Bloodthirsty, psychopathic and serial-killer-esque quotes
I look forward to you two finding out about “;no means no”; in, oh, 20 years.
^Guys who take this "no means no" business too seriously get laid a lot less often than those who don't!
A certain amount of coy resistance is inherent in female sexuality, I think--and I don't just mean human females.
A harsh, firm "NO!", and, yeah, I'd probably back off
[Emphasis added]
Some males do have a right to a female’s body.
Husbands have a right to their wives body. Vis versa too. 1 Corinthians 7:4
Unborn boys have a right to their mother’s body.
A former morgue worker admitted to having sex with up to 100 dead women, some of whom were murder victims, during his time on the night shift in Ohio between 1976 and 1992. The disturbing crimes were revealed in a deposition video, with further details coming to light in a recent Federal lawsuit against the county.
They're dead. What's the big deal? It's not like he dug them up, sexually assaulted(?) them and stole whatever was in the coffin or went on a murdering spree just to have sex with the cold stiff bodies.
Men can't be victims of rаpe or violence simply because it's in their nature to be violated and abused. They are shock absorbers for actual humans; a tool can't be a victim of anything
I want to release a bunch of genetically engineered, drugged up, aggressive strictly gay males on the street to rape and pillage every moid. They will be programmed to leave us alone though, obviously. After all the men have been thoroughly raped we will kill them all
(A TERF responding to another TERF whom virtue-signaling about the “just because we reject the “trans ideology”, we still don’t want trans people to die and they are still human and largely innocent” argument)
Trans-identified people aren't human & they are not innocent at all. I get what you are trying to do, but unknowingly absolving their existence as "they are mentally ill ppl who need help" does nothing but ignore their history of misogyny & sexual violence (esp against lesbians)
…
Idc if I'm making radfems "look bad" for not caring about their disgusting existence. Idc if they are killing themselves off or nontrans-identified males are doing it to their own TIM brothers. Stop moralpolicing for TIMs bc I will not feel guilty for being apathetic
…
I don't understand posts like these on radfemtwt that humanizes them (esp TIMs bc... that's a male) just to make the masses clear they aren't conservative. THEY RAPE WOMEN, MAKE DYKE AND TERF BREAKING FICS, INVADE FEMALE SPACES, FETISHIZE THE FEMALE SEX. Stop caring
Ukraine is fvcked and they are getting everything theyve asked for.
This war isnt a war of choice for russia.
Why I will never care about cases of moids or scrotelings getting "molested" or "abused" hurt them worse. Free Polina Dvorkina Free Lindsay. 3 year olds rape adult women more often than the reverse
(Response to a tweet condemning J.K. Rowling’s blatantly open transphobia regarding trans women in the women’s bathrooms)
Good.
Trans people are mentally ill.
Transphobia is a natural and fair reaction to a cancerous ideology that needs to be stamped out.
All you lot should be rounded up and put in prison, you're fucking terrorists.
Woman wears clothing that invites men to look at her in a sexual way.
Woman struts her stuff to show off her body in an area that's not so safe.
Woman gets raped.
Sure, the guy is definitely at fault, but sometimes it takes two to make something happen. Maybe if women would dress a bit more conservatively, maybe if women wouldn't be showing off their body so much, maybe if women would watch what they're doing at parties and such, we'd see a lot less rapes.
Do you walk down the streets of the ghettos at night wearing an armani suit, and carrying a briefcase full of cash? Of course not. That'd be inviting a mugger to rob you blind.
…
Doesn't matter if it is a robbery, rape, murder, there's the person who commits the crime... and then there's the person who the crime is committed against.
If the latter invites the former by being an easy target, or an attractive target, then the latter is partially contributing to the crime.
Everybody has a responsibility to act maturely and in such a way that they are protecting themselves from such crime. Sometimes crime happens anyways even if you do take all the precautionary measures, but if you do something absolutely stupid and you become the victim of a crime... then yes, you're partially to blame for it.
Everybody is responsible for their own personal safety. This includes women and skimpy clothing. There's no reason to wear skimpy clothing other than to get men to lust after them. Is it really THAT big of a surprise when a woman who was wearing that trashy clothing gets raped? Now, obviously, if a woman was not wearing trashy clothing and still got raped... then no, she's not at fault (unless she did something else stupid, like drinking at a party or something) at all.
…
If you're a woman wanting to avoid being raped, then yes... you should not be wearing skimpy clothing and perhaps you should be avoiding parties and drinking. Perhaps if the woman in question weren't wearing trashy clothing, men might have a little more respect for her, eh?
I always lol when people go "LOL LOLI = CP AND PEOPLE WHO ENJOY IT ARE PEDOS"
I like loli but I absolutely HATE real CP. I don't find children attractive and I never will.
so what does that make me?
Lol you should of seen the reactions when people found out that my ex had a 5 year old daughter :ho
Sorry if I sound rude, but its the truth.How the f*** can some of you condone these actions? Pedophilia is sick, These girls/boys have JUST hit puberty in most cases, and a 13year old cant possibly make an intelligent decsion for another few years;there being taken advantage of. There practically still babies themselves, most 13 year olds dont know what love is ik I didnt and know what? I still dont. The legal age for sex(Florida) is 16 but even then its still iffy as most kids still need there parents to think/act for them if they get into deepshit. I mean you can hurt a kid at 12-13 years old with sex. If there the same age or in same age range though......have at it.
In Orlando, Florida, state prosecutors have decided to drop charges against ex-Tampa teacher Debra Lafave, who was accused of having sexual relations with a 14-year-old middle school student.
LGBT Hypocrisy
The LGBT movement is not so much a "community" these days, but an expedient political lobby.It is very easy to identify internal contradictions, cynical strategies and realpolitik when one assesses the state of the modern movement.
@David Thorstad
"One obvious contradiction in the assimilationist position is that if homosexual identity is inborn, as they say, then why do they oppose freedom of sexual expression for minors? Assimilationists argue that sexual identity is fixed by age six, but they deny young people the right to enjoy sexual pleasure with the person of their own choice."
However, pederasty didn't suddenly disappear the moment a taboo was placed on it. A perfect example of this is how gay men fetishize "straight boys" in the porn industry, or the feeding frenzy that ensues on user-shared porn sites such as LPSG, whenever a boy celebrity turns 18. The resulting search among users is invariably for self-shot/leaked photographs of the young male's preferably erect penis. While "gay for pay", "straight boy" models are over the age of 18, these tend to be scenes in which young "straight" males are cast as inexperienced and juvenile in character. The producers are thus "taking advantage of boys" by tricking them or using money to have their way with them. The relative popularity of this type of content in the gay porn industry is sometimes seen as "displaced pederasty" or at least a hangover from the "seedy" sex trade in boys that received so much attention in the 1970s before fading out
. A young woman from Norway, 24-year-old Marte Deborah Dalelv, naively thought she could do the same in Dubai, but was shocked to learn that what passes for "rape" in Norway is criminal conduct for women in Dubai. The courts in Dubai didn't agree that her story constitutes rape, and sentenced her instead to 16 months in prison for fornication and drinking alcohol.
….
One side of a story is almost never accurate, and here we only have the woman's story quoted. Even so, Marte's story does not add up to rape even if she is telling nothing but the truth. She describes only token resistance in going to the man's hotel room before willingly going to bed with him, and then blacks out and implies no resistance at all until she has her regrets the next morning as she wakes up naked. There is no violence; only drunkenness and regret. The case could hardly be more stereotypical of regretted drunken sex redefined in retrospect as rape thanks to feminist rape law -- minus the feminist law. The accused rapist is just a normal, persistent man, behaving like I have done many times and any of us would. Only with perverse, misandristic laws can this be rape, and I am pleased that Dubai rejects the hateful precepts of feminist rape law that Marte thought she could get away with.
…
Marte Deborah Dalelv was at worst taken advantage of while drunk and careless, like any normal man would do, but she was not raped. I am happy that she is now experiencing a backlash for her hateful attitude that she is entitled to have men imprisoned for our normal male sexuality.
I don't know why they get so angry at me when I say 90% of males should be culled from the human species. They are all non loyal whores who are only happy when their dicks are in use. In my ideal society the moids (who would all be gigachads because anything less would have been put down eons ago) would be wandering studs. Either they'd be getting their semen extracted or, if they were particularly attractive, they would be getting rented out for use. Sure they'd have no say as to who would rent him or for how long, but for the most part your average moid would have several sexual partners in his lifespan.
Literally everyone would be happy. Women would be free, men would be used the way nature intended them to be used, and incels would be dead.
Yet, in a way, we do share responsibility for the 9/11 atrocities. The Bible says that if we behave a certain way, we will receive blessings; if we behave another way, curses.
Deuteronomy promised that if the Israelites kept their covenant with God, they would be blessed with rain in its season, abundant crops and victory over their enemies. If they violated the covenant, they would suffer disease, drought, famine and death at the hand of their enemies and eventual exile from the land God had given them.
Our conduct as a nation shames me – abortion up to the moment of birth; turning mothers who murder their children into celebrities; the mutilation of adolescents in the name of our latest idol, transgenderism; pornography pushed to schoolchildren; the streets of our cities turned into open sewers; recreational drugs; and accusing a nation of Holocaust survivors of genocide.
What kind of shining city on a hill is this?
It was the Palestinians who attacked a music festival, killing and raping Israelis. Did they not expect retaliation, did they expect no reaction. For a moment there was peace but as usual they never miss a chance to miss a chance. Too bad if they’re starving. Too bad if they are homeless. Too fucking bad.
[Translated from “Happy October 7 to everyone!”]
Stop what you’re doing immediately!
Jews died one day somewhere!
The need of the Jews to show themselves by crying remains the most stinking element of character of this race
Moreover, they no longer pretend to make a spectacle of themselves: France is no more than a locality in the suburbs of Tel Aviv[…]
The military operation of October 7 is not “anti-Semitic” – even if the fight against the Jewish race would have perfectly legitimized this military operation. These Jews were not targeted because of their ethnic origin or religion, but as settlers in a national liberation war that has lasted for more than a century[…]
This "anti-Semitic" story is a mystification produced by the Zionist propaganda services to compel the West to support Tel Aviv, an inevitable myth of the Holocaust[…]
Precisely, let’s talk about the duty of memory: to shed a single tear on the fate of the Jews, race of executioners, is morally fatal. This breed, which plunged Europe into war in 1939 to maintain its dreadful financial dominance on the planet by means of mass bombardments, cannot expect to come out of it crying because some of its settlers were taken apart in occupied Palestine[…]
And let’s not talk about the overwhelming role of the Jews in the advent of genocidal communism or in the anti-racist ideology that they imposed on us in 1945 before organizing mass immigration to our countries
I remember from October 7 the courage of the Palestinian revolutionaries who, with derisory means, demonstrated their determination in the face of world Jewry
Three years later, Hamas is still not defeated
Glory!
Sinwar for a thousand years!
[From “It is time”]
I was predicting war or democide in 2025, but then fourteen years ago, in 2012, I backed off a bit from that prediction to instead predict war, collapse, democide, or whatever, in 2026
Well, 2026 is nearly over, and it is not war or democide yet
But there was an interesting post on X
If the Democrats win, they are going after the entire facefag right[…]
It is win or die. The Republic has been over for some time. You just have to get on with killing your political opponents, or they are going to kill you. Those slow to figure this out will die
Elections require a willingness to live with your political opponents. Politics has become existential. The left is no longer willing to accept the continued existence of the right[…]
We just have to drag out every judge and bureaucrat involved in weaponizing justice and just kill them, then just kill anyone who attempts to conducts elections in ways that enable fraud. We probably will not do what we have to do, at least not in 2026, but that is just going to increase the butcher’s bill when it finally comes due[…]
Regardless of how people vote, the outcome is likely to be that both sides declare victory. “Oh no”, the Dems will cry, “Thugs from ICE are suppressing the votes we found under the couch cushions two months after election day”[…]
The killing will not necessarily start before the election[…]but if both sides fail to agree on the outcome of an election, what is there but force?[…]
After 2020 I predicted a purge like that promised by Elissa Slotkin for 2026. It did not happen. The gerontocrats in charge of the Democrats backed away from the precipice[…]
What has changed, what has been changing all my life but is now reaching critical levels, is that the left is no longer willing to exist in the same universe as the right, the brown left no longer willing to exist in the same universe as straight white males, and white liberal women are no longer willing to exist
[From “The Scouring of Paris”]
Paris is burning. Milano is under assault. It won’t be long before London and other English cities are as well. And the primary concern of the treasonous, satanic European governments and their unelected masters is to prevent the French and Italian and British peoples from remigrating every single Third World invader
All of this was obvious before I was even born, in 1968. All of this is inevitable. But it looks as if Reconquista Time may be approaching a little sooner than anticipated. This is still just prelude, but the arc of future history is already apparent
Pray for the native people of Europe, St. Breivik
If I were Macron I would go on TV and announce to the youth of France that if they don't feel like getting an free state-paid education, they can stay at home, but if they stand in school entrances and try to block others from entering, the police will shoot them dead. They'd only need to kill a few dozen and [the student protests/riots] nonsense would be over.
@Lizard
A real-life example of a Lolita-type relationship like what I alluded to above(where the child is a willing participant) is that of Mary Kay Letourneau, a 36-year-old schoolteacher from Tacoma.
She slept with a student of hers for the first time when he was 12, and had two of his children before he was 15.
My link is old, but in new testimony from the “victim” (whose identity is now public because he is 18 and party to a lawsuit seeking damages from his old school system) the guy admits he made a bet with a classmate over who could sleep with a teacher first. Obviously, not a victim in the normal sense.Not to hijack this into a GD/Pit thread or anything but…they aren’t traumatized until the social workers get a hold of them, is that what you’re saying?
Interesting that you brought up the Letourneau case. I always saw that so-called crime as a bittersweet “forbidden romance”, and very Lolita-like. (After all, he sought HER out, when she was released from jail the first time!) Also interesting to see that her “victim” is now suing the school for “failing to protect him”, and I can’t help but wonder…has his therapist convinced him that he was truly abused, and he’s working to set things right, or has age corrupted him to the point where he’s seeking out the big bucks? (A la Michael Jackson’s alleged lover…)
Thats pedophilia.
How so?
Look, a fairly large percentage of 13 year-old girls in this country are sexually active. What difference does it make whether they're sleeping with another 13 year old or 22 year old?
Age of consent is basically an imaginary boundary. It's a good idea mind you, because it keeps pubescents from making stupid mistakes and prevents real pedophilia (sex with a prepubescent), but if there's parental consent involved, I fail to sse the problem. As stated in the article, they ARE legally married.
…
I admit to exaggerating a little. But the fact remains that if parental consent was involved, it is much less likely that advantage was being taken.
Meh. *shrug*
The age at which someone may be eligible for marriage is subjective. My maternal great grandmother got married at 14 and she seemed "ok". Others in countries around the world get married at equally young ages.... I really don't know what the big deal is. Further, I don't like the idea of law deciding what two willing participants and their families may or may not consent to. I think it ought to butt out.
So the question here is; "Is sex with a thirteen year old abhorrent?" Having lost my virginity at that same age, I would have to say "no", so long as the sex was consentual. As for whether or not a thirteen year old can consent, legally they cannot, but realistically they sure can. Again, so long as the family is in agreement, I think the law ought to butt out.
Ok, but did you lose your virginity to a 22 year old? I think thats one of the key points here. I think that it wouldn't have been such a big deal if it was two 13 year olds.
Acutally, she was 19 or so. Not exactly 22, but close.
More importantly, did someone fall pregnant? Sex, I can live with as long as I don't have to hear about it, but supporting a child is well beyond most couples with teenage members.
If that is the case, then it should be illegal to have sex with someone who cannot afford a child. While I like that that thought, I don't know how it could possibly be executed.
Suspect of the deadly shooting in Trappes (central France) claimed to have acted in response to the unrest during the October 17 demonstrations and the widespread looting[…]When he was arrested[…]the man[…]stated in substance that he had "avenged the shopkeepers" by targeting "Black people and Arabs"[…]
This statement by Kevin T.[…]made to the first responding police officers, is one of the reasons the National Anti-Terrorism Prosecutor's Office (PNAT) opened an investigation[…]
Initial investigations appeared to show that the shooter, during a chaotic journey between the towns of Trappes and La Verrière, west of Paris, exclusively targeted people who were not White, firing bursts from his car, a Renault Clio, with a submachine gun. A search and seizure of evidence was conducted at his home in nearby Plaisir and continued into the early evening. Le Monde has learned that investigators found a copy of Adolf Hitler's Mein Kampf[…]
Bomb disposal experts and officers from RAID, the elite unit of the national police, had to be deployed during the search because of the discovery of a booby-trap device in the apartment[…]
In addition to the weapon used in the attack, police also discovered pepper spray, gloves and a substance resembling cocaine – currently being analyzed – in the suspect's vehicle. "A blood test is still underway to determine his toxicological status," the PNAT said in a statement on Saturday. Kevin T.'s criminal record shows four previous convictions for ordinary law offenses
The method of operation, the apparent choice of victims, the suspect's initial statements and the results of the search and seizure of evidence form the basis of the anti-terrorist prosecutor's case for a racist act intended to spread terror among the population[…]
During his deadly rampage, one person – a 26-year-old mixed martial arts practitioner – was killed and five others were wounded, some critically. Among them was a 12-year-old girl who was hit by multiple bullets
why in the world would we need to save xys in these situations? what's the material benefit of this? even from a pro reproductive standpoint it's illogical. nearly no males are needed to continue the species/country's population. so nearly all males are biological baggage that do nothing but cause destruction in the wake of their sexual frustration
even as a romantic breeder who thinks males are these important contributers to society (kek) it makes zero sense to give them equal priority as women and children during a rescue. barely any of them ever actually make children with women and in those cases they quite often still don't contribute anything positive to women's and children's lives
in areas of crisis, single males (and coupled ones, dear straight women) resort to horting resources from women and children, then exchange them for sex (rape). they also go around raping and killing for the hell of it. women know this instinctively, that's why they're scared of crisis. males are a bigger threat than natural disaster could ever be
why does 'human kindness' only ever mean offering a merciful hand to xy rapists? why the fuck are women endangering themselves to help males during precarious situations? i can tell you why, because this shit is just an extension of heterosexual females' feelings of 'love' (sexual submission) to males. all of these notions of female generousness and mercifulness, it's just sexual submission to males. think christianity's mother mary who getd biblically venerated for basically being raped by a god to have a child without being asked first
#blackpill feminism#blackpill lesbian#lesbian blackpill#bp feminism#bp separatism#feminism#radfeminism#gendercritical#4b#4bmovement#6b4t#radblr#terfblr#pro terf#gencrit#bp lesbian#lesbian bp#terfposting#terfs please interact#pro misandry#feminist#radical feminists do interact#blackpilled feminism#bpf#female liberation#radfemsafe#radfemblr#decenter men#female separatism#total moid death
ICE is doing the job Congress created it to do: enforcing federal immigration laws. If that makes liberals furious, that means they doing great job . A country that refuses to enforce its own laws undermines their very purpose. The objective is nation safety and the rule of law—not political approval. And let's be clear: the ends justify means. ICE has a job to do, and enforcing immigration laws isn't supposed to be a popularity contest. The objective is not to win applause from critics but to achieve results. Effective enforcement has to be swift and sometimes brutal whatever you like or not.
Warrior Poet Society, the gun-training company run by former Army Ranger John Lovell, scheduled a two-day course there on clearing a building alone[…]with an AR-15[…]
His congregation[…]began in 2023 as an offshoot of Grace City Church in Wenatchee, Washington, whose pastor, Josh McPherson, wrote an ebook titled Christian Nationalism[…]
The White House invited McPherson and 99 other pastors to mark the first 100 days of Trump’s second term. Bonny has described him as a firm believer “that government must ‘submit’ to religion”[…]
McPherson went on the podcast of Frank Turek to promote Freedom Con[…]McPherson praised the Black Robe Regiment, preachers of the Revolutionary era who he said “were willing to fight for and defend truth in real time with real bullets, in real battle.” Turek interjected, “We’re not advocating violence, just to be clear.” The pastor warned that if Americans neglect peaceful means, “there will come a time where we’re forced to either compromise or stand and fight”[…]
McPherson also posted that if Christians and churches “simply showed up and voted their conscience… we’d flip Washington State”[…]
McPherson’s men’s ministry, Stronger Man Nation, sells the conference merchandise, which includes a “Dragon Killer” shirt[…]The ministry also runs Project ManCard, a four-day rite of passage for boys 14 to 17. “Boys were made to kill dragons”[…]At the end of ManCard the boys recite a creed that closes with “I’ll kill the dragon. I’ll win the girl”[…]
[Lovell] toured the U.S. Capitol and posted four takeaways. Number one[…]that the country’s Christian founding is “simply undeniable.” Number three came with a chili pepper emoji and was aimed at other pastors. “Pastors are derelict in their duties as shepherds if they do not speak out on the policies that liberate or enslave their fellow man”[…]
The day before the 2024 election, Lovell wrote, “Vote Trump, folks,” and said a Trump win would mean “far less aborted babies, & chemically castrated kids”
While I respect a woman not reproducing for whatever reason, I do not think women should have to be forced/coerced to not have kids any more than I think a woman should be forced/coerced to have kids.
I think we need to encourage women who want to be mothers to raise children with other women instead of with a man (which is more aligned with social mammalian nature anyways). The workload and child rearing would be split more amicably since women are superior both as parents and workers. I also want women to know that you can in fact select and purchase sperm at banks, and also get them selected for sex so you never have to worry about birthing a demon moid.
Lesbians do this shit all the time, this is why males are so scared of them.
If more women adopt this style of child rearing we can have males become more like government experiments, produced mainly to be experimented on/vivisected so we can eventually live without males and our species can have our genetic diversity via artificial sperm.
I believe with less patriarchal pressure for women to be broodmares, the human population would naturally taper down to a reasonable 500 million-1 billion (aka the population we had a century ago) and we could just focus on improving the quality of life of said stable population with each passing generation without compromising our environment.
As far as utopias go, this is the one that logistically makes the most sense.
#radfeminism#terfblr#radical feminism#gender critical#terf#feminism#radblr#misandry#men are evil#radical feminists do interact
A Falklands War veteran caused fury when he said small boats carrying migrants to the UK should be shot. Major-General Julian Thompson, 92, a former commander of 3 Commando Brigade, commanding Operation Sutton, the attack at San Carlos Water in May 1982, on the ground. "I would shoot them," Maj. Gen. Thompson said in a YouTube documentary produced by Steven Edginton. "We could stop them tomorrow, if we really had the guts. I'd shoot them, sorry, but I would," he added. "We've allowed it to happen. We're wet […] We've allowed it to happen"
"As long as they don't come around here, I don't mind what they do," Maj. Gen. Thompson told the Mail on Sunday. The former Royal Marine added: "They come over here and rape our girls. One machine-gun blast is all it would take […] then they would get the message
"I just want them to bugger off." He warned that if the Government did not stop them, then there "will be a revolution". "Our leaders are just wet," Maj. Gen. Thompson said, also suggested the country is "not Britain any more"
He added: "It's a sort of funny conglomeration of people, and in a wet country that allows itself to be pushed around all over the place." He even went as far to so: "I'm glad I won't see it; I'll be dead"
Maj. Gen. Thompson also called Islam "a flawed religion" in that "women are totally out". "They can be treated like chattels, and children the same," he said
A Home Office spokesman said: "This Government is bearing down on dangerous and illegal crossings. Anyone who seeks to take the law into their own hands is putting lives at risk and will face serious criminal consequences"
Fundy signgle-mindedness? I don’t thinks so. This is not an issue of personal “morality” which doesn’t harm anybody. As soon as a person starts adding victims to his behavior he loses my support. A man in his 20’s who publicly has sex with a drunk 15 year old girl is a fucking scumbag- no exceptions
Yes, I do think so. Fundies make their decision based on the Bible, because they believe that it’s the word of God. You’re basing your decision based on the laws of the society you grew up in, you’re not taking into account the fact that other societies both presently and in the past have different definitions of what is correct. Hell, even different states in the US have different definitions as to what constitutes statutory rpe, and yet you’re still willing to appoint yourself supreme arbitor of what’s right and wrong.
You’ve labeled the girl a “victim” without ever meeting her. Do you know that she was traumatized by the event? Do you know if she’s ever had consentual sex with someone her own age prior to this?
When I was in my early 20s, I was bnging girls who were 16 and 17 (along with the occassional 30 year old), every one of those girls had more sexual partners than I did, and I treated them better than their partners who were their peers. I didn’t simply sleep with them, I took them places, listened to them talk about their hopes and dreams and treated them with the same kind of respect a person should treat anyone they love. Does that make me a bad guy, simply because of a law, which is more likely to be enforced against a man, who crosses an arbitrary barrier than a woman who does the same? Perhaps it’s the law that’s wrong.
I’m not advocating adults sleeping with young children, but that’s beside the point.
and yet you're still spreading the genocide blood libel, which simultaneously puts a target on our backs, that conveys the falsehood that Jews are some powerful lobby that's in control over the US and the myth that the US currently provides aid to Israel.
To be clear, there is no need for rationalization of this. There is no reason to apologize for collective actions of Jews here. There are zero qualifications on opposing a group that aims to expel us.
Progressives broadly expect suicidal empathy from Jews, even those of us who are politically progressive.
[Translated from “Bourg-en-Bresse: married with Down’s syndrome, Elise and Victor live in their little specialized love nest”]
The most shocking thing in this case is that the media normalizes it with Soviet propaganda tact
Actu.fr[…]
These Mongols are extremely dangerous. Even before you can discern what is smelling, you have trisomics hitting each other while screaming with uncontrollable rage[…]
getting home from work, it’s usually TV for everyone[…]
“Work” is a big word
They are more or less put to work through specialized companies
A construction site with these Mongols is really risky for humans. A worker can get a 15-liter paint bucket on his face before he hears a scream from the scaffolding[…]
I grant Victor that he is more gifted in French than any Black or North African high school student[…]
The risk that a trisomic woman will pass on this defect is 75% if the genitor is himself a golmon[…]
This is where the humanitarian pathology leads
This sinister affair leads me to mention the successful enterprise initiated by the Third Reich—which, to my knowledge, never made a mistake—and which is called “Aktion T4”. Some literary people find it a bit too hard, but that is not to see the substantial savings made that can be allocated to healthy youth[…]
I would not agree to save them if they were integrated into a biological weapons program as part of the Remigration. There, at least, their dismal existence would find a source of redemption
I will conclude by recalling that the Catholic Church campaigns very actively to prevent abortion in cases of trisomy, a rare case for which I am in favor of this measure
As soon as it is a question of making it at least uglier and more black than it already is, we can count on those people
Males yearn to be second class citizens. They just mindbroke themselves into thinking they want to be dominant and oppressive but that goes against their very nature as males. If women were able to rise up and weed out ugly, violent, or otherwise dysgenic men, only allowing the best, most docile genes to perpetuate, we would see an objective improvement in society. We would look back at a time where there was a "male loneliness epidemic" and think it's just as ludicrous as when people believed in humorism.
#men are evil#misandry#radical feminism#radfeminism#radblr#radical feminists do interact#feminism#gender critical#terfblr#terf
@Debonperc
“She should not have gone to a fraternity.”
So you agree, men are inherently dangerous, and women should treat them all as if they are a potential threat.
Rumpelnstinsky1:
image
[Image: A chicken sits in a a giant pot full of butter atop a fire while saying to a hungry pack of wolves “I can do whatever I want that doesn't give you the right to eat me]
[From “Sink the Ships or Don’t Survive”]
All of the politicians profess to be horrified by a combat veteran pointing out the completely obvious about the invasion of Britain
The commander who led the land operation to liberate the Falklands has triggered a furore by saying that boats carrying migrants across the Channel should be machine-gunned
‘I would shoot them,’ Major-General Julian Thompson told a documentary about mass immigration to Britain[…]
The government not only won’t stop them, the government is aiding and abetting them. So of course there will be a revolution, and war, because that is part of the national cycle once foreigners start taking control of the reins of influence and power
This isn’t anything new. It wasn’t new when the Goths took refuge from the Huns in the Eastern Roman Empire, and within forty years had killed the emperor and sacked Rome. It wasn’t even new when the Israelites escaped Egypt and entered the land of Canaan
There are always those who invite the invaders and welcome the refugees and do their best to suppress the national reaction. Those who start the conflagrations are responsible for the inevitable violence, not those who put them out. It’s just irritating that everyone pretends to take their idiotic arguments seriously when almost everyone knows better
Immigration is war. Immigration has ALWAYS been war
Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said: ‘Opening fire on migrant boats would be completely wrong. ‘I understand people’s anger at migrant crossings but we cannot shoot at people. There is another way to end this
Britain has certainly fallen a long, long way from “we shall fight them on the beaches!” What a sad, despicable little place it has become
I don’t see the big deal about letting minors consent to sex. I remember being 13 and knowing which things I wanted and which I didn’t. Even at 9 years old, I held meaningful opinions about things that were happening to me
….
Problem: A 20-year-old man has sex with a 13-year-old girl. Was it consensual?
Solution: Let the girl know that her answer is entirely private and that no harm will come to her from answering or testifying in court. Then ask her if the sex was consensual. If she says yes, don’t waste any more taxpayer money on the case.
I have no reason to think it’s impossible. I’d have to look at each case individually, unless presented with medical evidence that 100% of humans younger than N years are incapable of giving consent.
if the child doesn’t feel she has been victimized, she wasn’t subject to any force or fraud, and she (as an individual) hasn’t been found incapable of giving consent, I don’t think she’s a victim.
And I don’t think we can possibly help the child by telling her, “I know you don’t feel like anything is wrong, but what happened was very bad, and your friend is a very bad man who will be going away for a long time,” creating a painful memory from what was otherwise a pleasant (or at least unremarkable) experience
From the October 6, 2026, edition of The State of Freedom, streamed on Rumble
CHRIS ALEXANDER (CO-HOST): What about Jack Smith, Joe? What about Jack Smith?
JOE HOFT (THE GATEWAY PUNDIT): What a — he should be hung, don't you think? I mean, he's so rotten. It's so bad
DANIELLE WALKER (CO-HOST): Yeah
HOFT: He's rotten. He's been doing — you know, he — there was a senator years ago that he took down. Do you remember that? It was under Obama. I think Obama's first year, there was a Republican senator out of Alaska they made a bunch of lies about. He eventually, I think, got either kicked out or resigned, and that gave Obama a 60-40 Senate, or he could push through with whatever he wanted. And Jack Smith was behind that takedown, and the guy died. And then he — they found out, no, he didn't do anything wrong
ALEXANDER: Yeah
HOFT: And that was Jack Smith so —
WALKER: How evil. How evil
[ On a ten year old girl giving birth in Mexico ]
I'm curious - why is it immediately rape? What if the boy with her was 11. Automatically he raped her? No matter what it was his idea, after all surely the 10 year old girl is perfectly innocent but the 11 year old boy is a deviant? Surely she could not have been willing..... Give me a break.
Yes, I'm older and for me to do with that one so young is just sick. But the idea that this is so awful is only a recent idea - dating back 100 years at the most. Think about Little House on the Prairie. What was she 13 when she got married? And that wasn't even considered too young at all. And this is Mexico - so you have to almost put them on par with us in the 1850's honestly. We only adjusted to the "18 to get married, your not an adult until then" when our life expectancy grew so much. Theirs isn't that high.
I can guarantee you there are 10 year old girls in Africa with boys near their age already in arranged marriages and likely pregnant. For them to wait until 14 would probably seem as equally weird to you as that age does to us.
Don't be so quick to judge or play the rape card.
Also - my ex-wife once confessed to me of having erotic dreams at age 9. No sexual abuse or anything strange, that's just when it woke in her. Which is also when her periods started. I.e. the hormones turned on and desires started along with them. She confessed to initiating some things as early as 11 with boys (the boys were about as confused as anything as to what to do). This idea that these little girls at this age are surely innocent and must have been raped is all well in good in fairyland, but simply not the realy. I know it's hard to think of little girls as something other that sugar, spice all that's nice, but they are just as perverted as boys and it typically awakens at an earlier age - as it happens when the hormones turn on and girls generally get their period at an earlier age than boys hit puberty.
I’d be more inclined to believe Vidal’s account than anyone’s that has posted in this thread.
Regardless of what the statute books determine rape to be, why is it so difficult to consider that Polanski’s victim might have been a teenage slut?
Because even if she was a “slut,” it’s still rape to have sex with a 13 year old girl? And by her account, it was not just statutory rape but forcible rape?
Well, she would say that, wouldn’t she?
As for her age, I’d bet that at least 50% of males on this planet, if they had a physically mature, attractive young lady waving her tush at them, would have done the same thing. Knowing her age might decrease that number, but there still wouldn’t be only Roman Polanski answering the call.
Well, the judge believed her testimony. Why are you so determined to paint her as a conniving little slut–because Gore Vidal said so?
Why is everyone else so determined to paint her as an innocent young victim, is just as valid a question. I’m giving Polanski the benefit of the doubt, because I’ve heard enough stories about teenage “star-fuckers”; what are your reasons for believing her account of the event?
I’m no saint by any stretch. But I wouldn’t rape a 13 year old girl who thought she was willing. Nor would I forcibly rape any woman.Seriously, are you such a weak kneed pussy that you can’t hold your own against a 13 year old girl? Do you truly have less character and force of will than a 13 year of child?
Can you point out where I said I’d be among the 50% that would? I know I am a honorable man, but I don’t know that about everyone else. Polanski might not be a honorable man, but I wasn’t there when this incident happened, so I’m not going to pontificate about what an evil man he is, based on one girl’s testimony. Now, if you can show this was not an isolated incident, I might be more inclined to join in with your faux outrage.
Human rights groups have raised the alarm over the growing number of death sentences and executions in Iran, after reports that a 23-year-old woman, Najmeh Amini, has been sentenced to death for blasphemy over a social-media post
Amini, an accounting student, is being held in Vakilabad prison in the north-east city of Mashhad. She has been sentenced to more than 12 years in prison and death in separate cases heard by a revolutionary and a criminal court
A source close to Amini’s family told the US-based Human Rights Activists in Iran (HRAI) that Amini was sentenced to death on charges of “sab ol-nabi” (insulting the prophet). She was reportedly arrested following online monitoring by Iran’s Cyber Police (Fata). The exact content of her posts has not been publicly disclosed
In the second case, Amini was sentenced to 12 years, six months and one day on charges including acting against national security and spreading propaganda against the regime
Amini was arrested by security forces during January’s nationwide protests, which were suppressed with a deadly crackdown[…]
Under article 262 of Iran’s Islamic penal code, insulting the prophet Muhammad or revered Shia figures is punishable by death. However, article 263 provides exemptions for statements made while intoxicated or without deliberate intent, although offenders may still face up to 74 lashes in certain circumstances
According to the Iranian newspaper Khorasan, which confirmed the judicial proceedings, Amini told the court she had posted the remarks while hallucinating after taking psychedelic mushrooms with friends and her defence argued it was a “slip of the tongue”
The presiding judge rejected her defence, reportedly asking: “Why, in that same hallucinatory state, did you not insult other individuals or opponents of the regime, such as America and Israel?”
Amini’s death sentence is not final and remains subject to appeal before Iran’s supreme court
The moment you start victim blaming, is the moment you make it much easier for rapists to actually get away with it. You can recognize that it's dumb to act in a manner that would entice people, but in the end a no means no. I also clearly said 'act', because I don't believe that dress is a valid way of enticing people. Just because a girl is wearing a tiny dress doesn't mean she is trying to entice men.
Lovecraft's: “Sorry but as soon as she willingly starts making choices to do things that will incapacitate herself from protecting herself (getting blackout drunk with strangers and shooting up drugs), then she has to shoulder some of the responsibility. Honestly think how much people would learn if they figured out that bad choices lead to horrible consequences. “
Xaelai: “Praytell why ELSE she'd be wearing skimpy clothing?
I can't think of a single practical use for wearing skimpy clothing other than trying to look sexually pleasing to men. Unless she's Bi or lesbian or something and trying to look nice to other girls, but still. Is there really a need to be walking around in public dressed like that? “
