1. Neopronouns? Usually isn't it just using they/them or the "wrong" ones that get you all in a tizzy?
2. Don't you all disagree with the the doctors when they do give the diagnosis you disagree with?
3. Anyone can rap. It's a musical genre.
4. No it's not. Unless you are just doing it for women.
5. It depends on how you define it. For the entire amount if film ever in the US, sure. Representation has gotten much better though.
6. Ah yes, "Cancel Culture." Cries the side who happily bans books, shoots beer, and engages in other sorts if boycotts.
7. I mean individuals certainly could be doing so, it's mostly just them being helpful and kind.
8. While some Native American mascots can be endorsed by Native Americans and coached on how to do it properly. In general the mascots tend to be questionable, and leads to fairly sketchy things done by opposing fans or more high school/college level fans doing dumb things.
9. I don't even know what they are complaining about... okay, Google has helped. And the answer is, not really? While some people do prefer say, "A deaf person" vs the "person who is deaf" it isn't universal and the entire reasoning behind person first language is to focus on the person not whatever trait they might have. Apparently person-first language was introduced awhile back to prevent more derogatory or harsh verbiage against disabled people, but people are aiming to more "take back" the language so are shifting back to identity-first speech. The person-first might be falling out of style but was never ableist.
Maybe when you parody something at least get the talking points accurate? Usually makes the jokes hit better, cause your shitty, shitty art doesn't help anything.