new

“Socialising the people” and “removing the Jews from society” are the same thing. Lenin and Stalin had [...] their Holocaust [...] Because to form Marx’s worker’s paradise, you must socialise the people, remove the bourgeoisie middle class from society. Hitler didn’t outcompete them in a free market. Aight? Hitler socialised the state and used that to remove the Jews from society. If Hitler’s not a socialist, and he didn’t socialise the people, then he doesn’t remove the Jews from society. Hitler’s socialism was his racism.

So those of you who deny that Hitler was a socialist...you’re actually denying the Holocaust. [...] Marxist Holocaust denialists refuse to accept Hitler’s socialism. [...] How did the free market result in the Holocaust? [W]hich private business owned and marketed the Holocaust? Marxist Holocaust denialists have no answer to these questions. [...] This is why Holocaust denialist laws exist, because Marxist Holocaust denialist historians cannot explain the ideological reasoning for the Holocaust.

[...]

National Socialist Holocaust denialists know it’s happened. [...] What they’re doing...is trolling the Marxist historians. They’re saying, “Look! Look! There's a huge flaw in your argument here!”. And the Marxists can’t plug the gap, because in order to plug the gap, they would need to admit that Hitler wanted to socialise the people, remove the Jews from society. And they can’t do that, because that would be an admission that National Socialism was “real” socialism. To admit that would undermine their entire ideology. It would place Hitler on the far left of the political spectrum. Or it would place Marxism and socialism on the far right of the political spectrum.

Wherever Hitler goes, Marx goes too. And this they will not allow, because if people realise the true nature of socialism (total state control of the economy and people, totalitarianism), how can these Marxists call for the Holocaust of the middle class, the bourgeoisie? They can’t.

{Submitter’s note: A fundie video and comments claiming women wearing pants is evil and cause men to lust (as if dresses stop some men from harassing us.)}

JESUS WARNED ME About WOMEN WEARING TROUSERS, They Will Not Enter HEAVEN!!

Comments

( OlipahNalungwe )
Alot of women wear trousers O Lord! Help the world before it's too late

( EviaChakuamba )
If you love Him obey His word.
You cant rely on mercy and keep on sinning. Mercy is only available to those who repented.
When l looked in the dictionary the meaning of trousers it says
a man's outer garment.

( Heaven Updates )
I think you don't know who your Father is by now 🤔..

He said, 👇👇👇

(Matthew 5:28)
But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.

What do you think the trousers does when a woman wears it, don't you think it draws her shapes in that trousers and make the men to lust after her..

Then I ask you, will the DEVIL ask you to take PRE-CAUTION against making men to lust after you??

Many of us out here don't really know what is right for our soul..

I pray God help us know him better...🙏🙏

( faith1222 )
@mhodupe_xmaybe, but don't be the cause of men's lust. They might still lust after you, even if you were covered from head to toe, but that is their problem. The important thing is you obey the will of the Holy Father by being modest and well covered. DO NOT BE THE SOURCE OF TEMPTATION, cause you will give an account for that.