If existence in your line of sight is provocation to murder then fucknuts you and everyone you represent are far more danger to our kids, your own, hell every man and woman alive.
Your entire stance here - one you are already perfectly happy to lie for - is that violence shouldn't be wrong and the part you're hoping nobody catches is the unspoken suggestion of using the same violence you'll gleefully enact on adults should you believe yourself immune to reprisal on your own children with even fewer reservations so that one way or the other they don't become adults you want to kill on sight. Because not only do you not fear physical revenge from small children as far as you are concerned you as a parent are the only one with rights and using violence and terror to enact your personal will is your inalienable right to exercise on your property and those you decide should not have rights.
This reminds me of a conservative Christian group that kicked up a stink a while back in the Praries claiming their children were being taken away for being Christian. They couldn't prove that, of course. They didn't try to demand independent reviews or otherwise get any kind of evidence abuse claims were spurious. They tried to muddy the waters about the definition of abuse and downplay neglect or the emotional end of things but that didn't help them for one very specific reason: The claims were all substantiated by physical evidence at hospitals. The hospitals were the ones filing the reports as they were required to by law if there was strong evidence of physical or sexual abuse. So what did this group of concerned Christian parents who just wanted to protect their kids do? Aggressively lobbied to end mandatory reporting and even punish hospital staff for going behind parents backs.
Some try to dress up similar pushes elsewhere as an issue for the financially disadvantaged, but between the sweeping the greater number of violently abused children compared to the neglected under the rug to make this claim and even those neglected frequently revealed being a matter of deliberate choice over financial hardship i.e. malnourished unattended children who spend a suspicious amount of time "grounded" with limited and controlled social contact but in a home with curiously full cupboards... That happen to be locked. And the parents with the only key happen to be out frequently and rarely because of overtime work hours. Between these and other little details? Not being quite honest.
Well, honesty is for children I guess. Unless of course the truth they tell you is inconvenient. Then it's out with the belt, bed without supper, and weeks without human contact. But that's not abuse, not like reading bedtime stories or vaccination against disease oh no. It's discipline. Or fighting the devil.
Don't lie and say it's about protecting the kids, it's never about protecting kids it's about keeping your own abuses as their normal. You're enraged to the point of murder because the mere existence of people who don't live in fear of you and the norms you'll beat or even rape into anyone who isn't in a position to fight you off is enough to make a crack in the foundation of fear you disgustingly mislabel as parenting. A child might see you were far more threatening to them than your fake bogeymen. And you can't have that.