The woman-haters, man-haters, and non-binary-haters
As a general rule, grown men should not go to therapy. Most therapists are liberal women who couldn’t possibly have any useful advice to give them. Most people who go to therapy are also women. That’s because sitting around and talking about your feelings is inherently feminine. Men don’t solve their problems that way.
[From “Nick Fuentes is a gay commie fed”]
And George Galloway is a straight commie[…]
He is now self exiled from Britain[…]subject to state violence because he thinks that women are not men[…]that it is probably not a good idea for Britain to pick a fight with a state that has three thousand nuclear weapons, and similarly shocking and unthinkable thoughts
In the Iraq war, George Galloway was a guest on the BBC every day ranting about American imperialism[…]
Nick Fuentes hyperbolically claims to be the most cancelled man in America. Elon Musk thinks that Nick Fuentes is on the fed payroll. And I agree
Nick Fuentes was invited onto “Piers Morgan Uncensored”[…]much hilarity ensued as Piers Morgan was completely discombobulated to find he was debating someone who was actually uncensored
Piers Morgan would show a Nick Fuentes clip, and complain that the clip was ism and phobia[…]Nick would smile like the cat that got the cream, and cheerfully say the unsayable all over again[…]
But Nick is still a gay commie. The reason they are platforming Nick Fuentes while they are still trying to put Andrew Tate in jail is that though Nick Fuentes is right about women and the holocaust, Andrew Tate is a lot more right about women than Nick Fuentes
The difference between Fuentes and Tate on women is that though they both say that women need to be conquered and subdued, Tate also says that they want to be conquered and subdued, and are bitter and unhappy because they cannot find anyone capable of conquering and subduing them
Nick Fuentes is a limited hangout. He is the left deciding to open the Overton window substantially[…]
It was entertaining to see Nick slice and dice Piers[…]every answer Nick gave was a soft wobbly retreat from the full thought crime[…]
It is great that the British left is now willing to hear what Nick Fuentes is saying. But they still cannot hear what George Galloway is saying, and still less can they hear what Andrew Tate is saying
(...) the idea that men under "patriarchy" are encouraged to display "positive masculinity" in any way. That is a mystification designed to dupe you into thinking that you're getting something in exchange for feminine deference, which leads many radfems to conclude that "gender abolition" can be made palatable to men and pro-male women if only they offer something like "you stop murdering and raping us, I pick up the check at the restaurant and let you wear my pantyhose". They will never accept your "deal" because men run the show. They're not really "forced" to adhere to any standard in the first place and there is no punishment for deviating from it, it's all a sham. They'll sell you movies portraying "women and children first" as they drown them to save themselves. "Valor" in war isn't a thing, and neither are knights in shining armor. Males habitually use "feminine" emotional manipulation and heartstring pulling to maintain dominance, and always have. You're not offering them anything they don't already have full access to.
This is one of many fallacies of "gender abolition" - the one where self proclaimed "gender abolitionists" actually take "patriarchal" descriptions of gender roles at face value, and (again, not insult) I would probably blame autistic tendencies here. In practice, the only rule of "patriarchy" and "masculinity" is that there are rules for you and no rules for men, which is why I reject these words in the first place - there is only male dominance/parasitism. Trans women are the most glaring example of this. If tomorrow you proclaimed that men no longer have to be GI joes, they'd find a way to have a higher social standing than you by being wailing loser faggots. And it would be entirely at your expense.
The idea that some silly, jaded straight women are delaying this "gender abolition" by expecting some nebulous "effort" on Valentine's day rests upon the assumption that "masculinity" is what it says it is. It's not and it never has been.
During a live interview on 19 December, Russian President Vladimir Putin praised child marriages, citing both the practice in general in the North Caucasus and the marriages within Chechen Head Ramzan Kadyrov’s family, saying it was a ‘very good tradition’
Putin’s comment came in response to a question by a 23-year-old audience member about his long-term relationship with his girlfriend
Putin went on to praise the people of the Caucasus as having a ‘very good tradition’, saying that it consisted of parents marrying off their children at a fairly early age. He said that, in his opinion, this is something others should emulate
‘Among the peoples of the Caucasus there is a very good tradition: they marry off their children at a fairly early age. This is really right, we should take an example from them. How do I know? Ramzan Kadyrov has a large family, many children, and they marry and get married at a fairly early age. He told me that this is their tradition, generally across the Caucasus. And that is very good’, Putin said
Putin also stated that this is ‘really right’ and beneficial for the formation of family life. He linked the discussion to the problem of declining birth rates and to the difficulties that, in his view, young people, especially women, face when trying to combine education and careers with family life
In his Telegram channel, Kadyrov called Putin’s praise of his family a great honour and stated that, in his opinion, without a strong family, a meaningful marriage and the birth of children, neither the development of the state nor the preservation of spiritual and moral foundations is possible
Kadyrov stressed that marriage and the birth of children are a sacred duty for the residents of the Chechen Republic[…]He thanked the president for the high assessment of his family and said he intended to continue adhering to ‘traditional values’
> [02:08:04] You just go get a Masonic symbol and just stare at it for about 10 minutes and just look for things.
> [02:08:11] Right. And if you do not see your vagina.
> [02:08:14] I mean, from the inside.
> [02:08:16] Don't look from the outside.
> [02:08:18] Look from the inside.
> [02:08:19] You know, from the G outward.
> [02:08:21] Exactly. Remember, in the vagina, you have a G spot.
> [02:08:26] Exactly. Think about this.
> [02:08:29] Why would they say you have a G spot?
> [02:08:31] Ironically, we have a Freemasonic symbol that looks like a vagina, and what does it have in the middle?
image
60+ free meals even a roastie has life on tutorial mode :feelswhat: guaranteed this hole rejected many Men even above her looksmatch, foids can never be lonely.
The billionaire co-founder of software company Palantir has called for the return of public hangings in order to demonstrate “masculine leadership”
“If I’m in charge later, we won’t just have a three strikes law. We will quickly try and hang men after three violent crimes. And yes, we will do it in public to deter others,” Joe Lonsdale wrote on X
“Our society needs balance. It’s time to bring back masculine leadership to protect our most vulnerable”
Lonsdale, who co-founded the tech giant along with entrepreneurs including Peter Thiel, made the comments in response to online criticism of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and his attitude to recent military strikes against alleged “drug boats”
Hegseth was called out for his own online posts in which he boasted openly about sinking “another narco-boat.” Online users reacted with outrage, with Claire Lehmann, editor of the Australian-based libertarian website Quillette describing the post itself as "grotesque"
“And look I get it that sometimes hard men need to do ugly things. But if you're going to do this, don't broadcast it, & don't brag about it. FFS,” Lehmann wrote
Lonsdale replied: “She’s just wrong. Leftist schoolmarm leaders cause violence and evil in our civilization. Sinking narco boats publicly helps deter others. As does hanging repeat violent criminals
“Killing bad guys is DoW job. He should brag more. Masculine truth: bold, virtuous men deter evil”
Some Russian Girls Can Marry At 14. That's Good News!
1. Brutally Honest Rather Than Shameless
Immigration seems to be a hot topic these days here in the United States. People are constantly complaining about open borders and rightfully so. However, what gets much less attention is whether adult men have the right to bring foreign wives into the country if those foreign wives are younger than 18 years old.
..
Some of you may be asking the million-dollar question, which is, "If you're an adult man and you're traveling to the Russian Federation to find a wife, why not marry a woman in her twenties?" I'm not discouraging American men from doing so. However, keep in mind that a majority of Russian women are getting married right out of high school. Therefore, an American man is not going to have as many 20-something-year-old single women to choose from in that country as teenage girls.
A 20-something-year-old American man will have no problem finding himself the 14- or 15-year-old love of his life in the former Soviet Union. All he has to do is attend a Russian beauty pageant, and there will be contestants as young as 13 years old with bodies that would make even the hottest 29-year-old woman green with envy.
If we American men want to travel to foreign lands to find ourselves a teenage bride, it's our business. Call it a caveman fantasy if you must, but it's a heck of a lot better than being married to some self-absorbed, youth-obsessed hag.
…
Never mind all of those horror stories that Fraidy Reiss and Jeanne Smoot spread all over the nation about older husbands who beat on their underage wives. These women are scraping the bottom of the barrel for these kinds of stories, when there are likely more true stories about girls of middle-school or high-school age getting married to someone older and living happily ever after.
Femi-Nazis like Fraidy Reiss and Jeanne Smoot have gone as far as falsifying data to support their baseless arguments that teenage marriages are somehow all exploitative and wrong. They've misused the press and the media to showcase their agenda.
Do not feel bad for women with children, they are simply being punished for the crime of being mothers. There is no excuse, there is no justification, they made a selfish choice and now they must pay for it.
#anti natalist#anti natalism#circle of life
[ TRANSCRIPTION ]
Autistic women vs autistic men's areas of special interest
vintage fashion
radical feminism
classical literature
web art
psychology
jigsaw puzzles
cottagecore
mental health awareness
-
school shootings
hentai
4chan
the alt-right
incel killers
Chris Chan
autogynephilia
(Content Warning: Site links to an NSFW AI chatbot service, this was found in one of the comments of a bot)
It made me wish an actual Alolan would show up with a Palossand and a Salazzle. The Palossand would trap them in it's body and the Salazzle would Flamethrower away their reproductive rights.
Mass rape and extermination of all foids is based
i don’t know if this is allowed but it’s based.
(Jimb0)
saint Goebbels
Technically, trooning out is often a result of self reflection. The part that's missing is drawing a logical conclusion from it, which can't happen because of the reproductive niche a male evolved to occupy. If a male completes the process of self reflection, he will not engage in male-typical sexual behavior. That makes the trait self-eliminating.
You may have noticed this already. A male grows up watching his mother get abused by his father, perhaps getting abused himself. He feels bad for the mother, pities himself and acknowledges that his father was wrong, yet eventually becomes an abuser. A male is a pillar of the community, kind and charitable to everyone including children. He is also a pedophile. A male would kill any male hitting on his 13 year old daughter, yet his hard drive is full of jailbait. A male understands that pregnancy is painful and destructive to the woman, and feels bad for his wife. He still wants heirs.
A male's observation that he needs to hurt others to fulfill his reproductive program, logically, should result in him ceasing the program. And perhaps it did in the distant past, but that trait by definition mostly died off. This predicts an existence of some kind of a neurological "switch" in the mind of a male that prevents him from internalizing his own awareness of male harm. Studies showing previously rape-condeming males increasingly justifying sexual violence and rape myths as their own arousal increases are consistent with this hypothesis, as well as the established male tendency to externalize.
Sure, a number of TIMs most definitely troon out as a premeditated means to min-max their current place in society. But some can be expected to troon out as part of the mechanism described above, especially given their higher exposure to observations of male harm via news and social media, as well as some extent of public condemnation of it. The sheer number of born-again coomers, deadbeat husbands and pedos who troon out at the most opportune moment can reflect either scenario. Male harm is increasingly more difficult to compartmentalize or launder away, but self-elimination from the gene pool via suicide or celibacy is not optimal.
The true horror of moidry is the fact that even if they genuinely want to stop being what they are and doing what they do, they can't. There no other way for them to exist.
Has The War Against Teenage Marriage Become The Democrats' Agenda?
If you have been a loyal follower of mine since the time that I first became a Hiver, then you have to know that I have been sharply opposed to our elected officials passing laws to forbid teenagers from getting married before they become legally old enough to vote. The Commonwealth of Virginia is a disgraceful jurisdiction that has scrapped the rights of teenage minors to enter into matrimony to make their loving relationships all legal since 2016.
…
1. Virginia Not For Lovers Or Marriage
Upon recently discovering this change in the marriage laws in this same state jurisdiction, I surfed around on YouTube to see if there were any videos about it. All I could find was a video of this one bimbo smiling and celebrating this bill's passage into law. The video is below.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/CSaxDQKtDtY
Amie Knowles Gives An Intellectually Bankrupt Narrative About How New Virginia Law Outlaws "Child Marriage" As Of July 1st, 2024
Duhhh, Amie Knowles. Medical science defines a child as a boy or girl before puberty. Therefore, child marriage has never been legal in the Commonwealth of Virginia. Before 2016, a girl had to be pregnant to get married if she was under 16 years of age. You're talking about teenage marriage with the exception of 18- and 19-year-olds.
…
However, there was a 14-year-old girl in Ohio and another 14-year-old girl in Alabama who each married a man in his forties, and neither one of them regretted it.
I mean, every man over 40 years old who falls in love with a teenage girl is not the next Brian David Mitchell, Ariel Castro, or Phillip Garrido, for pete sakes. Some of them actually do have honorable intentions for these young girls. Society and the law are not always right about these men.
The Term "Map" Offends Adult Teleiophiles With Teenage Love Interests
I never thought that I would be making this statement, but self-proclaimed child advocates and pedophile activists have become strange bedfellows in promoting the MAP narrative in a dangerous way. Self-proclaimed child advocates want adult men who have non-Platonic feelings toward teenage girls to be lumped in with actual pedophiles, because these idiots insist that there is no difference between the two. Pedophile activists merely wish to latch onto the umbrella of chronoastiphilia so that society will accept pedophilia.
What is the umbrella of chronoastiphilia? It is the umbrella that contains hebephilia, ephebophilia, and teleiophilia. Pedophilia and nepiophilia have their own umbrella that identifies them as maladaptive paraphilias and psychiatric disorders.
Fact has it that there is a world of a difference between an adult teleiophile who falls in love with a teenager and an actual pedophile who fantasizes about sexually molesting children. The two should never be cross-polinnated in any way, shape, or form. Most unfortunately, the American culture is vulnerable to the imposition of these ludicrous terms and acronyms because of what can be best described as "Pedophile-Panic Derangement Syndrome" or what can be even better described as "Knee-Jerk Map Hysteria Crap."
Not too long ago I read a true story about a foster mother who allowed for her 14-year-old foster daughter to date a 24-year-old man provided that he followed the foster mother's strict rules. To make a long story short, the young man married the girl eight years later, and they lived happily ever after. He even put her through college. He fell in love with her when she was only 14 years old and he was a full-grown adult, but he never manipulated or groomed her.
My question is why would a decent man like that want to hang out and chill with some sicko who gets his rocks off by watching adult men sexually assault toddlers on camera? He wouldn't. Therefore, how does it make any sense for anyone to lump that young man in with someone as depraved and revolting as Peter Scully? It doesn't.
[From “Benny Johnson: “You're going to invade Venezuela? Which I'm totally against. Invade Canada? I'm more in favor of that, frankly.””]
From the December 17, 2025, edition of The Benny Show, streamed on YouTube
BENNY JOHNSON (HOST): Today you are witnessing a miracle. The miracle is a group of young people who are more religious than their parents. You've never seen that, not in human history, not in American history, where church attendance and belief in God is higher than actually their parents' generation. You can see these numbers quite plainly. Again, in purchases of Bibles, in adherence to particularly traditional churches like Catholicism is seeing a great increase and spike,. and in belief in God, which remains incredibly strong in our party[…]There was a time when this was waning in both parties and it was collapsing from sectarian. And it's like a very weird psyop moment in, like, the 2010[…]You know, like, we need to just[…]liberalize the movement, and we need to get rid of traditional values and social norms and social conservatism. And Charlie brought that roaring back[…]
And the final thing is the motivation of those men. Because one thing is like, you know, OK. You have all these younger, more conservative people. What are they going to do with that energy? You're going to invade Venezuela? Which I'm totally against. Invade Canada? I'm more in favor of that, frankly. But what are you going do with that? Invade by peaceful means. I think Canada, you could just kick in the front door, honestly, and they just surrender. I think you could do that. I honestly think that would roll really easilyWhat what are you going do with that energy? Well, according to Gallup, so you have all these young people that believe in God. They're believing God in great numbers. They're more right-wing and conservative in greater numbers than ever politically. What is the motivation? What action are they going to take? They want families, dude
I growl at my mother
Instead of showing my whore mother attention and speaking to her, I just growl at her. Also, it's funny seeing her reactions when I growl at her. I hiss at her as well to add some variety in my communication. My mother is super annoying so whenever she's nagging me I just hiss or growl at her in response. I recommend you guys growlmaxx at foids as toilets don't deserve our words.
On a classic episode of ID the Future, we spotlight the book The Toxic War on Masculinity, by author and scholar Nancy Pearcey, professor and scholar in residence at Houston Christian University. In her conversation with me, Pearcey argues against the current fashion of seeing masculinity as inherently toxic. She traces the tendency back to Darwinism and explains how the industrial revolution, working hand in glove with secularism, fueled toxic masculinity at the expense of virtuous masculinity.
Download the podcast or listen to it here. Tune in to hear what Pearcey offers as an antidote to the war on virtuous masculinity.
From the December 8, 2025, edition of Fox News' The Five
JESSE WATTERS (CO-HOST): This is the most popular foreign policy action of Trump's second term: killing narco-terrorists. You know what the second one is? Bombing the Iran nuclear program. So, the Democrats are now coming out against the two most popular things Trump's done abroad this year. Dumb. People love these videos. They hit your feed, they're like, yes, let's go. Hit them again, and if you're against it, you sound like a lawyerly, whiney, effeminate weasel
Pinkpill here.
Feminism is an inherently western, individualistic, Enlightenment based ideology. I'm going to blow your mind here - technically there can't be any 'nonwhite' feminism because the interests of one's race and tribe are inherently irreconcilable with the interests of women as individuals, because family and all of its surrounding structures innately require female mules. You acknowledge this when you complain about black men/ankhs building black community/identity/self worth on the backs of black women. This isn't a bug, it's a feature. If you want to uplift a nation in any sort of tribal struggle, this is what you have to do. There is no way to support female liberation whilst simultaneously elevating the status of men in your group as compared to men in other groups. In the end you're spending your resources to help advance a man in a male hierarchy. It's unfortunate and I can sympathize with the double bind to an extent, but I have long abandoned the idea that helping women also helps the men (along w with other silly idealistic stuff like 'having it all' and 'teach boys to respecc wamen').
If you're not prepared to be childless/tribeless/identityless and family-less, anything you do will benefit men at your (or other women's) expense.
[...]
Men's issues are not women's issues, but intersectionality aims to obscure that. Being forced to balance the interests of women with the interests of men due to a common group descriptor inevitably results in incidents like not wanting to give up R. Kelly because he's giving more status to the community as a whole. Black men could enslave all white men tomorrow and it would make absolutely 0 difference for black women, except maybe a consolation prize of being sexually valued above white women - a goal that's inherently nonfeminist in the first place.
> Men aren’t fully human. They obsess over specific scenarios of putting their dicks into holes and if they can’t, they become simultaneously catatonic and in a state of psychosis. Imagine living half a century and the only thing you think your existence is worth is a few minutes of hookup sex. I’m so glad I wasn’t born a man nonnies. It’s an existential nightmare imagining yourself as being physically human without a human soul.
> There really is nothing there.
[paragraph breaks added for legibility]
In recent years when it became a cancelable offense in any non-explicitly right-wing institution to say, "transwomen are not women", it got me wondering when did majority elite opinion first require believing obviously insane things. There has always been crazy beliefs, but many of those crazy beliefs are at least plausible if you don't have firsthand experience and are just reading about it in the books.
For instance, I believe in HBD, not blank slatism with regards to race, but unless you spend a lot of time interacting with a cross-section of each race, it's at least plausible to believe that it's just a matter of education or not getting a proper chance.
But when did majority elite opinion become crazy in a way that required people to defy what they saw with their own eyes? My answer is allowing women in combat. Sex differences in size, strength, demeanor, interests, are just so great, the importance of women to childbearing is so obvious, that believing women have a right to be in combat is both crazy and crazy in a way that defies obvious common sense, defies what people see with their own eyes. A few years ago I happened to be watching the Ruth Bader Ginsberg documentary and they were praising her for the famous Citadel case where the Supreme Court acquiesced to an appeals court grant a constitutional right to a woman to attend a state funded military academy. RBG is praised for her brains, but to me, that signifies when elite opinion had totally gone off the rails.
A female who makes a male is making war for females. A female who makes a male becomes the means by which males war against females. A female who makes a male, however unintentionally, is enabling and continuing and even improving males’ war against females. She is “helping” males become “better” and “better” rapists; she is “helping” males become more formidable. – The diving beetle, for example: Even though the female tries to avoid males/rape by diving underwater, the male still dives after her to try to grasp/rape her. Females in turn evolve altered dorsal surfaces, making it harder for males to grasp them underwater. But the males who “overcome” this female morphological defense will do so through “improvements” – having better graspers, being the biggest males, etc. – making them even more hellacious rapists, – which the female will be forced to perpetuate, – inadvertently bringing a new level of hell to other females.
[OP of “Reasons why Marital Rape Law is Dangerous:”]
2) Marital Rape is already Covered in Sexual Abuse of Domestic Violence Act, she can take Divorce, Residencial Rights, Alimony, Maintenance & Litigation Charges.After this, what purpose do you think an Additional Marital Rape Clause will Serve apart from giving Woman 1 more Weapon for Misuse to Exploit & Extort Innocent Men?
3) False Allegation of Mariatal Rape would be used as a Weapon of Fear & Defamation for Blackmailing & Extortion from Husband. Even if the Man is Innocent he'll have to Spend 1-3yrs in Jail till the Case is Proved to be False after that Punishment for False Allegation by Women is only Rs.1000 or even Sorry
4) Women's Rights Activists & Feminists don't take any Accountability & Action against any False Allegations made by a Woman even tho they know very well that Real Victims Case gets Delayed because of Time Wastage on False Allegation Cases. These people will cry "Justice Delayed is Justice Denied" but won't take any Action against Women behind this Delay. They'll rather Blame Patriarchy for their Fault & Move on, than making Laws Gender Neutral & Strict Punishment for False Accusers[…]
6) What about Women who are Genuine Victims of Marital Rape? File for Domestic Violence under Sexual Abuse. Leave your Husband, File for Divorce, Claim Alimony Maintenance & Litigation Charges from Husband
7) Women are 100% Protected 'Legally', you don't have to Worry about them 'Legally'. Whenever something Wrong happens to a Woman whole State Fights for the her. It's always Man vs State, if you Real Court Judgements you'll Notice that. The only thing they Lacks is Safety. Safety & Legality are 2 Different things. Safety works for Prevention of Crime. Legality works for Punishment after Crime happened. You have to understand that Safety requires huge Investment on Infrastructure & Technology which Government wants to avoid, that's why they Introduces some Sh!tty Laws as an Excuse
Do men want to be raped? Absolutely. Do they show it by writing trashy “romance” novels? Not usually. Their expressed desire for becoming rape victims can be literal and obvious, but most of the time, far more subtle and psychological, and it bleeds into almost everything they do or create. Every time man puts pen to paper, when he “expresses” himself, he is crying for rape in some way. Nietzsche’s works are more salacious than anything booktook has to offer when it comes to how much the author suggests a desire to be raped. That’s pretty much all of them.
I remember arguing with a nonna on here who refused to believe me when I say that males ultimately crave to be raped.
I would even say that misogyny, at its core, is a man’s rebellion over the fact he isn’t worthy of rape, and his jealousy over women because thinks they are.
For troons, the solution is retarded yet fairly straightforward. He becomes rapable by becoming a woman. He becomes worthy. He is more worthy the more he can prove he is rapable, the more he proves he is a woman. Notice how TiMs only complain about being TiMs because when they feel unsexy (unrapable). Notice how TiMs only brag about being TiMs when they feel sexy (rapable). Even when they’re “complaining” about “being rapable” (literally), it’s a point of pride. Humble bragging over being “forced” into sex work and getting “unwanted” chaser attention, giggling and blushing over “validating misogyny” from “TIRMs”. In fact they even invent lies about lesbians and TERFs wanting to rape them, because that’s the best marker of success he can think of.
Moids are driven to create the conditions that best resemble him being raped. Since it’s impossible to command a woman’s will, he can never make her think “I want to rape him”. Typically, he substitutes her want for her need. He forces women to accept his role as “the provider”, and her helpless to resist. He fabricates the conditions required for a woman to depend on him for her survival (staying alive, since he can’t barter with his worthless gametes), where the default is for him to depend on her for his survival (reproduction). She now needs him, instead of him needing her. His power and resources become his coveted fertile womb. He’s necessary. He’s important. He’s so important and so necessary a women would die without him (he’ll make sure of that!)
His insistence that he should be rapable bleeds into all that he believes, or wants to believe. His sense of self, his ego, relies entirely on his ability to trick himself into thinking he is rapable. He wants to feel raped even while he is raping. The woman/child seduced him. She was asking for it. No, demanding it, and since he is helpless to his lust that she controls. She basically raped him.
It all comes down to rape, which is to say, being so necessary and important you inspire a want so commanding that others must take.
The Justice Department announced today that it filed legal action against the Loudoun County (Va.) School Board (Loudoun County) for its denial of equal protection based on religion. The suit alleges that Loudoun County applied Policy 8040, which requires students and faculty to accept and promote gender ideology, to two Christian, male students in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
“Students do not shed their First Amendment rights at the schoolhouse gate,” said Assistant Attorney General Harmeet K. Dhillon of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division. “Loudoun County’s decision to advance and promote gender ideology tramples on the rights of religious students who cannot embrace ideas that deny biological reality.”
Policy 8040 requires all students, regardless of their religious beliefs, to adopt the Loudoun County School Board’s understanding of “gender identity” — including its practical application that affects all students’ use of intimate spaces, such as bathrooms and changing facilities. At Stone Bridge High School, a female student took advantage of this policy, entered the boys’ locker room, and recorded audio and video of the boys in that locker room. Several boys spoke out about this incident, including two Christian, male students whose religious beliefs require them to use biologically accurate pronouns and use sex-segregated facilities.
Loudoun County determined that these Christian, male students’ religious practice violated school policy, recasting constitutionally protected activity as “sex-based discrimination” and “sexual harassment.” As punishment, Loudoun County suspended the boys for ten days and ordered them to submit to a “Comprehensive Student Support Plan” that further violates the boys’ right to free exercise of religion at school.
The Department’s motion to intervene in S.W. et al. v. Loudoun County School Board is pending before the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.
All mothers, and motherhood itself, are evil. Women are just like that; it isn’t any degree of artificial psychosis. “Raise my children for me (for free) or I’ll kill them to spite you. I’m so oppressed.” No one feels more entitled to female labor than another woman. (Feminists love to play dumb about “the community of caregivers” being coerced or else forced [girl children, impoverished women] female labor.) Of course, no one gives a fuck about the child/children, the only victims, who did not consent to be born.
Freud externalized, like all males do. He may have briefly stumbled upon the truth but his ego defenses made him pretzel it into a convoluted cope. His initial work was on CSA and pedophilia, which likely made him unable to separate his observations from his core male self somewhere down the road, this prompting the testerical "NO ACTUALLY ITS THE CHILDREN WHO PROVOKE THEM REEEEEE" pivot he became famous for. Fundamentally, a man cannot face who he is - it hurts too much and "kills" his false self. This is something all the women who believe in changing men need to understand.
A male is incapable of accountability because guilt and self awareness interfere with his most basic evolutionary function - take stupid risks until he either reproduces or dies. That alone requires self deception and grandiose delusions.
You will frequently see shit like serial killers trooning out, pedos age regressing, etc. That is typical male convoluted guilt-dodging - to ward off the realization that he's a piece of shit, he will scrap his prior self entirely and try to become someone else, typically a member of the group he wronged, which is supposed to enhance his delusion of innocence. He, of course, won't stop the behavior he is trying to dodge the guilt of, because he is unable to. He'll just use the mangled split identity to "okay" it to himself while mitigating guilt and shame. This is the kind of deranged mess that happens inside men's minds.
[From “Hello, Mr. Tort!”]
It seems that not even Hitler had the full picture of the world and of how rotten the English were which might have cost him the war. Céline perhaps had the better understanding of how far gone the other Aryans were, he even blamed the Germans for their relaxed behaviour in Paris, instead of fomenting a revolution they were indulging themselves in bars. What should we make of Hitler failing to blame Christianity in his Testament?
I have seen The Village, it is quite curious that an Indian made films with mostly a white cast for a long time. Should we put the Aryan woman on such a pedestal? Didn’t David Lane regret later the second variation on the 14 words? Shouldn’t we simply want to survive because that’s what life is? Struggle? Will? Power? I am an incel myself, but I cannot care that much to put a woman on a pedestal. And women today are as traitorous as men if we care to give them agency[…]
Our race is our race, and our race shall outlive the other races, especially the Nordic, or exclusively so—I am a Nordicist myself. Fuentes will never be a radical, that’s why he can be in the open, unlike us. His purpose will be to make other whites self-castrate. The truth is out there, we can look around us and look at History and we will get to Adolf Hitler! No man more noble, he who doesn’t get to Hitler alone will never get to him! Germany had a gold population back then, National Socialism being born in the trenches of the First World War
Meanwhile, the Amerikwans went to war for a government that allowed niggers to roam in millions their territory, absolutely insane people for which no politics can be possible, every Amerikwan should scream daily in forgiveness to the murder of Germania and of our continent which is the only real treasure of this failed human species!
Heil Hitler. May the convergence of catastrophes save us from extinction, whites on their own are too far gone to wake up!
Forgotten Soldier
I truly believe every moid in existence should be raped at least once. I know it wouldn’t make them reconsider their actions, but they’re way too comfortable seeing rape as some light crime like stealing and not a literal violation of one’s humanity just because it mostly happens to women/girls. Or god forbid ‘destruction of property’ if the victim already had a boyfriend/husband/father.
Most of you need to understand that moid wants are not logical if you zoom out. Moids evolved to have wants that only make sense in the short term because they are disposable. The moid's short term interest is monopolization of mates, and everything that appears to be "reasoning" in a moid is a mere post hoc rationalization of base short term instincts. It doesn't matter if eventually he'll have to resort to inbreeding to keep the guaranteed wives flowing, or that all of his epik chad son lineage will be deformed and uncompetitive in the long run. It doesn't matter that the moid will eventually die in a war as a result of society that he created. Because of lower offspring investment, the long term welfare of said offspring (and by extension society) simply isn't part of the moid's program on a purely biological level.
(emphasis is the submitter’s)
I feel like there's this rhetoric that if a man doesn't make feminism his highest priority he's automatically toxic. You can be a good man, and still treat women like shit. Obviously you should work on it if you do, but my points are that a) men aren't perfect, and b) manhood doesn't revolve around womanhood.
From the November 24, 2025, edition of the Jack Neel Podcast, uploaded to YouTube
JACK NEEL (HOST): So I guess the year is 2036. Nick Fuentes is elected president of the United States. What does day one look like in Nick Fuentes America?
NICK FUENTES (GUEST): Oh, day one is going to be ugly. No. But look. I mean, day one --
NEEL: Also, I should have clarified. Would you run for president?
FUENTES: Oh, maybe. I don't know. I don't think I could ever win because I'm too offensive[…]Assuming I did and if I won, I would immediately -- Here's the role of the president: the president is the chief law enforcement officer of the country[…]And what is happening right now is[…]the nation's in open rebellion
We have a criminal illegal alien population of maybe 40 million people. We don't even know[…]Many of them, tens of millions of them, have to be returned because they have no legal standing here
Well, what happens when you try to do this? You see what's happening in Broadview here in Illinois. You get riots[…]
So if I were president on day one, I'm bringing the National Guard everywhere. I'm talking hundreds of thousands of National Guard in all the major cities, and we are putting that shit on lock. It is going to be martial lawAnd the message would be, we have laws here. We don't fuck around. This is the United States. You have to follow the law and we're no longer going to pander to criminals[…]
NEEL: What rights would you take away from women?
FUENTES: Well, I would just take away the right to vote for tons of people. Women for sure, but also I'd raise the voting age to like, 25 in general. I would probably take away the right to vote for, you know, maybe people that have no stake, no skin in the game[…]
People with children, people that own property, people that are of a certain age, people that have had military service, people that speak English. You know, how about that? I mean, there would be some requirements that'd be introduced
Rather than not 'having' to, I assert they didn't want to as a natural consequence of feminine systems only ever competing internally for dominance.
Societies become feminine when they become overpopulated relative to the economic opportunity per capita present. If there's sufficient population they turn to mass murder; that's where the [people of the] Khmer Rouge's "let's murder 1 in 4 people for Mean Girls reasons" philosophy came from. And then there's the South Koreans- a different culture, yes- but they prefer to conduct this conflict by just not reproducing instead of mass post-natal abortion (or pre-natal in the Chinese case).
Now, saying 'economic opportunity' is papering over an utterly massive sum of factors- more advanced technology can either help or hurt this based on who's needed to get the most of it (either it centralizes it and makes capital more valuable, or it decentralizes it and makes labor more valuable; industry was generally the latter, but as labor costs rise all advancements have been in the centralization direction re: robotics). And environmental factors can affect this as well.
And sure, mass murder isn't necessarily unique to feminine societies- late 18th century France being kind of the poster child of that far more than the Nazis were, but if you think of the French Revolution as a massive power vacuum collapsing due to the [not working-class] losing their ability to hold it together (due to technological factors) over 5-10 years, then the working class installing its dictator (Bonaparte), and then striking out to impose the [second] European Union?
To be fair, this model does have some holes- I'm still not entirely sure how to explain the ritual mass suicide euphemistically called "World War 1" other than "we finally figured out metallurgy and assembly lines good enough to do it, so we went for it solely for shits and giggles".
But those wars did create a particular political thinker who did notice that humanity dies when all the world turns female; 1984 is a treatise on that. (So's Animal Farm, for that matter, but it's not explicitly incel-coded like 1984 is.)
Manosphere podcaster Myron Gaines boasted on a recent episode of Tim Pool’s podcast that he “kept a woman out of the White House” and sent former Vice President Kamala Harris “back to the fucking kitchen”
Amrou Fudl, who goes by Myron Gaines, co-hosts Fresh & Fit[…]
From the November 14, 2025, edition of The Culture War with Tim Pool, streamed on Rumble
MYRON GAINES (GUEST): I get your grievances, right, with Trump. And I’ve noticed this, that, like, a lot of progressives, a lot of, like, people that hate Trump hate him for, like, him, not his policy. They just hate him because of him. But I’ll tell you this. As someone that kept Kamala Harris —
…
GAINES: As someone who kept Kamala Harris out of the White House — and she admitted it in her book, by the way, that she blamed me for her losing her election — I would say Trump is the best alternative by far compared to her
TIM POOL (HOST): You think that Kamala watches your content, Myron, and she, like, secretly gets off to it?
GAINES: Maybe
…
GAINES: She blamed me and Andrew Tate. So, hey, that’s a W for us. We kept a woman out of the White House, back to the fucking kitchen
one could crudely summarize every source of human misery as a byproduct of abstract intelligence - namely, an ape being forced to spectate its own animal nature, in particular the awareness of sex and death. esoteric christfags may begin orgasming about the apple of knowledge symbolism here females, being more robust, default, multi-purpose units, are capable of denying animal nature (such as opting out of sex and pregnancy) to some extent, thus managing at least one terror. males, being built for one purpose alone, can't. a male's life therefore defaults to being forced to spectate his own objectively vile, antisocial sexuality, violence and infinite greed - things he knows to be bad because he'd hate to be on the receiving end of them, things he builds laws around condemning - but being unable to stop himself from acting on them, which causes the male to churn out unfathomable amounts of neurotic cope to resolve the moral conflict. the bulk of humanity's cultural heritage practically oozes with this, most instinctive male politics do as well (the perennial idea that it's the other, differently colored males that do bad, vile male- i mean, SAVAGE AND BRUTISH things), even dumb little memes like "post nut clarity" (the brief moment the ape is rightly appalled by the evil it just fapped to) or realizing that your daughter is about to deal with people like you doing to her what you did to her mother.
imagine being a cancer growth with a brain, knowing that you'll kill yourself if you get what you want, but genuinely having no other means of existing, so you have no choice but to antagonize your host. this is what the "male psyche" is. another, late stage form of their neurosis is a delusional, grandiose fantasy of infinite purity and freedom from desire (easy to find in any religion or monastic practice), which usually follows after they pig out on cake too much.
The "Sexual Revolution" of the 1960s was not liberation—it was the systematic destruction of the Christian sexual ethic that built Western civilization. What was marketed as freedom became chains of addiction, broken families, and demographic collapse.
[…]
Modern feminism has taught generations of women that motherhood is oppression and true fulfillment comes only through career achievement and economic independence from men. The results: plummeting birth rates, epidemic female unhappiness, and millions of children raised in broken homes.
[…]
The pornography industry is disproportionately owned and operated by those with no investment in the health of Christian civilization. They profit from addiction, broken families, and demographic collapse. A people addicted to pornography will not form strong families, have children, or build.
[…]
The Long March Through the Institutions
In the 1960s-70s, radical leftists—many of them Jewish intellectuals influenced by the Frankfurt School—infiltrated universities. They succeeded beyond their wildest dreams. University faculty are now overwhelmingly left-wing, with conservatives outnumbered in humanities by ratios of 50-to-1 or more.
What They Teach:
• America is fundamentally racist and evil, unredeemable except through radical transformation
• Western civilization is uniquely oppressive while non-Western cultures are celebrated
• White people bear collective guilt and must accept discrimination as penance
• Christianity is backward and oppressive
• National borders are arbitrary and immoral
Hollywood can also stop with tHe MeSs@g3. Does every action hero have to be Keanu Reeves? No. But I’m not going to believe that the fat gay black woman is going to drop the seven foot body builder.10 I will not accept waif fu unless we’re in comic books or supernatural fiction. Gay folk are maybe 3% of the population, I don’t need them to be 50% of the characters in media. Stop turning every fantasy world into downtown Manhattan. [footnote: See … any fantasy on streaming. Sigh. No. Really.] I can go on.
You know what I saw in the theater this year? A Working Man. Why? Because I like Chuck Dixon and I wanted his film to do well.
Prior to the institution of automation, to the replacement of males by machines, the male should be of use to the female, wait on her, cater to her slightest whim, obey her every command, be totally subservient to her, exist in perfect obedience to her will, as opposed to the completely warped, degenerate situation we have now of men, not only not only not existing at all, cluttering up the world with their ignominious presence, but being pandered to and groveled before by the mass of females, millions of women piously worshiping the Golden Calf, the dog leading the master on a leash, when in fact the male, short of being a drag queen, is least miserable when his dogginess is recognized -- no unrealistic emotional demands are made of him and the completely together female is calling the shots. Rational men want to be squashed, stepped on, crushed and crunched, treated as the curs, the filth that they are, have their repulsiveness confirmed.
The sick, irrational men, those who attempt to defend themselves against their disgustingness, when they see SCUM barrelling down on them, will cling in terror to Big Mama with her Big Bouncy Boobies, but Boobies won't protect them against SCUM; Big Mama will be clinging to Big Daddy, who will be in the corner shitting in his forceful, dynamic pants. Men who are rational, however, won't kick or struggle or raise a distressing fuss, but will just sit back, relax, enjoy the show and ride the waves to their demise.
Do not believe anything men say about anything. Fundamentally, the male is a selfish creature whose only sense of right and wrong is entirely informed by “what’s best for me”. At best, he will entertain himself with ideological musings, but will not apply these beliefs to himself if a beneficial opportunity arises that demands his non-compliance (most rape is opportunistic, for example). They have no principles, no sense of morality, just a set of gambits he employs in hopes of getting the most for the least effort. When they play at being arbiters of reasoning and morality, I can only roll my eyes. The sex who must be constantly and continuously instructed and corralled in an attempt to dissuade their rape children, to varying degrees of success, has no business standing on a podium to lecture anyone on what’s good and bad. They obviously lack the hardware required to possess an innate sense of decency, dignity, respect, and excellence. It’s like asking a robot to describe what it means to be human. They can spit out a rehearsed reply, and it may even be agreeable at first glance. But there is no foundation, no substance, no ground in reality, no through-line. Just a calculated output based on what he thinks he should believe, or rather, what he thinks you want to hear. Worse than a robot, who is entirely without motives, the male exercises an attempt to maximize his own benefit, often to the detriment of others. But I digress.
There’s no such thing as a man who believes in something for its own merit. Even if he were cognitively capable of such an abstraction, the benefits of doing so are preemptively trashed as soon as women are involved.
Failure to thrive is so endemic to the male mind, the discard process is mostly unconscious. Pruned, cerebral garbage, flushed down his spinal column to be shit out, and destined to wallow in the eternal sewer that is male potential. Any and all profound male thoughts serve only as heavy slag to fill the bottom of a septic tank, so that his sperm may one day spill over and escape.
If his “moral” argument is reasoned to lead to women’s further accessibility, it’s not “moral” at all, it’s a gambit. He sees a crack in the cement shit drum and scrambles towards the light by dumping more shit.
Moid psychology and their relationships with women all stem from their envy and self hatred. They hate so much that they need us, but they won't let us go. They can never be free and actualized individuals separate from women because they literally can't be. Their egos won't allow it, and even if the could manage it would all be for naught since the parasite will die without a host. Monks dedicate their entire lives freeing themselves from their male obsession they have towards women, and for their efforts they will die alone without any progeny. That's why misogyny always manifests as women being controlled and enslaved, never simply absconded or abandoned (like misandrist are towards men). They need us and they hate that they need us. Deep in the most ancient and primal part of their brain stem is the need for us. They want us to pay for how much they need us, because it's just not fair.
“Every game, the communities around them, the discords for said games, and so on. You get banned or muted for basically saying anything in chat, people cry about toxicity everywhere, we use AI to moderate voice chat in games now, it's just getting ridiculous.
I'm really tired of studios trying to make gaming into a little safe space for fragile egos. Who even asked for it?”
“It was never a safe space. It was "safe" because everyone in the gaming sphere was a nerdy as fuck outsider and they all shared a lot of the same interests. It was never safe from the kinds of things they want to make us feel bad about. Mockery and insults were common but mostly innocent. Depending of course on how deep into a specific scene you were as some were more hardcore than others. There was a sense of camaraderie but always a sense of competition as well and competition breeds conflict both innocent and extreme.”
“It was "safe" because everyone knew that everything was just online and it wouldn't go into the physical world. Guys let off steam when they're gaming.
The problem is women taking online banter seriously as if a bunch of nerds would follow through.
It's ruined so many online spaces that now have real-world rules applied to them.”
A moid is just a primitive, defective parasitic machine who wants the world to be free and open for him to indulge. Free and open, but only for him. Because this would never manifest without him first being anointed “god” of reality (the whole universe agrees he is the main character), he is just an angry, confused, ineffective thing. He has to come up with strange coping mechanisms to explain the incongruity between his idea of the universe where he himself is god, and the real universe where he isn’t.
Compartmentalization is one of these copes. Where he rightfully assesses that the outside world constantly denies him, so he makes an “alt” mode in cases where he sees he can take/indulge. When the conditions do not exist for him to successfully benefit from his “alt” mode, it also doesn’t exist. Seeking sex (goon alt), seeking connection (yearn alt). The post nut-clarity phenomenon they speak of demonstrates this very clearly. It’s a total alt shut-down, tied to a very specific material condition (arousal vs refractory period).
(anonymous): you said men are genome recombinants i truly felt like my third eye was blasted open. yeah, that's literally just what they are, it's their evolutionary purpose. and people can argue that the existence of both sexes hinges on sexual reproduction, but it's so abundantly clear that females are the original blueprint, what the species would look like if only asexual reproduction existed. the smaller gamete only exists to give up its genes, the egg provides the mitochondria, the fertilized egg is the cell we start out as. if the y chromosome and sry gene doesn't activate, the fetus grows into a female. we are the blueprint and they are the variation.
(1yyyyyy1): Going to use this as an opportunity to disclose my unconventional view of the situation we are in. Humanity the way it currently is is an infestation of mutated sex-crazed females that women nurture out of pity and God knows what else.
Good for her [Marjorie Taylor Greene]. I liked a lot of her positions, but women don't belong in government. We still have Thomas Massie in congress, & hopefully more men like him will run and get elected in 2026.
Every Zionist, sell-out Republican should be primaried in 2026 & replaced with patriots.
Two North Texas men are facing charges after allegedly plotting to invade an island off Haiti, kill all the men and turn the women and children into their sex slaves, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office Eastern District of Texas.
U.S. Attorney Jay R. Comb announced on Thursday that Gavin Rivers Weisenburg, 21, of Allen, and Tanner Christopher Thomas, 20, of Argyle, have been charged with conspiracy to murder, maim, or kidnap in a foreign country and production of child pornography. The two-count indictment was returned by a federal grand jury in the Eastern District of Texas.
Between August 2024 and July 2025, Weisenburg and Thomas allegedly schemed to recruit and lead an illegal "mercenary force" to the Island of Gonave, part of the Republic of Haiti, "for the purpose of carrying out their rape fantasies," court documents state.
Weisenburg and Thomas had plans to purchase a sailboat, firearms and ammunition as well as recruit homeless people from Washington, D.C. to serve as their "mercenary force" as they invaded the Island of Gonave and staged a coup d'etat.
The two men created operational and logistical plans and learned to speak the Haitian Creole language, court documents allege, as well as recruited others to join their invasion and enrolled in schools to learn the skills needed for their invasion plan. The announcement from the U.S. Attorney's Office says Thomas enlisted in the U.S. Air Force to learn relevant military skills.
If convicted of the federal conspiracy to commit murder in a foreign country, Weisenburg and Thomas face up to life in federal prison. If convicted of the federal production of child pornography charges, both face at least 15 years and up to 30 years in federal prison.
[From “A question…”]
I recently mentioned the film The Village, and yesterday I watched the most exquisite scenes.
What impressed me most were the shots of the lead actress, and how she acted, perfectly imitating 19th-century mannerisms: how American women used to behave. I kept telling myself, awestruck, that this woman was absolutely beautiful, and I imagined what it would be like to marry such a creature and constantly gaze upon her! The story is simply a fairy tale, but what’s worthwhile is that only white people appear in the film, and the director’s artistic virtuosity is evident in quite a few shots.
In the end, I was surprised that the director—an Indian man!—was also the producer and writer of that 2004 film. It’s true that one of my two favourite films for the sacred words, P&P (2005) and S&S (1995), both based on Jane Austen novels, was also filmed in this century. But both were filmed in England. As for LOTR, it was filmed in New Zealand.
Aside from The Village, written, produced, and directed by an Indian man, is there an American film from this century that stars a young woman whose mannerisms overwhelmingly inspire a man to marry someone like her, but filmed by a white man? It’s not about beautiful women appearing on the big screen. It’s about any movie inspiring a white man to marry someone like that heavenly creature.
Does such 21st century American film exist…?
A prominent Republican Congresswoman has defended Donald Trump after he told Bloomberg reporterCatherine Lucey to be “quiet, piggy.”
Representative María Elvira Salazar said that Trump looked "picturesque," as he scolded the journalist, and also remarked that “no one is perfect.”
Salazar defended the commander-in-chief while speaking to CNN host Jake Tapper on yesterday’s episode of The Lead, where she also let slip that she thinks Trump is a “difficult” politician.
“You know, President Trump is a very picturesque, and difficult, and different type of politician,” Salazar said. “But I always say that I look at his policies and not at his personality.
“No one is perfect. Those who are perfect are in heaven.”
The moid is a gooner until he is a lovesick yearner. He is never himself, who is both at the same time.
Moids go into like fugue states where they are either porn-manic degenerates or self-pitying “I missed out on highschool love”/“I would marry that cashier and bleed out on the streets for her”. If you catch him fancying either state, he denies the existence of the other. It’s Schrödinger’s moid.
This is why they say retarded shit like “only men are capable of real unconditional love” while also saying the very next day “all men want is sex, they don’t care about women as people”. He may sincerely believe he’s not lying when he does this, because he is cognitively impaired. Part of their brains seem to affectively shut down and reactivate whenever it deems necessary.
