“No clear atmosphere means no life. Science would have us believe that life is adaptable to whatever atmosphere is around it.”
To a degree.
Many have pointed to Venus and said that atmosphere is probably what Earth looked like when life started. But the process of life evolving in that mess had a clear atmosphere as a side effect.
“ For evolution to work, this would have to be so. But if life possibilities were so easy, then there should be at least one planet that has life besides ours. But no life is what we find.”
How many planets are there and how many have we sampled for life?
“But science is so bent on proving God and creation wrong,”
Science is silent on the supernatural. It’d be weird to have a goal that you could never reach by definition.
“they will spend billions of dollars to go to other planets. But won't spend a dime to bring down Noah's ark so it can be examined”
What makes you think that you know where Noah’s Ark is? The bible says it came to rest in a mountain range, not on a particular mountain.
Prove that Noah existed, then prove that the boat persists, THEN get funding to see if it stands up to scrutiny.
"Is science afraid of truth, or are they afraid of God?”
Science has the truth. YOU GUYS insist that Genesis is historical, that’s your burden to prove.
"I think they are more afraid of having to admit they were wrong.”
Did you miss the critics who insist science changes too often to trust it? That’s an admission of error or at least incompleteness.
"Think about it. All that has been invested in theories, time, etc... To admit they were wrong would be such a major blow, I doubt science could ever regain their credibility back.”
Science survived Piltdown Man and Nebraska Man. I think it’ll do okay.
“If you need an example name, just type in Kent Hovind. He is the most hated creationist by atheist known to man.”
Because he’s a liar, not that he’s right.
"Their lies have even branched over to the christian sites.”
No, sweetie. Atheists had nothing to do with it. Some creationists that are trying to hold on to any credibility have mantioned really pooor arguments that creationists should not use, they’re so bad.
And Hovind takes those cautions as a personal attack. Because piss-poor arguments is all he has.