What about all the findings in Levantine archeology that prove even the more grounded annals-sections of the Bible to be mostly Judean/Aaronite revisionism and that the Hebrew religion changed even more drastically over the course of its evolution as is evident from the Bible itself?
Also, I think it is fairly safe to assume that this will generally be unspectacular stuff, mundane truth like locations and names mentioned in the Bible actually existing. And I notice how you start at Abraham - a far more prosaic, far less juicy, far less crassly-at-odds-with-every-aspect-of-observable-reality, tale than the myths in early Genesis that you creationists are trying to prove.
PS:
unspectacular stuff, mundane truth
To clarify, this certainly would be extremely interesting if it was an actual archaeological exhibition examining the actual history behind the Bible from the perspective of actual critical-historical scholarship. But definiitively not as a Dominionist (to name the wolf inside the goofy sheep costume of Creationism) propaganda event, especially with Ken Ham’s track record.