#fundie

God says you have to do everything I tell you to!

David J. Stewart #fundie jesusisprecious.org

Throw your English Standard Version (ESV) that Bob Jones University sells and promotes into the garbage pail! Don't get sucked into dispensational teaching that idolizes present-day manmade Israel (founded in 1948). Here's an example of what the heresy of Zionism does to warp men's minds. Here is another example; and another! Zionism rots men's brains, turning them into superstitious quacks and junk theologians! Be aware parents and teach your children, that Luciferians are deliberately engineering society to commit fornication. If you don't believe me, watch this shocking video screenshot from YouTube of singer Taylor Swift. Sex is the God of Satanism, and they want to corrupt every teenager, through immoral media! Matthew 10:16, “Behold, I send you forth as sheep in the midst of wolves: be ye therefore wise as serpents, and harmless as doves.” You need to be informed that a group of Satanists, operating in clandestine behind Hollywood and the music industry, want to turn every youth into a sex pervert! I tell you with all certainty that Taylor Swift doesn't love you! (What's with the creepy goat scene... bestiality?). I am amazed how stupid parents are, and that parents don't care about this perversion, and merely go along with it. Something is very wrong with people who are okay with this filth! If enough caring angry parents complained, something would be done about it. At a bare minimum, parents can express their angry views online to expose ungodly reprobates like Taylor Swift, who influence children to become casualties.

Our whole rotten society is saturated with demonic influences! I wrote this article to open your eyes. Everything being targeted at kids today is meant to ruin them! Evolution is a blatant lie, intended to blind children from the truth of a divine Creator—the omnipotent (all powerful) God of the universe! All of the promiscuous music videos are intended to seduce young people into thinking in terms of sex, sex, sex! They want children to become filthy homosexuals. And now parents and doctors are being pressured by the federal government to allow transgender children to embrace their sexual identity crisis at age 3. I'm not kidding! Lately I have been humming a popular old Patsy Cline song called: CRAZY!!! This world has gone totally insane!

Rodrigo Duterte #psycho #fundie newsinfo.inquirer.net

In what appears to be a mocking comment against his critics, President Rodrigo Duterte said Friday God promised him that all victims of extrajudicial killings would go to heaven.

“Enjoy your human rights in heaven,” Duterte said, addressing critics of his drug war that had killed thousands after he assumed office.

“God promised me all extrajudicial killing victims will go to heaven, iyan ang hiningi ko sa Dios. Sabi naman ng Dios, ‘pwede, pwede [That’s what I asked from God and God said, it can be done, it can be done],’” Duterte said.

“Gawin ko ba iyan kung walang guarantee? Kawawa naman, [Will I do it without guarantee? What a pity] now, they have consolation, they will go to heaven,” Duterte said as he led the inauguration of the Northern Mindanao Wellness and Reintegration Center in Malaybalay City, Bukidnon.

“They’re doing drugs and they go to hell? Now, we have a consolation, they’re going to heaven. I said, God, just allow them, I am not asking for anything,” he said.

“Reserve the hottest place in hell for me and may I burn until eternity,” he said, but added, “If there’s hell.”

“Why would God create an oven for his creation? I said I have a God but it is not your stupid God,” he added.

Paul Bury #fundie familyfriendlygaming.com

Family Friendly Gaming, the industry leader in covering the family friendly video games is giving the trolls and haters some attention for a change. Normally we ignore the haters. Normally we ignore the trolls. I felt like giving them some attention for a change. Why would I do that? For a couple of reasons. One – I am open minded. Two – I believe in honest, transparent, and genuine communications. Three – I believe in challenging others mentally. Four – I care about others. Five – I want everyone to get better. Six – I want them to turn from their evil ways and come to a relationship with Jesus Christ. Am I throwing pearls to pigs?

It does not shock me to see all kinds of evil things said about me, and everyone else associated with Family Friendly Gaming from haters. It saddens me that they are not capable of recognizing their own hatred. I want to be very clear. I do not hate them. I do not hate them when they are saying all kinds of horrible things about me. I find it disturbing that they do not connect their entertainment choices with how wicked their tongues are. I am shocked they are not performing self-analysis. Going to other haters to reinforce their radical, extremist, zealot beliefs is not reality. Trying to diminish people of faith exposes them even more. I am not insulting them by speaking these truths in love. I want the haters to stop hating.

Some of the comments that I find most interesting is the disbelief in the opinion that evolution is a religious belief. There are plenty of resources that discuss this opinion that can easily be found online for anyone with an open mind and willing to listen. I did so and came to an informed decision. Another popular complaint is this game rated higher than that game. We have said for a great many years we give a diverse opinion from the worldly gaming sites. We also believe in obedience to God as opposed to rebellion. So our opinions refuse to join in the rebellion. Another fun comment is related to games are just to have fun. This has been dealt with in the Video Game Lies book, and in the magazine multiple times. Again anyone open minded can take the time to research that if they are open minded.
The drive by complainers are not doing their due diligence when the answers to their questions have already been provided. Maybe my expectations of them is too high. Maybe I give them too much credit. Ultimately the haters are proving me completely and totally right about their entertainment choices. All of their venom and hatred are not making the world a better place. We focus on as many positive things as we can. That makes the world a better place. I was once like them, and wonder why they cannot celebrate my diversity.

I hope you have a wonderful rest of your day.


God bless,
Paul Bury
Emperor
Family Friendly Gaming

Cheryl Chumley #wingnut #fundie #racist #homophobia gopusa.com

Christians Against Christian Nationalism, a movement driven by church leaders and executives of faith-based groups, just put pen to paper to warn Americans that “Christian nationalism” is becoming a concern because, in their words, it often serves as a cover for “white supremacy and racial subjugation.”
Sounds dire. Until you peer past the curtain, that is.

This is a campaign led by far-left types who use their religious positions to push their far-left ideas.
This is a campaign filled with self-proclaiming Christians whose Christian ideals and beliefs are, in strict biblical teaching, very un-Christian.

Hmm. Suddenly, the “Christian nationalism” they spit on becomes a pin the proud patriot, and particularly, the proud Christian patriot, should wear.

Among the “Christians Against Christian Nationalism” endorsers: There’s the Rev. Dr. Paul Baxley, executive coordinator of the Cooperative Baptist Fellowship, who supported the CBF’s opening of doors to gay church employees.
There’s Sister Simone Campbell, executive director of the Network Lobby for Catholic Social Justice, who openly backed the pro-LGBTQ bill, H.R. 5, The Equality Act, that would have barred discrimination based on “sex, gender identity and sexual orientation” — and who denounced President Donald Trump’s crackdown on refugees as “antithetical to our faith.”

There’s Tony Campolo, a founder of the Red Letter Christian Movement, who called for “full acceptance of Christian gay couples into the church,” as he put it, in June of 2015.
There’s Patrick Carolan, executive director of Franciscan Action Network, who just joined with more than 100 civil rights activists and social justice leaders to “pledge solidarity with LGBTQ Catholic school teachers,” Metro Weekly reported.

There’s Paula Dempsey, director of partner relations with Alliance for Baptists, who in 2017 said her staff were “thrilled” at the hiring of a lesbian couple to serve as senior members of a Washington, D.C., church — and that she hoped other churches would “have ministers who would identify as members of the LGBTQ community.”
There’s more. Many more.

But the big question is this: Just how “Christian” is this “Christians Against Christian Nationalism” movement in the first place?

After all, if these CACN types see the Bible as their rally call to fight against borders — which is another way of bucking the rule of law — why can’t they see it’s this same Bible that makes clear homosexuality, to God, is an abomination?

Grain, meet salt.

Or maybe, more to the point, conservatives, meet the newest leftist attack. It’s far-left ideology masked as religious righteousness. And it’s as wicked as it is clever.

An example? Here’s one. So when CACN endorsers write that “conflating religious authority with political authority is idolatrous and often leads to oppression of minority and other marginalized groups,” they’re not referring, say, to Sharia law, and how its Muslim adherents, working within the confines of government, toss homosexuals off buildings, or publicly cane women for the crime of walking in public without a face covering. No. They’re talking about Christian conservatives who stand for the rule of law.

They’re talking about Christian conservatives who believe in traditional marriage.

They’re talking about Trump, his supporters and those who believe in border controls.

They’re trying to draw moral equivalencies between religions that behead those of different faiths and religions of those in the Republican Party.

CACN endorsers say this: “Patriotism does not require us to minimize our religious convictions.” And this: “People of all faiths and none have the right and responsibility to engage constructively in the public square.”

They mean this: “Leave Rep. Omar Ilhan alone.”

They forget this: America was founded on Judeo-Christian principles, with an emphasis on both the importance of the individual and the concept of original sin that are spelled out in the Bible. From there sprang our governing documents.

Truly, it’s easy to keep Christian preaching out of the public square. It’s easy to confine the formal teaching of the Bible from a religious perspective to Sunday morning pews.

What’s not so easy, though, is to remove Judeo-Christian principles from our government — while still keeping the government our founders envisioned intact. Bluntly put, the country would crumble from within without its moral compass of Judeo-Christian teachings, without its base values of Ten Commandments principles, without its guiding belief of individual rights coming from God, not government.

Without its borders.

Without its traditions, and yes, traditional values. Traditional, biblically sound values.

Calling out such viewpoints as Christian nationalism, either subtly or overtly, is to deride our entire nation.
The takeaway is this: On CAGN, beware the wolves in sheep’s clothing.

Patsy Lambert #fundie newberryobserver.com

God has a plan for our life
By Patsy Lambert - Contributing Columnist

I love the story in the Bible about Joseph. God took the evil his brothers did to him and turned it into something good.

The brothers sold Joseph to the Ishmaelites and they sold him. He ended up in Pharaoh’s house. Joseph was over all in his masters house. One day Pharaoh’s wife told a lie on Joseph and he ended up in prison. The butler and baker were in prison also. They both dreamed dreams and Joseph told them what the dreams meant.

After two years Pharaoh dreamed a dream and Joseph revealed the dream.

God had a plan for Joseph’s life. Pharaoh made Joseph ruler over all the land of Egypt. There was a famine in the land so Jacob sent his sons to get food for them. After a period of time Joseph revealed himself to his brothers. They were troubled when they found out it was Joseph, because of what they did to him.

“Now therefore be not grieved, nor angry with yourselves, that ye sold me hither: for God did send me before you to preserve life.” Genesis 45: 5.

Joseph took care of his family. He wasn’t angry with them. He knew that God had used him in a mighty way.

We may not understand why certain things happen to us but, God has a plan for each of us. Will we be obedient and follow God’s plan?

It’s amazing how God took something that was meant for evil and turned it into something good. God does have a plan for our life.

Mark Bradshaw #fundie #homophobia #pratt disqus.com

(Excerpts of a conversation in progress - some content removed because context can’t be provided)

“No, because rapists and murderers are not consenting, they're abusing others. Once again, you do not understand informed consent.” ----- I do understand what informed consent it. But you still haven’t cited why informed consent makes behavior moral or not.

“No, because you do not understand the concept of consent.” ---- I do. And a child can provide consent. Your hang-up is “legal” consent. If the legal system has no definition of age required for consent, is having relations with an 8 year old moral or immoral? And why?

“You fail to understand the difference between consent and abuse.” ----- You’ve shown NO connection between the two. You’ve FAILED to show why a child cannot give consent – other than “It’s the law”. So, I ask again, since slavery was legal, is slavery moral?

“If they find nothing wrong with rape or murder, yes their morals are wrong.” ----- HOW can you make this claim that their morals are wrong?

“All right, go ahead and abuse a child.” ----- Again, HOW is it abuse if (the child) consents?

“Says the law. Age of consent laws exist for a reason.” ----- So, the law is the arbiter of what is/isn’t moral? I guess slavery was moral, right? What about countries/societies that don’t have laws regarding age of consent – are relations with children moral in those instances?

“And you have elected to believe your denomination is right and the rest are wrong.” ----- Not “the rest” – just those who reject God and His word. But the same could be said of YOU, right? You reject anyone that doesn’t believe the same way you do. How is that any different than what you accuse me of doing?

“- No, I'm asserting that you have what everyone else has - an interpretation, which means you're just as wrong as everyone else and no one can agree about things because you're all so sure you've chosen the 100% correct understanding.” ----- Upon WHAT AUTHORITY can you claim that I am wrong? How can YOU be sure that YOU’VE CHOSEN the “correct” morals? You cannot even cite an authoritative source for those morals.

“You're trying to give it the answer you want, but you can't do that.” ---- I am using how words are defined.

“People don't commit murder because they believe it's acceptable...come on. They do it out of desperation in their situation and because they no longer care and have lost the ability to reason.” ----- So, now you are a psychologist and can claim to know the motivations of every murderer?

“I love the way you think any two people on earth can just make the decision to copulate and it's going to work out peachy.” ----- When did I ever assert that any behavior will “work out peachy”? Why do you insist on asserting that I’ve said things I haven’t actually said?

“Desires you feel you have the right to tell people to squash because of your religion.” ----- FALSE. All that I’ve simply stated is that homosexual behavior is immoral. People “squash” emotions and desires all of the time.

“Not confused at all. I never said our parents got everything right.” ----- Yet you DID say that you learn your morals from your parents – that your parents are your moral authority.

“We get older and our brains develop and we learn for ourselves what good morals are.” ----- “Good” based upon WHAT? You are essentially saying that YOU are your own moral authority. If someone’s morals allow for murder or rape, is that acceptable? If not, then upon WHAT AUTHORITY can one assert something is good/bad, moral/immoral?

“that as we learn to think for ourselves that we don't need a holy book to tell us what's right and wrong.” ---- Upon WHAT BASIS can you determine something to be right or wrong, moral or immoral? You haven’t answered that simple question. You keep going on and on about “learning what is right and wrong”, yet have NEVER cited a source for what is right and wrong. If someone grows up learning that murder and rape are moral, how can you say that murder and rape aren’t moral?

“This is the last time I'm going to humor you on this subject since you don't know and have no desire to know the difference between consent and abuse.” ----- Again, you continue to FAIL to cite an authoritative source for why abuse is wrong, or where not providing legal consent is a qualifier of abuse. You have FAILED to show why, in a society where there is no law regarding age of consent, it is immoral to have relations with a child who has consented.

“We take rapists and murderers out of circulation when they engage in this behavior because it's abuse and it's illegal.” ----- But WHY are those acts immoral? Why are “abuse” and “illegal behavior” immoral? WHAT AUTHORITY asserts that these acts are immoral?

“We don't do the same with homosexuals because they decide to engage in a sexual act because it's not abuse. No one gets hurt.” ----- Whether one gets hurt or not doesn’t determine morality.

“Yes. Age of consent laws aren't absolutely perfect and no two countries draw the lines in the same places, but they do the best they can.” ----- So, if a country/society define no legal age limits on consent, having relations with a 6 year old is acceptable/moral?

“The 20 year old man goes to jail. Quite rightly.” ---- What about in countries that don’t have any limits on age of consent? Is that 20 year old man having relations with a 6 year old girl moral or immoral?

Mark Bradshaw #fundie disqus.com

(Excerpts of a conversation in progress - some content removed because context can’t be provided)

“We're not living in the time of slaves.” ---- Yet people DID and that was LAW at that time – yet you contend that laws determine morality. Is/was owning another human being moral?
“You are trying to corner me into saying that our morality comes from the Bible. Well, it doesn't.” ----- How can you claim where my morals originate? My morals are based in God’s morals – as enumerated in the Bible. You have NO AUTHORITY to tell me, or anyone else, where my morals come from.
(On the age of consent): “We have to draw the line somewhere because until a child's brain is fully developed, it cannot and should not be held responsible.” ----- So, your “line” isn’t really about consent, but is about ability. Why do you believe a child cannot consent to something? Why do you believe that there is some magical point at which consent given is acceptable?
“It's morally wrong for about a million reasons, not least of which we don't need a bunch of teen and pre-teen parents running around who aren't mature or capable of caring for babies.” ----- So, yet again, you are imposing YOUR morals on society.
“Allowing perverts to abuse young children IS a far worse thing than allowing two consenting homosexual adults to physically enjoy themselves, and if you can't see that or need a holy book to tell you why it's wrong is downright shameful.” ----- You still have yet to articulate how a child is harmed in this scenario. You just keep asserting “harm” without ever articulating how harm occurs. And, it isn’t about “enjoyment” – it is about what is/isn’t moral. I am sure people engaging in immoral behavior are enjoying themselves – why would they voluntarily engage in behavior if they didn’t find it enjoyable?
(On rape/murder being immoral): “can't see for yourself that it's one person enforcing their will over another which goes right against the Golden Rule.” ----- Upon WHAT BASIS can you claim that the Golden Rule is moral? So far, you have failed to answer this simple question.
“Now tell me why you need a Bible to tell you that's wrong.” ----- Because without an authoritative source, all you have is YOUR OWN beliefs of what is right and wrong. If that is all you believe is necessary to form morals, then how can you force YOUR morals on anyone else by asserting that the Golden Rule is moral?
“We don't NEED people like you to "rebuke" what you call "sins".” ----- Again, it is NOT about what I call sin, but IS about what God calls sin. Sorry you are so confused.
“We need you to mind your own business because we have the right to have chosen to believe differently than you do and don't require the morals you have chosen to follow.” ----- So, a person who believes it is moral to rape or murder is acceptable? Are the morals of individuals who believe it is acceptable to rape and murder acceptable in your world, since that is the morals THEY CHOSE?

Kris Harpster #fundie quora.com

My choice is to not respond. It’s not my place to arm wrestle anyone over to my belief. If another “hears” truth in my words, and that leads them on a path in search of more truth, then I have planted a seed. If another resonates completely with my words, then that person is validated in their belief, and feels deeply seen and understood. I don’t personally believe that spiritual understanding can be taught to those who are not in a spiritual position to be taught.

I know, from my experience, spiritual understanding is not an intellectual enterprise. It’s truth beyond words and intellectual concepts. The intellect can be utilized to help illuminate truth, but this is useless as a tool to convince a nonbeliever. A nonbeliever doesn’t understand the truth is beyond intellect, and thinks that if the believer cannot win an intellectual debate, he is disproven. When the truth is, the intellectual debate is entirely outside the realm of spiritual truth.The intellect can only be used to indicate. The reality is beyond words. Using arguments made of words causes the reality to be lost.

Laura Wood #fundie #conspiracy thinkinghousewife.com

[From "The Robber Pope"]

MORE AND MORE Catholics are coming to the inescapable realization that Jorge Bergoglio, aka “Pope” Francis, is — to use an old-fashioned, but indispensable word — a heretic.

Very few, however, have drawn the logical conclusions from this fact:

1. By divine law a public heretic cannot be pope.
2. The root of Francis’s heresies lies in the Vatican II Council, which is responsible for the less obvious but no less outrageous heresies of his immediate predecessors, John Paul II and Benedict XVI.
3. Francis’s open contempt for Church teachings on sexual morality has pushed many Catholics over the edge and prompted these latest accusations of heresy, but equally egregious are Vatican II heresies on the nature of the Church, on religious liberty, on ecumenism, on the historical events of the Incarnation and more, of which all the Vatican II claimants to the papacy, not just Francis, are guilty.

The papal chair is empty. Papal succession continues in the material sense only. Jorge Bergoglio doesn’t even want to be pope. See more from Fr. Anthony Cekada here and here. He writes:

Vatican II represented the triumph of the modernist heresy, dominated as it was by theologians who were, as the Louvain professor Jürgen Mettepennigen said, “inheritors of modernism.” The poisoned seeds of theological error were sown during the Council with all its yes/buts, existentialist blathering, equivocations, ambiguities, work-arounds, silences, poisoned neologisms, redefinitions, false equivalences, destroyed distinctions and the rest.

Bergoglio is nothing more than one more poisoned fruit from a thoroughly poisoned garden, and he has merely been applying the principles that Vatican II gave him.

Unfortunately due to slick marketing and the natural desire for peace, harmony and God’s love in a fallen world, quite a few innocently perceive a benevolent message in Bergoglio’s frequent outrages.

All this adds to the feeling that we are living through a bad sitcom. (Here’s his latest.) Francis drags the papacy through the mud. He does what a true pope can never do: He harms souls. Turn the TV off and think about what all this means. Your refusal to recognize him as pope matters.

Lady Checkmate #fundie disqus.com

Lady Checkmate’s headline: “Abhor "that" which is evil..."that", not "who"”

Those with skewed world views often accuse Bible-Believing Christians of hating them...which is a bald-faced lie. We love them, but we abhor sin and evil behavior ("that which is evil") as God's word instructs us to. I repeat, we abhor evil sinful behavior...behavior like pedophilia, we abhor...behavior like adultery (and all sexual immorality), we abhor...unrighteous violence (stalking, death threats, rape fantasies, creating kill lists, etc.,), we abhor. It is not the "who" or the individual that we abhor...it is the behavior "that" we abhor.

We share the gospel with the world, even as they threaten to kill us for it. We spend time in prayer, interceding and crying out to God for them, even as they create kill lists with our names on it-because we love them as God has instructed us to and we truly desire God's will for their life. My prayer is that even though they hate us for sharing Life and Truth with them. Even though they wish death on us for praying for them. Even though they despise us, stalk us, harass us and threaten our lives, we will continue to pray for them. God is not mocked. We will continue to seek God. We will continue to love them because it pleases God and we are submitted to Him and His will. The world's hate will not stop God's Love.

Romans 12: 4-10 (KJV)
4 For as we have many members in one body, and all members have not the same office:
5 So we, being many, are one body in Christ, and every one members one of another.
6 Having then gifts differing according to the grace that is given to us, whether prophecy, let us prophesy according to the proportion of faith;
7 Or ministry, let us wait on our ministering: or he that teacheth, on teaching;
8 Or he that exhorteth, on exhortation: he that giveth, let him do it with simplicity; he that ruleth, with diligence; he that sheweth mercy, with cheerfulness.
9 Let love be without dissimulation. Abhor that which is evil; cleave to that which is good.
10 Be kindly affectioned one to another with brotherly love; in honour preferring one another;

Brethren, we will be starting a separate community for us so that we may continue to fellowship, continue to encourage one another, and continue to share Truth with those who are truly seeking Truth. I will tag each of you to our new community when it is established. These are the end times, and we are here for a purpose...may God's will be done...forever.

David Barton #fundie rightwingwatch.org

Earlier this month, Religious Right pseudo-historian David Barton asserted on his “WallBuilders Live” radio program that “religious folks” are entitled to “more protection” under the First Amendment than everyone else.

Barton was praising recent Supreme Court rulings having to do with the issues of religious liberty and expression, such as the Bladensburg cross case, and hailed the Court for supposedly recognizing that the Founding Father intended for religious citizens to be granted “added, special protection” under the Constitution … three times more protection, to be exact.

“Secular speech is protected by the Constitution,” Barton said, “but religious speech has several protections in the First Amendment.”

Barton said that while everyone has a right to free speech, religious speech and expression are “protected by three clauses,” which means that his speech is entitled to “more protection, if you will, than just normal, secular speech.”

He insisted that the idea that secular speech or expression should receive the same protections as religious speech or expression is unconstitutional because “that’s not what the First Amendment gave me.”

“It gave me more protection because I get my speech but if it’s religious, I get it twice, and if it is religious with others, I get it three times,” Barton claimed. “In addition to free speech, there is also free exercise of religion, which often involves free speech. For me to exercise my faith means I will speak about it, I will live it out, I will activate it, I will do it. And, by the way, I have the right to assembly, so I can get together with other believers and we can act out our faith … While religious folks have at least three different forms of protection under the First Amendment for their speech, secular folks have their protections as well for speech and assembly, but they just don’t have the same religious motivations.”

When Barton’s son, Tim, tried to clarify that all citizens “have the exact same protections that a religious person does,” Barton disputed that assessment.

“You actually get added protection because it singles out your religious expression,” he said, “That’s a level of protection the Founding Fathers wanted to make sure that religious folks had, so they singled that out to give, if you will, added protection if you’re a religious folk … The First Amendment says, ‘Hey, religion is so vitally important that you get added, special protection.’”

u/[deleted] #sexist #fundie reddit.com

[Unironic Post] How s-x causes violence in thought and behavior and why it need to be banned

[Unironic Post] How s-x causes violence in thought and behavior and why it need to be banned
First off, I am very glad I found this board. I have been campaigning against s-x my whole life and am glad others are joining the movement. The creators of the content here are geniuses.

S-x is nothing more than an act of violent domination over another human being. This is not very difficult to figure out if one spends significant amounts of time browsing through p-rn sites (I do NOT recommend that you do this). Most s-x acts involve some sort of violence against the recipient, and I don’t want to go into detail about this because I want to keep this post NSFW. However, if one of you is familiar with what I’m talking about, it is very easy to understand what I mean. Indeed, in some cases it goes to extreme lengths involving some sort of simulated enslavement of the recipient.

This is not a coincidence. If you observe the animal kingdom, you will see that most mating rituals involve some sort of violence. This can be particularly observed in species of birds such as ducks and chickens. Our ancestors were not much different, and in a time when we did not have stable laws, forced s-x was very common. In a lot of cases, this was simply out of necessity, as a man’s s-xual urges are often uncontrollable because of the pressing biological need to reproduce. It was also a display of dominance, since women generally prefer strong males in order to produce similarly strong and healthy offspring.

So s-x is very often nothing more than a dominance display. The fact that the majority of women have fantasies about forced s-x and domination proves this, and most men are happy to oblige. It is not simply a means of reproduction, at least not today. With modern contraceptives, s-x is usually some just to fulfill base animal instincts instead of simple reproduction. Furthermore, we are now developing means to develop children without needing to resort to s-x. It is therefore completely unnecessary.

When one has s-x, he releases his base animal nature which causes him to act violently in other areas of life. Once one has already committed to one violent act, he finds it much easier to do so in other spheres of life. It is no coincidence that history’s mass murderers were all s-xhavers, while some of history’s most revered prophets and teachers of peace were celibate. It should therefore be forcibly discontinued among humans.

S-xual desire should be treated as a mental disorder. One could say that this is not right because it is natural, but other disorders such as schizophrenia, bipolar, OCD, autism, etc. are natural as well. S-x makes people unhappy as it is something that can never be satisfied and people want more and more of it, therefore causing suffering. Therefore, it is clearly a mental disorder, and can be treated with medication to inhibit desire. Procreation of the species should be accomplished artificially. Once this is done, we can enter an age of eternal peace where men and women are treated equally and would enable us to travel the universe. We would do so peacefully, without intent or desire to conquer alien species. A universal age of prosperity would then be achievable and all would be content and fulfilled.

Thank you for reading.

Conservapedia #fundie #wingnut conservapedia.com

A welfare queen is a worthless person in society who mooches off the government and wants them to supply them their daily bread. Welfare queens are condemned in the Holy book as not having earned the salt in their bread. They often have babies as teenagers and have more so that the government will give them more money so they don't have to work for a red cent.
Welfare queens are all too common in the United States because of the government giving them all this money they can't afford to give. They also get tax exemptions and food stamps. Liberal Democrats and other godless heathens are responsible.

Steven R. #fundie #homophobia #wingnut simplychristian.fandom.com

Fred McFeely Rogers (March 20, 1928 – February 27, 2003) was an American television host, liberal activist, and “minister” belonging to the liberal Presbyterian “Church” that supports same-sex “marriages,” “sex change” operations paid for by taxpayers, as well as such bogus theology as works-based salvation, national church hierarchy, and “real presence” based communion instead of the biblical symbolic understanding of the Lord’s Supper.
Rogers was the host of a publicly funded television program called Mister Rogers’ Neighborhood. This program showed Rogers cringeworthily interacting with kids in a way that is strongly inappropriate, and luring them in with extreme examples of “self-acceptance” which denies the sin nature that exists even in children. Rogers was also a puppeteer who often brought kids into the “land of make-believe” where he interacted with many people, including a police officer named “Officer Clemons” who was a sodomite in real life and Rogers was okay with that, as long as Clemons wasn’t going to gay bars or dating men. This was only to preserve the “Neighborhood,” as back in this time people still had godliness and shame. Rogers in one scene protested the racist tendencies of that day by washing his feet in the same kiddie pool with Clemons, who is an African American. Rogers could have made this bold statement of racial unity with an African American man who wasn’t a sodomite, and it would have been one of the few good things he did in his career.

Rogers was able to talk Congress into funding his disaster of a program in 1969. Later on, Rogers retired from this program and then passed away. He has become a false idol in the internet world, being revered by many including so-called “Christians” who think that being Christlike is being a soft spoken weirdo in a sweater vest. It’s strongly speculated that Rogers was a bisexual as well, from an interview where he said he’s found both men and women attractive. Even giving him the benefit of the doubt on the one, he still supported the sodomite Clemons.

Rogers is being portrayed by accused child abuser Tom Hanks in an upcoming movie, and it makes Rogers seem even more embarrassing given he sounds like a slightly faster talking Forrest Gump (who was autistic/mentally incapacitated) in the movie.

Aluζky #fundie twitter.com

"Animals can’t consent"←And earth can't be spherical, right?

Scientific evidence on animals mating rituals and language shows that they can consent to sex. Zoosexual porn also shows animals consenting to sex with humans.

Zoosexuality is not a mental illness, it can't be cured.

Lady Checkmate #fundie disqus.com

Lady Checkmate’s headline: “Reprobate Pete Buttigieg questions some GOP lawmakers' faith over their stance on minimum wage”

Theologian Jonathan Morris weighs in on Pete Buttigieg's remarks calling some Republican senators 'so-called Christians' because of their refusal to raise the minimum wage.

https://video.foxnews.com/v/6066131434001/#sp=show-clips

Mick Williams:
And this from a so-called Christian himself. Eyeroll.

Lady Checkmate:
Pete is very lost and confused. I pity him...and not because I’m in any way better than him. Yes, he has earthly influence, but long term...he has nothing. Sadly, he has been greatly deceived and runs the risk of spending eternity in hell separated from the only living God. My heart weeps for Pete. It’s as if he doesn’t know...as if he hasn’t heard that God is NOT mocked. Everyone will have to give an account of what they did with this life and rather or not we lived it for Jesus Christ:
image

(image says: THE GREATEST DECEPTION OF THE DEVIL IS WHEN HE TRICKS SOMEONE INTO THINKING THEY ARE SAVED WHEN THEY ARE NOT. NARROW IS THE WAY, WHICH LEADETH UNTO LIFE, AND FEW BE THERE THAT FIND IT. MATTHEW 7:14)

kingjameswriter1965 #fundie #conspiracy kjbisjesuschrist.blog

[Re. the December 2018 - January 2019 US federal government shutdown]

We’re in bad shape, people, when our own elected (or should I say, SELECTED) leaders go shutting down all we depend on as the nation sinks further into more sin, depravity and decadence. I believe the highest leaders were due to make sacrifices to Satan during these five weeks. Sound shocking? Wake up and do some research. A lot of secrets are being made manifest plainly nowadays. I mean, who cares, right? We just wanna get drunk and PAHTAY!!

Some femcels #fundie reddit.com

Re: Living with a Stacy roommate

(froggy997)

I lived with stacies before and it really does punch you right in the face how different their world is. Ppl always dropping by, enthusiastically volunteering to help them with homework, bringing Starbucks just as a 'I was on my way and got something for you), friends always listening intently to the most boring dribble...I could go on.

(CatSweets)

I was on my way and got something for you

RIGHT???
One thing that always got me puzzeled is how stacies always have people giving them things out of nowhere. My dream is to be given random gifts just because of my beauty (never gonna happen, LOL)

(Icy_Tradition)

waiting for the day where earth blows up...

(vcardthrow1)

"She has. SO. MANY. FRIENDS." This shit.

It just rots you from the inside. When you see how easy it is for attractive people who have been treated as attractive their whole life, and have developed into interesting open people as a result....GOD.

And you can't resent them for their good fortune but it's like seeing someone sprout wings.

It makes you ache from a place of deep bitterness.

I've come to feel others' incredible happiness and possession of things I literally couldn't even imagine in my wildest dreams of friendship or love or success is life mocking me directly, rebuking me.

(AshamedThrew)

Yep. Fuck this life tbh. The Hunchback of Notre Dame could be my twin except he’s a man so at least he got people caring about him.

(Raida2)

She has. SO. MANY. FRIENDS.

90% of Stacy's have HUGE social circles with minimal effort, it's actually insane. They always know someone or know someone who knows that someone, and those people are happy to help her out. Becky's can also have HUGE social circles and be super well-liked by everyone but it takes a good personality. But Stacy has it effortless.

femaleaspie1999 #fundie reddit.com

How is prostitution more predatory than casual sex? This is something never explained

In casual sex there are women getting choked and having violence thrown on to them so why exactly is prostitution worse? It seems like a bunch of moralizing to me to say "It's OK to have casual sex all the time for no money and be degraded tee hee." whereas if a woman gets paid for it they think NO THAT'S WRONG. Moids are angry at prostitutes and strippers because they gamed the system well and offered a product.

Are you a troll account? Everytime you post its like reading a mano sphere post.

I am the red pill for women. I'm not a blue piller.

Ok so give men exactly what they want and harming yourself because knowing you're being used makes it ok.

Everything is transactional even love is exchanged for love. You can't just walk in the store and take the necklace without paying. You give to whomever will give you the biggest exchange. Would you fall in love with someone who hated you? No of course not. That would be stupid.

Life IS full of exchange, but ppl aren't things to be bought and sold without consideration to their safety and mental well being. How happy do you think women have been for most of history where they had to live under this type of system. Oh your husband demands sex after you guys had an argument? Better give it to him and suffer the vaginal damage in silence or you'll be legally prosecuted for not fulfilling your duty as a wife.

I'm libertarian. I believe women should have freedom just as anyone should. I believe in neither feminism's vision for society nor the patriarchy's vision. If people want to buy or sell themselves as fit it's their freedom of choice. I hate how the world is so infantilized. She shouldn't be legally prosecuted but if she wants to get more out of a marriage and does that then that's fine. People make choices.

It's not infantilization when the whole of female socialization is 'be pretty, have no boundaries, and serve men or you're trash'. The 18 year old girl who was exposed to porn at an average of 10 y/o, had their boundaries and opinions consistently ignored, and brainwashed by media and society to place all their value in serving men at the cost or their own self... Should just make her own decision to get into sugar daddying right? The world isn't split into tiny bubbles, context matters. You're not making decisions for other ppl when you give them information about how society has influenced them.

Society is a meme. She chose to look at porn at 10 IMO. She chose to say her boundaries and opinions were bad. She chose to say "choke me" to whatever guy she's having sex with. You are presuming she has no choices in life and she is helpless against this thing called "society". You can question the world you live in. She chose not to. I'm tired of this lack of agency being pushed here. Now if her parents pushed her in front of the stuff that would be different. I was far more influenced by my parents than a bunch of random strangers from the middle of nowhere.

You're pulling my leg now lmao. People believe what they believe because they're exposed to certain things consistently and certain behavior is rewarded/punished. Saying just make your own choice just shuts down any discussion.

Except many people make choices that aren't rewarded. People can choose to expose themselves to anything they want. We have books and have the internet for crying out loud. How come my opinions are different from both the feminists and meninists then when I live in the same "society" they do?

curricel, lovelytangela & uglygalthrow #sexist #fundie reddit.com

(curricel)

Re: I have no idea how virgin teenage girls my age (18) cope with the sexual frustration

I’m not a virgin because I want to be, or because I’m trying to “save myself”. It’s just that for most of high school, I was the socially awkward, unattractive girl. High school kind of just felt like this bland journey that I made my way through and eventually got out of. There was nothing really that interesting or memorable about it. If i had the opportunity to lose my virginity I would do it in a heartbeat.

I have literally zero sexual experience and Due to my pent up feelings of sexual frustration, I get extremely horny and I masturbate like 5-8 times a day depending on the day.

I feel kind of dumb writing this, like there are way worse things in the world than feeling horny and lonely like this feels like such first world problems? But its just that every time i think about and see all the people my age who are dating people, or have dated people/ had sex in the past, which is alot of people, and then this combined with horniness, i can’t help bit die a little inside.

Lmao they dont cope, they have sex. I've know even teenage girls who claim to be God fearing with conservative parents who found a way. My libido seems to be becoming stronger and stronger bearing 26. I see no end .

Make sure you're not just masturbating due to boredom. I find I dont get as frustrated when I'm visiting family because my mind is occupied.

Lmao im literally visiting family in a diff country rn still masturbating the same amt at night

When I was in high school I think I masturbated so often because my body liked the endorphins and dopamine released because I was severely depressed. It was more like I was masturbating as a cure for loneliness instead of out of horniness or lust.

Idk if this is TMI, but you can also actually desensitize your clit if you masturbate too much so be careful!

How much should you masturbate to not desensitize your clit

I think once a day or every other day should be fine, but I'd look it up online.

shit im like way more than that ug

(lovelytangela)

They don’t, most teenage girls have sex. I was just one of the loser who didn’t (and still don’t) it makes me depressed honestly because I feel like I’ll be this way forever. It seems like I missed my window.

(uglygalthrow)

Literally every attractive girl was having sex in hs no matter how conservative or goody goody they fronted

Stacies are run tf through

femaleaspie1999 #sexist #fundie reddit.com

[We might need a gerontophilia tag]

You have more sexual power dating older. The feminist arguments are full of it IMO

That gives you more sexual power compared to the sexual power you get with people your age. You have your youth as leverage so how exactly is it more predatory knowing you have more power to get what you want out of them compared to the ability to get what you want out of people your own age? You try getting more out of someone your age when they compare you to Stacy. The older man compares you to the 50 year olds. The world is a transaction and life is about getting what you want. Go live in your idealist blue pilled world where age shouldn't matter and where you "should" be competing with your age who see you as ugly because they've seen porn all their lives. Go ahead. Be idealist lol. If you think being bullied by moids your age is preferable you've drank too much of the blue pilled koolaid.

Sure you can make the argument that younger women have more "sexual power" by dating older, but sexual power doesn't mean shit when you're comparing it to actual power (money, capital, etc.) that the older man has and will use to make you dependent on him, wasting years of your precious youth. You're a human being not a pawn some moid can use to quell his own fear of aging.

I get that we are on a femcel sub, but do you want to simply get fucked by a shitty, insecure, and manipulative man that you're not attracted to at all because you want some rent money, or do you want a loving relationship with someone that you can build a future with?

I don't get the power imbalance thing. If you don't live with someone and they aren't your boss, your teacher, your parents, or a religious figure how exactly would they have "power" over you?

Also many women here were bullied and abused by others yet that's considered better treatment because "it's their age". I don't see how positive attention from the motive of valuing youth is worse. Positive from an ulterior motive is better than negative from a harsh motive. I value my parents opinion not some random 60 year old on the street

Yeah you don't get the power imbalance thing and that's why you made a bad post.

You aren't looking at things from a holistic perspective. Dating an older man is bad because you are dating a predatory person…? They only like you because you are younger than them and therefore they are expecting you to be naive and easy to manipulate. So they are coming into the relationship with the intent to dominate over you in the relationship. If you become financially and emotionally dependent on someone, it becomes very hard to leave them, even if they are abusive.

So in other words it's better for someone to randomly hook up and get insulted and called ugly like the people on here do without pay because it's not "predatory?" right? Manipulation is a part of life and someone many years older or younger could love each other or have each other's interests in mind.

Question_Woman #sexist #fundie reddit.com

You evil gatekeeping aphobic scum.

/s

In all seriousness though I have met more than my fair share of pedophiles in the ace community. Just an example.

Damn, that's insidious! And it makes sense because kids who have a delayed puberty are the most likely to identify as "asexual". Hell, if I had been interrogated about my sexuality when I was younger than 15 I would have said "asexual" as well.

In reality, I just wasn't ready to admit my attraction to men because then I would be vulnerable up to their mocking and scorn based on my appearance.

That was certainly an issue in my teens, not anymore but the attraction still isn't there. Go figure. Actually I do feel some sort of attraction but it isn't sexual. I think.

You do you, I'm just not a fan of the split attraction model because I don't see any way in which attraction can be split into a sexual and non-sexual mode. I also have an issue with some people who claim it's no reason to worry if someone doesn't have a libido. Low or nonexistent libido can be a sign of hormonal impairment, autism, or depression and it's not something that should be glossed over.

On the other hand, the label of asexual can also be an understandable cope for women who are constantly pressured into sex by men. Men's prerogative of "pump and dump" is effectively countered by women with the labels of asexual/demisexual. These labels give women something to point to that's "out of their control" when men pressure them for sex. In reality tho, heterosexual sex fucking sucks for women unless the guy actually cares about you...which usually doesn't happen unless you've been dating for 3+ months or you're a Stacy.

Women also have it harder because men are violent, predatory, and disgusting in general so it makes sense to be wary of any attraction we feel towards them, especially when they see undesirable women as sub-human.

SuicideChick #fundie reddit.com

Is it just me or

does it seem like less attractive women are more like to identify as queer or non-gender conforming? I have unattractive female friends that have mysteriously come out of the closet as queer/agender but spent their formative years pre-rejected from any form of attention from men and now they identify as proudly queer. But I just don’t see for all of them for some reason

Idk maybe i’m just prejudiced

Not a coincidence. It's common for people to try and switch sides once they reach a certain level of desperation. I've read some reddit stories of guys getting blow jobs from gay men just so they could get some action, of which they subsequently did not enjoy.

I feel like for some people it can also be a defense mechanism thing. Like someone unattractive marketing themselves as asexual, it's like "you can't reject me because I'm not interested in you anyway."

Obviously there are legitimate queer and asexual people but I wouldn't be surprised if some people were touting those labels for their own ulterior motives.

Alice Leszek #fundie books.google.com

There are doctors all over the world that are dealing with people with mental conditions. Statistically, I wonder how many are battling demons. How radical it would be if we treated people with prayer, with Jesus, so that they might be set free. There are people all over the world who celebrate Christmas and stop at that not knowing, not realizing, not truly understanding the power of Jesus and how powerful he could be in their lives.
There are demons that are wandering around in the spirit, who are no more powerful than you or I. They know Jesus is the Son of God, and they know the power he possesses; they fear him for that and rightly so. This experience I had was not a dream or vision. It truly lasted for days and days. At the time, I didn't know what was going on; it was only afterward, as time passed, that God revealed it to me, revealed himself to me, and gave me these scriptures to prove what he was revealing to me was true. How did he do this? After I was delivered by the Lord from the demons that had tormented me, I had another experience. It wasn't a dream or a vision, but rather, this time, I was caught up in the spirit by God. My human eyes were open, but in addition to that, God enabled me so that I could see in the spirit world. There was a noticeable difference between this experience and the one I had with the demons. God was in control, and throughout, there was nothing but peace. At first I wasn't sure what was going on, but then God started revealing and teaching things to me. This revelation commenced at a pace that I could handle. He told me he wanted me to understand, and we handled it like a Q&A session. He first told me that there are many demons in this world and that they want to live in human bodies. I asked why were there not more people running around mad. He told me that they are working on people in different ways, he told me that they are invisible to human eyes but that you can see them in the spirit, and then he opened my eyes to see. He pointed out a man to me, and I could see from a distance that there were demons inside of him. The Lord asked me how many there were, but I could only tell that there was more than one; yet he looked normal from the outside. As if reading my mind, the Lord said that he was not normal, and these demons were controlling this man's life and causing him to make bad decisions, and he can't sleep at night.
Next he showed me a woman, and I could see the demons inside of her. He explained to me that these demons caused her to overeat, and she also could not sleep at night. I was in Rosie's house as the Lord was revealing this all to me. I could see so far, it was astonishing. I could see the roads and into different houses, and there were demons everywhere. There was a particular man that the Lord showed me; he was in the road and a demon was just standing there, talking in his ear. The Lord said that this is something that commonly happens in people's lives: demons whispering in people's ears. As I watched, the Lord opened my ears to hear what the demon was saying and what the man was thinking. The man had had an argument with his wife and was very upset. He felt that he was tired of his wife. The demon asked the man why doesn't he just kill her. I could visibly see the man receiving these words. To himself, he said that no one would know it was him. The demon heard this thought and, even louder, said that he should kill his wife and added that no one would know that it was him and that this was the only way out of his marriage. The man received those words also and was convinced to think about it further.
[snip]
So the Lord said that if this man could say God's Word in his mind against those murderous thoughts, the demon would leave him alone. However, if he does not, he will continue to listen to this demon and kill his wife and be caught. How can you know God's Word if you don't read it? The devil knows this, and that is why he fights so hard against bibles being in schools and stuff like that. He knows that if children read the Bible and have this information, he will lose power over them. Instead, he encourages them to watch TV and get on the Internet so he can feed them whatever he wants.
The Lord showed me some men in a house that were smoking marijuana, and then he showed me a demon in a tree and indicated that he was the controller of the whole village. I could draw you a picture of what this demon looked like. It was so big it could look over the whole village. It had a body of a human from its head to where the wings started. Under its wings, it had hands with fingers on it and the legs of an animal with fur on it. The Lord told me to look at what the demon does to them after they smoke. This is what happened: This demon was on the tree far from where the men were smoking. It reached its finger across the way, and while the men were smoking, he commanded the first man to go steal. The man didn't hesitate and left immediately. He told the next man to go beat his wife up and to then go hide in the bushes and wait for another woman to beat. Again, this guy didn't hesitate either. The third guy in the house was Rosie's husband. The demon stretched his hand to him and commanded him to commit adultery with another woman, and off he went. This demon was watching them and was laughing and enjoying himself. The Lord showed me these men doing these things and explained to me that when these men smoked, they gave their minds up and were no longer in control of themselves. The demon waited until they were smoking and getting high and used that as an opening to use his power on them.

Patsy Lambert #fundie newberryobserver.com

We will reap what we sow
By Patsy Lambert - Contributing Columnist

When things go wrong, we have always heard the saying, the devil made me do it. But the truth is we are responsible for a lot of the things we go through, because we make the choice.

We know that Satan is real and he loves evil. And it brings him joy when we make the wrong choice.

Before Satan rebelled against God, the world was perfect. There was no sin or evil. But now we live in a world filled with sin. Satan doesn’t cause every bad thing that happens to us.

Sometimes we don’t know the reason, but at times we are responsible.

“But every man is tempted, when he is drawn away of his own lust, and enticed. Then when lust hath conceived, it bringeth forth sin, when it is finished, bringeth forth death.” James 1: 14-15.

If we turn our backs on God and follow our own sinful desires instead of God’s will. We will pay, as the Bible tells us.

“Be not deceived, God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.” Galatians 6:7.

We need to be careful of what we sow. We will reap what we sow.

Mick Williams #fundie disqus.com

Today’s Laugh 7-29-19

image
image

(first image: people seated at a meeting. Various voices: “Manholes must be de-gendered. How about maintenance access hole?” “Hole sounds like ‘ho’, suggesting we come in different genders.” “Maintenance access entrance/exit aperture!” “’Apeture’ bothers me.”)
(second image: man shown dropping jar containing brain. Label on jar says “normal brain”. His hands are then shown holding a separate jar with a brain labelled “Democrat brain”.)

Rich Pivo #fundie quora.com

Your commentary is full of holes, but you already know that, suspecting no one will call you out on it. But if you’ve actually read the Bible (clearly you haven’t), you’d realize there are several examples of scientific information they had no way of knowing at that time. As for cleanliness, what do you think their dietary laws and laws about washing were all about? It’s a complex book, yet simple to read and understand well enough, even for you. Do yourself a favor and educate yourself by actually reading it and then you’ll know what’s in it. Brush stroke philosophy is ignorance and arrogance.

David J. Stewart #fundie jesusisprecious.org

I have often heard Oprah rationalize that if a person in a remote part of the world has never heard the name of Jesus, but they have a good heart and want to do what is right, surely God must allow them to come to Him through a different path. The Bible gives us the answer in Titus 2:13, “For the grace of God that bringeth salvation hath appeared to all men.” I don't claim to understand how God fulfills this Bible verse, but I know God is faithful. If a person never had a chance to get saved, God would be unjust to send them to Hell. If God sees an unsaved person who desires to be saved, then God will send them a soulwinner, as He arranged for Corneous and the apostle Peter to meet in Acts chapter 10.

Resident #fundie blog.bibleplaces.com

*Context: A debate on Hell, and how a lack of eternal punishment is disrespectful for the damned*


CGrim: "Everlasting is only aionios in Greek, so that everlasting hell becomes only age-during garbage dump"
Uhh... no. Check out Matt 25:46. By your rationale, the "everlasting life" Jesus promised really only meant life until AD 70.

Jerry62: Not only that, if there were any doubt, Jesus is further clarifying what was already mentioned in Daniel 12:2... eternal is an appropriate word for the English translation. That's why Jerome translated it aeternam in Latin as well, because he knew what was implied by the Greek.

J: Two different thoughts on the Matthew verse. One is that the age-during is modified by what it refers to. In the case of life age-during, that life is with God, who is eternal. The chastisement is in reference to the Second Death, which can't be eternal if we are to take any of the passages about death itself being destroyed literally.
OR, the age-during life with Christ could be just that, since in 1 Corinthians it talks about Christ giving up his kingdom to the Father at the end of time.
And, Christ's wonderful promise into banality? The wonderful promise that is "You lot will experience everlasting happiness while the rest of the world suffers unimaginable torment for eternity"?
That is not a wonderful promise, that is a concept more horrific and disturbing than anything any horror writer could come up with.


Resident: Yes, wonderful promise. If you don't like it, go and take something else but don't put your thoughts into Christ's mouth.
"age-during" isn't a word but if you are insisting on such literalist readings, you should be consistent and take things literally. And then "the age" is either eternal both times or it is temporal.
Saying "God is eternal" is chickening out. One can have a temporal stay with the eternal God.
The rest of the world will not "suffers unimaginable torment for eternity" - the world will be with God, whose judgement is just, even in regard to the damned.
But you are faking compassion - you don't want the damned to suffer but have no problem with seeing them dead.


Anonymous: Jerome also used the phrase "en aeturnum et ultra" ("in eternity and beyond") in his commantary on Collosians. If 'aeturnum' always means 'eternal' then Jerome put his foot in his mouth when he wrote this. What can be beyond eternity?
One of the strange things about all of the talk about whether punishment is eternal or not is the fact that if the Lord had wanted to communicate the idea that punishment would be eternal, there are several ways to do this in Greek and make it crystal clear. That did not happen. Instead we have bibles that translate 'aion' and 'aionion' in several different ways. If it was consistently translated as 'eternal' people would see how ridiculous that idea is.
It is also very instructive to study the writings of the early church fathers and church history to see how prevalent a belief universal salvation was, and then compare the conditions that surrounded the second council at Constantinople where they decided that a confession of belief in an eternal hell was one of the conditions for being accepted into "the church". The first post-apostolic council at Nicea was chaired by Gregory Nazianzen who was a universalist. Gregory of Nyssa, another prominent teacher of universalism, drafted the part of the Nicean creed dealing with the trinity. If eternal hell doctrine is so clearly taught in scripture as we have been told, where was the protest over these men even being allowed to attend the council, much less play major roles? If you look at the political and religious power struggles going on at Constantinople it is apparent that the doctrine of eternal hell was used to scare people and get them to submit to those who had control of the church, so they could hold their kingdom together.
The objection that "eternal punishment" and "eternal life" are used in parallel in Matthew 25:46, and therefore aionian must means eternal is based on a false presumption that the "aionian life" which is spoken of would have to come to an end at the same time that the "aionian" punishment does. The thing is, that as the "aion" during which the punishment takes place is coming to an end,DEATH WILL BE SWALLOWED UP BY LIFE! THE LAST ENEMY TO BE DESTROYED IS DEATH! So at that point there will be no more "aionian" life, it will be the same life as was lived in the "aion", but now it will continue outside of time. It will not end, it will just no longer pertain to an 'aion' or time period. There is no corresponding situation for punishment having it's opposite destroyed thus allowing it to continue outside of time.
As for Isaiah 66:24, it cannot be referring to eternity, as v.23 which is in the same context states that "from one new moon to another and from one sabbath to another all flesh shall to worship before Me, says the Lord." (Actually it says "from one new moon to IT'S next", meaning the same new moon one year later)Time is clearly still in view in this context. I also don't think we will be taking field trips out to look at burning and worm eaten bodies in eternity.

Resident: I cannot vouch for Jerome, his meaning or his wording. Words can indeed mean different things at different times, with different context and different people. Jerome is one, Christ may be another.
And Christ spoke (e.g. Matthew 25) of the "blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world" and of the "cursed ... into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels ... these shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous into life eternal."
The verses are clearly parallel, so that eternal MUST mean the same for the blessed and the cursed.
Also, to pin this on one word is a common folly. There are quite a few verses in the gospel expressing the same idea in different words, e.g. "the worm never dies" - how do you turn never into "sometime in the future"?
Add to that the teaching of the church since the earliest days. But of course, some know-it-all flippig through pages will know it better! Your idea about "universal salvation" among church fathers is wrongheaded. There were some that believed in such things but they all went into trouble with it. Most did not.
So your attitude "If the Lord had wanted to communicate this" is not only arrogant towards him (he chose his words as he saw fit, not you) but also false: he did clearly communicate this.
You are also disrespectful towards the damned - it is one thing, as God does, to give them their just deserts, but quite another to simply blot them out from existence and pretend everything's fine.
Finally, you are also mistaken about time and the eternal life. Eternal life doesn't mean that there is no time just as it doesn't mean there is no space. The New Jerusalem will contain people body and soul living in space in time, with God in happiness for all eternity.
And that's probably what Jerome is after, distinguishing between this end-less but not time-less eternity and the God's eternity without such constraints, wihtout beginning or end.

Kenyetta Tunne #fundie #moonbat quora.com

The construct of ‘white people’ was invented solely for the purpose of oppression.

Atheists attack the concept of god because they believe it hurts society, but ignore the social construction of ‘whiteness’.

The concept of ‘white people’ was invented by the English ruling-class. That’s evidenced history.

Atheists say god in an invention that is bad for society, but ignore that the concept of ‘white people’ is an invention that is bad for society.

It was invented for division during the colonial period, and still functions for division today.

Atheists have one set of ethics they use to deconstruct the concept of god, and a completely different one to deconstruct the concept of ‘white people’.

That is selective ethics.

Various residents of Tega Cay, Congressman Ralph Norman #fundie wltx.com

South Carolina city to restore 'Lord' to police memorial after controversy
City Manager Charlie Funderburk told NBC Charlotte he’s heard from people across the country about the issue.
Author: Alex Shabad, WCNC Staff

TEGA CAY, S.C. — Tega Cay announced Friday that after careful consideration and much conversation, the city council made the decision to restore a controversial fallen officer monument.

Full statement from the city:

After careful consideration and much conversation with people on both sides of the discussion, City Council has made the decision that the Police Officer's Prayer will be restored to its original condition and returned to the Fallen Officers’ Memorial located at the new police station. We want to thank everyone for voicing your opinion, as it’s not always easy to do so on such a sensitive subject. As Mr. Dunn stated before Council July 15th, none of what has transpired was an attack on our Police Department or anyone’s faith. Our City Council and citizens have always been strong supporters of the men and women in blue. We’d like to thank Mr. Dunn and the others who spoke before Council. The respectful exchange of ideas and opinions is truly what makes local government extraordinary. This was a tough week in Tega Cay. It is our hope that we can now move forward together and continue to be the strong, welcoming community that we have always been known for. Regardless of our different viewpoints, our people are what truly makes this City such a wonderful place.

On Tuesday night, the city announced they decided to remove the monument altogether while they look for a solution that expresses support of "those who risk their lives every day."

Before that, the city decided to remove the word "Lord", which appeared three times on the monument, after backlash from the community. Then, social media began buzzing with others who disagreed with the city’s action.

The monument was originally placed at the fallen officers memorial outside the police department. A police spokesman said the controversy began when the department started getting complaints about the religious references, so city leaders had a meeting and decided to remove them.

In a statement released Tuesday, city officials say they received comments both locally and nationally in response to the monument.

"We attempted to find a compromise but failed as our community has further divided. In an attempt to find a resolution, we have upset parties on both sides of this issue and, for that, we are truly sorry," the statement reads.

The Tega Cay Facebook page had dozens of comments about the monument. Some questioned the legality of having the monument on public property.

"It’s nice, but why is there a Christian bible verse and prayer on it? This violates separation of church and state," one woman posted.

Others like longtime resident, Charles Parker, had a different view.

"People on social media complain, and I’m saying, get a life," Parker said. "We were organized as a Christian nation, and I don’t see that that’s really a problem of separation of church and state."

Even Congressman Ralph Norman weighed in, posting a video on Facebook.

"You know the last time I checked, it was 'One nation under God,' to have this scratched out is sad, to say the least," Congressman Norman said in the video. "That’s why we’re fighting in Washington, D.C. to put God back in public to buildings like this to put God back in our public schools."

Tega Cay’s city manager, Charlie Funderburk, told NBC Charlotte he’s heard from people across the country about the controversy over the monument, which was donated to the police department by the Tega Cay Women’s Club.

“We upset a lot of people, we screwed up, we are owning that,” he said. “It wasn’t the intent, we weren’t trying to disparage U.S. Christian faith or anything of that nature, not even close.”

Funderburk said the monument was meant to honor law enforcement and modeled after other monuments that appear across the country at various levels of government.

However, after seeking legal advice, the city decided to remove the references. Funderburk released the following statement to NBC Charlotte:

The City of Tega Cay and our Police Department understand that not everyone agrees with the religious references that were on the monument located in the Fallen Officers Memorial at our Police Station. We also understand that just as many people are not in agreement that we have removed those references. There was never any intent to hold any group in higher regard than another. This monument was modeled after other monuments that appear across the country at various levels of government honoring law enforcement officers, military veterans and others whose duty is to protect and serve. Be that as it may, after seeking legal advice on the matter and after discussing it at length with City Council, we have made the decision to remove those references. We are public servants and want to make certain that all members of the public, regardless of what their religious beliefs may or may not be, understand that we are here to serve everyone. They will be welcomed into our facilities, whether it be the Police Station or City Hall, they will be treated fairly and with the respect they are owed by us. As the two sides of this issue continue to debate their stance we hope they will do so civilly and respectfully.

City leaders said a bible verse will be kept off the monument when it's returned.

Brian Niemeier #fundie brianniemeier.com

Keep in mind that the Boomers murdered half of their children in the womb.

Sincere condolences, Gen X. You were supposed to be the heroes we needed. But like hack authors who purposefully subvert the hero of prophecy in their postmodern Tolkien ripoff novel, the Boomers' neglect and abuse killed your optimism and patriotism. Along with half of you.

The bad news is that our civilization probably won't survive the damage inflicted by Generation Locust.

[…]

Many authors among the PulpRev and Superversive literary movements belong to Generation Y. They're not only establishing themselves as skilled artists, they're actively seeking to inspire cultural change.

Another prominent--one might justly say infamous--author making a cultural impact is Gen Y pickup artist turned Augustinian sage Roosh V. Having turned from hedonism and toward Christ, he travels the globe trying to foster male fellowship at great personal risk.

The greatest obstacle Gen Y will have to overcome is their lack of confidence and practical skill. To fulfill their role of guiding Gen Z, they must embrace failure as a trusted teacher and put in the work to master the life skills they were never taught. And like Roosh, they must return to Christ.

Todd Bolen #fundie blog.bibleplaces.com

The Myth of the Burning Garbage Dump of Gehenna

I have long wanted to do a little work to debunk the endlessly repeated myth that the Hinnom Valley (Gehenna) was a perpetually burning trash dump. There simply is no evidence to support the idea, but because it seems a reasonable explanation for the origin of the Hinnom Valley as “hell,” writers and preachers accept and propagate the story.

Yesterday Louis McBride raised the issue (HT: BibleX). He writes:
"I consulted over a dozen study Bibles on Matthew 5:22 and no less than eight of them made a reference to the rubbish heap. Almost every major commentary on Matthew that mentions Gehenna also spoke of the garbage dump. I’ve always thought that this was an established fact."

Then he quotes Peter Head, G. R. Beasley-Murray, and Lloyd Bailey in tracing the origin of this notion to Rabbi David Kimchi in AD 1200. Specifically, Bailey states:
"[Kimchi] maintained that in this loathsome valley fires were kept burning perpetually to consume the filth and cadavers thrown into it. However, Strack and Billerbeck state that there is neither archeological nor literary evidence in support of this claim, in either the earlier intertestamental or the later rabbinic sources."

As with the legend about the rope around the high priest’s ankle, this popular myth seems to have originated in Jewish circles in the Middle Ages. McBride has more details and the sources in his post.

The explanation for the “fire of Gehenna” lies not in a burning trash dump, but in the burning of sacrificed children. Jeremiah is explicit that such occurred here:

Jeremiah 7:31–32 (ESV) — And they have built the high places of Topheth, which is in the Valley of the Son of Hinnom, to burn their sons and their daughters in the fire, which I did not command, nor did it come into my mind. Therefore, behold, the days are coming, declares the Lord, when it will no more be called Topheth, or the Valley of the Son of Hinnom, but the Valley of Slaughter; for they will bury in Topheth, because there is no room elsewhere.

Isaiah had already envisioned Topheth as the fiery destiny of an enemy of God.

Isaiah 30:33 (HCSB) — Indeed! Topheth has been ready for the king for a long time now. His funeral pyre is deep and wide, with plenty of fire and wood. The breath of the Lord, like a torrent of brimstone, kindles it.
Thus already in Old Testament times, the Valley of Hinnom was associated with the destiny of the wicked. That the valley was just outside the city of Jerusalem made it an appropriate symbol for those excluded from divine blessing. Isaiah closes his book with these words:
Isaiah 66:24 (ESV) — “And they shall go out and look on the dead bodies of the men who have rebelled against me. For their worm shall not die, their fire shall not be quenched, and they shall be an abhorrence to all flesh.”

It is not difficult to see, from these and other texts (e.g., 2 Kgs 23:10; 2 Chr 28:3, 33:6; Jer 32:35), why Jesus and his contemporaries used the word Gehenna (“valley of Hinnom”) as synonymous with the place of everlasting fiery torment. Indeed, there is no reason to search further for ancient burning piles of discarded newspapers, product packaging, and junk mail.

kingjameswriter1965 #fundie #quack kjbisjesuschrist.blog

As a now long-sober woman of God, who has learned to give all my cares to Jesus, I want to tell you what drugs really do to a person. Drugs are doorways to your soul. When you take drugs, demonic spirits enter in and wreak havoc on your body and slowly destroy your mind. That sounds weird but it’s true. Why do you suppose people on drugs act like animals, screeching, destroying things, even running into cars’ windshields and getting up without a scratch? That’s evidence of demon possession. Why do you think it takes four grown men to hold down a wasted druggie? Because demons (fallen angels) are powerful entities which take over your body, your mind, and your soul. They possess superhuman strength, which makes the druggie physically stronger than he normally is. When you stick a heroin needle in your arm, or smoke crack or meth, you are in essence allowing evil spirits into your whole being. They use these powerful vehicles (drugs) to enter into your body and get you high, and addiction happens when you crave the very first high you ever had; however, the human body is not made to withstand supernatural forces, and you can never attain that level of “high” any more, so you want more and more and you become a wasted human being, sick, diseased, worn out, burnt out, penniless, powerless, and with no hope of recovery. The Devil always shows the glamour, the glitz, the power and the fame, but he never shows you the death, the destruction, nor the Hell that awaits your soul when you perish.

I’ve seen poor folks so messed up on meth that they look like shells of their former selves. They live on the street, begging for money in front of Wawas or in the middle of highways where they can very easily get killed. They need much prayer. They have no hope but the needle, the bong, the blunt, the fleeting rush of intense power and well-being which vanishes faster and faster so they keep shooting up more and more, and then end up dying without God. You can get mad at me and say I’m delusional by labeling your addictions as demon possession, but what else would you call this if it wasn’t for satanic power…

Seeing this breaks my heart. What a waste. I pray that she is still alive and gives her heart to Jesus.

I started to show a picture of a meth addict’s teeth, but you can look that up for yourself, if you dare. It’s too terrible to show here.

I wanted to give my testimony because I have been around the block a few times and I know what it’s like to suffer under the overpowering control of drugs. Granted, I can’t say I’d done anything stronger like meth, PCP or acid, so please don’t judge me by the things I didn’t do. Point is, I’m telling you that the Lord Jesus Christ is far more powerful than your addiction. But I have seen others struggle under the stranglehold of drugs and how wasted their lives ended up, all because they wanted one more hit, one more high, but then all they get is Hell if they didn’t get born again.

I said all that to say this. If you are reading this and have a substance abuse problem, there is hope for you. Jesus Christ came to set you free from bondage, even the bondage of drug addiction. This is not Al-Anon, nor AA, nor a mental hospital, this is Bible. You can be saved. Jesus can set you free from your addictions. You will not go to Hell if you do drugs– you go to Hell for not believing on Jesus to save your soul FROM Hell. You can be born again and live a clean, glorious life for Jesus, and in the power of the Holy Spirit, never have the urge to do drugs again.

Mick Williams #fundie disqus.com

“Today’s Laugh”

image

Robert Mueller rendered as Frankenstein’s monster lies motionless on a table. Two “doctors” (who resemble Adam Schiff and Elijah Cummings, I assume) speak:
Cummings: Maybe we expected too much of it…pushed it too hard and too long.
Schiff: No!! Give it another 20,000 volts!!

John Piper #fundie twitter.com

We come to the close of Asa’s conflicted life, and watch him bring it to a sorry end.

"Yet even in his disease he did not seek the Lord, but sought help from physicians.” 2 Chronicles 16:12

Surely, we are all to take heed, and pray, “Lord help us to end well.“

Bishop Neophytos Masouras #fundie #homophobia patheos.com

Homosexuality is usually a problem transferred to a foetus, when a pregnant woman has anal sex and enjoys it.

It happens during the parent's intercourse or pregnancy.

It follows an abnormal sexual act between the parents. To be more clear, anal sex.

[Saint Porphyrios] says that when the woman likes that, a desire is born, and then the desire is passed on to the child.

Joseph Phillip Daniel Ministries #fundie facebook.com

The Trump curse
/Begins taking its effect on the political career of the Satanist, Nancy Pelosi/

The speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi defames our President Trump, bringing curses upon herself as the demons inside her lead her to falsely call him a racist on the House floor....

The curses began taking their effect on her political career as you moved powerfully, FATHER GOD, against the demons inside Pelosi through your servant, Rep. Doug Collins, who was the first person to call her out on the House floor in decades, going viral over the internet soon after and destroying her public image even more before the American public...

David J. Stewart #fundie jesusisprecious.org

Pastor T.D. Jakes praises Oprah Winfrey, an ungodly false prophet who has repeatedly denied salvation through Jesus Christ throughout her secular career in media. We've got a bunch of reprobate (unsaved) heretics in the pulpits today. Kindly, I think T.D. Jakes is as phony as can be. he is wrong on being born-again, and he bids Godspeed to a degenerate like Oprah Winfrey. I was disgusted watching the following disturbing video, titled: “T.D. Jakes makes Oprah Winfrey Cry.” James 4:4, “Ye adulterers and adulteresses, know ye not that the friendship of the world is enmity with God? whosoever therefore will be a friend of the world is the enemy of God.” These imposters who influence tens of millions of people must be exposed, not embraced. Titus 1:10-13, “For there are many unruly and vain talkers and deceivers, specially they of the circumcision: Whose mouths must be stopped, who subvert whole houses, teaching things which they ought not, for filthy lucre's sake. One of themselves, even a prophet of their own, said, The Cretians are alway liars, evil beasts, slow bellies. This witness is true. Wherefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith.” T.D. Jakes openly says that he wants to be known for what is is FOR, and not what he is against!

In the preceding video T.D. Jakes tells Oprah that he believes people in false religions can come to God through their pagan beliefs. That is blasphemy against the inspired Word of God!!! At one point in the video Jakes quotes Jesus in John 14:6 that He is “the door,” but then he succumbs to pressure from Oprah for him to agree with her that people who have never heard of Jesus, can still come to God through their Satanic false religion. Folks, that is not true! Islamic Muslims are going straight to Hell. Mormons are going straight to Hell. Jehovah's Witnesses are going straight to Hell. Baha'i Faith are going straight o Hell. Judaizer Jews are going straight to Hell. Buddhists are going straight to Hell. Roman and Orthodox Catholics are going straight to Hell. Lutherans are going straight to Hell. Church of Christ are going straight to Hell. Scientologists are going straight to Hell. Hindus are going straight to Hell. All of these aforementioned false religions pervert the Gospel. Galatians 1:9, “As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.”

Mick Williams #fundie disqus.com

Good evening. I shall begin with the astonishing assertion that the modern democrat party is the best thing going for Christianity. Before I prove my thesis, note my avoidance of "democratic", since these unwitting servants of the gospel are anything but. Don't bother with a Google search for "democrat party". They will immediately correct your spelling to "democratic party". If you seek anything critical of democrats, be prepared to wade through countless pages of glowing praise. One would think both the DNC and their big tech enablers were legitimate entities.

Their persecution of the faith confirms the Bible prediction, thus strengthening the believers' faith. Recall the Battle of Britain to know that human nature requires resistance to bullying and tyranny. Thirdly, we can reliably take our cue from folks seduced into a backward paradigm. If they oppose it, it has to be a good thing.

Then there are the consequences of unbelief. The Book confirms strong delusion, for one. No rational mind can change its sex or race on a whim. Is it rational to coddle Islam, which takes a sword to the sacred cows of homosexuality and feminism?--or to attack the patriots who espouse a strong border? It is a reprobate mind that lusts after children via drag queen story hours. Ditto for one that decides against parenthood at the moment of birth, taking advantage of democrat laws allowing termination. As the list is a long one, I shall move on.

Our leftist friends also confirm the supernatural in their gibbering hatred of the president, its kneejerk triggering of no earthly origin. Perhaps the unseen entities riding them are channeling their master's ire at the president's anti-globalist agenda. It's a pipe dream the left has nursed since the Tower of Babel.

Finally, scoffers confirm the prophetic account, be it Tribulation or Second Coming. Evil men are indeed waxing worse and worse, deceiving and being deceived. Though long a truism, the end-times American model charts on an exponential curve. After all, the U S is the final obstacle to the left's communist hell on earth. Since the Evil One is the conductor of this infernal orchestra, this, ironically, makes him the greatest dupe of all.

I shall now return to the relative sanity of black and white vintage TV. Good night.

(Includes photo of Alfred Hitchcock, not included here)

biblicalgenderroles #fundie #sexist biblicalgenderroles.com

A woman turning her husband down for sex simply because she is “not in the mood” as opposed to having some serious medical condition is a serious violation of her marriage covenant:
“3 Let the husband render unto the wife due benevolence: and likewise also the wife unto the husband. 4 The wife hath not power of her own body, but the husband: and likewise also the husband hath not power of his own body, but the wife.”
I Corinthians 7:3-4 (KJV)

Men primarily give and receive love in marriage through sex. It is what bonds them to their wife. Where as women primarily give and receive love by talking and sharing feelings and this is how women feel bonded to their husbands. This is not to say that men cannot feel bonded to their wives by talking and sharing feelings nor is this to say women don’t feel bonded to their husbands through sex. But we are talking about primary means of bonding verses secondary means of bonding which are different in men and women.

Ladies, let me translate this for you. Imagine you had a rough day with the kids and lots of other things going on at home. You can’t wait to put the kids to bed and just talk and share your day with your husband and also find out about his day. So, you get the kids to bed and slip into bed with your husband. You start talking to him about your day and he stops you “Babe, I am really not in the mood tonight” and then he rolls over and goes to sleep.

That frustration you would feel as a woman if your husband did this to you is exactly what a man feels when his wife tells him she is not in the mood for sex.

Matt Walsh #fundie rightwingwatch.org

(tagging this “#fundie”, since “#asshole” doesn’t seem to be a thing.)

The Daily Wire’s Matt Walsh argued on a podcast that the minimum wage should be placed at zero dollars per hour and argued that some people do work that is not worth a living wage.

Walsh, who earlier this year argued that 12-year-old rape victims should be forced to have children, streamed a podcast with The Daily Wire on Friday in which he argued that because it is feasible not to work, the minimum wage should not exist in the United States. His commentary comes after news that the House passed legislation that would gradually increase the minimum wage to $15 per hour by 2025.

“Zero should be the baseline for work because that’s the baseline amount of effort you can put in,” Walsh explained. “It’s possible for someone to do zero work, which means that they have earned zero dollars.”

Walsh went on to describe a negative experience he had with a cashier at a McDonald’s restaurant in which the cashier he ordered from made him feel unwelcome. That cashier, and all fast food industry workers who behave like that cashier, he argued, deserve wages as low as 25 cents or 50 cents per hour.

“How could [their work] possibly be worth $15? It’s not. It’s not worth $8 an hour. Somebody like that—I guess that the company, the restaurant, the store, has some need for them. That’s why they’re still there. So, what are they worth? 50 cents an hour at most? 25 cents? They’re worth very close to zero. Maybe not zero, but very close to it. And so, that’s what they should be paid,” Walsh said.

Fast food workers that make him feel good, Walsh said, could be worth $30 or $50 per hour.

“It should be a situation where there are people [behind a fast food counter] who are making $35 an hour and there are people who are making 35 cents an hour. That’s how wide the gap should be between wages, because that’s how wide the gap in effort is and the wages should reflect that,” Walsh said.

Minimum wages exist to create a minimum standard of living for people who work and to stabilize the economy. The United States’ federal minimum wage has not increased since 2009, despite significant inflation, and 29 states and Washington, D.C., have minimum wages above the federal floor.

Movieguide #fundie movieguide.org

(A christian review of the anime film: “Your Name”)

However, being a tale from Japan, there are some negative elements built into the story. The world created in YOUR NAME is thoroughly Eastern. The towns and countryside all have shrines to local deities. Thus, while these false pagan references mostly occupy the background, the guiding principle behind the lives of the characters originates from Shinto Buddhism. Concepts from this way of thinking ground themselves heavily in the movie’s references to tradition and honoring family ancestors. There is an openness of each character to the possibility of there being more to life than a person can experience with the five senses. In this regard, YOUR NAME is consistent with a biblical worldview that acknowledges there are unseen orders of creation that are as real as the one experienced by the senses. YOUR NAME posits that these other spiritual dimensions can be experienced by humans, but it does so within false pagan context.

(and later on…)

The Bible speaks clearly against pagan religion and perverse notions of switching one’s sex. So, media-wise viewers will find YOUR NAME to be unacceptable, no matter how well it is put together.

Jesse Lee Peterson #racist #wingnut #fundie wnd.com

GRIEVANCE INDUSTRY
LOVE WHITE PEOPLE OR LEAVE MY COUNTRY!
Exclusive: Jesse Lee Peterson challenges the true racists in government

Somehow in this country, white people became the only ones called “racist” (even though “racism” does not exist; it’s either right or wrong, good or evil). Everyone is encouraged to hate white people. The Civil Rights Movement, which I regret participating in, only brought destruction. Blacks forced white private businesses to service them, and whites began catering to blacks. Then other immoral people came in and used black people for their own agenda, to bully the weak whites. Women who hate men, radical homosexuals, illegal aliens and others seduced black false leaders, comparing their wicked causes to blacks’ supposed “struggle.”

I often ask black and Hispanic liberal guests on my talk shows, “Do you love white people?” Rarely can they simply answer, “Yes.” But when I ask them if they love blacks or Mexicans, it’s suddenly an easy answer – “Yes!”

This month of July is my second annual celebration of White History Month. America is great thanks to white people. But it’s so overrun with blind white-hating people that we now have a Muslim woman with a head rag in Congress! Rep. Ilhan Omar, D.-Minn., is an evil, America-hating, Christian-hating “social justice warrior.” But she falsely claims, “I probably love this country more than anyone that is naturally born.” Her kind of “love” is the same emotional, egotistical spirit as angry single black mothers who raise thugs and defend them when they commit crimes.

I’ve been saying for years that if anyone does not love this country, they can leave! If you hate white people, and you believe in so-called “racism,” even though whites let you into this country, go back to Africa or wherever you came from! Same with the white communist antifa members who hate American freedom – get out of my country!

Order Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson’s book, “The Antidote: Healing America from the Poison of Hate, Blame, and Victimhood.”

President Trump rightly said the same thing in a few tweets last Sunday. He suggested that these “progressive” Democrat Congresswomen “go back and help fix the totally broken and crime infested places from which they came.” He’s right. But they won’t, because they’re hypocrites – including Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib and Ayanna Pressley. Not only will they not fix their own communities, they want to mess up ours! They only offer abortion, immoral socialism, false victimhood and hatred of white people, men and Christians.

Although the president defended white female Democrat Nancy Pelosi against false accusations of “racism” by Cortez, Pelosi turned on Trump, paying back evil for good. In order to help “women of color” who hate her, Pelosi led a controversial vote condemning what she falsely called “racist tweets,” denigrating the president. In response, Trump pointed out that “this was the first time since 1984 that the Speaker of the House was ruled Out of Order and broke the Rules of the House.”

Thank God, a beautiful crowd in Greenville, North Carolina echoed the president’s sentiments, chanting, “Send her back!” – referring to America-hating, Israel-hating Ilhan Omar. The children of the lie, including the liberal media, Democrats, RINO Republicans and Never Trumpers, of course freaked out over the lack of political correctness. These deceivers hate good people, and support America’s enemies. Weak, cowardly establishment Republicans begged the president to distance himself from the “send her back” chant, which he obliged to a point. But when pressed by media, the president stood by the people of North Carolina as “incredible patriots.”

President Trump loves America, and said that these Democrat women “can’t get away with” denigrating its people. “I’m unhappy that a Congresswoman … can call our country and our people ‘garbage.'” He referred to Cortez (the socialist), who trashed the opportunities offered by this country, and called the late President Reagan and working white people “racist.”

Trump said, “I can tell you this, you can’t talk that way about our country, not when I’m the president.” These are the words of a real man. Not a weak, pathetic person concerned with silly notions of “racism,” “sexism” and whatever else they come up with – Trump stands on what’s right. He’s a straight, white, conservative Christian man of power – everything the children of the lie hate.

Ilhan Omar promised to be the president’s “nightmare,” which really means she wants to be America’s nightmare. Trump said, “She’s lucky to be where she is. … And the things that she has said are a disgrace to our country.”

I say shame on us for allowing such a woman to come here. But this is what evil wants. It’s time for the people on the side of good to stand up. Thankfully, President Trump is doing that.

There’s nothing more important than rebuilding men. There are no men in the Democrat Party – only weak beta males. Women run the Democrat Party, which is anti-American and of Satan. We saw what happened when men disappeared from black homes. The black community worships “mama” while they kill one another. Now other races, including whites, follow in blacks’ footsteps of self-destruction, by following women. Whites have turned to weakness and surrender, thinking the people of color will love them. That’s not the way.

Watch and learn from this president, who makes evil unwelcome again.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=D_J1HRwqt94

Heaven’s Gate #fundie #ufo heavensgate.com

(Yes, Heaven Gate still has a website. I don’t know whether this is the original site that somehow never expired in all those twenty-two years - or, more disturbingly, whether there is some remaining cultist who is still maintaining it even after the mass suicide and Hale-Bopp’s uneventful passing. There seem to be no dates after 1997.
Emphasis original.)

OUR POSITION AGAINST SUICIDE

We know that it is only while we are in these physical vehicles (bodies) that we can learn the lessons needed to complete our own individual transition, as well as to complete our task of offering the Kingdom of Heaven to this civilization one last time. We take good care of our vehicles so they can function well for us in this task, and we try to protect them from any harm.

We fully desire, expect, and look forward to boarding a spacecraft from the Next Level very soon (in our physical bodies). There is no doubt in our mind that our being "picked up" is inevitable in the very near future. But what happens between now and then is the big question. We are keenly aware of several possibilities.

It could happen that before that spacecraft comes, one or more of us could lose our physical vehicles (bodies) due to "recall," accident, or at the hands of some irate individual. We do not anticipate this, but it is possible. Another possibility is that, because of the position we take in our information, we could find so much disfavor with the powers that control this world that there could be attempts to incarcerate us or to subject us to some sort of psychological or physical torture (such as occurred at both Ruby Ridge and Waco).

It has always been our way to examine all possibilities, and be mentally prepared for whatever may come our way. For example, consider what happened at Masada around 73 A.D. A devout Jewish sect, after holding out against a siege by the Romans, to the best of their ability, and seeing that the murder, rape, and torture of their community was inevitable, determined that it was permissible for them to evacuate their bodies by a more dignified, and less agonizing method. We have thoroughly discussed this topic (of willful exit of the body under such conditions), and have mentally prepared ourselves for this possibility (as can be seen in a few of our statements). However, this act certainly does not need serious consideration at this time, and hopefully will not in the future.

The true meaning of "suicide" is to turn against the Next Level when it is being offered. In these last days, we are focused on two primary tasks: one - of making a last attempt at telling the truth about how the Next Level may be entered (our last effort at offering to individuals of this civilization the way to avoid "suicide"); and two - taking advantage of the rare opportunity we have each day - to work individually on our personal overcoming and change, in preparation for entering the Kingdom of Heaven.

Paula White #fundie friendlyatheist.patheos.com

… I’d had three dreams, and in those three dreams, we flew out on a Monday morning at that 6:00 flight. I land at 8:30 and I was going into surgery at 9:30. And I didn’t tell anyone this, but in three dreams, I saw my leg getting amputated.

And I said, “Lord” — and I know it wasn’t a fear, it wasn’t anything else — I said “something’s not right today.” And I’m sitting there, and they go in, they put the IV in me, etc. And all of a sudden, I said to the doctor, I said, “Sir,” I said, “How long?” Meaning how long will the surgery be? And he said, “Oh, we’re just waiting. They changed the anesthesiologist.”

And the moment he said that, I turned to [husband] John, I said, “Grab my phone right now.”

John goes back in the office, grabs my phone, and all of a sudden, a prophet that’s a very dear friend calls me from Ghana, and said, “Mom, you’re on a table right now. Get the IV out of your arm. There’s a demonic timeline to try to take your life.”

I looked at the doctor, I said, “Get me off of this table right now.” I’m going in surgery! Is this not true, baby? John’s looking at me like I’m crazy, but he knows when I hear the Holy Spirit, there’s nothing you can do. I looked at him, I said, “Sir, you’re not going to understand this, but I’m about to save your practice, and I’m about to save my life.” I said, “Because they have intercepted, and there’s a demonic timeline to take my life today, and God had confirmed it to me through three dreams, and I had not said a word to anybody. The Prophet calls up, and he says, ‘Mom, you’re laying on this’ and there’s a demonic, he said you can have surgery but not on this day.”

And I knew. And I said “Get this IV out of me!” And they said, “Oh, we’ll get your regular anesthesiologist. He’ll come at 2:00.” I said, “Get the IV out of my arm, or I’m ripping it out of my arm. You can’t do surgery on me today!”

Patsy Lambert #fundie newberryobserver.com

The Bible
By Patsy Lambert - Contributing Columnist

The Bible is so important, because it is God’s Word. It isn’t a collection of stories that men made up. It is written by people that had been with Jesus and were inspired by the Holy Spirit.

“For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.” 2 Peter 1:21.

The Bible is given to us so we can know the Lord and know His will for our lives. God has not changed and neither has the Bible.

Our need for Christ and His salvation should be stronger today than ever before. The Bible let’s us understand that Jesus Christ, who was God in the flesh came from Heaven to save us from our sin.

From the beginning of the Bible until the end we can see and know the hope that we have in Jesus.

God wants us to read and understand His Precious Word. We need to always remember how important the Bible is to our lives.

John Piper #fundie twitter.com

Daniel's message to all self-sufficient leaders: The God you ignore is "the God in whose hand is your breath, and whose are all your ways" (Daniel 5:23).

Indeed: "In his hand is the breath of all mankind” (Job 12:10).

Every breath without thanks is treason.

Mick Williams #fundie disqus.com

They call him Orange Man, a president whose every word triggers them into paroxysms of hysterical rage. Yet these enemies of freedom are no bigots. They label him a sexist akin to the religious death cult they champion; a baby-killer who would deny women their "reproductive right" to infanticide; he's all the evils unknown on their side. Doubters have merely to check with their pet media.

Who are these modern masters of hypocrisy? They're the legacy of the old Soviet Bloc, who, failing to defeat us on the battlefield, planted the seeds of internal rot. So brilliant has been its success that the Cultivators are now turning on each other; so complete has been their descent into lunacy that some of their own are being scared straight. A worried Russian president, in fact, insists that liberalism is harmful to the host, hoping to forestall the complete collapse of the disease.

The Dregs, known to Russia as "useful idiots", are those the state has divorced from the Good Book. Lacking absolute truth, their moral compass is a weather vane duck with spinning wings, blown about by the hot breath of that old serpent they'll never see. After all, no heaven equals no hell in the algebra of the left.

A certain "wealthy financier" laments that the president is dismantling the New World Order. Sensing his re-election, certain Middle East actors are making overtures of peace. Nor is an EMP attack likely, since the Illuminati need the internet. Time to relax? Not according to those who like to quote "at a time ye think not", when all seems normal and prosperous. The sudden absence of millions will likely crash a house-of-cards economy propped up by a rapidly withdrawing Restrainer. It's a crisis tailor-made for a man waiting in the wings, stage left, in The Twilight Zone.

(Accompanied by a photo of Rod Serling, not included here)

Next page