Mathematically speaking the average loli is much more intricately designed. Whereas fully grown women have long forms which are full of empty generic detail, Lolis are compact and can be absorbed completely as a whole. Instead of being a mishmash of organs and body parts, lolis are perceived as a biological entity with a functioning nervous system, leading to less autism. Well designed lolis are uniquely enjoyable to look at and as a result, increase the visual processing and problem solving skills of observers. Real women who look stupid in unique costumes are all the same and thus no longer become real instances of humans, but rather symbols that destroy visual comprehension.
Lolis are pleasant to interact with and encourage higher thought. Their large expressive facial features validate one's efforts to produce scientific advancements. Meanwhile, the blank expressions of adult women cause mental illness and fear, destroying the brain cells of observers.
Have you ever actually seen a human female, adult or juvenile?
If, by “a mishmash of organs and body parts”, you mean breasts - which really is the closest thing I can come up with to make sense of this: It’s called “sexual secondary characteristics”. They signal sexual maturity. They also signal capacity for milk production, which is another aspect of human reproduction. Most men quite like them.
Lolis are also at maximum future fertility
As I said, it is secondary sexual characteristics that indicate reproductive readiness, anatomically speaking, not a lack of them.
You really fail at this “I am just giving the cold hard scientific facts”, creep.
Also, are you talking about real girls or “2D females”? All the talks about “designed” lolis vs “real” women would indicate the latter, but you can obviously only reproduce with someone who is real.
Finally, you know that “lolis” are just not those nasty women yet, right?