@Vocheka2 #111031
Most agender people, and some non-binary people, are indifferent to what anatomy they have. (Not always; there exist a small number of agender people who prefer entirely de-sexed forms, and some non-binary people who prefer androgynous or “exotic” physical forms, though it’s not necessarily a strong preference.) While it’s really hard to test because it’s not like people can just transition willy-nilly, nor would indifferent people be very inclined to experiment with it if they could, at present it seems likely that such people genuinely wouldn’t experience any form of dysphoria if they changed things around.
It’s also entirely valid to identify with the gender typically associated with one’s anatomical sex for reasons of convenience if one genuinely doesn’t care how other people identify/refer to them. It’s also valid to say “I don’t know what I am, and I don’t care enough to figure out, I just identify as a person”… though that’s going to seem really weird to people for whom gender (or lack thereof) matters, and occasionally people who should know better might get stupid about it. Either way, people shouldn’t be forced into an identity they don’t care for/about; that’s just as bad as gender essentialism.
Of course, while there could very easily be TERFs who are anatomy-indifferent and really don’t get the concept of being anatomy-attached (for lack of better term), I suspect that it’s still more common that they’re just cis and not self-aware enough to express their gender beyond superficialities like “I have a thing that bleeds”. As long as it’s considered the default, cis people rarely need to be self-aware about their own gender, after all.