www.youtube.com

Fellow Traveler #conspiracy #moonbat youtube.com

[Transcript]

For Russia keeping Ukraine out of NATO is not a matter of imperialism let alone conquest, let alone taking over Europe, let alone reconstituting the USSR (I fucking wish) … For Russia, seeing to it that Ukraine does not join NATO is a matter of survival against US and NATO aggression and encirclements. Keeping Ukraine out of NATO is the prerequisite for preventing the greatest human rights catastrophe since the Holocaust because if the West had its way, it would spell genocide for the motherland as the imperialists’ end game here is the ultimate breakup, Balkanization, raping, pillaging, and plundering of Russia. If the imperialists are successful in the completion of their military blockade, they will have gained an insane amount of leverage over the country: they will have everything that they need to build an anti-nuclear missile defense system wall across the continent, effectively bringing an end to mutually assured destruction, as well as allowing NATO to carry out a devastating pre-emptive strike on Russia. In such a scenario, Russia will be completely at the mercy of the Western imperialists as they will now have everything that they need to militarily blackmail the motherland. The result would spell the immediate impoverishment and immiseration on a scale dwarfing the breakup of the Soviet Union by an order of magnitude. We're talking death toll in the tens of millions here. The west will be in a perfect position to carry out a genocide against Russia, succeeding where the Nazis failed during World War II. In light of this we need to have critical support for the Russian Federation in its struggle against NATO.

[...]

Anybody who is honestly supporting the current Ukrainian regime or the United States or NATO or any of the other bad faith actors in this situation are either woefully uneducated on the subject or are simps for Western imperialism or they work for the military-industrial complex regardless of the motives.

Peak Trans / Maria Maclachlan #transphobia youtube.com

How not to argue. A response to taln0reich
(note by submitter: continued from https://fstdt.com/8S8FGDY5LFFKK, Transscript starting around 23:56 and ending around 25:48 of a 36-minute video)
[…]

if she really believes, that feminists are physically assaulting trans identifying people in real life, she needs to provide receipts

Taln responded to that with "'gender critical feminists' do not have to go out and beat up trans people. Instead, the transphobic rhetoric spread by the likes of you" - transphobic rhetoric, you mean stating truths like sex is immutable and men whatever they call themselves are on average bigger and stronger than women? That most violent and sexual crimes are carried out by men and that claiming to be a woman doesn't stop violent predatory men from being violent and predatory? That women are being cheated out of places on medals podiums by men who claim to be women? That's transphobic rhetoric is it? "creates a cultural climate where those thuggish men feel empowered to assault trans people and think they can get away with that" show us your workings. This is just an assertion. Thuggish men have always felt empowered to assault anyone on the slightest excuse including gender non-conformity, homosexuality being female... show us specifically how you think women standing up for our rights have made things worse. I mean the implied argument here is, that if we would only go along with the lie, if we accept any man who says he's a woman as if he is in fact a woman, if we welcome such men into our spaces ignoring our own discomfort, fear and distress, if we applaud them when they beat real women in sports events, then thuggish men won't feel empowered to assault trans-identifying men because thuggish men totally care about what feminists think and say, don't they?
[...]

Valley of the Rogue & edrica webb #transphobia #pratt youtube.com

RE:Trans ideology: awful argument 18 Trans rights are human rights but there are no sex-based rights

(Valley of the Rogue)
Since there is no such thing as "trans," then there are no "rights" to be had. Instead, this is all about men's unrestricted sxl rights to get it no matter with whom, or where, or why, or whether there is any consent to be had. There is no way such dviant behavior should be accepted or allowed.


(edrica webb)
"Since there is no such thing as "trans," then there are no "rights" to be had."
This is basic, and may very well become the line of reasoning for legal protection of not only womens' rights, but childrens', as well. As "trans" is short for transitioning-- and transitioning is understood to be, transitioning from one sex to the other-- "transitioning" isn't possible. So how would legal rights be applied to something that isn't possible?

cedric worthington broadaxe #fundie #dunning-kruger #pratt youtube.com

(From “I reply to a page claiming they can "Prove Evolution Is False - Even Without the Bible")

This video does not do what it claims to.
Like many similar efforts, it merely rehashes numerous examples of micro-evolution and discredited 'missing links'; spends a lot of time eulogising over the Establishment 'consensus' about Evolution, and ridiculing the sanity of those who question it.
It utterly fails to answer the two serious questions which (as 21st Century Genetic knowledge increases) now threaten to relegate Darwin's Victorian Era theories of Abiogenesis and Evolution to histories dustbin.

These questions are:-
1.
Excluding the highly skilled process of Genetic Engineering within the confines of a state of the art Genetics Laboratory, there's no known observable process by which new genetic information can be naturally added to any organism's genetic code; so how did blind luck/random chance at the bottom of Darwin's "warm muddy pond" supposedly achieve such miraculous results in the distant past ?
2.
Without adding new genetic information at every step of the process, how can any living thing have evolved from amoeba to man; let alone have originally spontaneously generated itself into Life from a mush of non-living/inert chemicals ?

Conclusion
Would be seriously interested in hearing an intelligent answer to either/both the questions above, as I've grave doubts about the traditional magical/mystery style religious alternative; which only really leaves 'Intelligent Design?
IE: some sort of Captain Kirk type Extra-terrestrial Geneticist, who did the job as part of a Planetary Terra-formation Project??

Designed by aliens? (Crick, Watson, atheism, panspermia...
https://creation.com/designed-by-aliens-crick-watson-atheism...
Francis Crick and James Watson have used the occasion of the 50th anniversary of their discovery of the DNA double ... He does this with a theory called panspermia.

Panspermia - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panspermia
Panspermia (from Greek πᾶν ...The Nobel prize winner Francis Crick, ...and the distance to the target, guided by high-resolution astrometry of 1×10 −5...
History · Proposed mechanisms · Extra-terrestrial life · Extremophiles

Tim Pool #wingnut youtube.com

Georgia Votes To Permanently Recognize 'Ahmaud Arbery Day' In INSANE Support Of BLM

Ladies and gentlemen, I give you, Ahmaud Arbery day. That's right, holiday officially celebrating the second anniversary of the death of Ahmaud Arbery. February 23rd will be permanently recognized as Ahmaud Arbery day in Georgia.

Talk about the psychotic cult world we live in, in which Ahmaud Arbery is getting a holiday for him. The fact is, the narrative of a guy jogging down the street was a total fabrication, a lie to manipulate people. That brings us to a point where now we're having a holiday for this guy.

This is the level of insanity in this country we live in, a psychotic cult reality where lunatics, the inmates are running the asylum.

The media lied about everything, and you know what's funny? Conservatives, many of them, not all of them but a lot of them, are complicit in pushing this narrative and it's fascinating. We've heard it before but I genuinely think a lot of Republicans, they try and act like they oppose the Democrats, but they're so worried about what the left thinks of them.

This story was just patently false. What happened, the story is, I'll simplify it for you. A string of robberies in a neighborhood. Gun gets stolen, police go door-to-door saying, "This is the guy," with an image of him. He's seen on security camera footage entering someone's house. The prosecutor said that makes him a felony burglary suspect. Under Georgia law you can citizen's arrest someone with only probable cause, without actually witnessing it, if they're committing a felony.

The story about a guy jogging down the street is a complete lie, and now the Georgia General Assembly is giving this dude a statewide holiday.

There are several witnesses that came out and spoke on record that they suspected it was him, because they've already kind of seen some of the previous behavior leading up to that moment. That it was Arbery doing some of the trespassing according to some of the neighbors.

Various Commenters #transphobia #conspiracy youtube.com

RE: Trans ideology: awful argument 18 Trans rights are human rights but there are no sex-based rights

(George Potter)
Couldn't agree more with what was said in the video. What I struggle to get my head around is why does such a very small minority of 'Activists' have so much power, the power to cancel a person who doesn't agree with them, or who doesn't play along with their fantasies.. State a fact, and you're in trouble with the law for 'Hate', so does this madness lie with Parliament and who we vote for? If so, lets think very carefully who we vote for at the next General Election.


(Hyπατία)
Because this is not a classic bottom-up civil rights movement [which takes generations of activism to succeed], but a top-down reactionary one [spearheaded by men who are already in power, wanting even more power, by reducing "female" to an optional toy they can role-play as].


(kai 1)
Money, lot of money backing the T and being put into politicians accounts.


(Isha Obin)
If your objective is to move towards a transhumanist technocracy then erasing biological sex might speed up equal rights for robots. If your objective is more profits for the pharmaceutical/medical industry then transgenderism is your ticket. Control + profit.


(George Potter)
@kai 1 Money. The route of all evil, yes, that makes sense.

Archangelclk 1 #fundie youtube.com

A search for the truth and where it led me. What I found out was that every missing link that was found turned out to be a hoax, mis-identified, frauds or fabrications. All of them, Lucy, Piltdown man, Java man Nebraska Man even the archaeopteryx. Piltdown man and many others were deliberate fakes in order to gain funding and or meet deadlines. Often bones were found tens of miles apart.

As the secular culture tries to paint the picture as creation as intellectual suicide and mythical stories, the truth is that creation has the evidence and proof of what evolution does not hold up to. In the light of creation it is the inconvenient truth to evolutionists who would rather worship the creation than the Creator.

Peak Trans / Maria Maclachlan #transphobia youtube.com

How not to argue. A response to taln0reich
(note by submitter: continued from https://fstdt.com/Z7HKHBQT6TG$4, Transscript starting around 22:03 and ending around 23:56 of a 36-minute video)
[…]
then I said this

then there is the extraordinary claim, that abandoning the proposed amendments to the gra is devastating for trans identifying people. How?

and Taln responded "because the current process to change the gender in one's birth certificate is so difficult few have been able to do it forcing the rest to marry and die under a gender that isn't the one they are (as that is where the birth certificates come into play)" devastating means highly destructive or damaging. An example of devastating is having one's healthy breasts amputated and realizing you've made a mistake, surviving child abuse then realizing you have to share your living quarters with men who've sexually abused children, finding out that the man you've married and who fathered your children has now decided he's as much of a woman as you are. Not "oh no my birth certificate tells the truth about what I am"
then he says "the Gender Recognition Act has nothing at all to do with women's spaces or women's quotas/shortlists. So, no, 'women's rights safety and opportunities' are not at risk from a reform of the Gender Recognition Act" now that is fundamentally dishonest. The proposed reforms of the GRA will mean that a man is legally recognized as a woman if he makes a simple self-declaration that he is, and vice versa. We are already in a situation, where it is widely asserted that simply identifying as a woman means being able to access female spaces and opportunities and we're harassed and abused for objecting. Enshrining gender self id in law will make it much harder to challenge.
[...]

Peak Trans / Maria Maclachlan #transphobia youtube.com

How not to argue. A response to taln0reich
(note by submitter: continued from https://fstdt.com/J.2MKFW2_Q276, Transscript starting around 19:44 and ending around 22:03 of a 36-minute video)
[…]
"(This is also perpetuated by 'gender-critical feminists', referencing Alison Bailey's inappropriate and borderline pedophilic comment about 'breasts that have never known a lover's caress' while talking about underage FtMs)" that line of the heroic Alison Bailey comes from her keynote speech at the LGB alliance conference in London last year. I was in the audience, when she made it, and it was electrifying. Fortunately you can see the whole thing on Youtube. I'm just going to show the tiny bit Taln refers to

up and down the country and around the world girls are removing breasts that have never known a lover's caress

. there are many horrific consequences of the dissemination of gender ideology, but the amputation of healthy body parts and other irreversible interventions on young people, female or male, underage or not, is surely the worst. I find it impossible to imagine, what it must be like to do this when you're so young, you haven't even had a relationship and then to regret it. Is it possible to sink any lower, than to call Allison's comment, designed to raise awareness in a way that will strike a chord with all decent and humane people, inappropriate and borderline pedophilic? And he doesn't say why he thinks this, because he doesn't think it. Really, this is one of the cultists tactics, to throw out any old shit and hope it sticks. That's why we get called bigots and fascists and white supremacists. It's a bit hard, to make any of those stick on a black lesbian feminist. so let's go even lower, Hey Taln.

I'm skipping the next bit where he again invokes the patriarchy in a manner that suits his purpose and he mansplains what intersectional feminists should do. Obviously he's not going to acknowledge, that transgenderism is one of the worst forms of the patriarchy, because of how it obscures power relations between men and women and turns victims into oppressors and vice versa.
[…]

Peak Trans / Maria Maclachlan #transphobia #pratt youtube.com

How not to argue. A response to taln0reich
(note by submitter: continued from https://fstdt.com/DX$XLXRTZGML6, Transscript starting around 17:50 and ending around 19:44 of a 36-minute video)
[…]
Crimes like this are mercifully rare, precisely because most public toilets are single sex and most predatory males, whether they claim to be women or not, aren't as stupid as him in thinking they can get away with it. I have no idea what the rest of Taln's sentence is supposed to mean. I don't think it is seriously proposed that every man who claims to be a woman is doing so with an abusive motive. I mean nobody's actually said that, have they? What on earth are you talking about? "On the other side, trans men are infantilized by transphobic narratives, painted as brainwashed 'lost lesbian sisters' and thereby treated as unable to have their own volition" no they're not. That's just the narrative the cult have decided stands the most chance against the truth. Which is that there is a phenomenon called Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria, spread by social contagion and affecting girls in huge numbers who - prior to adolescence - had never expressed any unhappiness with their sex. "The patriarchal basis in transphobia towards trans men is a further apparent in their increased likelihood of corrective rape in order to 'put them back in their proper place as women'" I do know that claiming to be a man does not prevent a woman being raped, any more than claiming to be a woman will stop a man from raping women, even ones who identify as men (note by submitter: displaying headline "Transwoman activist Cherno Biko confesses to Raping a Transman"). Funny old world eh? I don't know whether the reason trans-identifying women get raped is specifically intended to be corrective and I'm not sure how Taln would know, but it certainly wouldn't surprise me knowing how horrible some men are, which is after all where we don't want them in our spaces.
[...]

Peak Trans / Maria Maclachlan #transphobia youtube.com

How not to argue. A response to taln0reich
(note by submitter: continued from https://fstdt.com/WL9F74F$R2KNK, Transscript starting around 15:21 and ending around 17:50 of a 36-minute video)
[…]

Elsewhere in his comment Taln says things like, I've seen gender-critical feminists saying this and doing that, supporting a conservative saying something, uh saying trans people should be deported or some such nonsense. You're not grasping Taln, that we are not a cult. We are individuals who can disagree on a whole range of things, but the one thing we do agree on is that sex is immutable and takes priority over subjective feelings in defining what we are. As for trans people being forced into spaces created for people of the other sex, that is another example of the framing intended to manipulate people into thinking they are victims of some great injustice. No we are not saying you should be forced to be anything or go anywhere. We are saying if you're male, keep out of our spaces. You don't belong there. Where you go instead is not our problem. Stop trying to turn us into your oppressors because we're not. You are the ones oppressing us.

Then I said

how can you be a feminist if you buy into gender ideology

and Taln said "by acknowledging that transphobia, homophobia and sexism are all interconnected and directly arising from the complex that is the patriarchal structure of society (in which you are complicit in upholding by spreading transphobic narratives based on patriarchal assumptions)" interconnected how? We get no argument in support of any of the three distinct claims I see made here, so I'm inclined to ignore it. I'm not a mind reader, but I would love to know what patriarchal assumptions he is referring to. That woman means adult human female and entitled to sex-based protections perhaps? "The transphobic narrative of the bathroom predator which is a myth" - blah blah blah - "only makes sense in the patriarchal image where women are the lower class therefore any 'man' taking on the role of a woman must be doing it out of some abusive motive" it's a myth is it? Tell that to the 10 year old girl and the 12 year old girl who were violated by this dude (note by Submitter: headline of this article https://metro.co.uk/2019/03/16/transgender-woman-18-sexually-assaulted-girl-10-morrisons-toilet-8914577/ displayed).

[...]

Peak Trans / Maria Maclachlan #transphobia youtube.com

How not to argue. A response to taln0reich
(note by submitter: continued from https://fstdt.com/G77LPGNW4KLK, Transscript starting around 13:00 and ending around 15:21 of a 36-minute video)
[…]
okay on to the next bit.

recently some bloke asserted that I couldn't prove that trans-identifying men were a threat to women. I sent him to the crime page on my website and I haven't heard from him since

Taln said "I don't doubt that you have some collection of 'trans women who are bad'" - you could say that - "but that doesn't prove anything". Yes it does! It proves that there are trans-identifying men who are bad. It proves that claiming to be women doesn't make violent, predatory men less so. You seriously think that we should be accepting these men in our single sex spaces. Seriously? I'll link to that vid below. And Taln said "we don't take away rights from minority groups just because some individuals from said group behave badly" no of course we don't. But we do take away rights from half the population because members of the other half - the dominant half, many of whom do indeed behave badly - don't give a toss about the safety and well-being of women and girls.
Next. "The assertion that 'gender criticalism'" - I've not heard that one before, and I don't know why he puts it in quotes because nobody actually says it - "the assertion that gender criticalism would only mean that the person believes that biological sex where immutable and separate from gender identity is fundamentally dishonest." and he goes on to say what he thinks it means, including that trans people should be forced into spaces on the basis of their sex instead of forcing themselves on people of the other sex in their spaces. But no, it isn't fundamentally dishonest to say as I did that

the core tenet of gender criticism is that woman means adult human female therefore so-called trans women are men and they don't experience womanhood at all

that isn't what gender criticism only means, but it is the core tenet and other views flow from it. But not everyone who agrees with the core tenet agrees on everything else.
[…]

hybridmongrel #transphobia youtube.com

RE: Reacting to Kat Blaque on Rachel Dolezal and Caitlyn Jenner
(Note by submitter: responding to https://fstdt.com/WZ786G$3HL5Y3 )

@MacyJane I agree it is gold, as is your comment. This subject is not focussed on enough by gender critics, so I'm delighted Maria has gone there. The rank hypocrisy of transideology, that their brand of pseudo oppression trumps all others and re-writes the history of humanity is so grandiose I'm amazed it isn't seen as the narcissism it so obviously is - and even so much as a faint criticism is felt as a narcissistic injury, mortification and met with narcissistic rage. This pathological process is well known, documented and - apart from Vaknin's Cold Therapy - untreatable.
Diana Shaw (womenarehuman.com) is brilliant on this, as you probably know (but for the people who don't...) siting trans firmly in the white colonial historical trajectory, the 'final frontier' (before space is plundered, whitey gearing up for that now) being women's bodies and identity. It is so obvious, especially to anyone with even a tiny grasp of left wing, anti-racist, anti-colonial education and awareness. Slacktivist indeed!
The other area where gender critics need to occupy is FGM. To the trans-cult:
Female Genital Mutilation (illegal in most of the West) = barbaric Black and brown witch-doctor savagery (where poor girl recipients are doomed to a life of no sexual enjoyment, excluding them from any possibility of being 'sex positive')
Whereas:
Female and Male Genital Mutilation (legal in most of the West) = the highest form of empathic civilisation and whitey enlightened technology, enabling recipients to enter the kingdom of glitter-sparkles and heaven gender-bliss (where boy and vulnerable male adult recipients can look forward to a life of sissy porn-fantasy-cum-true, oh my! And women can look forward with expectant glee to their rolled up tube of armskin faux-phallus, pumped up with a $10,000 erectile implant, woo hoo! Or talk to Buck about the alternative... )
As Jennifer Bilek says, this is seriously the most f*kd up sh*t ever in the sad history of patriarchy and capitalism. And it must be exposed and stopped.

residue junkie #conspiracy youtube.com

P.S. If you don't believe the 💉 is the mark, just watch these! After people have taken all the shots they will apply a quantum dot invisible tattoo on their hand or forehead, but the mark is already in them and when they go to a airport, they already know if you have it. So many pre-trib believers who thought they would have to know they were receiving the mark, or that they would have been "raptured" before it could happen have already taken it...so terribly sad!

MacyJane #transphobia youtube.com

RE: Reacting to Kat Blaque on Rachel Dolezal and Caitlyn Jenner
(Submitters note regarding context: the Video in question is a reaction by Maria Mclachlan/”Peak Trans” to a video by a trans woman titled “why Rachel Dolezal isn't Caitlyn Jenner”)

This video is gold. It's a topic that even in more open spaces that generally allow for gender critical critique/discussions, it is an aspect that remains censored incessantly. Because despite even regarding the leftists who are gender critical, they're often still afraid to go anywhere near race. No matter the context and how relevant it is. The thing is... it's the same thing. So many slacktivists claim it's "not the same thing at all! Stop comparing them!", but they won't say _how_.it's different. Because they can't say. And even those who aren't gender cultists, their reasoning is that it's just not politically correct to speak on race. Especially if you are white.

But the truth always rears its ugly head when a black feminist comes right on out and says it, that they ARE functionally the same thing, and that in fact, race isn't nearly as solid as sex is. Race is far more amorphous, more nebulous, more ambiguous than sex. It is far more a social construct than even gender (not sex, because obviously sex is NOT a social construct). If anything could be up for identity, between race and sex, the former would make more sense. But it's still absolutely batshit for a white person to identify as black.

Inevitably, that black woman who speaks on this issue gets the boot firmly on her neck, and it's almost always by a white leftist who wants to shut her up. So I don't think the reluctance towards (and desperate fear of) talking about racial sex ID v sex self ID comes down to "being respectful" or politically correct. It's primarily about what it's always about, avoiding common sense. Avoiding the truth like the plague. Because the moment you spend more than 5 minutes thinking about it, the whole house of cards falls apart.

Peak Trans / Maria Mclachlan #transphobia youtube.com

How not to argue. A response to taln0reich
(note by submitter: continued from https://fstdt.com/K$L7MW3X.2G.C, Transscript starting around 10:48 and ending around 13:00 of a 36-minute video)
[…]
Recently we learnt that Lia Thomas, the heterosexual male swimmer on the university of pennsylvania's swimming team regularly exposes himself in the women's changing room. We learned that many swimmers have complained to the team coach and have basically been told to put up and shut up. What is the difference between any random man going in there and showing his genitals and Lia Thomas doing it? nothing. It's abuse. Abuse of women, being carried out by a heterosexual male with, the complicity of the coach and relevant authorities.
And he continues - you might want to watch your blood pressure on this one - while girls fear of trans identifying boys is irrational, as trans inclusion does not pose a risk to them(note by submitter: displaying a headline referencing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loudoun_County_Public_Schools#2021_sexual_assaults ). Well there is some evidence that contradicts that, in the form of the two sex assaults by this boy at that school in Virginia. But as I have said repeatedly, it's not just about physical danger. It's about how women and girls feel. The trans cultists go on and on about how so-called misgendering and other nonsense is bad, because of how the truth makes them feel. Yet girls fearing having boys around, when they need to get undressed is irrational because there is supposedly no risk to them. And as for feeling embarrassed or upset, hey who cares they're only girls. Right. The study he cites by the way is not fit for purpose, the methodology is unclear and there is a bunch of standard information missing. But it doesn't even matter because the study neglects to consider the major issue here, which is about dignity privacy and psychological well-being. He goes on "therefore trans women's need to be able to use female spaces outweighs transphobic women's desire to force trans women out of them" you mean keep men stroke boys out of them. Yes how transphobic not to want to be around men while we're all in various stages of undress. we're such villains, muppet.
[…]

Peak Trans / Maria Mclachlan #transphobia youtube.com

How not to argue. A response to taln0reich
(note by submitter: continued from https://fstdt.com/9D_PVWS25W5TG, Transscript starting around 8:47 and ending around 10:48 of a 36-minute video)
[…]
that's the first paragraph of a very long comment well worth the read. The only thing I would add is that this is a red herring. Really it doesn't bloody matter what your brain is doing. Men are typically bigger, stronger, more aggressive and more violent than women. Most violent crime is carried out by men. Most sex crimes are carried out by men. And a majority of trans-identifying men are heterosexual. This is why women need some places to be single sex. It really shouldn't be this hard to understand. Even for misogynists.

the next is in response to when I said

you'd think it boils down to a numbers game there are many more girls who are distressed and uncomfortable at boys being allowed into their toilets and changing rooms at school then there are boys who claim to be trans and want in there

Taln tells us that "it's not a numbers game trans girls" - by which he means boys who claim to be girls "need to be able to use female spaces in order to be safe from sexual violence" and he quotes an article reporting on some research done by a phd candidate. But that's irrelevant. I am quite prepared to take this claim at face value and believe that assault of any kind is more likely to happen in a male changing room. It doesn't follow that those males who may be vulnerable should be forced on girls. What about the boy who doesn't claim to be a girl, but who is nevertheless somewhat effimnate and crap at sport? Might he be vulnerable to bullying an assault? Should he be sent to the girls changing room? The male entitlement in the phrasing here just makes me want to throw up. Again, it's about males using females as shields, regardless of how the females feel about it. Their feelings don't matter. But this time the females in question are school girls and college students.
[…]

various commentors #transphobia youtube.com

RE: Awwa Period underwear SELLS OUT women

(Samantha Whang)
I hate when people say “be kind”. It’s just a manipulative way to get empathic women to feel sorry for men, who claim they are vulnerable, even as they are gaslighting and abusing us. I don’t ever want to hear “be kind” from anyone ever again.

(Amalie Olsdatter)
That is so true! It sometimes works on me. Especially since i do feel compassion for people with genderdysphoria. However not enough to distort reality.

(Samantha Whang)
@Amalie Olsdatter These people never ask the men to be kind to us.

(justLorelle)
Yeah, woke for be quiet 🤦🏻‍♀️

(VF555)
@Amalie Olsdatter define the term gender in a way that isn’t just sexist stereotypes build on our oppression? There is never a reason to feel bad for men based on his sexist beliefs about us. It’s not an illness it’s a belief system the endorses our oppression.

(Amalie Olsdatter)
True, they do not. And even if you try to be understanding, they call you hateful if you are not willing to distort reality.

(I hate 2020)
Exactly I thought I was the only one. Also, “respect people” like no...respect is earned not given. The “be kind” bs is just them guilt tripping us and trying to make us look like bad people for disagreeing with them

(Rock Legend Films)
The whole "Be Kind" movement is another example of wokism! What they really mean in the most hidden way is: Accept LGBTQ as normal, and if you don't, we will share your rejection on social media!!!

Peak Trans / Maria Mclachlan #transphobia youtube.com

How not to argue. A response to taln0reich
(note by submitter: continued from https://fstdt.com/5CJLQY9RCTVX3, Transscript starting around 6:48 and ending around 8:47 of a 36-minute video)
[…]

The trouble with procedures is that it's human beings who make them, and human beings who interpret them, and as long as genderists succeed in obscuring the difference between men and women, women will get hurt. As for raping women en mass, this is a straw man and it is absolutely typical of the gender cult. They cannot refute the claims we are making, so they have to fabricate a claim that nobody has made. Nobody has said trans-identifying men are raping women en mass. We don't need to. Even if it were only Karen White - the whom I didn't mention by the way - but the reason the likes of me harp on about him is because he is a very high profile case, widely covered in the media, easy to point to and the perfect illustration of what can happen as a result of institutional capture by gender ideology.

Now i said

however much they try to dress them up in science the claims they make are metaphysical

and Taln responded with the usual canard about the brains of trans-identifying people being more like those of people of the sex they wished they were. It's not brain activity that determines whether someone is male or female. I did a video on the trans brain bad argument and it's really rather good. My favorite comment in response which I pinned below it came from a neuroscientist who said "you are spot on on this one the evidence shows that there are no consistent significant differences between female and male brains except for size. But even if there were correlation is not causation" - obviously - "neuroplasticity - a fancy word for the brain's capacity to change itself upon experience or training can shape brains functional networks"

[…]

Peak Trans / Maria Mclachlan #transphobia #pratt youtube.com

How not to argue. A response to taln0reich
(note by submitter: continued from https://fstdt.com/538CRH$BKQHS, Transscript starting around 3:56 and ending around 5:58 of a 36-minute video)
[…]

Taln said "risk assessment exists so no a rapist who is a threat to the general population of a woman's prison is not going to get there". How dare you disregard the fact that women prisoners have and continue to be frightened traumatized and violated by such men? Don't talk about risk assessment it's bollocks. You can never guarantee a man placed in the female estate isn't going to molest or negatively impact on the mental health of women prisoners. You can never guarantee anybody safety in prisons. But you can certainly decrease the likelihood and extent of harm to women by not housing male criminals with them.

Taln said "trans women are at vastly increased risk in men's prison, 'transgender people in prison are exposed to horrific rates of abuse by both staff and their fellow inmates' (note by submitter: quoting https://transequality.org/issues/police-jails-prisons )" and I don't doubt that trans-identifying men are at risk in male prisons. They still do not belong in the female estate, because they are Men. Women are human and not mere shields to be used by some men against others. Is it really too difficult for you to come up with a solution, that keeps trans identifying men safe and which doesn't distress and endanger women and to campaign for that solution. Or is this, as I suspect, really about validation at all costs to real women

then he said "isn't it interesting that gender-critical feminists only care about rape in women's prison when they can use that to fear-monger about trans people" what on earth makes you say that? this is the same old victim playing "you don't care about women you just hate trans people". You really are a piece of work Taln.

[...]

Peak Trans / Maria Mclachlan #transphobia #pratt youtube.com

How not to argue. A response to taln0reich
(note by submitter: Transscript starting around 1:19 and ending around 3:56 of a 36-minute video)
[…]

Taln responds that no one decides to be a trans woman as gender identity is innate. So Taln believes that even rapists and violent male criminals should be accepted as women because of their claimed gender identity, which of course there is no way of verifying. There isn't the remotest possibility that they could just be pretending in order to get transferred to a women's prison. On the prison page of my website I quote Dr. James Barrett who was chair of the british association of gender identities specialists who said it has been rather naively suggested that nobody would seek to pretend transsexual status in prison if this were not actually the case. There are, to those of us who actually interview the prisoners, in fact very many reasons why people might pretend this. Note that I said male criminals decided they are women. I didn't say trans women. Once upon a time I, along with large swathes of the population, were content to use the term trans women, understanding it to mean that it referred to men who wish they were women, who tried to present as women, without actually claiming to be women. Plenty of men who call themselves trans women still fit that profile, but thanks to widespread capture by gender ideology with its oft repeated and totally empty mantra that trans women are women the - purpose of which is to erase adult human females aka women as a sex class with needs that are distinct from those of men - we now have people conflating the two terms trans women and women. Those captured include political leaders and representatives of every part of the establishment. They pretend it's true because they think that is the side on which their bread is buttered. In the scale of things women simply don't matter. Men do. The upshot is that many of us who were once prepared to use the term trans women and walk that extra mile will no longer do so. Many of us who were prepared to be kind and accommodating will no longer be so, and there is no such thing as a trans woman and it's not your so-called gender identity that determines what we are. It's biology. I intend to deal with this in greater depth in a forthcoming video, so I'll confine myself to stating the obvious which is that no man can actually be a woman or vice versa.

[…]

amy. #transphobia youtube.com

someone tell me why us trans women are better looking than real females

Respectfully you aren't number one. You look like you were body slammed in the cosmetic section of a dollar general. If you're going to compare yourself to biological women how about you take all that off. Does the five o'clock shadow and the uncontoured adams apple will give you away? If you don't want to be measured in your passability, maybe don't measure women in their fuckability. If putting down biological women is the only way that you can validate your gender, you can take that misogyny and dilate your neo-vaginal disaster with it. Maybe if you didn't treat womanhood as a fetish you would have left your duets and stitches on.

Bryan Melvin #fundie #crackpot #psycho youtube.com

Bryan Melvin, a self-described "militant atheist," died from a contaminated drink that caused cholera. At first he heard a wonderful sound and a voice from someone who he instantly knew as God. But God told Bryan that he could not enter Heaven for reasons explained in this video. Instead, God sent Bryan to a place that the inhabitants initially described as "paradise." But this wasn't paradise, it was hell, and the deception of a homey veneer was soon exposed as a place so horrific that the mere mention of its surroundings could evoke terrible thoughts. Beings tried to devour Bryan as they clawed at him, but there was something Jesus had instructed Bryan to do in order to prevent his ultimate destruction. He viewed those who had been condemned to hell, people from the past - abusers, killers, even a preacher - and then he saw one of the most reviled persons in all of history, Adolph Hitler. What Bryan saw will shock you. But Bryan's story ends with redemption, and hope. Watch this video and realize not only the horrors of hell, but the saving Grace of Jesus in offering tremendous hope to everyone who heeds the call of God's Holy Spirit.

Donna Brooks #transphobia youtube.com

RE: How not to argue. A response to taln0reich

I heard that Philosophy Tube had drunk the kool-aid. I'm still a Liberal and disagree w/ Rose of Dawn political but have a number of Rose's vids in my trans demands ideology playlist b/c they are quite good, esp. the ones on the scariest trans-identified people. The same goes for Blair White. It's a DARVO technique for the trans cult, who demand strict adherence to their dogma & turn viciously on anyone leaving their religion, to call GC folks a cult. We come from all races, from across the political spectrum, & from countries around the globe. We are LGB, hetero, & "trans". We are men & women, from various professions & trades, including students & retirees & those on disability. We are of all different ages. Most importantly, we all think for ourselves. Each YTer, writer, or speaker has a different philosophy and different tactics that they think are more effective and they promote those tactics & viewpoints all for the same goal. We don't demand conformity. We argue the case for things like not using the word, "cis", something which I myself will not compromise on, but I also don't go apoplectic b/c someone hasn't come to the same conclusion I have. I just ask them not to use that term around me b/c I refuse to be turned into a subset of my own biological sex class. It bothers me when people assume this is a "conservative" movement. WTF? So are we a conservative movement or are we all terfs (radical feminists)? Which is it? Because the "pro-family" Far Right is not going to funnel money into radical feminist organizations! That's ludicrous!

Kym Francis & Julie Smith #transphobia youtube.com

RE: How not to argue. A response to taln0reich

(Kym Francis)
When I was doing my Master’s degree, in 2013-2015 the degree was in behavioural & health sciences (specialising in disabilities & mental health). I did a subject on sexuality & people with disabilities. The précis of the unit described the theoretical & behavioural implications & proposed to suggest discussion on strategies for people to use to to support people with disabilities to explore their sexuality & to seek mutually beneficial relationships. My expectations of the lecturer was that they were going to have professional experience in that sector & to be politically neutral; I couldn’t have been more wrong. Unfortunately the lecturer was a trans man & he used that subject to promote his ideology. I was utterly confused & I actually questioned my values because of that person. My values were completely stomped on & I was gas lighted so badly that I questioned my motivation for completing that course. Fortunately I passed the subject (just) & I never had to encounter that individual again.
I’ve always considered myself as an advocate of the principles of social justice & I have spent a long career advocating for the rights of people & to have my career diminished & reduced to a 12 week course was extremely confronting. That was my first experience of the revolting agenda of trans men.

(Julie Smith)
When someone tells you the emperor has fine clothes on and you can see they don't they are buck naked then believe in yourself. Always. Good you pulled through. It's like an experiment in a class. All the kids were told to raise their hands in agreement that a statement was true when it was in fact a lie. All but one student was in on it. When they all raised their hands this student didn't but looked round and was uncomfortable he stood out as the only one until eventually he started to raise his hand even tho he knew it was a lie. !! Peer pressure wanting to fit in and too young to stand and say you are ALL wrong. This what trans are doing and people like them pushing their ideology and using their captive audience to indoctrinate and not in fact the correct curriculum. It's happening in USA and in our schools now. I'm glad yo came through

Sterling Price #wingnut youtube.com

Says the fascist puke coated leftist.
What are patriots supposed to do when the fascist anti-white left steals a presidential election for the first time in history? Nothing? No no. They did the right thing. And unlike the insurrectionist blm/antifa, these were real patriotic Americans. Did a few get carried away? Yes. Of course there WERE undercover FEDS there trying to coerce people to go inside. More than 99% of the patriots who made the pilgrimage there that day stayed outside waving their signs and flags (unlike the domestic terrorists blm/antifa who BURNT American flags in the streets while burning stealing and destroying everything in over 500 riots in cities coast to coast). Eh?
None of those who went to the Capitol on Jan 6th were armed with firearms. None tried to hunt down members of Congress. IMO it would have been a good thing if they had actually had blood in their eyes and dragged a bi-partisan selection of our Congressional prostitutes outside and promptly hanged them.
AND, if your prejudiced anti-white bigoted racist election stealing fascist authoritarian regime tries to use the virus as an excuse to steal another election, your going to get a REAL insurrection. Next time the rifles won't be left at HOME. Neither will the BULLDOZERS, trucks, tractors, and a few other things.
When we get back in power, ALL of the criminals that the democratic left allowed to burn and pillage are going to be hunted down and arrested.
All of the prejudiced anti-white school administrators and teachers that have been abusing our children are going to be rounded up and jailed. All of the power-tripping little dictator administrators of leftist institutions that have been persecuting people, firing people, they are going to be FIRED.

Various Commenters #homophobia #transphobia #wingnut youtube.com

RE: Cocaine Addict Joe Biden Voter Identifying as Woman Rapes a Dog?!?!

(C B)
Remember the LGBT community is actively fighting for the rights of these types of people. Facts

(WhiskeyTangoFoxtrot)
Yes they are and advocating for kid phookers

(Rozie B)
Not to mention the socialist wing of the democratic party also.

(Kioko Fulgarion)
Hilarious that there are some insisting they're not, yet I have not seen one of them say or spread that they do not support this.

And remember, Trumpstein supported them, even held their flag up and posed with it for all the cameras of the world to see.

Nice try trying to turn people against the only guy who had the guts to destroy the deep states plans.

(iamrobot1c)
Share a link of anything where the LGBTQ COMMUNITY denounces any of this? Not a single LGBTQ person but a large group of the community as a whole. Because the San Francisco Gay Choir sang they were coming for the Children and I don’t recall any large backlash from the LGBTQ community as a whole that they were opposed to this message. I keep seeing love is love with grown men holding little boys hands, I see Sesame Street characters coming out as bi or non binary and I see schools having books that teach underage sex and I only see ‘far right’ mom’s speaking out against it.

Larry Elder quoting Zac Kriegman #dunning-kruger #pratt #racist #wingnut youtube.com

Data scientist DESTROYS the BLM narrative

I have frequently said that Black Lives Matter has done a great deal of damage to the very black lives they claim to matter. This is a prime example. A data scientist has posted a long critique of Black Lives Matter, where he documented how many people are dead as a result of the Ferguson effect, or more recently the George Floyd effect.

In 2014, after the shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson the BLM movement's anti-police rhetoric and propaganda found a receptive audience. The police were demonized, their morale and willingness to engage in proactive policing plummeted and murder rates, especially murder rates in
low-income black neighborhoods, spiked.

In just the five cities this data scientist examined, five cities, it caused a staggering 900 excess murders and 34 000 excess felonies that would not have otherwise occurred. The growing consensus that decline in proactive policing is resulting in drastic increase in murders is so substantial that even left-wing outlets like CNN are beginning to recognize it.

Over the last five years there have been typically between 30 to 100% more unarmed whites killed by police than unarmed blacks. Blacks make up 53% of known homicide offenders and commit about 60% of the robberies. Whites commit about 48% of the non-fatal violent crimes and blacks about 35%, but you look at just serious non-fatal ones, whites commit about 41% and blacks 43%, but as mentioned, over the past five years police have killed 39% more unarmed whites than unarmed blacks even though whites account for a similar absolute number of violent offenders, therefore the raw data suggests there is a slight anti-white bias in police applications of lethal force.

The claim at the heart of the movement, that the police more readily shoot black people, is false, and likely responsible for thousands of black people being murdered in the most disadvantaged communities of the country.

Tim Pool #dunning-kruger #wingnut #transphobia youtube.com

We like to say that the woke are white supremacists with guilty consciences and I think that's a fair point. They think white people are privileged and superior, at least politically. They reject that, saying "Oh, don't say that we're superior, that we think we're superior."

Yo. If you're a white person and you think you are granted and afforded special rights and privileges, you are saying that in society white people are superior, you just don't like that they are. That's a fair assessment. If you don't agree with that, well, that's your linguistic issue.

The racial thing becomes way too complicated. They said Polish people are people of color. You know that thing we talk about with Luke on the show, yes, woke people say that Slavic people are actually people of color. Whatever. Determining this is more difficult than gender.

Giggle is an app for females. Trans men are allowed on the platform, but the trans women community is viewing this more like an affirmation attempt. It would be lovely if male people respected female spaces and left them alone.

There was one story I covered years ago. In the UK, when they created unisex changing rooms, assaults against women skyrocketed. Why? The males who were committing these crimes against females now had greater opportunity.

So, when you have a CEO of a company who says they want a female only space, perhaps they don't want to be around a male of any sort.

During Occupy Wall Street you had women's only therapy tents. Somebody had raped several women in the camp, including a trans man. That's right, someone who is female but identified as male was raped during Occupy Wall Street. They created a female-only trauma tent.

They said trans women should be allowed in there because they're women. Several women got mad, saying these are males and they were scared to be around males, but at the same time, the trans man, they say trans men are men, was also allowed in that space. Why? Because she's female. Therein lies the conundrum.

Think 2 Invest #wingnut #dunning-kruger youtube.com

Typical leftist cancer content. Tests and grades exist to evaluate competance.

When a bridge colapses and kills hundreds of people becose you hired the F grade structural engineer, it only reveals how evil fake compasion is.

Maria in not in school to party. She is in school to develop competentce and become a usefull member of society.
She also has free time and weekends for self discovery, fun, friends.

Life is not just empty plejure but also about responsability.

Eleanor Lynn, Hugo Brand & Lida Hall #transphobia youtube.com

(Eleanor Lynn)
the article is a very clumsy attempt at conflating feminist analysis of "gender identity" with being racist and bigoted. They're hoping it will scare people off questioning gender ideology without thinking critically about the issues. People are scared by that label and even just the accusation could be enough for many people to duck the debate.
(Hugo Brand)
I'm surprised that they don't argue that it's akin to attacking religion (read: a strong philosophical/religious belief or lack thereof) because it's far more accurate to what T ideology actually is and represents, right down to protecting an individual's behaviour and how they dress. However, those rights to manifest those beliefs are limited in certain situations to protect the safety, rights, freedoms, etc. of others.

In that regard, by qualifying their beliefs as religious/philosophical they'd have a much greater chance at having their beliefs protected while also providing women, gay people, and kids with protection from those beliefs.

And, fundamentally, that's the only logical, rational route the T argument can go--it has no sound basis in objectivity. It is a subjective, reality-denying belief that tries to force society, science, religion, and everything else to go along with it: 'man' brains in women's bodies; women who are truly 'gay men', men who are actually 'lesbian', and, the award-winning: "born in the wrong body" claptrap.

It's a religious/philosophical belief and needs to be treated as such. It deserves no greater respect or acknowledgement than that

(Lida Hall)
@Hugo Brand A major tenet of their religious belief is that they actually have some kind of "science" backing them up, teamed with a belief that their soul heavy belief system is not a religion when in fact, it very clearly is. I suspect that this cognitive dissonance serves to distract adherents from the cognitive dissonance the "born in the wrong body" narrative gives rise to - but that's just a theory.

Donna Brooks #transphobia youtube.com

@Lena Black Stop using that term, "cis"! It's offensive to any woman who refuses to be made a sub-category of our own sex! Women don't exist only as a "NOT TRANS" "woman" (i.e. a non-man) & that's what you are doing when you call us cis. It's a disgusting, insulting term. So men who say they are women (transwomen) deserve to be called women, but actual women should be called "cis" women? F*** that shit. Your use of the term, "cis", means you are forcing your cult's language, dogma, & misogyny on the rest of society, & WE WON'T USE IT. Now you'll come back & insist that it's an innocuous term & not meant to be an insult, which just is further proof of your willingness to subjugate the feelings of women to the feelings of men who claim to be women. If THEY say calling them a "man" is harmful, then ALL OF SOCIETY must bow to their wishes & reinforce their fantasy of themselves as women. But if WE don't want to be called "cis", then too bad because for YOU, it's "trans uber alles".

Various commenters #transphobia youtube.com

Here is where I disagree with you. Buck Angel is a transman. We can respect that while not denying he is biologically female.


(Antje Galuschka)
why should we use trainslanguage? It's less harmless than most people think. Because when we read "man", our brain associates that it must be a male person. Whether the "man" is preceded by "cis" or "trans" is irrelevant.

How do you fix this cognitive dissonance „he is female“? It‘s an oxymoron.

I don‘t want to validate a GID.


(A. Rashid)
Then you have more in common with transactivists. If a sex offender is a "transwoman", do we need to legitimize that identity? Try to be consistent. Get a solid foundation of gender critical/radical feminism.

(Vanessa Vokey)
I don't respect pornographers. You've been groomed

(Crumbly Duckling)
Alternatively, we can choose not to respect bogus "identities" and childish, made-up language.

AA BB #transphobia youtube.com

I haven't watch the entire video yet but, I still want to comment as I'm five minutes in. I just want to say that I really don't whether or not being trans is a choice. Just because something is not a choice, doesn't mean it should be tolerated or that it is right. The whole discussion about whether or not being trans is a choice just seems like a distraction. Nothing can justify what happened at the Wii Spa, the massage Parlor where Yaniv went or Loudoun County. If someone has a burning uncontrollable desire to be an awful human being, that doesn't mean they deserve acceptance. I'll live more comments after I've finished watching the video.

Various Commenters #conspiracy #dunning-kruger #racist #wingnut youtube.com

RE: Not ONE Body Found in Canadian "Mass Graves"

(Norman F Birnberg)
Lauren three words for you: mass psychosis formation. The flight of people from reality has been documented before and this is a good instance of it. It always happen right before civilizations collapse. What we are witnessing and experiencing now is the late stages of a dying civilization.

(Cheesy Koch)
The world is full of these leftist people in power who are totally gone in the head. Every leftist needs stripping of any of the positions of power wherever it be in the world. They are screwing the world up with their insanity. They are insane the lot of them. They are very dangerous people.

(Rob Figulski)
Wait....There was reactionary public outrage over an unchecked media accusation? How weird.
Sincerely, Duke Mens LaCrosse Team

(Web)
This is what happens when you have it so good, that you have to go looking for victims and victimhood status.

(C.L.)
This was a psy-op on the European Canadians. Meant to shame humiliate and destroy Canada and Canadians.
Bravo to thé Québécois academic for having integrity.

(Scorpio)

I’m in Poland and many of my acquaintances and family members won’t hear about this correction. If I tell them I will look like conspiracy theorist. It’s all so depressing…

I've lost family members and close friends because I chose truth over the narrative.

(Odin the German Shepherd)
Same thing in Tulsa about the 1921 riots. They have been digging all over town for over 30 years looking for the “mass graves” of black rioters. They have found nothing.

(Kevin H)
So, basically a teenage girl spread a rumor, and society just went insane.

It's incredible how authoritatively people will speak on things they know nothing about. My industry works with all kinds of remote sending techniques, so anyone who wants to assert Lauren has been lying or obfuscating on the technical aspects of this topic, they are sorely mistaken.

Donna Brooks #transphobia youtube.com

Welcome to the Light. Like you guys, I once defended trans people until this movement morphed into the misogynistic, homophobic, violent, authoritarian movement it has become. It's a dreadful feeling knowing I was played. It was as if, while I was looking the other way, someone wheeled a Trojan Horse into the LGB"T" "community" & suddenly all these T people were pouring out, attacking freedom of speech and the boundaries & rights of women, children, & LGB people!

@MacyJane A few years back, while watching some MRA YT channels, I stumbled onto a video of a guy proposing a strategy to get women out of good jobs & positions of authority through trance ideology. He proposed that men apply for jobs as women, so that when there were positions to be filled, they could count toward the women's quota. If enough men did this, they could succeed in driving women out of public life by using quotas & demands for women's equality against us. I never gave it much thought at the time b/c I was a couple years away from my sudden enlightenment re trans demands activists & ideology (and the dangers of identity politics). I didn't think men would actually do this. Now I'm not so sure. Hate will drive people to extreme actions.

mechantechatonne #transphobia youtube.com

Why do you mind their existence? These people are doing stuff to themselves because they are in pain and trouble, Buck Angel for instance has been very open about the downsides of taking male hormones leading to vaginal atrophy due to testosterone intake, how can you say it promotes being trans?
You're just being hateful.

That's a weird question. Why would you oppose the entire practice of doctors giving medications and surgeries that cause serious, chronic issues to people with serious mental issues that asked for them? The answer ought to be obvious. Plenty of them are bothering people plenty with all the invading single-sex spaces and violating peoples' rights to safety and privacy in that way, and they're bothering people by recruiting ill children into their cult and making them lifelong medical patients. But even besides that, doctors shouldn't do you harm just because you ask them to.

These people are not doing things to themselves. These people are having doctors do things to them, things that are unethical and harmful, and they're lobbying politically for everyone to have access to medicalized self-harm. Nobody minds them "existing." People mind them promoting and lobbying for nonsense pseudoscience. IF they stop doing that, nobody will mind them existing at all.

Truthy Lucy #fundie youtube.com

My sister had schizophrenia. She heard voices & I believed her. ( She has since passed) I believe they're demonic entities in nature.
I remember reading about a case where a lady was driving to a location & became lost.
The voices she hears that she's told are hallucinations just so happened to instruct her how to get to her destination.
Most shrinks don't acknowledge the voices they call them hallucinations & prescribe meds.
They need to pay more attention to what the voices are saying. Imo
Excellent video!!

Vanessa Vokey #transphobia youtube.com

(Transscript of song sung)

Pronouns are rohypnol
Cause they try to numb your senses
If you can't tell it's a dude in a dress
You must need contact lenses

Cause Lesbians don't have penises
There's no such thing as a girl-dick
These fetishists just won't back off
I suspect they ALL are porn-sick

These adult men believe they're "girls"
But what does that really mean?
Depictions of females raped and abused
On pornhubs most watched video streams

Cause female is not an identity
You can put on when its pleasing
Its the cycle of the moon and tides
The life giving and bleeding

Do not call us vulva-owners
Babies are not fed by our chests
Stop erasing our experiences
And STOP sexualizing the function of breasts

younger gays are being told that they
Were born in the wrong body
Only perverts lie to kids about
Sex and human anatomy

Grooming is what predators do
They stalk their unwitting prey
MAPS are openly promoting their sickness
On Twitter and YouTube every single day

So if you're sick of this assault on truth
And you can't understand how we got this fucked
Share this song to all your friends
(Especially that one with his dick tucked)

Roy Kliffen, Aboc Stark & Heavy Metar is My Way #conspiracy #sexist #wingnut youtube.com

RE: Feminism and Low Testosterone Are Destroying Civilization, Men Are Losing Testosterone And Are Weak

(Roy Kliffen)
This has been known for a long, long time. When women in the US got the vote, a leading Soviet intellectual - whom's name escapes me right now - commented that the US sowed the seed of it's own destruction and Communism would conquer the US. He knew women tend to be collective and Capitalism leans more towards individualism; Communism is an ideology based in collectivism and with women always having the majority, the trend will be towards collectivism and thus Communism.

(Aboc Stark)
It’s almost as if telling half a generation that they’re the root of all evil because of they lie gender is a bad thing. Imagine my shock when the constant barrage of negativity and downright malice starts to have an effect.

(Heavy Metar is My Way)
As one psychotic feminist attacked me in another post on a different channel; "YoU jUsT rEdEfInEd FeMiNiSm."

Feminism appears as though it has righteous intentions on paper, but in practice it is completely evil.

Batya Ungar-Sargon & Tim Pool #dunning-kruger #wingnut youtube.com

Formerly-Woke Reporter Explains Her De-Programming From Wokeness

Batya Ungar-Sargon: The second thing i would say was, I read this Yale study from 2018, what they found was there's a difference between how white liberals and white conservatives talk to black people. White liberals dumb down their vocabulary when they're talking to blacks and Latinos, and white conservatives do not, and I remember reading that in 2018 and thinking to myself "This implicates my entire worldview."

And I had this moment where I was like, "This is disgusting," and everything I think is caught up in that thing that makes you dumb down your language. You assume a person of color is less educated than you, is poorer than you, and needs your help, and needs your generosity, and your beneficence. right?

Tim Pool: Jonathan Haidt's research found that conservatives have a balance of all six moral foundations, while liberals only have two of them, care and fairness.

The political divide is obviously not left or right, it's authoritarian versus anti-authoritarian. Liberals have a tendency towards authoritarianism because they're collectivist and collectivism is inherently authoritarian.

Because if the collective, which is the authority, decrees you either follow suit or you're ostracized, so if you're someone who is driven by care and fairness, and that's it, you don't care about loyalty, purity, authority or anything like that, then you don't care if they're doing vaccine mandates.

I think people really need to understand that the left and the right don't speak the same language. They come out right now in NYC and they say vaccine mandates work. New York is experiencing a massive surge in cases, but when they say vaccine mandates work, they're not talking about preventing Covid, they're talking about forcing people to adhere to the collective which why is you must get the vaccine regardless of the outcome.

Vanessa Vokey #transphobia youtube.com

no one is "trans". there are male and female humans. anything else is sexist stereotypes. detransitioners are the only voices who are speaking the truth about how self destructive medicalization was for them, and how much they regret it and blame doctors and surgeons for disobeying their oath to do no harm. this is real life, not make believe land where the "gender transformation fairy" exists and people will be happy as long as you lie to them every single moment of their life.

Catherine Robillard, Kai Decadence & Ruth Less #transphobia youtube.com

(Catherine Robillard)
It’s in trans activists interests to conflate gender with sex. If they used biological facts, instead of their interpretation of a social construct, their ideology would be shown for the nonsense it is.

(Kai Decadence)
Exactly. That's why they NEVER or hardly answer the simple questions of
- What is gender?
- How do you "feel like a man"? How do you "feel like a woman?"
They know if they answer these questions and use the usual gender stereotypes, it exposes the ideology for the rubbish that it is so they either don't answer the question, use circular definition that goes nowhere, and/or move the goal post. These people are ridiculous.

(Ruth Less)
Then it's accusing us of conflating the two, so they can escape humiliation for as long as it takes to block us, rant from behind a block and declare themself the winner

Winter Rose, Reverend Coffin's Other son & sdsmt1169 #transphobia #pratt youtube.com

( Winter Rose )
My personal take on it is that "cis" is religious language for the faithful of the Woke church. Rather like a Christians referring to people as "sinners." (I don't mean the words themselves have anything in common, just that they mean something to religious people and mean nothing to those who are not believers. If you are not Christian, "sin" is meaningless.) It's a descriptor that only works if you believe the theology. If you don't believe the theology, the word means nothing to you.

Since I don't subcribe to the religion that says gender and sex are unrelated and what you feel inside is who you really are, "cis" is just three letters. The problems arise when this new "church" and state don't stay seperate because, as with any truly zealous believers, they are convinced beyond reason that this religion is the "truth" and therefore the faithful must convert the unenlightened because then we would have our utopia. Fortunately, Christians worked out a few centuries ago it doesn't work that way. Hopefully, this new faith will realise that's all it is. It's not science. It's not truth. It's faith. Believe it if you wish, but do not expect others to participate in your rites and rituals and terminology.

I will not, therefore, use the word "cis" any more than I would expect an atheist to speak of himself as a "sinner."

(Reverend Coffin's Other son)
I like to call them the Church of Genderology and the famous TRAs are their high priests.

(sdsmt1169)
I used the same analogy to a friend asking me about the meaning of cis. I said it’s like infidel, or kafir. Not of the faith. I don’t believe in the faith so I don’t accept that label for myself. I am not an infidel, nor am I cis.

Leah James #transphobia youtube.com

RE: Transgender ideology: awful argument 17 Being trans isn't a choice..?

It's not a choice, yet gender is also fluid, some people's pronouns change over time, yet there's no wrong or right way to be trans, people know their "gender identity" from the age of 4, yet some don't realize it until they're 54, and on and on and on. There are so many loopholes in gender ideology, how do people take it seriously...Gender ideology is the new sexism and misogyny. I thought society wanted to get away from gender norms??? I thought we didn't want to live in the 50's🤔So many things I have heard men say that is sexism and misogyny, bit they can get away with it if they're "trans" or an "ally". Sexism in plain sight. How women don't see this, is beyond me...

Andrew S #magick youtube.com

When I first started taking magick seriously I created a protective servitor that lived in a statue on my alter. He had a passive form and a battle form. His battle form was designed to grab, constrict, and consume negative energies and beings. After consuming them they would be converted into neutral energy and released back to source. I released him after I learned how to protect myself better, but I still think of him fondly from time to time. He was a truly loyal and good friend.

"I was wondering if good fiction writers, in the process of the character creation also produce something similar? Maybe this is why some fictional characters seem to start life of their own?"

I remember hearing somewhere about authors having trouble keeping prolific characters in the rails of their story and the character often taking over the story for themselves and the author pretty much just falling along, look into Robert e Howard’s relationship with his character “conan”, apparently conan would just show up in his room , smash shit, and demand that he writes more badass stories about him

MUSE DEV #transphobia #wingnut #conspiracy #mammon #racist youtube.com

(Submitter’s note: This is a comment on a Green Day music video.)

Its 2021.. Joe Biden is a Pedo/Nazi/DeepState Puppet… inflation is at an all time HISTORICAL HIGH… men are identifying as women… Women are getting beat up in MMA cage fights with Trans Men …. Women who identify as men are sewing their vaginas up filling with marbles and getting skin grafts from their ass cheeks to fold a poor excuse of a “penis” connected to their clit…and BLM is a joke Antifa is a Deepstate project.. Bill Gates wants to Jab everyone to death… yeah… Simpler times… we should all GO BACK to how it was in this video…. To be truly punk rock you go against the Gov not for it… also.. invest in crypto.. especially XRP, XLM

Materva 1974 & Crumbly Duckling #transphobia youtube.com

RE:Transgender ideology: awful argument 17 Being trans isn't a choice..?

(Materva 1974)

There should be no medical intervention for anyone if it involves changing the function of the body. No hormones, no GRS. I don't think it should matter what age they are or if they have had therapy, the bottom line is doctors shouldn't be doing that. Cosmetic surgeries are different...they can be in poor taste, but changing someone's external appearance is a lot different than destroying their reproductive health

(Crumbly Duckling)
I'm always glad when people bring this up - thank you! Whatever anyone's opinion of cosmetic surgery, it tweaks what's already there, changing only the size, shape or location. It doesn't add something that isn't naturally there or remove anything that should be there. Many people only opt for it after a lot of soul-searching as to whether it's worth the risk or the expense, after being teased, bullied or stared at for having a body-part that doesn't conform to a narrow idea of 'normal'. These Frankensurgeries are in a different league.

(Materva 1974)
@Crumbly Duckling Yes, thanks for the reply. I probably should have clarified that I was talking about the context of trans surgeries. I don't have a problem with cosmetic surgeries in general, but I was thinking if a man wants to put on breast implants or pull out his beard or put in a butt implant then that's his problem. But if we allow doctors to give people hormones (which will screw up their whole body) or rip up people's genitals to conform to someone's delusion then I think we are a cruel society and that becomes society's problem

Hugo Brand #transphobia #pratt youtube.com

RE:Transgender ideology: awful argument 17 Being trans isn't a choice..?

This is on par with "religious people don't choose to be religious". I'd actually agree, to an extent--once you're indoctrinated into a belief system it's awfully hard to break out of it, let alone feel as though you ever had any choice or say in the matter. Kids grow up believing in the same religions as their parents and generally the same as the culture and society they grow up in. Indoctrination is often incredibly insidious and happens long before anyone really makes an 'active' choice in the matter.

[...]

T-genderism is just another religion many vulnerable people have been groomed into. I would certainly argue that their susceptibility to those beliefs likely was never a choice, but a lack of critical thinking certainly enabled a continued descent into those beliefs. At which point is the individual at fault for not snapping out of it or for not developing critical thinking skills?

Also, much like you often see religious people probing and asking questions and trying to find a way out on their own terms, you see much the same in the T-gender demographic. Some find a way out, some never do, and for some the 'benefits' of adherence (affirmation, feeling 'special', having a sense of 'community', access to off-limits spaces, sexual gratification, etc.) outweigh any desire to break free.

It's what happens when people never learn to develop coping strategies in real life for real life and instead see a warped version of real life through a dogmatic lens.

Either way, it's not a natural, harmless, benign, or healthy state of being--it's an ideology that is fundamentally destructive of the self and toxic to others, and for those who truly want it there is a way out--thus it is a choice in so far as it is something that has been foisted onto them that they have been groomed into believing. Thus, it deserves no more respect than any other religion, and I will never participate in it.

Next page