“I would first like to ask how you as an evolutionist can ridicule creationism and call it unbelievable.”
First thing that comes to mind is a 4th grade reading level.
“There is just as much evidence for creationism as you think there might be for evolutionism!”
Hardly. There’s a book. That’s it. ALl the evidence collected for evolution (and geology, and astronomy, and cosmology) is sorted by whether or not it can fit into the book. That’s it.
“Did you know that the sun is shrinking?”
And the tide’s going out. Are they both unending processes?
“Did you know, in fact, that if the sun is now currently shrinking, that at one time, it was bigger?”
Feel free to show how you know it’s ALWAYS been shrinking. G’head, we’ll wait.
"And did you further know that the sun is shrinking in such a rate that if the earth and everything was billions of years old, the sun would have been, at one time, large enough to where it would have swallowed up the earth?”
Do you have an actual citation for this? The math?
The days are gettting longer and Hovind said that 6000 years ago, Adam and Eve problably had a few hours fewer to each day. But the match ACTUALLY shows that if the slowing has been consistent for 6000 years, then at that time the day would have been different by SLIGHTLY over one minute.
I doubt your claims.
“Did you know that the moon is moving further and further away from the earth?”
Again, please show this is a consistent change, not like the tide or something.
"Did you know that this means that at one time, the moon was closer to the earth? Did you further know that if the earth and everything was billions, even millions of years old, at one time the moon would have been close enough to cause such tides that all the life on earth was washed away twice a day?”
More of the same bullshit baseless claims.
"Did you also know that the earth is slowing down in its rotation? Did you know that this means that at one time, the earth was spinning faster? Did you further know that if the earth was billions or millions of years old, the earth would have been spinning so fast that everything would have shot off it like little kids from a merry go round?”
Cartoon physics. Show your math, if you have any.
“ Do you know what happens to kids shooting off from a spinning merry go round? As they are travelling away from the merry go round, they themselves are spinning in the same direction as the merry go round was!”
No, they are not. Once they leave the merry go round, they no longer are subject to the acceleration it was imparting. They fly off straight from the point of departure. You should try it some time.
"If there was a big bang, and everything went shooting off of a spinning dot of compressed matter, then everything we see in space should be spinnning in the same direction, right?”
No, why would you think that?
I mean, aside from not knowing shit about the Big Bang model.
"Well, its not!”
Please find a textbook that says it should be?
"There are moons of planets travelling in a different direction than the rest of the moons of other planets, there are planets that are spinning in different directions, and, if our own galaxy were spinnning for billions or millions of years, it would have spun itself into a perfect circle years ago!”
Now you’re just making shit up. Siddown, idiot.
“I challenge you to explain away these facts to me.”
Physics does not work the way you need it to. Done.
“I challenge you to fit these things into your theory of evolution.”
Cosmology. Not evolution.
“I challenge all who believe in evolution to tell me how these things are in agreement with evolution.”
Because nothing works the way you inisst they do. You’re just wrong.
“Because if just one of these things cannot be explained, if one of these things cannot agree with evolution, then you cannot accept the theory of evolution as truth, and cannot accept evolution at all.”
Not even close to true. If one of these bullshit observations bears out, then we just have a question. That doesn’t reduce any of the evidence collected that supports evolution.
You’re just fractally wrong, and pathetically easy to dismiss as a critic of sciences you don’t begin to understand.