new

It’s obviously extremely hurtful for men whose dearest wish is to pass as women to be told they really don't. I wish they hadn’t been lied to and misled by gender doctors, who promised them the impossible. 1/9

These men were promised that if they took cross-sex hormones and underwent genital amputation, they would magically transform to such a degree that everyone, but specifically women, would see them as women. 2/9

Those men want that so badly, and they are so self-centred, that in response to such promises they take it upon themselves to enter women’s spaces as if by right. And they interpret women’s silence as proof that women see them as women. 3/9

That silence is motivated by kindness, embarrassment and fear. Women are told they will lose their jobs – or get a punch in the face – if they say that they can see these men are men. It takes astonishing narcissism to interpret our forced acquiescence as genuine acceptance. 4/9

I wish we didn’t have to tell these men what they so much don’t want to hear: that they don’t pass as women and never will. That they’re not welcome in our spaces. But it’s on them. They forced their way in, and can hardly object when we finally say NO. 5/9

Growing opposition to gender-identity ideology is giving an increasing number of women the courage to tell these men that we see them as men, and that they must now get out of places they were never entitled to be. 6/9

We shouldn’t have to do this. Doctors should never have lied to these men, still less told them they had the right to intrude on women’s privacy. These men were sold quack medicine on a false promise, and now they are in a very difficult position. 7/9

I feel sorry for them. But women’s rights are on the line, and we’re half the population. We can’t indulge them any more. And so we’re saying politely: You’re men. Stop trying to control our language. Stop coming into our spaces. 8/9

No, you don’t pass. No, you’re not welcome. No, we’re not “cis”, we’re just women, and you’re not. I understand it hurts to hear this, but you have left us no choice but to say it. And if you don’t listen when we say it politely, you can expect to be told less politely. 9/9

The difference between actual civil rights movements and the ‘trans’ movement is that none of them fought for rights on the basis of something they were not, or passing themselves of as another demographic of people. Black people didn’t say “Hey, we’re white!” Women didn’t say “Hey, we’re men!” and gay people didn’t say “Hey’ we’re straight!” They fought for rights on the basis of what set them apart.

But ‘trans’ is about claiming the identities and rights of others. Men claiming to be women. Women claiming to be men. Straight men claiming to be lesbians.

It is the only movement that wants the right to identify into demographics of people that already exist within their own right.

It’s a form of colonisation. Not only that, under the guise of ‘trans’ the meaning of words and material reality all have to be turned upside down to ‘accommodate’ this colonisation. Actual women are now ‘cis’ women so that men who call themselves ‘trans women’ can be seen to be every inch a women as them, even if they have an extra couple of inches dangling between their legs. Actual lesbians become ‘cis’ lesbians and are told they can’t have female only events anymore as they’re be breaching anti-discrimination laws that prioritise the demands of blokes who call themselves lesbians.

This is co-opting, appropriation, colonisation and the rewriting of reality. It is identicide: by trying to identify into the class of people they don’t belong to, they are killing off what they actual class of people represents. All because they are intent on killing off their own true identities.

We’re seeing how dangerous this is in sports, in prisons in rape shelters, in toilets / bath rooms / changing rooms / hospital wards, etc. It’s becoming more clear every day.

And it’s all rooted in a movement trying to make us believe they are not what they actually are.

No other movement has ever done that, it’s unique to the ‘trans’ movement. Just like the story of “The Emperor’s New Clothes” it was a sham from the very beginning.

And that’s why Monty here is trying to compare ‘trans’ activism and the response to it to other movements, to make it look like it’s the same, that ‘trans’ is simply ‘the next frontier’ and that we should learn from how actual civil rights movements have historically been discredited and not let the same fate befall the ‘trans’ movement.

[...]