new

Scientist have proven that as long as a reptile is living, it continues to grow. So, if we take an alligator and say it lives 100 years and grows 20 feet. What would happen if it were to live
900 years? It would have grown to be 180 feet, thus, a dinosaur. One more thing to think about the earht being in a bubble of water is that prior to the flood, man had never seen rain. That is why no one believed Noah when he said it was going to rain. At that time, the earth was watered by a mist. Another interesting thing to think about is the dramatic decrease in man's lifespan after the flood. he began to age musch faster because he was being pelted by massive amounts of radiation from the sun. Just recently, scientists who use computers to solve unsolve crimes by taking the remains of bones to restructure and form a face of the bones were asked by creationists to do an experiment. Now, first we must understand that this forensic science has met with great success and is proven itself as reputible.
They were asked to take an average man and by comparing the physical changes in the lifetime such as bone structure and come up with a model of what man would look like if he lived to be close to 1000 years. Remarkably, around the 400 year mark, the image looked remarkably like that of Cro Magnum man and aroung the 800 year mark, man the image looked remarkably like Neanderthal man. Now, is this just coinsidence or is God's word true. I believe the the world is just as the bible says, just around 6000 years old.

(I am afraid you don't get it. Evolution is a gradual process of incremental changes. None of the things you describe came into existence as complete systems. They developed slowly. Changes in one thing gave an opportunity for changes in another. If one change was advantageous then, over time, that small advantage becomes the norm. Then another small change happens, and that change becomes the norm if it is advantageous. And so it goes. This is why it is caused evolution - things evolve. They do not arrive fully formed.

If you took the trouble to learn about what you criticise, instead of listening to lying, cheating, dissembling, misrepresenting, misquoting creationists you would not appear so stupid.)

[Fundie's response]

Iansand98- Thanks for proving my point. You crack me up. By your own answer, I don't think that you even know about your own theory. By the way you describe it, I just picture all these lungs flapping around looking for a body to jump into. My question could be summed up into one, I guess: How can anything that is dependant on another thing exist (or evolve) without that other thing?
Sorry if that sounds to simple for people like yourself. My questions are real, and yet people like yourself like to give these very generalized fake answers.
Again, thanks to those of you who are contributing to this question.