new

[Serious] Why I Can't Fault Rapists (Society Let's Women Play The Game Of "Schrodinger's Assault" - An Act Is Only Assault When They Decide [Criteria = Looks])

1. Rape Is A Man Rebelling Against The Corruption Rampant In The "Sexual Market" (Whether He Knows This Or Not)

Women like to (and are allowed by society to) pick and choose WHEN something is a violation or not, it can't work that way, that isn't logical and it isn't consistent, and that makes it prone to bias and in a way "corruption" as women are the "higher class" hoarding a scarce and valuable resource and controlling its distribution in a manner that does not allow "upward momentum" within the social hierarchy of the sexual market (the rich get richer so to speak)

Let me put it to you in the simplest way

I can't DECIDE that someone stabbing me isn't an assault (the police will still detain and question the assailant regardless of whether I refuse to press charges)

I can't DECIDE that someone taking my belongings at gun point isn't robbery (same as above)

I can't DECIDE that someone burning my house down isn't arson (same as above)

Etc, etc, etc

IF WE APPLIED THE SAME RULES WOMEN APPLY TO ASSAULT BY MEN, TO OTHER CRIMES, EVERYBODY WOULD BE OUTRAGED AND CALL IT OUT AS A CORRUPT SYSTEM

You see a system like that is inherently corrupt and open to bias, every white person can just say every black criminal that assaults them has assaulted them, and every white criminal that has assaulted them didn't (and vice versa)

IT CREATES A RIGGED SYSTEM

YET SOCIETY LETS WOMEN DECIDE WHEN AN ACT IS RAPE/SEXUAL ASSAULT, EVEN WHEN THE SAME ACTS ARE COMMITTED BY TWO DIFFERENT MEN (VARYING IN LOOKS) ON TWO SEPARATE OCCASIONS

Here's what I mean by that:
Attractive man (Chad) forces his tongue down her throat - "he's being forceful, kinky"
Average/below average man forces his tongue down her throat - "help, I'm being raped"

IT CAN'T WORK LIKE THAT

Oh and yes I've seen shit like that happen in real life, attractive men get away with outright assault, because to women its only assault AFTER THE FACT (WHEN THEY HAVE REVIEWED YOUR LOOKS AND DECIDED WHETHER YOU GET A PASS OR NOT)

Women shouldn't be deciding AFTER THE FACT that THE SAME ACT is only now assault because they don't think the man doing it is attractive enough TO BE ALLOWED TO GET AWAY WITH IT

OH AND YES, THIS IS THE NORM AND WOMEN DO THIS SHIT EVERYDAY!

IT IS IN THAT SENSE THAT I CAN'T FAULT RAPISTS

BECAUSE IF WOMEN ARE COMPLICIT IN THAT KIND OF SYSTEM (AND THEY ARE)

THEY HAVE ALREADY ASSERTED MY ROLE/POSITION AS A RAPIST IN THEIR EYES

AS MY "ADVANCES" WILL ALWAYS BE TREATED AS ASSAULT (BEING A LOW TIER MALE), WHEREAS I WILL ALWAYS WITNESS ATTRACTIVE MEN DO WORSE, ONLY TO BE REWARDED

YOU SEE, MY SIDE HAS ALREADY BEEN DECIDED FOR ME, I'VE ALREADY BEEN MENTALLY PLACED IN THE ROLE OF "OFFENDER" BY WOMEN

EVERY INTERACTION BEING INTERPRETED AS AN OFFENSE, WHILE I LOOK ON AND SEE EVERY ACTUAL AFFRONT BY ATTRACTIVE MEN BE TREATED AS "ENDEARING" OR "CHARMING" (EVEN FUNNY)

2. Women Only Feel Violated Because They Feel They Were Not Compensated Fairly (Either By The Validation Of Said Male Being "High Tier" Or Monetary Payment)

What is rape (to women)? - having sex with a man you don't actually want to

What is prostitution (to women)? - having sex with a man you don't actually want to for money

I find it funny how easily "the most unspeakable act in the world" becomes completely acceptable and not traumatizing at all, the moment a woman accepts payment for it :feelskek:

AN AVERAGE/BELOW AVERAGE MAN HAS VAGINAL SEX WITH A PASSED OUT WOMAN AND SHE CAN'T REMEMBER A THING THE NEXT DAY (IS TOLD BY A FRIEND):
#METOO
#1IN4
#SURVIVOR
#RAPECULTURE

"RAPE IS THE MOST EVIL AND UNSPEAKABLE ACT IN THE WORLD, IT MUST HAVE BEEN SUCH TORMENT, SHE WAS VIOLATED SO HARSHLY"

AN AVERAGE/BELOW AVERAGE MAN PAYS A WHORE/ESCORT TO USE ALL HER HOLES, DOES ANAL, MAKES HER CHOKE ON HIS DICK, CUMS ON HER FACE, ETC:
#SEXWORK
#SEXWORKISREALWORK,
#YAAAAASSQWEEENGETDEMDOLLAS
#INDEPENDENTWOMAN

"SHE'S JUST EXPRESSING HER SEXUALITY IN HER OWN WAY, STOP TRYING TO CONTROL WOMEN'S SEXUALITY, SHE'S USING WHAT MOTHER NATURE GAVE HER TO GET AHEAD IN THIS WORLD, WHY ARE WEAK MEN SO AFRAID OF FEMALE SEXUALITY" (THE IRONY)

Do you think whores aren't being fucked "roughly"?, they are, they are handled more roughly than the average woman in a date rape who barely remembers anything, and whores do this with multiple men, day in and day out

THEY ARE VIOLATED IN THE TRUEST MOST LITERAL SENSE

NOT IN THE "I DECIDED IT WAS VIOLATION BECAUSE THE GUY WASN'T ATTRACTIVE ENOUGH" SENSE

But for some reason, like magic, there is no "outrage" like the woman who gets raped once in an alleyway or gets "date raped", now ask yourself, WHY IS THAT?

Its simple really:

IN ONE CASE THE WOMAN FELT LIKE SHE WAS DULY COMPENSATED (VIA VALIDATION AND/OR MONEY)

IN THE OTHER CASE SHE FELT LIKE SHE WAS ROBBED OF SOMETHING (THAT SHE IRONICALLY WOULD HAVE GLADLY LET GET TAKEN AWAY IF THE ASSAILANT HAD A BETTER LOOKING FACE)

That's the only difference, the difference between rape and prostitution is the feeling of being compensated (be that validation from males she desires and/or money, its the lack of compensation that women see as the TRUE VIOLATION, not the act itself, AND THAT MAKES "THE SYSTEM" CORRUPT)

IT IS IN THAT SENSE I CAN'T FAULT RAPISTS

AS THE VERY SCHEMA BY WHICH WOMEN DECIDE WHAT IS ASSAULT OR NOT, I AM BY DEFAULT IN THE "OFFENDER CATEGORY" AND ONLY IF I GIVE PROPER MONETARY COMPENSATION DO I GET A PASS

LIKE I SAID BEFORE, MY SIDE WAS DECIDED FOR ME BY THE FEMALE COLLECTIVE AND THEIR STATUS QUO, IF I'M PUT IN THE ROLE OF MONSTER, I WILL NOT CARE FOR OR COME TO THE AID OF HUMANS, I WILL LEARN MY PLACE AND ACCEPT MY ROLE
Last edited: Today at 8:33 PM

[Serious] Is Rape really such a bad thing?

Before the soyim piss their pants, hear me out on this one.

Rape in modern society is very different from what it originally was. The abhorrent and evil crime of rape was originally about defiling another man's woman thus cucking him and possibly impregnating his wife. Thus diminishing his rightful chance at a legitimate offspring. Consent(the base of modern concept of rape), doesn't come into the picture. Husbands in olden times never needed consent from their wife, sex was a duty to be fulfilled, for family and community. There were also conquerers wifing up conquered people's women. Still no consent.

We can easily see that throughout history, the women never actually chose who they're gonna fuck. Men competed and the winners got to take their pick.

Modern rape( the one based on lack of consent) is a recent feminist construct. According to that logic almost all sex, that got humanity to where it is now, the reason why we all exist, is rape. In fact certain radical feminist groups unironcally proclaim that all sex is rape, even when its consensual. They want women to abandon heterosexual partnership and procreate via sperm banks. More moderate feminists would say that earning consent by using the situations of a women is also rape. According to them, escorting, beta-buxxing, sugar-dady relationships are also rape where the rapist is forcing consent by using women in bad financial situation.

So I pose this question....Is rape, the way it is defined now, such a bad thing? It allowed men and women to procreate. Allowed humanity to grow and prosper instead of dying out. Allowed people to live fulfulling sexual lives and build families. Is it so bad that we don't want to give much concern to something fickle like "consent" and instead want redistribution of sexual opportunities among the masses?

This is why people hate us. What used to happen before is not relevant now, we've evolved. Yes men would go around raping women, but they'd also fight and kill other men in the process. Saying rape isn't bad because that's how it used to be is like saying we should go back to times when men fought and killed each other for women. I guess some people here would think that that's the way it should be, what do I know.

The sex between a husband and wife is rape as well. As the husband is using patriarchal oppression to force sex upon a women who'd rather fuck chad(5% of men).
Is that arrangement also unwanted according to you?

Rape isn't. I think it's marginally worse than a brutal physical assault. Which...isn't great either, to be fair, but rape is not something that should warrant a significantly harsher criminal penalty than, say, grievous bodily harm.

Yes rape where a man hurts a woman should be a crime. It is a little more worse than assault. But in a world running rampant with whores with 20+ body counts. Where birth control flow like water. Is it still such a crime. And certain kind of "rape" like a woman fulfilling a duty to her husband or an escort serving a unwiliingly serving a client she is not attracted to should not be considered crime at all.

We got a lot of people here who think actual rape is fine. You put those people and their family in that situation and you will see how quickly their opinions change.

I am against sexual assault, if that is what you are implying. But there are reasons why these things are considered so abhorrent. And those reasons are floundered daily in modern era. Would you rather allow women to have a choice and become cumdumpsters for chad?

I'm not angry at them, they have better options than me. I would fuck the hottest woman I could get as well, that's human nature. I'm upset at the system that incentives for women to only fuck the top tier men and rewards them for having bastard children. I'm upset at women but what they're doing is completely logical, what's not logical is why there are no legal brothels for us to go to, why single mothers get free money, that's the shit I'm angry about.

You are upset at this system. But the system that allows you to get a woman would be considered that of a patriarchal rapist. This is contradictory. If you actually support the current system where women can congregate to top tier men then the only thing you have right to be upset about is, you were not one of those men.
Thus there is nothing you could possibly do. I am sorry but this thinking is too pussy. Its like a poor serf saying he deserves it for not being born with god's royal grace.

Sure, you can go ahead and try to do that but it will come with severe consequences.

Not if it is done in a civilized manner. Traditional marriage is one example. Roasties actually had to fuck men bellow their looksmatch. Blackpill tells us that the roastie doesn't want that guy and so it would be rape. But there are little consequence cuz the system is not build by cucks.

women are hypergamous, any man beneath 6.5/10 is seen as ugly by them
men meanwhile are attracted to majority of women if they aren't fat

The only reason humanity got this far is cuz women never really had a choice on the matter of reproduction.

Low IQ post.
If you wouldn't like to be held down and fucked against your will don't do it to others.
Moneymaxx and escortcel.

Choice can be manuafactured under the right circumstances. Escorting ,as you mentioned is one example.

If she's a virgin, it's bad.
But if she's a whore and it's dick #54968596, it's not a big deal, about as bad as assault.

But that's the thing. Raping virgin is bad exactly cuz she is another man's rightful first. But the modern gynocentric system spits on this very concept

It doesn't have to be violent and unsavory. Civilized redistribution of sexual resources is possible. Women could be raised to be dutiful, even to men like us that they biologically repel. Read the thread