexual AWAB meeting. He also went to hear one of his idols, Ravi Zacharias, who receives a standing ovation every time he speaks for sex-perverted Mormons at their Masonic temple in Salt Lake City, Utah. I'm not trying to be unkind, but our churches are a disgrace today.

I know a Baptist church that teaches its youth to perform Walt Disney theme songs. Walt Disney is pro-homosexual. One of the theme songs is from “The Lion King,” a film in which the word “SEX” is written across the sky. Look on YouTube if you don't believe me. Walt Disney is extremely sex perverted. Again, search the internet and you will be totally shocked. Churches ought not promote Walt Disney to their youth. Netflix is also popular in the church. What will they have next at church... boogie-woogie night?

Most of the women, including staff, wear pants in the church. Many of the young girls wear sensual clothing, because the pastors don't preach as they ought against immodesty. I'm tired of hearing how much pastors really care and are concerned about the truth, while they blatantly reject plain evidence that the modern Bible versions are frauds, and the plan of salvation has been tampered with by the Devil. When's the last time you heard any pastor preach against the satanic Roman Catholic religion? Am I the only one? I tell you, the pope is a dope and he has no hope!!! God deliver us from chicken-crap pastors!

Jack Hyles #fundie #sexist jesus-is-savior.com

14. Teach her to do feminine chores. As is mentioned elsewhere it is better for a girl to do the dishes than the yard, to wash the pots and pans than the car, to clean the bedroom rather than the garage. She should do the duties that she will do when she is married and a successful mother and wife.

Much stress should be placed on the importance of her working hard. It is not feminine to be lazy. In fact, it is quite feminine to work hard. It is not working hard that makes one unfeminine; it is the doing of masculine tasks. Wise is that mother who teaches her daughter that good hard work is feminine and that the work a woman should do should be that of feminine chores.

15. Let her be around feminine women. Teach her to associate with ladies who are feminine. Point them out to her when she is a little girl and tell her they are the ones she should copy and emulate. Let these ladies be those who dress like ladies, talk like ladies, walk with feminine grace, sit with feminine charm. Let these be ladies who are good mothers and who have poise, dedication, chastity, consecration, and spirituality.

16. Let her baby-sit. It should be remembered that someday she will no doubt be a mother. She can prepare herself for this and train for it by caring for little ones while she is a teenager. When a girl gets around thirteen, she should becomes acquainted with taking care of little babies and small children. Her motherly instinct will be developed and nourished. This is very important in preparing her to be a successful and happy mother.

17. Let her care for younger girls in the family. Let her dress them, do their hair, wash their faces, etc. Even a girl seven or eight can care for a little sister. She should be encouraged to do so. This will teach her to fulfill responsibilities, to carry the load in the family circle, to work hard, and to prepare herself for motherhood.

John C. Wright #sexist scifiwright.com

I say that if the inevitable side effect of votes for women is women swearing like sailors, being treated like dirt by their menfolk, and sleeping around like whores, with the secondary side effects of teen mothers, broken families, children like walking wounded in the divorce-torn hellscape of modern life, and abortion rates as horrific as pyramids of skulls collected by the Aztecs, then be damned to votes for women. If that is the trade off, it is a bad bargain.

The woman can vote, but she cannot keep a man from walking into the locker room when she is changing. She can vote, but she cannot vote into effect a law to prevent her daughter from killing her granddaughter in the womb for any reason or no reason. She can vote, but cannot vote for a state law to protect her from illegal aliens. She can vote, but a bureaucrat decides the nature and amount of her medical care, and whether she is forced to buy contraceptives and aborticides for employees. She gets no vote on those things.

Her great grandmother could chop down a tree on her own land and build a shed, or burn the wood in her own hearth, or slaughter a chicken, or bake and sell cookies, or give food to the poor, without asking leave or let from the government. By any rational measure, her great grandmother was more free than is she now, vote or no vote.

Alextestalex #sexist shroomery.org

So I was watching a video of a famous youtuber who was crying about being in an abusive emotional relationship with his girlfriend,

He talked about how she manipulated him, etc.

The whole time I was thinking - you are just a HUGE PUSSY.

I understand women who are in abusive relationships. They fear getting beat up.

But men? I have no sympathy. If a man is in an abusive relationship, it's his fault for not breaking up.

This is just like the pathetic men who bitch about being raped, if a man gets raped by a girl, he should thank her.

Women who rape men are COOL AS FUCK in my book and I seriously hope one day I get raped by a woman.

In the video, everybody was commenting about how bad they felt for the guy and how brave he was to discuss his situation publicly.

Do you have sympathy for men in abusive relationships?

[ Do you have sympathy for women in abusive relationships Alex? ]

Yes of course.

I understand how women can be victims of an abusive relationships,

Men can't be victims, if they are victims, it is by their own choice,

Council of Islamic Ideology #sexist indianexpress.com

Pakistan: Council of Islamic Ideology proposes ‘light beating’ of wife for defying husband

In a bizarre move, the Council of Islamic Ideology (CII) has proposed its own Women Protection Bill, recommending ‘a light beating’ for the wife if she defies her husband.

The council has proposed that a husband should be allowed to ‘lightly’ beat his wife if she defies his commands and refuses to dress up as per his desires, turns down the demand of intercourse without any religious excuse or does not take bath after intercourse or menstrual periods.

It further suggests that beating is also permissible if a woman does not observe Hijab, interacts with strangers, speaks loud enough that she can easily be heard by strangers and provides monetary support to the people without taking consent of her spouse.

It says that there should be a ban on co-education after primary education, ban on women from taking part in military combat, ban on welcoming foreign delegations, interacting with males and making recreational visits with ‘Na-Mehram’.

It further states that female nurses should not be allowed to take care of male patients and recommends that women should be banned from working in advertisements. The council recommends that an abortion after 120 days of conceiving should be declared ‘murder’.

However, it says a woman can join politics and contract a ‘Nikah’ without the permission of parents. The bill suggests that anyone, who tries to force women to marry with the Holy Quran or facilitate this, should be awarded 10-year imprisonment.

Similarly, the proposed bill says if any non-Muslim woman is forced to convert then the oppressor will be awarded three-year imprisonment while the woman will not be murdered if she reverts to her previous faith.

The Express Tribune quoted sources as saying that this proposed bill is under consideration by the body and further deliberation will continue today when CII chairman Muhammad Khan Sheerani will give final recommendations with the consent of other members.

The three-member delegation of Justice (Retd.) Manzoor Hussain Gilani, Noor Ahmed Shahtaz and Muhammad Abdullah yesterday raised objections on many clauses of the proposed bill and urged the chairman to moderate the same.

They said the bill was drafted by Mufti Imdadullah, a member who belongs to JUI-F, adding that the above three members have insisted the chairman and Imdad follow the current circumstances while drafting the law. They said the bill was discussed by a panel comprising men as the only female CII member, Sameeha Raheel Qazi, was not present yesterday.

The bill was drafted after the CII rejected Punjab’s controversial Protection of Women against Violence Act (PPWA) 2015, terming it un-Islamic. The CII will now forward its proposed bill to the Punjab Assembly.

Wang Weixing #sexist straitstimes.com

A member of China's organisation overseeing relations with Taiwan has come under ridicule from Chinese netizens for calling the island's new president Tsai Ing-wen "emotional" and "extreme"because she is a single woman without children.

"As a single female politician, she is unburdened by love, and lacks the constraint of family or concern for children," Wang Weixing, a military analyst and a board member of the Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits, wrote in the International Herald Leader newspaper, which is under China's state news agency Xinhua.

"In political style and strategy, often she tends to be emotional, personal, and extreme. In terms of political tricks, she considers strategy less, tactical details more, and short-term goals are paramount, while long-term goals are less taken into account."

The attack came days after Tsai, Taiwan's first female president, took the oath of office at the presidential palace in Taipei.

Wang's long and blistering op-ed also accused Tsai of intending to pursue "hidden independence" for Taiwan. It disappeared from some portals on Wednesday (May 25) and the link to the newspaper's website failed to load.

James #sexist sluthate.com

Women enjoy being raped

Did you know women often orgasm during rape? Isn't that weird? Most of them can't even get off with their own man, but need a creepy nigger lurking the streets at night to get it going.

Next page