latest

(the news article talks about a 40 year old woman sexually abusing a 13 year old boy for nine months in a daily basis to prove he isn't gay)
She got 7.5 years for victimless sex and the misogyny is unrecognized due to supernatural belief in the badness of sex which is the state religion. Facts of seduction get distorted into "abuse" which literally replaces the truth for a brainwashed populace.
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/mum-40-sex-terrified-boy-26960483
How much longer are we going to let this witchcraft pass as facts? How many more lives must be ruined before we can face the truth that consensual underage sex does not lead to trauma, so the justification for locking up these women is gibberish?
Why can't we have evidence-based laws? How can a connection with no scientific evidence that the "victim" group is any worse off than the control group pass as 100% certainly caused by the thing criminalized in our justice system? Isn't that spectacularly bizarre and unjust?
In order for crimes of supposedly traumatic abuse to make sense there should be evidence that victims have more trauma than a random control group. For CSA this evidence is comparable to witchcraft and for male "victims" of women, the evidence says BETTER outcomes than controls.
The boy in the above story claims sex made him traumatized and suicidal, but why can't people see this is no proof? The MECHANISM must also make sense or else it might as well be an accusation of murder by Voodoo. That is exactly how backwards the justice system is on sex crimes!

@hollowearthterf: You must understand that without love, care, and provision, the male is indistinguishable from a virus

image

@tramryder: not true for the simple and critical fact that the male produces copies of the host (female) with equal probability as himself. and that’s qed even within your deranged and ungodly frame

@cyberheathen88: well duh! the virus MUST allow the host to make female copies cus no future hosts = no more viruses. the opportunistic parasitic virus is simply serving its own needs so it can continue to live off the host and perpetuate itself. (p.s: the virus doesn’t make any copies lol)

@tramryder: lol i think you meed the argument simplified: 1-parasite/virus live off host 2-parasite/virus not make host 3-male make (w 50% genes) “host” = female 4-male not parasite/virus

do not think i can dumb down further i apologize

@cyberheathen88: i think i “meed” to simplify the argument further 1) male doesn’t “make” anything 2) male uses the host to copy itself 3) since male doesn’t control the human genome (even tho it really, really wants to), females continue being produced 4) hence, male parasite

@tramryder: female cannot make female w/o male. therefore male together w female make female and (male). observing plants or other non-primate eukaryotes in fertilization can help cut through internalized bad arguments or trauma

@cyberheathen88: new word for today : pathogenesis. in short; offspring without fertilisation. ofc human females don’t have this ability but the process itself exists. male doesn’t make anything. male copies its parasitic DNA into the copy machine to make a copy of a copy of a copy of itself.

also remember: women are XX, males are XY. females don’t need males to exist (potentially) but the male cannot exist without female. the majority of the genes in a male come from the resource rich X chromosome. the Y chromosome is gene deficient & incredibly deformed, aka, virus

the male BEHAVES like a virus in everything but name. this isn’t an exact pathology. we’re discussing behaviours. males are opportunistic parasites which is why they evolved to be bigger & stronger than the host. this is what happens when every parasite wants the host for itself