www.quora.com

Solomon King #fundie #sexist quora.com

It (feminism) serves no other persons good: you never hear talk about doing what’s best for mankind, your relationship with your spouse and your family, this is because feminist views are inherently selfish so they can’t serve anyone outside the woman, she has been convinced that there is no higher cause than herself, that’s why feminists are able to place themselves above God, their husband and their family. It is too obvious, the evil doctrine of feminism.[…]

Chances are it was not your husband that abused our put shackles on that woman you read about in college in women’s studies, […] Before a woman becomes a slave to feminism the thoughts she heard urging her to be rebellious and uncooperative are not her own thoughts but she doesn’t know that there are evil spirits all around us that whisper ideas and thoughts into our minds, […] this is the end goal of feminism, to misalign you and create a mind and heart of conflict and war with the world around you because it was established by men, this is the cause of the rise in mental health issues amongst feminists and single women past 30 years of age, […]there is no end reward for the feminist, rather a trick prize, the eventual rejection and casting off of male influence and partial isolation from mans control, but the cost is far greater than the selfish feeling of empowerment to fight constantly, you lose the great opportunities that should arise from loving interaction with men and women […] The same kind of man you called controlling, toxic, misogynist (only because he resists your far out ways and ideas). […]

Solomon King #fundie #sexist quora.com

Feminism doesn’t stop women from being treated like anything, it triggers mutual hatred and avoidance of women causing them to grow old alone unable to fulfill their godly purpose. What is being treated like a rug to you? Following your husbands lead like his deputy?, catering to your husband cooking cleaning, maintaining order in the home so when he comes back from working hard to provide for the family he has a rejuvenating environment at home? Doing nice things for a man? Submitting to a man that provides and protects you and making yourself as useful to him as possible? That’s why feminism is evil, it undermines Gods plan for families, more than half these women have never been abused by a man. The problem is because feminists choose to reject Gods narrative about reality, they think that reality will change for them, all they got to do is just keep ignoring and rejecting the truth. A woman pumped up by feminists rhetoric, suddenly believes she is equal to a man and will only suffer the same equal consequences as a man for certain actions, she goes out and devalues herself sleeping around to “empower” herself, is it empowering to do something that will lower your ability to commit to one person in marriage and increases your likelihood of divorce when little normal relationship storms pop up, then you become single thinking you can do better forgetting that everyday that goes by you get older and less attractive naturally, after many years you wonder why you can’t at least find a man that’s at least equal to your ex husband. Feminism will not let you identify the root cause and tackle the problem bcos its ideas are the root cause, rather it will say forget men, you’re too good for them, if they don’t want you then something’s clearly wrong with them, no truth just bs to give you a quick dose of false sense of self worth, but it never shows you how to actually get what you want. How many ppl have said feminism helped them become a better person and achieve their goals and desire for happiness?? None.

Solomon King #fundie #sexist quora.com

Men did not create the patriarchy God did, so interchanges God and patriarchy and you will see who you are truly calling your enemy. How can you expect to stand or succeed sustainably when you oppose God? This is why there is no lasting happiness as a true feminist that is actively in activism and living the life of a feminist, they grow old, miss opportunities to bond in a viable productive manner and so remain alone except for the very women and perverse minded men that tell her her newly encountered problems are not caused by her new thoughts but by the patriarchy.

Solomon King #fundie #sexist quora.com

3. It is anti God: You cannot be a feminist without disobeying scripture continually when commanded to submit to your husband, it makes God out to be a confused creator that doesn’t know what is best for the female kind he created from man. There is a reason God made man first and woman second, In Gods wisdom he created hierarchy and gave each part duties so they can function effectively under obedience to Gods way, it is seen that the whole of humankind now suffers death and decay, sadness, sorrow and every other evil because Eve decided to disobey and undermine authority and the power structure created by God, her very first act in self interest was the biggest mistake ever made by mankind. […]

Solomon King #fundie #sexist quora.com

If the deputy rebels against the general there is now a breach in authority and communication between the general and the troops and the plans of the general for the success of the army will be perverted due to the deputies rebellion and it will cost the army greatly in loss of stability, coherence and leadership structure. When plans are perverted or compromised the enemy suddenly has a higher chance of destroying the army. This is what happens when a married woman becomes a feminist and acts on her new ideas, the enemy uses her own hand to destroy the relationship that has worked and the family she built in order to satisfy her immediate feelings.

Feminism is grade A manipulation, it was not conceived by human minds, that of why it is able to use women to destroy their homes and what they build with their partners, promising a great feeling of empowerment. The power to cause chaos, but not to build or establish anything long lasting that serves more than just your own selfish desires, it is deceptio and manipulation through a twisted narrative of what it is to be a woman.

Rene Donaldson, Security Officer (2017-present) #fundie quora.com

Yes. Tatoos and brandings on the skin always have a demon attached to it . Its a way demons possess you and own you as their property. This is why the bible states for people not to get a tatoo or marking on their body. The mark of the beast is the mainstream marking of mankind, which is the most demonic and well known mark on the planet. Its literally forcing people to become demon possessed

Scott Sassaman #crackpot #racist #conspiracy quora.com

Q: Why is the Tartarian Empire hidden from history teachings?

A: It is being hidden because the Tartars were the rulers of the world and those that conquered them are afraid they will come back.

The old kings lists from 200 years ago or more refer to the King of Tartary as the king of kings and the lord of lords[ sound familiar?] There were many kings in succession.

They were Zoroastrians and so are the originators of the monotheistic religions.

One in twelve people today are said to be descendants of Genghis Kan. That is mathematically impossible but it is very likely that one in twelve would be Tartartian.

I think the story of the mongol invasions is the backwards and upside down story of the destruction of Tartaria. 40 to 80 million systematically destroyed. A lot can be hidden in such events.

Genghis Khan was said to be Mongolian but the idea that Mongolia is on the steps of northern China is a twentieth century construct. Mongolia is 1300 miles north of where they say it is today and was occupied by Caucasian people.

There are many pieces of evidence that this country and empire existed but it is still being buried to day. The last big push to bury evidence was World War 2. The blatant destruction of Europe in general and places like Dresden in particular was getting rid of some of the last of the evidence. Another thing WW 2 did was vilify the swastika which was an important cymbal for the Tartarian empire and the whole ancient world.

The Tartarians left their mark from the Basques of Spain the Cathars of Europe the Samurai of Japan or the Mi kmac and Acadians of eastern north America. All these people have been driven from their homes and or murdered over the last centuries.

There is much more as this was a world wide culture. It seems to be the last civilisation with left overs of the golden age[a whole other story] and may have been intact just a few hundred years ago. There is more information coming out all the time.

Brian LeCrone #fundie quora.com

Your question is beautiful in its simplicity and in its profoundness. Let's change your question, for a moment, to "What, if anything, in the Bible can we believe as true?" Well, if we are to decide which passages in the Bible are true we must first have some sort of benchmark by which we can measure them.

We should not accept or deny any passage simply because it seems to us to be too incredulous or too desirable. (i.e. deny the 7 day creation or accept Jesus resurrection) That is not a benchmark. That is simply an emotion. We need a good source of credibility. So consider this: Is God, Himself, a good source of credibility? If God stood before you and gave you an answer would you believe it? My answer to that is "Yes."

Countless times in the Old Testament specific people relay to us what God has told them. But I assume that, for many readers today, these individuals lack credibility because there are no corroborating witnesses to verify that God actually said these things to them. So maybe we cannot trust the Old Testament to be true. Please read on.

The New Testament features God speaking to people in a very different form than in the Old Testament ... PERSONALLY, FACE TO FACE, as the man Jesus. God took the form of a human being to address man in a very direct manner. Why should we believe that this happened?

Because it was reported, not by one individual, as in the Old Testament, but by many, we can give the existence of Jesus credibility. The gospels of John, Mark, Mathew and Luke are independent verifications of Jesus' time on this Earth; as well as are the 13 books written by Paul. But why should we believe these guys? We should believe them because of how much they suffered for sticking to their stories.

You see, the Apostles all followed Jesus with fervor while things were going well. But, when Jesus was arrested, they all fled in fear of persecution. They abandoned Him. Even refusing to know Him when confronted. Not one of them attended His crucifixion or even his funeral. But 40 days later they were ALL back out in the public preaching His message. For the rest of their lives they continued preaching, against the threat of death by the Roman government. Each one of these men underwent excruciating torture and death rather than retract their testimony that Jesus rose from the dead or rather than stop preaching his message. To me, that is proof that Jesus did, in fact, raise from death and appear, as indicated, to over 500 people. If Jesus can do that He should be given some credibility in what He says. And, here is the kicker ... HE SAID THAT HE IS GOD.

So we have multiple credible eye witnesses, that all died rather than retract their statements, verifying that He raised from the dead. We have Him establishing to us that He is God. So I think we can believe anything He says. And most of what He says is verified by multiple reports from multiple men. But what about everything else in the Bible?

Well, let's look at the rest of the New Testament. Jesus told the 11 apostles (Judas was no longer with them) that He would put the Holy Spirit in them to guide them in their teachings. For me, that verifies the rest of the New Testament. What about the Old Testament?

Multiple times Jesus referred to Old Testament passages, verifying their truthfulness. I believe that this means all of the Old Testament is true.

So that is the LOGIC that I use to support my belief that every word in the original Bible manuscripts is true and infallible. But consider in the book of John, chapter 20 verse 29, when Jesus, after raising from the dead, stood before His apostle Thomas. Thomas couldn't believe that it was Him until Thomas put his finger into Jesus' wounds. Consider what Jesus then said to Thomas: "Is it because you have seen me that you have believed? How blessed are those who have never seen me and yet have believed!"

So I caution you to rely too heavily on logic and proof. Just search the word "faith" in an online Bible and see how much Jesus emphasizes the importance of faith over proof.

God Bless You.

Quora/Ilja F. #crackpot #conspiracy quora.com

Q:
Why was Tartaria erased from the record books?

A:
It was erased from the records book to rewrite the winners history, which was made by todays ruling Elite. That was the main reason, as we are simply now living on Tartarias ruins and all that old cathedrals, which are told to be european arhitecture etc, were built in reality before Europes Civilization and made by Tartarians (Siberian Russians), which have existed not only in central Asia, but also in Northern and South America and partially in Africa. Though, this elite still couldn’t erase it completely as
the “Strait of Tartary” still exists as a strait between eastern Russia and the Sakhalin Islands:
That is what happened back 200 years ago, when Tartaria (Siberian Russian Empire) has fallen, when Romanovs with Napoleon were constantly attacking Tartaria, which had it’s capital in Siberia and that’s why Siberia was completely bombed by a nuclear weapon and became dessert like after that in 1820’s. Only after that period, the freemasonic (European) occupants' dynasty Romanovs moved towards the eastern part of Russia.
The Strait of Tartary still exists, if you look at the map. It is located between Russian Sakhalin Islands and the Japanese Sea at the eastern side of Russia:

The second reason for Tartarias erasing was the elimination of the competition in ruling the world.
That is also the main reason why the West constantly attacks Russia, as the remained biggest for that western elite, to establish their world wide order. Russia can challenge them.

Robert Gillis #magick #crackpot #conspiracy quora.com

Q: Can demons come into your home uninvited?

A: Yes a demon will come into your home uninvited especially if your home is dirty and very messy and very smelly. Demon's are attracted to this type of house as it gives off dark energy. Demon's are made of very dark energy and are attracted to the darkness it's food for them.

Demon's also like negative emotions and feelings they feed off the fear that negative emotions give off. Arguing, crying, rage, anger, intense sadness and more intense feelings attracts demon's to enter your home to feed of the anger the sadness the fear that these emotions generate dark energy it's just what demon's want. Please understand Demon's want Chaos and destruction in any home not just dirty and unclean homes. Demon's are evil and they weave a web of lies and misdirection. They get an extra thrill in turning clean homes into Chaos they want crying, anger, rage and violence especially in a nice tidy house. Demon's are hateful evil dark beings never trust a demon. Demon's hide in the shadows and fade into a silhouette there masters of disguise.

Demon's connect to certain things like Ouija boards, seances and trying to connect to the Astral realm. Attempting to summon or communicate with energies on the Astral plane is very dangerous this is one place where demon's reside and connecting to them will give demon's a conduit for them to enter your home. Please don't summon demon's through the use of black magic it's very dangerous. Demon's once in your home will attach them selves to children, pets, sick and drunk and drugged people. Once in your home their very hard to remove as they feed off the weak and vulnerable. Your been warned !!! Remember Your a Spiritual Being having a Human Experience. God Bless you ❤️ Love Robert ❤️ l Love Angels ❤️.

Frank Schlernitzaver #fundie #crackpot #dunning-kruger quora.com

Uh, none of the evidence of eviloution is undisputed, it is ALL disputed, and highly disputed BTW, as it is all based upon flawed and imaginative assumptions,preconceived assumptions again btw.

And there is no way to KNOW the sea floors are any younger than any place else on the earth. Answer me this where did the sea floors come from if they are younger- did they just poof appear or what; your thinking is almost comical when thought out. All the matter is same age ALL of it, none of it could be any older or younger unless it was CREATED later (lol).

Yes the materials have been sifted sorted BY the global flood of Noah’s day; we see the flood strata everywhere on earth. And the water receded back in to the earth and the Mtns rose up after the flood as Bible tells us and we see the overt/obvious evidence of their too in the inverted broken strata layers so we KNOW they rose up and water runs down hill, it always has btw, except in Grand Canyon where it had to flow up hill for millions years to form the canyon but that is the only exception (lol).

George Clark #fundie quora.com

The writers of the entire Bible from Genesis to Revelation had no training in astronomy or astrophysics. Neither did they know about “red giant stars”. That does not change any prophecy about the resurrection, matters of faith, or current science.

What the Bible does say is that the Lord God will make a new heaven and a new earth as a forever dwelling for all the faithful. Since God made our existing sun and solar system and the entire universe in six days, Almighty God has the capacity to make anything go away, dissolve the universe, and design a world fit for eternity at the speed of divine thought.

Secondly, the light that will illuminate heaven will be the divine light from the very glory of Jesus Christ in his divine state. There will not be a need for the sun or the solar system in the new earth and new heavens [all the stellar universe]. Jesus has been creating places for all believers now for at least two thousand years nearly. I cannot imagine the detail and particulars Jesus has in mind. So I am not worried about our Sun going to Red Giant status.

Jesus did promise to return on the Last Day of human history, resurrect all the dead both righteous and the wicked, change the living at the time of His return in the blink of an eye, judge every person from all of human history fairly, separate [actually throw them] the wicked into a lake of fire forever, and then celebrate with all the faithful in our new eternal home!

The universe only appears to be billions of years old because of the current speed of light. Based on Genesis 1, originally—. light could have had unlimited light speed. This would account for God saying,” let there be light”. Then when God separated light from darkness, He changed the speed of light to the current speed. This secondary change then made the universe seem much older.

Gen 1: 1 says that in the beginning God created space [universe, Hebrew word used was heaven] and matter [Hebrew word used was earth]. Therefore, I would not ascribe any limitation to Almighty God.

But I would note that God foretells literally melting this earth with fire in the book of Peter as a form of judgement. He destroyed the earth once with water in the flood. He promised not to repeat that action. The next time, He will use fire. Perhaps God will cause the Sun to go into supernova mode at that time. Who knows.

Those who are among the faithful will be with Jesus in that New Earth and New Heaven in Revelation.

Norm Fishler #fundie quora.com

Modern abortion is nothing more or less than ancient Molech worship revived. It is the promise of liberation from commitment and financial freedom. Read through the Historical Books of the Bible to see how the practice played out in the natural. Then read the Old Testament prophetic books to see what those men of God had to say about the practices of child sacrifice. “A woman’s right to choose” is fraudulent on its face. It is not your choice to terminate a healthy living soul that grows within you. Nor is it a man’s right to bully a woman into doing so. Please keep in mind that these medical emergencies that the pro-abortion crowd likes to bandy about are so rare as to be statistically non-existent.

Wanda Dailey #fundie quora.com

So with this said, I suggest recommending the following: (1) Tell the person(s) that if they have great difficulty believing there is but one Creator-God, to ASK HIM to make it possible for them to know He is God & to know He WILL answer them in His own unique way & timing! To ask Him directly & not through a spiritual leader! (2) Mention that Lee Strobel, an award winning Investigative Journalist & a strong-minded atheist, set-out to prove once in for all, that Jesus was a fraud & was not who he claimed to be & did none of the things He claimed to have accomplished! And, in fact, He never existed! Strobel hated Christianity even though he didn't have a clue of what he was talking about, but like many, had confused Christianity with mankind's religions, believing they were one in the same. And, as Strobel may have earlier mentioned, how do we know George Washington ever existed? How do we know our history books aren't a hoax? We know Washington existed, due to the number of folks who personally knew him, saw him or heard him deliver a speech & recorded their encounters in diaries, in letters, on documents, etc., etc., etc. Undeniable, verified documents is how Lee Strobel ended-up KNOWING who Jesus is & is not, was reconciled to God through Jesus & became an actual Christian and ended his quest by writing the only book in history, “The Case For Christ,” to prove Jesus is as the Holy Bible says! And, with this said, I mention I recommend them to read the book.

Abby Austin #fundie quora.com

If I knew without a shadow of a doubt that God wanted me to kill my child for any reason, I most certainly would. I love God with all my being. He rescued me from everything in life. Yes, God is all-knowing, but He wanted to test Abraham's faith through it. He knew beforehand that Abraham was willing, but Abraham did not know before. God puts trials in the lives of every single human being to draw them closer to Him. It may not seem like it most times, but I guarantee it has a purpose. God did really love Abraham too. He loves every single living thing on this planet because HE made it, and molded it after His own image.

Martin Cosentino #fundie quora.com

Mr. La, I have read many articles here, but yours comes straight from the heart.

The reason that Christianity presents the greatest difficulties of belief, is exactly because it presents the greatest rewards for continuing faith.

Any Christian, who lapses into despair and nihilism, ends up going insane like the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche.

For me, Jesus of Nazareth was, and IS, the greatest Quantum Scientist that will ever live. He told us , 2,000 years ago, that we could speak DIRECTLY to the Father, in his Name. We did not need the Levite priests to tell us how to pray or the infinite abundance of G-d’s love.

Most people are afraid of Jesus’ message, because it tell us real things, about ‘picking up our cross daily to follow him.” That does not fit well with our comfortable life-styles and instant gratification.

Your mention of Jesus ‘interacting with us continuously’ is a definitive confirmation of quantum mechanics, which Jesus already knew two thousand years ago.

If Jesus himself, dying on the cross, can experience the loss of his Father (“My G-d, My G-d, why have you forsaken Me?”) how much more can we, in the comfort of our society, ask him to strengthen our faith when it becomes weak.

You are also spot on with ‘ absolute logic’. - which is the tool for material scientists, but not for maintaining subjective faith in G-d.

“Seek first, the kingdom of G-d, which is WITHIN YOU, and all of these things you ask for shall be added to you.” Matt. 6:26

The discovery of quantum physics is the verification that Jesus knew THEN, what faith will bring to those who remain the “True and Faithful witness.”

Muhammad Rasheed #fundie quora.com

Christians are right tho. Our Bible came first. And the different translations are simply different angles on one Truth. Jesus did die on the Cross. No dithering around, where angels took him off. Even the Koran says Jesus was the Messiah. Well what is a Messiah.

And Muslims love to ask..”where in the Bible did Jesus Himself actually claim to be God?’ Answer. Many places, but to start, in the Book of John.

And also in what was not said. Notice how the disciples prayed a lot. But not when Jesus was with them. Only after He had died. Also Jesus said ..’before ABraham was, I Am.’ not know ‘I was’—.He was with us way back before time began.

Jesus said He was humble. And we believe Him. But at the same time left a Jesus said he forgave sins. One man sins against another. Doesnt sound humble.

The Bible says, ‘whoever brings a religion other than that Jesus is Son of God is of the EVIL one’.

Jesus said. ‘I am the Way, the Truth, the Light. Nobody comes to the Father except thru me’—.well of course. HE IS GOD

but despite these bold claims, we still believe Jesus when He says He is humble.

And unlike Mohammed, who is likely roaming in Hell, Jesus did nothing wrong ever.

So—.we will be welcomed into the Joy of the Lord.

P.s. all we have to do—is place our hands into His—muslims can never know if they have made heaven in this life. I read that. ‘we are never safe until we die an nd only then will we know we made jannah’

We place our trust in Jesus and wall and talk with a loving Heavenly Father who knew we could never ever earn heaven. So He came Himself. As Jesus died on one side of the Cross—we—Susi, Tom, Dick..Harriet—all died on the OTHER side of the Cross. We died too.! And are already seated in the Heavenly places

But we are at the same time stuffed back in to these suits of human flesh. Which has mortal human urges. So we confess and are forgiven.

I will not see a stranger when I die. But a friend.

Manuel Garoffsen #sexist quora.com

[…]
Unfortunately, that's not so the case with women who are 24 or older. Without being rich, they cannot afford the necessities to be or remain attractive after 24, and said necessities of attractiveness include cosmetic surgery, expensive skincare and makeup products, and gym memberships, all of which are far out of reach for the middle class person. This ultimately means that women who are 24 or older and aren't rich are doomed to be overweight/obese, man-faced, short-haired and/or extremely wrinkly and old-looking. You'd be forgiven for thinking that a woman over 24 you met was a man.
[…]
With so much influence that feminists have, of course men are going to be forced to realize that all the attractive women they they met are only attractive because said women are in the 18–23 range and that they will be ugly once they turn 24 (unless said women are multimillionaires, but then these men will never be able to even talk to them unless said men are multimillionaires as well).

Wyie Naout #dunning-kruger #conspiracy quora.com

As much as can possibly be legally brought against them, if they did that.

As for what Trump actually said was that “there are fine people on both sides”.

Liberals lie that “both sides” are defined as one side being Neo Nazis/White Supremacists, and the other side being anti Nazi/ White supremacist.

That definition is a deliberate lie.

There were some Neo Nazis that did not want the statue torn down.

But there others on that side who were not Neo Nazis or White Supremacists of any kind, and who had nothing whatsoever to do with the racist, haters, who were also there.

Those others were the “fine people” on that side of the issue, who Trump was talking about.

The idiocy of the claim by liberals showing that Trump was not saying anything in favor of the Nazis, is that even they admit that he said there were fine people on both sides.

By their definition, that would have mean that Trump was (supposedly) saying “there are fine Nazis, and fine anti Nazis”.

You can’t have it both ways.

No one who sides with Nazis ever says anything good about those who are clearly against Nazis.

It would be like Nazis themselves, saying that some of the Jews we all want dead and call “subhuman”, are “fine people”

No one with a brain, would be stupid enough to believe that any Nazis would ever say such a thing.

Wayne Leigh #dunning-kruger #conspiracy #wingnut #racist #moonbat quora.com

The politically incorrect answer would be that like the rest of R1b, they were descended from the neolithic farmers who came to Europe from anatolia speaking various related languages. The Bell Beaker people were a development from these farming societies. When the R1a came conquering from the steppes, some mixed races speaking predominantly Indo-European languages were created, such as the Celts. But the languages of the ancient farmers continue to exist well into Roman times till they were eventually subsumed into the majority. Languages such as old Iberian, Etruscan and Basque. Eventually only Basque held out. Its pretty much the the Han colonisation of South China. All the Yue were Sinicized except the Vietnamese. Yet their DNA is still closer to Vietnamese rather than Han. No one would identify O2a as DNA of ancient Han, but its a third of the southern Han. The only thing which stopped West Europeans from identifying R1b as neolithic farmer as against being steppe nomads are their self-identification as Aryan conquerors rather than members of a conquered race.

Wayne Leigh #wingnut #crackpot #conspiracy #racist #dunning-kruger quora.com

Based on y chromosomes, the Germans have a haplogroup L1 all to themselves and their kin. This should be the main contributor to the substratum in their language. Uralic and Finno-Ugric people likely originate from N haplogroup, although they are very mixed now. So it's unlikely the substratum language in Germanic is Uralic. The R1b haplogroup in Germans likely originate from the Bell Beaker people who might be related to the Basques, so it might be worth also to find traces of Vasconic as well in German. Despite the baseless assertions of Aryanists, R1b is clearly not part of the Indo-European invasion.

Wayne Leigh #conspiracy #dunning-kruger #racist #wingnut quora.com

As you have yourself supplied part of the answer, it is obviously not. Besides it's geographical concentration, the other obvious facts are (1) the age of the haplogroup is obviously far older than Indo-European, and the main migration route was via Anatolia, not the Steppes unlike the R1a. (2) the R1b were in Western Europe much earlier than the R1a. They founded locally the Bell Beaker culture, which originated from the coasts of Iberia. (3) the people in Ibera, large areas of France and Northern Italy spoke non-IE languages right into historical times, only switching partially to Celtic, then almost fully to Romance languages in the days of the Roman empire. (4) Basque, which retains its old pre-IE language also have the highest concentration of Rib, and lowest for R1a. All the assumptions that R1b is IE does not hold water, in the face of these data. What we can, however, say is that R1a and R1b split nearly 20 thousand years ago, before IE existed. The languages they spoke also evolved independently. The R1b folks arrived in Western Europe, and replaced most populations except in Scandinavia and the Balkans, where they mixed with the local Germanic (I1) and the (I2) Balkan natives. The arrival of of the R1a from the Steppes later on led to the mixing of the R1a and R1b in central Europe to produce Celtic, an IE language with tantalising links to Basque. The colonization of large areas of Europe by the Celts resulted in widespread language replacement, though much of Ibera and France remained old pre-IE. Only the Roman conquests successfully converted these areas to IE speaking, with the exception of its last remnants in the Basque territories. It is pride and refusal to identify with the vanquished that led people to insist that R1b is IE.

Wayne Leigh #conspiracy #racist #wingnut #crackpot #dunning-kruger quora.com

This belief is very popular, probably because white people want to identify with Indo-European conquerors. But it totally, absolutely, doesn't make sense anymore than the Chinese insisting that the neolithic Liangzhu civilization (O1, related to Austronesian/Daic) on the Yangtze delta is Sinitic (O3 from Sino-Tibetan). It is impossible for R1a and R1b to both be the source of Indo-European since they are geographically far apart. Looking at the y-haplogroup map of Europe its obvious that Indo-European must have originated with R1a, and that R1b folks underwent a language switch along the way. The R1b must have arrived in Western Europe before the Indo-Europeans, and they founded the famous Bell Beaker Culture, before the Indo-European Celts (themselves a hybrid of R1a and R1b from central Europe), and the Romans subsequently assimilated them. The Germanic people are even more complex, being originally I1 before being first absorbed by the R1b Bell Beaker people, then the R1a Indo-Europeans. The Basques, Etruscans and others speak remnants of the old R1b languages. This should be the honest conclusion untainted by the desire to be the conquering race. White doesn't necessarily mean Indo-European, and Indo-European doesn't necessarily mean white.

Wayne Leigh #wingnut #conspiracy #racist #fundie quora.com

If you just look at the Y DNA map of Europe, the most obvious answer to this, which are rejected by Indo-Europeanists, is that R1b split from R1a long before the rise of the language itself, and that the R1b folks moved into western Europe in neolithic times, developing many stone age cultures including the Funnel Beaker culture, and speaking many related languages including Vasconic. The R1a Yamnaya people then arrived later from the steppes, with their ability to travel far with their domestication of the horse. They took over central Europe and mixed with the R1b locals to create the hybrid Celtic culture, which eventually spread all over western Europe, becoming the lingua franca. The Basques are just a residual people who did not make the language shift. In fact during Roman times, many R1b folks still spoke non-Aryan languages, particularly in southwestern France, Iberia and northern Italy. Most of them made the language switch only in medieval times. But the Indo-Europeanists are so fixated on being the conqueror race, they cannot accept the idea that R1b Celts and Latin peoples were in some ways subjugated by the R1a Slavs and Balts some time in the past. Even the base y DNA for the Germans was I1. They were first assimilated into the Beaker culture by the R1b folks, then by the R1a Yamnaya folks, creating the unique German branch of Indo-European.

Wayne Leigh #conspiracy #racist #wingnut quora.com

Most answers assume that R1b and IE are the same. The assumption probably stems from the unthinkable, horrifying alternative that R1b folks could have adopted the IE language from the inferior, R1a Slavic people. R1b and IE⁸ are of course not the same. It predates IE by millennia. It is found in Tarim basin (the ancient mummies did not speak Tocharian. Tocharians were R1a), Africa, and in Europe itself as early as 14000 years ago. The fact that the highest concentration of R1b is to be found in Aquitaine, Navarra and the northern Spanish coast speaks volumes. It is absolutely illogical to speak of dna replacement by violence or otherwise when the more “Indo-European” regions in fact have lower concentrations of R1b but higher levels of R1a. The data speaks for itself. The concentration of R1b coincides with the expansion of the Bell Beaker culture. These R1b people spoke Vasconic, Etruscan and other ancient languages. These R1b folks would have come, not from the Steppe, but from the Caucasus and Anatolia, via the Balkans and the sea, as neolithic farmers. They displaced earlier hunter-gathers. The innovations of the Bell Beaker enabled them to expand to all of Western Europe. But their expansion pitted them against the R1a IE folks pushing westwards as evidenced by the Corded Ware and other IE groups

Darren Blair #wingnut #dunning-kruger quora.com

The term “Intellectual Dark Web” was created as a smear against a group of academics, pundits, and others who actively rejected “progressive” politics despite being in the exact fields where “progressive” politics tends to find the most fertile soil.

The idea was to scare people away from looking these individuals up or anything that they had to say, part of a larger effort on the part of a number of people who do practice “progressive” politics to try and prevent competing ideas from being heard.

His4Life Dorie #fundie #psycho quora.com

Which prominent atheists do you most look forward to seeing burn in hell?

Personally, I will laugh my damn ass off when that shriveled little deceiver Stephen Hawking touches down in the flames and his diaper starts burning. LOL!

Wayne leigh #conspiracy #racist #dunning-kruger #wingnut quora.com

I find it infuriating that researchers routinely reject or try to explain away with ridiculous assertions that R1b in Basques were introduced from male Indo-Europeans. If that is so, why do the Basques have the highest level of R1b and why do its surrounding regions such as Spain and Aquitaine have more R1b than those furter away, and inversely less R1a? The only logical explanation is that rhe R1b folks were speaking languages related to Vasconic rather than Indo-European. R1b would have been responsible for the Bell Beaker culture, and its wxpansion. Celtic would have been a hybridization of Vasconic and Indo-European in central Europe, resulting from an IE elite ruling over a mixed population. The hybridization produced a superior culture which took over former Vasconic lands, resulting in a first language shift. There remained many places which still spoke Vasconic even after the Celtic take over. The subsequent Latinization of these lands further eroded the position of Vasconic. The Aquitanian language thus disappeared completely. Yet these former Vasconic/Bell Beaker places exhibit the highest level of R1b, regardless of whether this was a local cultural expansion from Spain or a invasion.

Steve Dragon #racist #fundie #psycho quora.com

Goegre Floyd was a rotten criminal. He deserves to be killed and then burn in Hell with Staan. He should have enever even been born into this world. Criminal apes need to be aborted and their little brittle baby bodies stomped on the floor and cast down to Help where they will be raped by the Devil for eternity. Fuck Goerge Floyd! Fuck his gay retarded family! Floyd was a hideous mongrel monster that never meant to be born! His mother should have had hear motherfucking tubes tied to prevent this beast creature from ever having been born at all!

John M #sexist quora.com

Biology says that a female is ready and able to bear children when she starts to menstruate. Biology is always right and biology always knows best. Also a females body doesn't need to be fully grown and fully developed for it to be safe for her to get pregnant and give birth. A females hips are also wide enough at those ages. Most females bodies are also fully grown and fully developed by age 15 and all peoples bodies are fully grown and are fully developed by age 17.

Miles Kendziorski #sexist quora.com

God has made it clear not to have children until your hips are wide enough sometime in your 20s? What about if you take a woman in her 20s that is extremely petite and tiny to the point that she doesn’t look bigger than a 14 year old, and what if you take a 14 year old that is already as large in the hips as the average woman? Does that mean that the tiny woman in her 20s should never have children? Generally speaking, a person’s body is incredibly smart, and if a girl is able to become pregnant it’s because her body has deemed her ready. Being able to give life, but then you must wait for multiple other things to fall inline first? That makes no sense, that’s like putting on your pants first, and then your underwear. Now could your 20s be the best time to have children physically? It could be, but I don’t believe that that automatically disqualifies someone from having children in your early teens. My grandmother started having kids when she was 14 or 15, she lived to her 90s, had excellent health until she crossed over, she had at least 6 children.

Brad #fundie quora.com

Yashua, Jesus Christ, Gabriel, Athena, Apollo, Aphrodite and Zeus.
Artemis confessed. She is a fallen Angel. The Queen of Heaven is with Satan.
Abaddon confessed. He is a fallen Angel. Abaddon is with Satan. Isn’t he supposed to imprison Satan?
Like in that prophecy stuff no human knows how to read but thinks they do?
Oh they are named in scripture. What a coincidence.
Now I know what you’re thinking.
Could Death’s appearance be the reason I drew these 3 years ago after God made me a prophet 6 years ago when I was 33?
Nobody believed me then, and you still don’t.
Could Deaths appearance to me and then again at the Olympics be fulfillment of this prophecy?
Maybe…..
Could a giant Red Star gone supernova in the Orion constellation be interpreted as a Red Dragon in prophecy?
Crazy?
Or just not retarded?
Let’s see who can riddle this out.
To say those are Angels, Christ has returned before the end of the world and that’s Heaven’s Army would be crazy talk right?
Now what you’re thinking.
“Burn da witch!”
Try.
Anubis Rides with me.
We used sorcery to join souls like Amun and Ra.
Amun Ra is No Second. Amun Ra is second to No One.
Yashua is the No.1 supreme being of the universe.
Jesus Christ has forgiven me for this, it’s sort of how we met, God and Heaven’s Army did not smite me for using sorcery to combine souls with the Grande Vizier of Death.
Neither will you.
We’ll be ones raining down wrath and plagues all over Earth.
I suggest you believe this, and repent.
Or don’t.
Your choice.
Life begins after you die.
THERE IS ONE GOD.
YASHUA.
Asia needs told again.
Thy will be done in Earth as it is done in Heaven.
I am The Son of Man.
And ya.
The cloud said so that’s why.
😂😅🤣😇

Thomas Warmuth Thomas Warmuth #fundie quora.com

Repent and believe that Jesus is your Lord and Savior would be more accurate. You do not accept Jesus; He accepts you upon repentant faith.

The idea of “accepting” Jesus is very poor terminology. Imagine that I drove into the Augusta Country Club, loaded my golf clubs onto a cart, then walked into the clubhouse and announced that I had accepted them and would be teeing off in 10 minutes. What do you think the reaction would be? Most likely, I would be escorted off the club grounds because I do not accept them, but rather they accept me. That is the order of things, and it is the same with God.

God is in authority. I accept His terms of surrender. I do not accept Him, He accepts me when I lay down my arms and surrender on His terms. Repentance is laying down your arms and surrendering. Faith is believing that Christ died to pay the penalty for your sins, and that the perfect righteousness He earned can and will be credited to you when you surrender.

So, as the Holy Spirit says:

“Today, if you hear his voice,

do not harden your hearts

as you did in the rebellion,

during the time of testing in the wilderness,

where your ancestors tested and tried me,

though for forty years they saw what I did.

That is why I was angry with that generation;

I said, ‘Their hearts are always going astray,

and they have not known my ways.’

So I declared on oath in my anger,

‘They shall never enter my rest.’?”

Hebrews 3: 7–11

Repent and believe while you can, for a time will come when God will say “You shall never enter my rest.”

Brian S. Holmes #fundie quora.com

You’re drawn to the Church because your conscience is seared from your sin and there’s a force compelling you towards repentance. And if you have even a single sin to repent for then you need Jesus. (And we all do)

You’re drawn to the Church because God created everything in the universe and despite your attempts to force yourself to believe in some form of atheism or agnosticism and Darwinism you feel compelled to think that there is a Creator and a higher purpose. (And there is)

You’re drawn to the Church because God created you with a God-sized hole in your heart that only He can fill. And you’ve tried filling it with everything else and nothing seems to satisfy the longing for “more”—even though you can’t yet describe that longing and aren’t ready yet to admit that it’s for God. (And it is)

You’re on your way friend. Humble yourself. Seek God in prayer with ALL your heart, soul, mind, and strength. God is already pursuing you, that is why you feel compelled. You’re the prodigal son. God is waiting for you to come home. Go to Him, He will run out to meet you!

God bless.

Dianne Paulsen #fundie quora.com

Soon, God the Father will Demonstrate HOW He can imprison 7.9 Disobedient, SELF-Leading God-created Souls, in hell for Eternity.

You just wait.

or you could . . .

RUN to GOD, and beg God the Father to teach ‘you’ to live His Unselfish Ways, so that ‘you’ will become selfless, like Jesus, our Example, so ‘you’ are working WITH GOD, instead of with satan, AGAINST GOD.

TIP: ‘Good Intentions’ lead to hell.

Gali Galit, Messianic, Missionary, Scholastic. #fundie quora.com

//Would you choose to burn in Hell forever, if it turns out that God is pure evil, such as because he slaughters children and tortures people forever, or would you bow down and worship him to save yourself from having to suffer the same fate as others?//

Thank you for the A2A.

“he slaughters children and tortures people forever,” you say.

Someone else once asked me a ridiculous question like yours somewhere else. They posted a video of how “bloodthirsty” God is.

The video cited verses where God punished people by death including:

drowning Pharoah’s army in the sea, failing to mention that they repeatedly refused to obey God and sought to enslave Israel again;
destroying 3,000 people when Moses returned from the Holy mountain with the Lord’s commandments, failing to mention that they were worshipping idols and behaving like wild pagans, despite experiencing several miracles of God which resulted in their freedom from enslavement, and who were even given the choice of choosing God or rejecting Him before God destroyed them. Those who rejected Him, despite gaining their freedom by God’s miracles, were rightfully destroyed;
blasphemers being stoned to death, as per Divine Law;
destroying 600 Philistines! (not nearly enough, imo), failing to mention that they were aggressive, warmongering people who physically threatened Israel’s development as a nation for 200 years, and who continue to do so to this day, putting out “Pallywood” videos, playing the victim to the hilt despite their international war crimes, and promising the destruction of Israel and worldwide Jewish genocide.

The video continues attacking God, using several examples from the Book of Judges, failing to mention that the purpose of the Book of Judges is to show to the consequences of disobeying God. The Book of Judges establishes the recurrent pattern of sin that would dominate the time of the judges. By the end of the book, it is clear that Israel violated her covenant with God in almost every possible way. “Charlie” obviously expected that God should ignore His own Divine Laws, ignore the breaking of the Covenant between Himself and Israel, ignore those trying to destroy Israel which He loves, and expecting that God should just sit on His hands in silence. I wonder if “Charlie” expects police and Court judges to do the same when mortal laws are broken.

The video then continues on to attack the Book of 1 Samuel. Israel had a priesthood that was corrupt. Samuel’s sons who served as judges in Beersheba were also corrupt. The people of Israel showed open disdain for the Word of God, and refused to listen to His prophet, Samuel. A remnant of Israel was righteous and longed for the glories of a just monarchy; God granted their desire. He gave them King Saul, however, Saul also ignored the Word of the Lord. The Philistines continued to be a threat to Israel, and they captured the ark of the covenant. But “Charlie” expects that God should accept it all quietly. The video even condemns David killing Goliath!

The video then moved on to attack the Book of 2 Samuel which covers the establishment of the kingdom of Israel. The book emphasizes that God rejected Saul for his disobedience, chose David for the throne, and disciplined David for his pride. The key to David’s successful reign was his relationship with God. God described him as a man after His own heart:

In his youth, David demonstrated his strong faith in God by challenging a giant with only a few stones and his faith in God’s strength to win the battle;
In his adulthood, he continued to rely on God for guidance and strength;
Early in his reign, he demonstrated the importance of his religious convictions to all Israel by bringing the ark of the covenant to Jerusalem in the midst of a lavish celebration before the Lord;
Following that, his eagerness to build a temple for the glory of the Lord was known to all.
David led the Israelites back to the true worship of God.
Even when he sinned, he demonstrated to the people his repentant heart before the living God. David’s religious leadership was the most significant part of his reign.

Through all the national and personal events of His people in order to accomplish His will, God gave David a glimpse of His ultimate will in the promises He gave him, commonly called the Davidic Covenant. In this unconditional Covenant, God promised David an eternal dynasty, an eternal throne, and an eternal kingdom. If the wicked had to die to accomplish that, so be it.

The video then mentions that no number of the dead were available from the Flood, but fails to mention that mankind was so wicked that, among other abominable human behaviour, human women were having relations with demons which resulted in supernatural, wicked, giant offspring:

etc.

If God hadn’t wiped out life on Earth when He did, giants would still be part of our population today, if not the only population today, certainly increasing in evil, and would make this sinful world of murder, rape, pedophilia, necrophilia, bestiality, wife-beating, child abuse, liars, thieves, and disease, look like a picnic.

The video also condemed God for the death of all the first-born of Egypt, failing to mention that this Divine judgment was the result of an Egyptian edict that all the first-born of Israel should die, so God turned it around on them. Perfect justice.

The video then moved on to attack Ezekiel 9 where God destroys the wicked, failing to mention that the people were perversely wicked, and that God protected those who cried out to Him for protection, by destroying them.

Then the video moved on to attack the Book of Jeremiah (“the weeping prophet”). Jeremiah’s ministry covered a very critical time in the history of the ancient Middle East. Josiah, the King of Judah, died at the hands of the Egyptian army. The people of Judah lost their freedom and didn’t turn to God, but to idols. This idolatry was the reason for Jeremiah’s proclamations of God’s judgment. “Charlie” obviously didn’t know that idol worship is against God’s Commandments and is punishable by death when violated. The book of Jeremiah includes many difficulties including Nebuchadnezzar defeating Pharoah, Jehoiakim rebelling against Nebuchadnezzar, Jehoiachin replacing Jehoiakim on the throne for a short time, and thousands of political and religions leaders in Babylon. Jerusalem’s walls were eventually breached, Nebuchadnezzar’s army besieged Jerusalem, the temple was burned, along with palaces, houses, and other administrative buildings. To Jeremiah, God was the incomparable God of all creation, was the Lord over nature and history, and He reigned not only over Judah and Israel but over all nations. Jeremiah was very aware of the covenant between God and Israel. The covenant bound Israel to God in a special relationship of love, faithfulness, and hope. But the covenant had two sides: Faithfulness to the Lord and to the covenant would bring blessing; disobedience would result in punishment, destruction, and exile. Finally, Jechonias (called Coniah in Jeremiah 22:24-30) was so evil, there was a special curse pronounced on Jeconiah that affected the throne of David, which in turn affected the rule of Jesus on David’s throne, which could only happen through the genealogy of Mary. The video fails to mention all of this and more.

The video then mocked God, i.e. “God is love, 1 John 4:8,” etc., failing to take into account all that they failed to mention up to this point.

Then it mocks the book of 1 Kings when God chastises Israel, and misses the entire point of the book which is the importance of obedience to God’s law. Naturally, the video disregarded the false religion of the Canaanites, the failures of the Israelites to walk in God’s ways, and only focuses on God’s chastisement which serves as a warning to us. Unfortunately, some of us are just too thick to get it.

Then it moved on to attack the Book of Isaiah which details the prophet’s message of condemnation to the 8th-century Israelites, pronouncing judgment on their immoral and idolatrous lifestyles.

At this point, the video records God “killing” almost one million (1,000,000) people, not including the Flood.

Alas! …

… the video introduces Satan - WHO KILLED ONLY TEN PEOPLE! count ‘em, 10! - and continues to attack God and Scripture by attacking the book of 2 Chronicles.

While Satan holds steady at 10 murders, the video attacks the Book of Acts (obviously believing that God should overlook lying to the Holy Spirit, too).

The video’s pièce de résistance? God kills Jesus.

The video’s conclusion: God killed over 2 million people compared to Satan who killed just 10.

The ignorance about the death of the Christ and the number of murders by Satan is astounding. “Charlie,” - who posted the video to straighten me out - didn’t understand that when Satan lied to Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden, their sin was generational without end. Every single person after them was born in sin and even conceived in sin (Psalm 51:5). There are almost 8 billion people on the planet today, and there were billions on the Earth in the last 5,780 years, every single one of them was born in sin, and separated from God because of it. “Charlie” didn’t understand that Satan killed billions of people because of what he did to Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden. Satan is the biggest mass murderer in the history of the world.

Enter The Christ.

“Charlie” didn’t understand that God loves mankind so much that God became incarnate to die for the sins of mankind - including “Charlie” himself - based on God’s own LAW, Leviticus 17:11. “Charlie” didn’t understand that God is a God of integrity Who wouldn’t break His own LAW despite the enormous cost to Him to save sinners from eternal punishment because of what Satan did, and because of man’s endless rebellion against Him now.

As God incarnate, the Christ restored sight to the blind, healed a paralytic, fed 5,000 people by multiplying a minimal amount of food, fed 4,000 people by multiplying a minimal amount of food, turned water into wine, cleansed the lepers, restored hearing to the deaf, healed a man with a withered hand, healed the woman afflicted with a hemorrhage, healed a possessed mute, healed a possessed crippled woman, healed the possessed man in the tombs, restored Peter's ear after it was cut off, cast out demons, calmed a storm, walked on water, raised the dead, suspended the laws of the universe, and performed so many other miracles that if every one of them were written down, the whole world would not have room for the books that would be written (John 21:25).

The Jewish leaders hated Him because He claimed to be exactly who He is, the Jewish Messiah and the Son of God (Matthew 26:63-65). The religious Jews (the Pharisees) brought Him to the head of the Roman administration, Pontius Pilate, to sentence Him to death. Pilate found no fault in Him, but to satisfy the huge uprising of people, he sentenced Jesus to flogging. The legal limit for flogging was 40 lashes. The Romans flogged Him so much, and tortured Him in other ways to such an extent, that Scripture says that His appearance was beyond human likeness: Isaiah 52:14. As God in the flesh, He had the power to escape from it anytime He wanted to. But He loves man and wanted to reconcile us to Him, so He endured it. This is just the flogging, which shows a small fraction of what He endured:

After the horrendous beating that disfigured Him beyond human likeness, He was then mocked with a crown of thorns and more, and forced to carry His own heavy wooden cross when all His bones were out of joint: Psalm 22:14.

He was then nailed to a cross to be humiliated, and tortured to death. This link details His physical suffering: frames of physiopathology. This is no small price.

After 3 days, He rose from the dead again, sat at the right hand of the Father in heaven (Luke 22:69), and sent those who accept His sacrifice for the forgiveness of their sins, His Holy Spirit to live within us (Ezekiel 36:27; 1 Corinthians 3:16), for several reasons. Not only did God forgive us our sins if we accept the Christ as our Saviour, but He continues to gift Christians in many ways.

People today are as rebellious as ever. They’ve obviously never heard the expression “You can run but you can’t hide.”

Galatians 6:7
Do not be deceived, God is not mocked [He will not allow Himself to be ridiculed, nor treated with contempt nor allow His precepts to be scornfully set aside]; for whatever a man sows, this and this only is what he will reap.

Did you know that by 1924 when their caliphate ended, the ideology killed a total of two hundred, seventy million (270,000,000) people? And we didn’t have weapons of mass destruction or nuclear weapons. All of these people were butchered by the sword. Iran is working on those nuclear weapons now.

Here’s something legitimate to bellyache about:

Terror Attacks - This list is updated daily, and lists every single day all the way back to September 11, 2001. That’s approximately 7,000 consecutive days to date.

You might also want to look up the islamic Eid al-adha festival .

Remember:

"There is no drop of liquid as loved by Allah more than the liquid of blood." - Muslim cleric Abu Hamza

.

Christopher, if you think God was harsh in the Old Testament to people who broke His laws, violated His covenant, loved sin and Satan over Him, and chose them over being reconciled to Him, wait until the Christ returns to deal with society throwing God out of everything, and embracing and legalizing everything He forbids and abhors. When the Christ returns, they’re going to experience some serious fecal incontinence.

.

Thank you again for your A2A.

Gary Ayers #wingnut #sexist #dunning-kruger quora.com

Gary Ayers
Then please offer examples and data that prove the existence of The Patriarchy.

I really tend to think that it is like God to the feminists: It is apparently eternal, omiscient, omnipresent, and omnipotent. It has been crushing the female sex under its boot for ALL of human history, and yet each generation of feminists believes that THEY will be the generation that will FINALLY destroy it. Even though feminists NEVER have made up more than 7% of the female population of any country at ANY time since their movement began.

Gary Ayers
Oh PLEASE tell me you're not a male feminist. Those are documentedlybthe worst type of men.

Set aside the feminist propaganda for a moment: did you ever consider that maybe there was good reason ancient cultures governed their women and girls in such a way? Maybe with a 60% divorce rate (80%of which initiated by women), a 76% single-parent rate, and a 70%-and-increasing hookup culture participation rate, maybe women are proving they're lousy at picking men? And the rest of your diatribe is about 50 years out of date, isn't it? And if corporations actually could get away with paying women less than a man for the same work, why wouldn't they hire only women? Think how much would be saved on labor costs alone. But that isn't true and you and every other feminist fucking well knows it. And what rights have been taken away from women? Abortion was merely returned to the states to decide as their populations wish. It was not outlawed or “stripped” from women.

Society bends over backwards catering to women now. Show me where men have gotten women thrown in jail on false accusations. Why do women get less prison time than men for the same offense? Why is the entire domestic violence infrastructure built on the feminist Duluth model of sexual power, where the woman is automatically presumed to be the victim in every case of domestic violence, even in cases where it is CLEAR that the man is the victim? Why is sexual behavior in women treated as less serious or explained away when such behavior would be considered reprehensible in men, such as sexual assault of school students?

So just spare us the women are so oppressed schtick. The facts of today's world render it invalid.

Christopher Parks #sexist quora.com

Schopenhauer was extreme but he was right about a lot of things. Women behaving like adult children is one. Whether it’s wining and complaining, the inherent solipsism, the shirking of responsibility for their actions, or the overall lack of an ability to control emotions, women IN GENERAL have a childish mindset which makes sense because women are babied by our society. Obviously not all women but enough to be important enough to bring up in a discussion. Everyone these days are afraid to say anything that can been seen as negative about women because they think they’ll be labeled as misogynist, women haters, and for women “pick me’s”. The truth is women have a tendency to certain flaws just like men have a tendency to certain flaws and as free willed humans we can and I’d even venture to say should work to fix. Schopenhauer does a decent job at pointing them out. Does he seem to have some annimus towards women? Yes. Was he right about a lot of things? Also yes. Both can be true.

Terigi Ciccone #conspiracy #dunning-kruger quora.com

Question: What’s a dead giveaway that someone doesn’t know anything about climatology?

Terigi Ciccone: Two signs; first they ask questions that assume that global warming is real and humans can do something about it. The second signal is they accuse people who don’t buy the story of being climate change deniers.

Andrew Whitman #fundie quora.com

If humanity created a jail, does that make us a monster?

I am always fascinated by the assumptions inherent in this kind of question. Have you ever considered them? It assumes, first of all, that Hell is inherently evil. Why? Because, in our minds, it is unfair to humans. Which is to say that it is an injustice against humans. Which is to say that it is a sin against humans.

We humans are happy to love a God that does not offend us. We are happy to love a God that gives us what we want, provides for our needs, and accepts us with all of our faults. If he does not do these things, he is apparently unworthy of our love. And if he strikes us for offending him, then he is in the wrong. He should be judged by us and condemned if he sins against us.

So, you can see, then, that we agree that sin should be punished. We simply disagree on who God is. If God is God, then He is in the right, and our offense against Him deserves to be punished. But if humanity is God, then we are in the right, and God deserves to be punished for have the audacity of imposing on our sovereign self-determination.

Good luck enforcing your discipline on God. Good luck creating a Heaven where you can live eternally apart from God. Which, consequently, is the definition of Hell.

Bryan K Starr #fundie #wingnut quora.com

Lol really?

In the leftist corner you have senile Joe, a incredibly corrupt, traitorous, demented, soulless creature who is certainly going to hell.

In the right corner you have Trump, a man who seriously wants to push American values, including Christian values and like many people has his own faults to deal with.

I don't care if Trump cheated on his wife, or sold crack on a corner somewhere back in the 90s.

The question is; who is better for America?

Under Trump we had low prices on everything, secure borders, no dumb wars, etc, etc.

Under Biden it's been the exact opposite and magnified terribly for all of us, you included, and you have the audacity to question why any one would vote for Trump vs Biden?!

Are you retarded?

Bryan K Starr #fundie quora.com

They (atheists) certainly can't understand the Bible, which is strange and more evidence the Bible is the truth.

Many claim a college education and yet cannot comprehend even simple things and concepts in the Bible.

It mixelplixes their brains or something.

That's why you see them say the Bible has thousands of contradictions - except they're not contradictions, they're evidence of the atheists inability to comprehend scripture.

Their whole life is predicated on multiple lies to shield them from the truth.

Abiogenesis, macroevolution, there is no God, etc are the lies they willfully swallow.

The Bible says they are under strong delusion, a consequence of living a lie.

It's incredible.

Bryan K Starr #fundie #pratt #dunning-kruger quora.com

I love the evolutionist stories lol, they're so funny because they're so dumb.

The shrinking pond theory, the hooved dog crocodile turning into a whale because it wanted to swim lol, the apes coming down from the trees because they wanted to walk upright, and the flightless birds that grew wings over millions of years rofl.

Great comedy.

Bryan K Starr #racist #psycho quora.com

You apparently assume that the Palestinians are somehow innocent in all of this.

They are far from innocent, they teach their children to hate and kill Jews, the women also fully support Hamas.

In earlier times any nation would've just wiped them all out.

That's why they should've thought about all this before attacking Israel, but they're stupid Muslims and as usual, are getting their asses kicked for being stupid.

Israel needs to just carpet bomb the whole area and be done with it.

Bryan K Starr #fundie #racist quora.com

You mean Islam.

Hitler admired the fanaticism that Islam provides. These idiots will go kill themselves because they think God told them to.

In theory it is great for warfare, but the muzrats are known for their cowardice and treachery.

They've been getting their ass kicked back and forth for centuries. Greeks, Alexander, Rome, America, whoever.

They make a good fight of it at first but as soon as there's a chance they might lose they break camp and haul ass.

But, with WW2 German soldiers, such fanaticism would've aided the German army very well.

They still wouldn't have won though.