“GOOD MORNING CLASS: Today I issue a bold challenge to all atheists - a challenge that not even the most educated and meticulous thinkers of them will be able to satisfactorily answer in any way.”
So, what I see is that you think you’re SO clever, you’ll dismiss any answer that actually does satisfy your challenge.
“The only thing they will be able to do in effort to effectually rebutt this challenge is to babble unintelligently.”
So, stop bragging and offer the challenge.
“The challenge has to do with the issue of human death. The sentence of death (which comes from God as a result of mankind having committed high treason against God's kingdom in the first man Adam)”
Grammar is not your thing, is it?
“is one that every person of mankind cannot escape as long as mankind exists. (The actual experience of death is one that few humans will escape).”
Make up your mind. NO ONE can escape death, or only A FEW can. They’re mutually contradictory.
“Every atheist BELIEVE and even KNOW that every person of mankind, must die.”
How can you scientifically show this to be true? I am not certain I’m mortal. I mean, I haven’t died ONCE my entire life so far. What makes YOU so sure I do NOT believe science will make me immortal before that eventuality?
“However, even though they believe and know this fact,”
And suddenly you know how to use commas?
“not one of them can supply SCIENTIFIC PROOF to that effect.”
Well, no. The future is just a working hypothesis, not a proven fact.
We HAVE seen that people die right and left, and have yet to find anyone who lives even 200 years, but that’s not evidence it’ll NEVER happen.
“Their belief is not based on any type of SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE.”
Not true. The vast preponderance of history is that humans tend to be mortal. It’s evidence, if not CONCLUSIVE evidence of our mortality.
“This is so because no scientific proof actually exists to that effect.”
Okay.
“If there was scientific proof, it would also point to a specific time, date and type of death.”
How do you figure?
Accepting that I’m mortal does NOT require a belief that I’ll die at the age of 85. Or whatever.
“But despite the fact that their death is inevitable,”
Exactly how are you claiming this to be a fact? What evidence do YOU have that it’s inevitable? I mean, I’ll say it’s likely, based on accumulated science, but not a FACT that it’s inevitable.
You’re talking shit, aren’t you?
“ there is no so-called "scientific proof" to that effect.”
You just keep repeating yourself. Not the acme of clever debate.
“The only real proof is found only in the unadulterated teachings of Holy Writ
- the Bible.”
This would be the bible that says the Earth is flat, the moon is a light source, and the sun is closer to us than the sky? Yeah, not a valid source for science, what?
“Duly noting that death has prevailed over all mankind throughout their history is not proof that all will be overtaken by death in the future.”
Yea, I just said that.
“ It is only proof that death has prevailed thusfar, (since there will be certain people who will not be overtaken by death in the future).”
Then how do you present this as a fact?