This, in fact, is what the Leftists hold to be their qualifications to make a moral judgment. Ask any of them. They will tell you repeatedly, so vehemently that one cannot get in a word edgewise, that they make no moral judgments, that making judgments is wrong, and that to make a judgment even in one's thought is wrong -- they call this bigotry, because they call everything by the word that means the opposite of what they really mean.
I cannot speak for “Leftists” in general, but I very much do not believe that it is wrong to make moral judgements. Indeed, I am not in favour of apathy at all. However, one should judge for the right reasons, be critical of oneself, consider whether something is actually one’s business and that “it makes me uncomfortable and I would never want that” does not automatically equal “dire evil that must be purged immediately at any cost”.
That family means nothing, that sex is entertainment and means nothing, that life means nothing, that ergo young women should act like bigmouthed jerks?
Non sequitur. Seriously, how does any of these premises lead to “young women should act like bigmouthed jerks”?
That a woman in a leadership role is not a princess, prophetess nor priestess but is instead a pervertess?
Wait, isn’t that the view your ilk promotes?
Also, those are not even remotely mutually exclusive. Across history, there have been plenty of accusations of sexual immorality against women of highest nobility and female religious leaders. That probably even includes a few that actually have some truth to them.
PS:
That family means nothing, that sex is entertainment and means nothing, that life means nothing, that ergo young women should act like bigmouthed jerks?
Non sequitur. Seriously, how does any of these premises lead to “young women should act like bigmouthed jerks”?
And on the converse, from what I’ve seen here, being a good brainwashed fundie-wife does not seem to deter women from being bignouthed jerks, either.