I don’t get it. I honestly don’t. The premise of your argument is that:
1. Male sexuality is inherently destructive.
2. Most men are smart enough to recognize this, but compartmentalize to cope with it, because evolution.
3. MtF transwomen are either Machiavellian min-maxers, or acting on the above compartmentalization.
4. Male harm is increasingly more difficult to compartmentalize or launder away, but self-elimination from the gene pool via suicide or celibacy is not optimal.
The first three points are based on premises that are mostly wrong, but follow from the premise in a logical way. The last one, however, implies that transitioning is an alternative to suicide and celibacy that doesn’t self-eliminate from the gene pool.
This is nonsense, because most transpeople are self-eliminating from the gene pool.
I don’t think there’s any serious controversy here. “Not having grandkids” is PITT parent’s second-most-common gripe. Most publicly-visible advice guides for transpeople directly suggest dating other transpeople as safer than the alternative, and literally every transperson I’ve personally met was either single or dating another LGBT+ person (usually someone they can’t have kids with). And though not every trans person gets bottom surgery or hormone replacements, the ones who do are obviously less fertile after the operation than they were before.
Put this draft in the trash, and come back when you have an essay that doesn’t blatantly contradict everything we know.