The woman-haters, man-haters, and non-binary-haters
Men rape women because they hate women — they hate their mothers.
All men hate women, and must forgive mama. You're attracted to what you hate, and yet you can't stand that spirit.
11:39 PM · Sep 27, 2024 · 3,347 Views
1 Repost 27 Likes 3 Bookmarks
Last week, Gisèle Pelicot, 72, told the court that her calm demeanour masked a “field of devastation”, triggered by the instance, four years ago, when a French policeman had informed her that her apparently loving husband had, in fact, been drugging her for a decade and inviting strangers – more than 80 local men – to enter the family home, and the couple’s bedroom, to rape her while he filmed them[…]
Mazan’s 74-year-old mayor, Louis Bonnet, sought to play down those tensions, arguing that most of the alleged rapists came from other villages and seeking to frame the Pelicots as outsiders who hadn’t lived there long[…]
“If they participated in these rapes, then it’s normal that they’re considered targets. There has to be transparency about everything that happened,” he said, while also condemning the accused and their actions
In his interview with us, Bonnet talked about the case itself[…]
“People here say ‘no one was killed’. It would have been much worse if [Pelicot] had killed his wife. But that didn’t happen in this case,” Bonnet said
Then he went on to address Gisèle Pelicot’s experiences
“She’ll have trouble getting back on her feet again for sure,” he agreed, but suggested her rapes were less troubling than those of another victim in the nearby town of Carpentras who “was conscious when she was raped… and will carry the physical and mental trauma for a long time, which is even more serious”
“When there are kids involved, or women killed, then that’s very serious because there’s no way back. In this case, the family will have to rebuild itself. It will be hard. But they’re not dead, so they can still do it.”
When I suggested that he was seeking to play down the gravity of the Pelicot case, he agreed
“Yes, I am. What happened was very serious. But I’m not going to say the village has to bear the memory of a crime which goes beyond the limits of what can be considered acceptable,” he said
"They're eating the dogs. They're eating the cats. They're eating the pets of the people that live there."
Are fat, dumb Americans finally waking up? At least some of them?
Hundreds of reports of Haitians in Ohio killing and eating cats, dogs, ducks, geese, and family pets appears to have galvanized many Americans. The average American has no interest in, nor any ability to understand, the details of fiat currency, Continuity of Government, military occupancy, fake school shootings, World War II truth, 9/11 truth, fake vaccines designed to murder millions of people, or a whole host of other issues.
But they do care about their pets. That's why this story has riled up millions of people and why the Fake News media is in full meltdown mode trying to suppress it. Despite their best efforts, have you noticed how the story isn't going away? It's sweeping the nation, and rightly so.
<...>
The common denominator between these awakenings is intrinsically evil people murdering innocent lives, either human or animal. For whatever reason, the average American refuses to listen to facts, evidence, or anything that runs counter to what they've been brainwashed to believe until innocent lives are killed. The one loss-of-life issue that doesn't wake people up is abortion. Men don't care, and women remain fanatically devoted to their "right" to murder their own children.
<...>
Granted, this latest mass awakening has sent some people over the deep end. When a person has undergone extensive programming their entire life suddenly realizes that everything they've been brainwashed to believe is a lie, it can cause serious cognitive dissonance. In some cases, it can cause people to double or triple down on denying reality.
<...>
Look at White Dudes for Harris. What kind of a faggot would call themselves a White dude for Harris? You would have to be the most guilt-ridden and self-hating person in the world. There are some people who are so far gone, they are never coming back to reality.
The story of the Israelis broadcasting pornography over Palestinian TV stations is not in the first edition of Libido Dominandi because it occurred four years after its publication, proving after the fact that my thesis was correct. Sexual liberation, by which I mean everything from pornography to abortion to gay marriage to transgenderism, is the most sophisticated form of social control in human history, and the march of events since the publication of the first edition continues to substantiate my thesis.
<...>
The second edition of Libido Dominandi: Sexual Liberation and Political Control, containing 300 pages of new material, is now available at fidelitypress.org. Why is the second edition necessary? Because it deals with the Internet in a way that I could not have done in the 1990s or in the first years of this century. If you ever wondered why you or someone you know doesn’t have a life, pornography may be the answer. Pornography is the social disease that has turned a whole generation into sex addicted recluses who can’t get married and can’t form the families that would make them productive members of society. That’s the bad news. The good news is that Libido Dominandi is the cure for that disease.
“You’re E. Michael Jones, aren’t you?” said one young man as I pulled up to the local supermarket on my bicycle. After I pleaded guilty as charged, he said, “I stopped watching porn because of you.”
For more than 20 years now, I have received unsolicited testimonies from people who have been liberated from pornography simply by understanding that its purpose is to turn you into a docile sex robot who can be controlled by the manipulation of your passions. No matter how crazy and counter-intuitive the claim that sexual liberation was a form of control sounded when I first made it, it has been proven true by the course of events, which showed, as St. Augustine said, “A man has as many masters as he has vices.”
Texas pastor Joel Webbon is a radical Christian nationalist who believes that the American people are too degenerate, stupid, and cowardly to abide by the Constitution and must therefore be governed by a Christian dictator. This dictator, Webbon believes, must “rule with an iron fist” and force everyone to, at the very least, “pretend to be Christian.”
Under his preferred form of Christian nationalist theocracy, Webbon wants to see the Apostles’ Creed added to the Constitution; abortion, pornography, no-fault divorce, in vitro fertilization, and birth control outlawed; non-Christians kept out of his neighborhood; and every non-Protestant Christian reduced to second-class citizenship.
Webbon, of course, is also a misogynist who wants to see women banned from voting, so naturally he is deeply alarmed by the prospect of Vice President Kamala Harris winning the election in November, as he made clear during a recent podcast.
“I believe it’s Isaiah that says that one of God’s judgments and curses on a nation is that they will be ruled by children and women,” Webbon said, citing Isaiah 3.”It’s not like if we get Kamala, then we’re going to have sinful policies and then we’ll be judged by God. That’s true, but it’s not just that Kamala will invoke judgment by wicked policies; Kamala is the judgment because of all the wickedness that we’ve already accrued.”
“We have been a wicked, rebellious, apostate nation for decades and decades and decades,” he continued. “Kamala is not the sin that will result in judgment; Kamala is the judgment that is the result for all of our past. The judgment is being ruled by women.”
“Why is that a judgment?” he asked, rhetorically. “Because the Bible said so. That’s why.”
“Women are not fit for that role,” Webbon asserted.
In 2023, Webbon was among the contributors to a document called “The Statement on Christian Nationalism and the Gospel.” Drafted by Christian nationalists like Oklahoma state Sen. Dusty Deevers, former Trump administration official William Wolfe, and others, the document declared that the United States must formally “acknowledge the Lordship of Christ” in all its laws, “abolish abortion,” outlaw marriage equality, and “recapture our national sovereignty from godless, global entities who present a grave threat to civilization.”
[From “When Voting Fails”]
The purpose of voting was largely to provide some form of “revolutionary” capacity to change the leadership of a people without violence[…]In effect, every two, four, or six years, the American republic provided a vote that at least made the people believe things might change without the need for guns[…]
Now comes Trump – yet again. This short article is not about Trump, per se. Rather, it is about the continual belief in voting as a form of implementing change. More importantly, it is about the moment in which that belief no longer exists[…]
There are a great many Baby Boomers who believe in voting and Trump because they have been conditioned for generations to believe voting works[…]
It is clear that voting – a process dominated by one generation for almost half a century – is losing its grasp on future generations. That is dangerous for ruling elites[…]
It is not an accident that total societal change has been inspired to emasculate the populace. Younger men not only have lower testosterone levels year over year (I personally believe due to some form of chemical introduction), but masculinity itself is under constant attack. Transgenderism is simply a byproduct of the war on men. Notice that the females harmed by the transgender movement are athletic women who would be inclined to gravitate toward athletic men, creating genetically athletic offspring. The totality of the movement to emasculate – from girl power narratives to deconstructing masculine social structures to promoting effeminate males (e.g., “Big Bang Theory” television show) to transgender therapies[…]– is part of a defensive posture to guard against the consequences of an eventual collapse of voting
When voting fails, populations rise violently. It is helpful to have a nation of emasculated men if you want to remain a tyrant. After all, it is hard to shoot at the ruling class with your legs crossed, sipping on a Pumpkin Spiced Latte, and wearing a dress
Can the white race win against this opposition?
1) A fast growing nonwhite population determining who gets elected, voting for diversity handouts and demonization of white identity.
2) A ruling business and cultural class that believes that diversity is the greatest strength of the West, and prohibits by law white identity politics.
3) Millions of Muslims living in Europe, building mosques everywhere, while Christian churches are turned into nightclubs.
4) A matriarchal order in which female psychology dominates academia, media, and political world, and men lust for these women to give them sex.
5) Blacks dominate American pop culture and the NFL is totally blackified in accordance with the American official view that integration is the greatest moral ideal.
6) A Jewish group with lots of financial and media power, loved by White elites, assiduously pushing woke politics and Neocon wars.
7) A fertility rate below replacement, with Greece, Italy, Spain, and much of Europe, in dire need of Africans and Moslems to keep the GDP growing.
8) An entire institutional network, from schools to universities, law courts, political parties, libraries, Google et al, dedicated to racial and cultural diversity. 9) A White psychology that is historically and psychological wired against in-group white politics, believing that we are all individuals with equal rights.
Liberals have never hesitated to take their principles to any extreme, no matter how irrational and insane. They instinctively fear that the inapplicability of the equality principle to any group of people threatens the principle itself, so it must be infinitely extended.
In the 1940s, the liberals told us there was "No Difference" between Jews and non-Jews. It became a crime to say that Jews hi-jacked the country and caused the war. It became "Nazi propaganda" to say that the gas chambers were an invention of Allied propaganda.
In the 1950s and 60s, the liberals told us there was "No Difference" between the races. It became a crime to "discriminate", even when the Negro "Master Race " robbed, raped, and beat up our friends and relatives and wrecked our schools and neighbourhoods.
Since sexual differences are a reminder of racial differences, the liberals told us there was "No Difference" between men and women. It became a crime in France to advertize for "air hostesses".
Since national differences are a reminder of racial differences, the liberals told us there was "No Difference" between nationalities. It became a crime in Holland to advertize for job applicants who could speak Dutch.
Since the differences between homo and heterosexuals are a reminder of the differences between men and women, which in turn are a reminder of racial and national differences, the liberals told us there was "No Difference" between homo and heterosexuals. It became a crime to discriminate against homosexuals
It then transpired that 50% of the homosexuals in San Francisco (to cite only one example) were already infected. The liberals were undaunted. They took their principle one step further. They told us there was "No Difference" between AIDS carriers and non-carriers, because only 10% of all carriers were developing the disease. No problem! It became a crime to discriminate against AIDS carriers. "Closing Your Doors" to the carriers of a fatal, incurable, and contagious illness! How pitiless! How cruel!
The major sports leagues are twenty four hours away from losing everything they have built over decades because our society doesn’t respect men and their sexual prowess and respect for same. Our society as Rollo Tommasi has mentioned, time and time again is in a Gynocentric social order and men have to emote like they are females in order to seem “safe” in that same order. Same social order gives females more leeway in a lot of things, even when they do horrible acts.
The reason why these sports leagues are going to lose everything (respect), is because many of these men have had relations with those that are transgender prostitutes.
I have zero sympathy for men of colour facing any kind of oppression because of their skin colour. I have zero sympathy for muslim or Arab men facing oppression because of their religion or ethnicity. I have zero sympathy for gay men who are oppressed because of their sexuality. I have zero sympathy for disabled men who face discrimination because of ableism. So just know that when i speak against homophobia, racism or ableism, i exclude these men from my activism. I don’t care if they’re victims so don’t ever expect me to stand with them they can die as well.
[Anonymous: how exactly are you racist]
I'm much more comfortable around white men than black, for instance. I could welcome any woman of any ethnicity to live in my country but I have much stricter standards for men. And while I realize that many behaviours are due to socioeconomic conditions and culture, I must say I couldn't care less which of them gets me raped and murdered. I don't want them in my country and that's that.
If it wasn't for Red States being subsidized by the federal government to
keep food prices down, blue states could not afford to eat and would
starve to death. That might not be a bad thing in the long run.
Congrats to Megan Rape-a-ho' for upholding the liberal way and losing.
Trump says he will burn the citation for her medal of freedom when he is
elected again.
Unfortunately her endorsement will matter A LOT.
Taylor Swift's fanbase is overwhelmingly women with an IQ of 86 that lack critical thinking skills and think "Trump=bad misogynist".
Women are far more susceptible to propaganda than men are.
If we repealed the 19th and women didn't vote we wouldn't have to worry about Kamala being president.
Women vote on emotion, and celebs which is exactly what the democrats use in their campaigns.
Facts are facts.
[From “School shootings are the ultimate expression of despair.”]
OP by Moroccancel
School shootings are the essence of how social outcasts express all the hatred and enmity against a society that treats them as trash and that they will not fit in because society will always reject not only the different, but the worthless
I welcome any mass school shooting. I celebrate it because they have essentially had enough balls to elevate the great pain of millions of silent men. The normies cope with the idea and call everything "mental illness", "he had to improve his personality" but that is not true. Mass shooting is the ultimate expression of life in the face of death, it is, in short, the desire for power and attention in the highest form, for one last time before dying or ending up permanently in prison, hopefully executed or on death row for a few years
What social outcast will not be happy by the instant normality that is broken? Bravo
In video game
Moroccancel:
@KillNiggers
It's the most selfless act one can do. Most pussies just stick to their own thoughts and rope
:yes: :yes: :yes: :yes: :yes:
Moroccancel:
@opioidcel
Normies hating mass shooters is hypocritical beyond belief because mass shooters are created not born. Mass shooting is the end result of a lifetime of social ostracisation and humiliation resulting from bad looks and non NT ness
Absolutely. Imagine being rejected, hated, being told that your life is over before it even begins
It is the logical consequence of every person who rationally understands that revenge is the only answer. Because violence has always been against them
opioidcel:
@V?REN
Your talking about a fraction of mass killers, Most just do it for fame
Nah most do it cause of jewipill brain rot/damage
Fine Taylor … you win … I will give you a child and guard your cats with my life
[From “My mother is based.”]
OP of the thread by Serious:
Even my mother says that she doesn't understand why rape is such a big deal, especially when woman is not virgin anymore
But my mom is 60+ already, so she may view life in an old fasioned way, plus she was virgin when she married
From Sloth.Belgrade:
She's based:feelzez::feelzez::feelzez:
It's only rape, if a female is a virgin, married, or a widow
From veryrare:
@Stupid Clown
She's probably only saying these things because she herself is older and thus more spiteful towards young foids. Most of the "basedness" some old women have is just them hating on younger foids out of jealousy. I definitely agree with her tho
Foids with high body counts complaining about rape is like a golden corral complaining about a hobo stealing
Facts, Your mom probably acted like any other foid out there
To call her based is just .... no comment
[From “Chronosexual”]
Woah-man
I think all men should go on a strike for a week.
- No electricity.
- No water.
- Sewage problems.
- No internet.
- No stocking of groceries in stores.
- No fuel at gasstations.- No one to call to fix stuff.
- Many many instances of femaly employees realizing they don't have a firm understanding of how their company runs.
All men think and feel like women, like their mothers. But that nature is not their natural way of being. You must forgive and overcome your mother!
12:28 AM · Sep 3, 2024 · 4,339 Views
11 Reposts 1 Quote 105 Likes 6 Bookmarks
Elon Musk has used his large platform on X to promote a theory that a free-thinking “Republic” could only exist under the decision-making of “high status males” – and women or “low T men” would not be welcome in it.
On Sunday, Musk re-posted a screenshot of the theory – which appears to have been conceived on 4chan in 2021– on the social media site.
The theory, written by an anonymous user, suggests that the only people able to think freely are “high [testostrone] alpha males” and “aneurotypical people”, and that these “high status males” should run a “Republic” that is “only for those who are free to think.”
“People who can’t defend themselves physically (women and low T men) parse information through a consensus filter as a safety mechanism,” the post reads.
“Only high T alpha males and aneurotypical people (hey autists!) are actually free to parse new information with an objective ‘is this true?’ filter,” it adds. “This is why a Republic of high status males is best for decision making. Democratic, but a democracy only for those who are free to think.”
…
“Interesting observation,” Musk said, in response to the post.
The modern alienated anti-hero is the Luciferian JEW at war with God (the Moral Order) nature and society. "Modernism" is Jewish Satanism i.e. Cabalism, a solipsism where they redefine reality according to their perversions and self-interest. Sick is healthy.
<...>
"Audiences are more sophisticated," the writers tell us, "people want moral ambiguity." Really? Do we want it or does Satan?
We've reached the point where amoral and violent delinquents, misfits and weirdos are the norms. They have made the world conform to them.
<...>
Freaks and Geeks. Six Feet Under. Seinfeld. Glee. Arrested Development. The Office. Self-absorbed misfits, i.e. Jews and gays, are the "new normal."
<...>
In the 1950's, they had to rebuild, so the Illuminati gave us healthy values. "In 1950's television, the man of the house was king of his castle. Was it an illusion to begin with?" Father Knows Best. Ozzie and Harriet. Leave it to Beaver. My Three Sons.
Was it an illusion? I don't think so. Some things are hard-wired. Most men want to rule their own roost. That doesn't mean we want to lord it over anyone. But every successful organization is a hierarchy and that applies to families as well. Only a monster has two heads. The division of labor made a lot of sense. If you want a man to shoulder responsibility for a family, he has to lead it. It must be his creation.
There was no moral ambiguity in the 1950's Westerns. Good versus evil. Gunsmoke. The Lone Ranger. Have Gun Will Travel. Men were men. They put their lives on the line to build a just society. Women supported and loved them for it.
<...>
TV and movies initiate us into the satanic cult which is modern society. A satanic cult controls and exploits its members by making them sick. Because television and movies were my reference point, I was dysfunctional until almost 50. I didn't know how to be a man. There were no models of true masculinity. When dysfunctional sick people are your role models, you become dysfunctional.
Why God Wants You to Stay in an Abusive Relationship
[…]
But when we read the Scriptures we see a very different view of how we should respond to abuse:
“18 Servants, be subject to your masters with all fear; not only to the good and gentle, but also to the froward. 19 For this is thankworthy, if a man for conscience toward God endure grief, suffering wrongfully.20 For what glory is it, if, when ye be buffeted for your faults, ye shall take it patiently? but if, when ye do well, and suffer for it, ye take it patiently, this is acceptable with God.
21 For even hereunto were ye called: because Christ also suffered for us, leaving us an example, that ye should follow his steps: 22 Who did no sin, neither was guile found in his mouth: 23 Who, when he was reviled, reviled not again; when he suffered, he threatened not; but committed himself to him that judgeth righteously: 24 Who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree, that we, being dead to sins, should live unto righteousness: by whose stripes ye were healed.”
I Peter 2:18-24 (KJV)
When we endure grief or suffer wrongly at the hands of others, in other words when we endure mistreatment which is abuse and take it patiently the Scriptures tell us “this is acceptable with God”. God is not excusing the actions of the abusers. But God is saying when we are on the receiving end of various kinds of abuse and we take it patiently that this is acceptable with God.
Such a thought is foreign to our thinking but the Scriptures tell us “For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the Lord” (Isaiah 55:8).
We often talk on this blog about how God likes to image or model things. Man was created to image God and thereby bring him glory (I Corinthians 11:7) and woman and by extension marriage was created to help man fully image God as a husband and father (I Corinthians 11:9, Ephesians 5:22-33). When it comes to this matter of suffering abuse – we, both men and women, actually model Christ when we suffer abuse from others taking it patiently as he did. And that is why God wants you to stay in an abusive relationship.
[…]
(Commenting on a picture of Kamala Harris next to Hillary Clinton)
Funny how blowjobs impacted both their careers differently.
(Trump retweeted this)
[From “The End Game”]
More women across the West desperately need to understand that all of their “oh, poor refugees” and “someone should so something” and “be nice, don’t be raciss” and “they’re just here to seek a better life” is going to avail them precisely nothing once the foreign invaders have sufficient numbers to impose their will on society and reshape it more to their liking
This is the end game for women’s suffrage. As I have pointed out for decades, there is absolutely no evidence that a society can survive it for long. And what we’re witnessing now is the inevitable fate for which the majority of women have dutifully, if not smugly, voted for decades
‘Call Her Daddy’ Proves Why Feminism Is Actually Dangerous For Women
Matt Walsh
This one is very painful, I'm warning you...the host of the most popular podcast in the world for women must be canceled today.
(One of the comments)
DonaldDeCicco
Why do men not value me!? Because what's free has no value.
Last week, there was a video clip of a woman in an airport. At first, it looked like she was under a pile of people and when she climbed out, she was completely naked from the waist down with her bra on. One breast eventually fell out of her bra. She was screeching and fighting anyone who came near to her. She was doing obscene things with her body. (There were many people around her witnessing all of this.) The cops had no idea what to do with her. They eventually got her down to the floor on her stomach and handcuffed her but it was a fight. Several people below the video commented that someone should have put a blanket around her for her dignity. Yes, this poor woman needs to be clothed, not just with a blanket but with the righteous clothes that only Jesus can give to her if she would only repent and believe in Him.
[…]
This caused me to think about feminism and how it is complete rebellion to God and His will for women. “For rebellion is as the sin of witchcraft, and stubbornness is as iniquity and idolatry” (1 Samuel 15:23). Be aware that feminism is leading more and more women into witchcraft, and witchcraft leads to mental illness, insanity, and demon possession. Feminism and witchcraft are NOTHING to fool around with, women.
A tearful, unscripted moment between Tim Walz and his 17-year-old son, Gus, has unleashed a flood of praise and admiration[…]
But the show of affection triggered a swath of snark and ugly comments on social media, many from MAGA supporters of former President Donald Trump, who faces Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris and Walz in November
Conservative columnist and right-wing provocateur Ann Coulter mocked the teenager’s tears. “Talk about weird,” she wrote on X. The message has since been deleted
Mike Crispi, a Trump supporter and podcaster from New Jersey, mocked Walz’s “stupid crying son” on X and added, “You raised your kid to be a puffy beta male. Congrats”
Alec Lace, a Trump supporter who hosts a podcast about fatherhood, took his own swipe at the teenager: “Get that kid a tampon already,” he wrote, an apparent reference to a Minnesota state law that Walz signed as governor in that required schools to provide free menstrual supplies to students
The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported that Jay Weber, a conservative Milwaukee radio host, made a now-deleted post on X criticizing the Walz family
“If the Walzs (sic) represent today's American man, this country is screwed: 'Meet my son, Gus. He's a blubbering b---- boy. His mother and I are very proud'”
After removing the post, Weber apologized and claimed he didn't know Gus had a learning disability
Opening Night at the Democrat National Convention: “women” parade around the scene costumed as abortion pills.
And across the water, Britain’s new Labour government (that’s “Off-the-Wall Far Left Crazy” in American English) has threatened a government crackdown on “harmful beliefs”. They’ve vowed to go all-out, no quarter asked or given, against “extremism.” If your beliefs ain’t right, the cops will bite.
In France last week, a 72-year-old man was sentenced to “re-education”—he got a break: it was originally going to be a prison sentence—for the, um, crime of showing disrespect for government officials. (That would explain why so many creepy individuals wind up in government. They’re welcome nowhere else.)
Has the whole Western world collectively lost its mind?
Because they have to conceal the fact that it’s us they’re laughing at, and that the prospect of devouring our liberties makes them positively giddy, Democrats have staked a claim to a soon-to-be legendary Politics of Joy. “We’re the happy, jolly ones, and that’s why you should vote for us! Trump and Vance are a couple of gloomy guses, really weird! And they’re gonna force women to have babies!”
<...>
But vice-presidential candidate Tim Walz has the answer: tampons for boys. Because, you see, “gender” is 100 percent fluid, you really are whatever you say you are, and that whole male/female thing is so yesterday!
What? That doesn’t expand your lungs with joy? Well, then, how about this—wide-open borders, with Free Stuff for everyone who breaks our immigration laws? Hey, Kamala Harris is our Border Czar: she’s had oodles of practice, bringing in millions more Democrat hangers-on.
<...>
So why not join us in our mirth? We offer you a top-to-bottom revision of America that makes the Chicoms look like amateurs. Look and see: Britain and France are leading the way. Surely we can overtake them—and create a new America where Harmful Beliefs can land you in a labor camp.
A church body that carries out "gay exorcisms" as conversion therapy and believes in witchcraft is expanding in Scotland after launching its headquarters in Edinburgh
Forward In Faith Church International Incorporated (FIFCII) has bought premises in Edinburgh and has plans to set up ministries in Glasgow, Aberdeen and Fife[…]
Scotland is currently seeking to legally end conversion therapy - that seeks to meddle with any individual's gender identity or sexual orientation
However, as the Daily Record reports, the FIFCII has been accepted by the Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator (OSCR)[…]
The Pentecostal model church, which has a huge following in Zimbabwe, where it was formed by "Apostle" Ezekiel Guti in 1960 and known as ZAOGA[…]
Its ministers also regularly oversee miracles, which allow crippled people to suddenly walk and all manner of ailments to be suddenly cured at mass evangelical gatherings
Two overseers for Scotland have been appointed - seeking to set up in Glasgow, Fife, Edinburgh and Aberdeen. Premises have already been bought in Edinburgh for a Scottish HQ[…]
The website of FIFCII describes the exorcism of a man possessed by a "homosexual spirit"
One "Apostle's Update" blog post on the charity's website in 2017 describes how the spirit "bound him for many years" but that he was freed during a "miracle night" in St Kitts and Nevis[…]
Another blog entry describes the 'deliverance' of a 14 year old girl in Zimbabwe who was taken nightly to "eat human flesh and drink human blood" as part of a 'witchcraft' ritual[…]
A blog from 2015 praises the deliverance of 17 people in Zimbabwe from "spiritual husbands, bitterness, homosexuality, witchcraft, satanism - to mention a few"[…]
In another blog, Pastor Fiona Arthurs sets out a wife's responsibilities in a sermon titled 'A Wise Woman's Responsibility'
It says sex is "the very reason" for marriage, adding: "When we said 'I do' we were saying 'I do' to his desire for sex
God has made it clear not to have children until your hips are wide enough sometime in your 20s? What about if you take a woman in her 20s that is extremely petite and tiny to the point that she doesn’t look bigger than a 14 year old, and what if you take a 14 year old that is already as large in the hips as the average woman? Does that mean that the tiny woman in her 20s should never have children? Generally speaking, a person’s body is incredibly smart, and if a girl is able to become pregnant it’s because her body has deemed her ready. Being able to give life, but then you must wait for multiple other things to fall inline first? That makes no sense, that’s like putting on your pants first, and then your underwear. Now could your 20s be the best time to have children physically? It could be, but I don’t believe that that automatically disqualifies someone from having children in your early teens. My grandmother started having kids when she was 14 or 15, she lived to her 90s, had excellent health until she crossed over, she had at least 6 children.
Biology says that a female is ready and able to bear children when she starts to menstruate. Biology is always right and biology always knows best. Also a females body doesn't need to be fully grown and fully developed for it to be safe for her to get pregnant and give birth. A females hips are also wide enough at those ages. Most females bodies are also fully grown and fully developed by age 15 and all peoples bodies are fully grown and are fully developed by age 17.
If you want a woman to be president then you’re gay.
“Woowwww a girl boss!”
Get an aids test.
You’re a homo.
Speak Venusian ( Understand Womens Language 100%)
Women have their own language for quite along time , also women are more socially intelligent then men , most women at least. I came across an mp3 that let’s you think like a woman , but it was created with the intention for transgenderism. I want too still be myself , but speak Venusian with perfection.
26 Audio Spells:
Extreme attraction – – this has similar power output to 700ct but it’s for attraction, the extreme attraction, and main goal is: sex. It can be something insane, (of course set for attracting/manifesting women for love/sex relationships).
gain favors
learn fast
learn languages
fun in learning
boost intelligence
power erotic male
boost sexual arousal
friendship
a new love
excellent communication skills
quick correct response
gain important evidence
<...>
Programmed with these chi energy suggestions:
I am now a master of communication with the opposite sex
I now speak Venusian naturally with clarity
I now manifest the ability to understand women and their secret language now and always
I now understand the secret meaning behind women’s language
I now know what women want
I now manifest the ability to know what women want just like Mel Gibson in the movie what women want
I now manifest the ability to know what women want on deeper subconscious and conscious levels
I now the develop the ability to read women’s mind with clarity
I now use my ability to read women’s mind for the highest good
I now manifest the ability to read women’s mind emotions thoughts and body language in all dimensions perfectly
I now manifest the ability to hear what women think
In AT3 (Audio Talisman) there are two trance engines, quite heavy ones, and another pretty strong one based on Silent4D Image Mp3s. Dynamic music.
In mp3s for listening via headphones, there is light trance engine and one light Silent4D Image Mp3s engine. More ambient, so it is applicable to listen while doing other things.
<$39.07>
Men are physically stronger than women. It's not rocket science. An that's the reason why they have been in the position where they have been throughout history, including the position of being expended for the sake of women and children. But eventually, In the comfort of this modern world, physical strength has lost much of its value, and consequently the traditional position of men in society has been put into question.
In the softness of this modern digital era, most people have been relieved from hard physical work, and they have forgotten how hard life was for both men and women throughout history. And it's this very same comfort that grants people the privilege to dwell in their existential resentment and vent all their frustrations against the "patriarchy", "toxic masculinity" and other "social constructs" ... ending up incarnating the very problem that they claim to fight against. Pure projection.
matex2207
Comment section of that video highlighting once again why women historically had no rights at all.
8
@ramprel1
They still don't because rights are in your head.
@AryanDuty14
Yea that whole womens rights movement caused a lot of trouble
I wonder who caused it ⚡
@_synchrophasotron
🧓
"In my time, it was acceptable to own slaves"
- you, probably
@walterkronkite4262
@_synchrophasotron Way to take a statement out of context. He’s saying historically it is a good example on the reasoning behind why they didn’t have rights. He’s not saying he condones slavery. Sensitive.
Exactly. Let's bear in mind folks women hate each other, as adults they'll give advice that is harmful for the other so they can better their position in society
@MayaMaya-tj7kw first I've seen far too many cases where women give other women advice that was not in their friends best interest. Secondly he needed Kleenex, do tell me how hard done-by you are. Women had their chance for 50 years they showing they can't handle the responsibility and accountability needed in order to have those freedoms. I'm not saying it's not possible, just that Western culture women have not got those qualities in general.
Is it really not all men though?
Because when we say ACAB, we mean all. Because they're complicit in a system that perpetuates violence.
I don't know a single man who has reliably, every time, called out other men for their vile behaviour.
In fact they usually make friends with them, and if the women in their lives point it out they'll "oh, yeah, he's a bad dude" and then go have beers because what the BAD DUDE thinks of them is more important than the comfort and safety of the women in their lives.
They call themselves protectors but I don't see them calling each other out for creepy behaviour, online or off.
They're complicit.
All of them.
They're complicit in a system that perpetuates violence against women.
Not only that, but they continue to both benefit from it AND be harmed by it, but still unwilling to change it because even though it hurts them, it hurts us more. They get more from this than they lose.
Yeah. All men. Every single one.
You are completely ignoring the fact that at the basis of the patriarchy not just the oppression of women by men but also the oppression of disadvantaged men by advantaged ones.
I myself, before starting to identify as non-binary, suffered the worst consequences of this firsthand as an Autistic AMAB. Under patriarchy, the physical abuse of men by other men is way more openly normalized than physical abuse of women by men
I am an intersectional feminist. When I say "all men" I should correct myself and say "all cis men".
But "all cis men" is 98% of men.
While it's also "all cis men" who are complicit in the parts of patriarchy that also harm men...
... I'm really tired of it only mattering to men to fix it when it hurts them.
Why do we have to convince them that THEY are being harmed before they'll change something?
Why is the harm they're causing us (everyone but cis men) not enough?
- They, themselves, are luxury people. Civilization does not need them. It does need the specific subset of straight white males they are at war with.
- Their agenda is a luxury morality. Civilization will not collapse if someone says that male and female brains are different, that a man in a dress is not a woman, or that the dregs of third world Muslim failed nations are not a suitable replacement for the white male button-down-shirted NASA engineers of the 1950s.
- The agenda of their opposition, the aforesaid straight white males, is not a luxury morality. Civilization will indeed collapse if positions of responsibility are not handed out according to capability and trustworthiness.
What we desperately need certain people to understand, so that we don't end up having to imprison or kill them to save civilization, is that democracy is not a general synonym for "fair and enlightened modern civilization in general".
[From “Even the Taliban Didn’t “Solve” the Woman Problem. They Just Manage It Intelligently.”]
People look at women in Afghanistan and think “wow, the Taliban sure solved that problem”
This is true insofar as “they solved it as much as it is humanly possible to solve this problem”[…]
If the Taliban had “solved” the woman problem, they would not need to keep them in bags. They would be able to allow women to walk around and participate in public life[…]
You can’t let women act like normal humans, or they will just start trying to destroy everything[…]This has been the case since Eve[…]
Women are in fact an unsolvable problem[…]
You have an open wound that cannot heal; the only thing you can do is try to keep it clean[…]
That is what is happening in America and in the West: we have failed to control women[…]
There is no series of moves that tricks women into not taking any opportunity[…]to turn everything into a total nightmare on earth, where it’s all sluts, abortions, gay tranny children being handed over to state homosexuals, gun control, black mania, mass abortion, endless war everywhere for no reason anyone can explain, legalized crime[…]
And before anyone starts with “oh but there are men who support that too” – just shut the hell up, faggot. The reason there are men that support any of those things is that women have power[…]
In Afghanistan there are no men, with the notable exception of homosexuals, who support a female agenda. Boys are raised to be men[…]
There are different levels of influence that women have in different societies, and you can restrict them without going full-Taliban[…]
East Asians are pretty strict about women. If a woman starts getting out of control, any man will say “hey, bitch – settle down, okay?” and she will understand that this is backed up by the threat of physical violence[…]But Asians have allowed women to work and make their own decisions about marriage, and women have decided to just stop having kids
I mean, whether she was trans or a Ciswoman.
Cis woman shouldn't be allowed to compete against biological woman.
You wanna use the argument she was born a woman and raised as one?
100% that's okay.
She unfortunately was born with both X-Y chromo's. Sorry. Science > feelings
Ah, but you haven't heard about the second Golem.
The women of America made it, out of words, for they saw that men had built many things, and would not give them half of what they had built. Of their most cunning arguments and their most piteous appeals for sympathy they crafted it. And into its head they placed a clay tablet, with their most sacred scripture, which read "Gender is a Social Construct." They called it "Feminism". And it went forth and fought for them.
"Gender is a social construct!" the golem cried. "Men and women differ only in their genitalia! Therefore women can do everything men can do, backwards and in heels, and are entitled to an equal share of everything! Little boys have no special capabilities or needs! If they behave differently than little girls, they are defective and must be dosed with methamphetamines until they are docile! Women are entitled to equal pay, because they must be doing the same type and amount of work! Anything a woman does differently than a man, or a man does differently than a woman, is regressive social conditioning and must be vigorously stamped out, because gender is a social construct!"
And all the little boys were herded into schools sensibly run by women, and all the men's spaces were opened to women, and changed to be welcoming to women, and all respect for men and their capabilities, and all rewards for men and their contributions, were banished from society, because gender is a social construct, and therefore men neither needed nor deserved anything that a woman did not receive also. And when everything had at last been made equal, the golem put on a sundress, and a pink hat, and it went into the women's locker room to suit up with the women's soccer team for their game.
"Stop!" the women cried. "You are not a woman! You a five-story animated statue made of clay! You are smashing the building! You are invading our private space!"
"I identify as a woman," said the golem. "See? I have put on a pink hat. Women wear pink hats. I am a woman."
We’ve all heard about the need for a “course correction” in the development of certain affairs, but rarely, especially when it comes to the most crucial aspects of a culture, of a “thought correction.” This is certainly true of one of the most damaging ideological deformities of the modern West, namely, feminism. When it comes to feminism, whether as a practice or a theory, even its most astute and honorable adversaries do not tend to think clearly, as I hope to show.
If it should turn out that Khelif is indeed female, then there is no argument. She is just a very big girl with a competitive advantage over others of her sex. If her chromosomal packet remains disputable and it turns out that Khelif is a bivalent creature, there is ample room for suspicion and disbelief of those who claim that Khelif is a woman. Khalif not only looks like a man, is built like a man, and may well possess x/y chromosomes, but is a man in effect and action and not a woman or a hermaphrodite. In which case, sympathy and concern for the young woman whose nose he broke in the ring is precisely what any decent person would feel—as many have. But caution is required about the real issue.
There is everything to be said for helping women who have been brutalized or unconscionably hurt. But the thinking is often, as in this case, wildly off the mark. If one really wishes to help victims like Angela Carini or to establish both a social and athletic arena of fairness in the matter, one must first put a check on one’s sentimental feelings and expressions of fury or indignation, and determine where the septicemia actually lies. And any objective assessment will reveal precisely where the fault is to be found. It’s called feminism.
Women are jealous of men. They hate that the children love and respect the father. So they turn the children away from the father toward them.
They try to play “man” by trying to impose on men’s sports, take men’s jobs, kill his children, vote, usurp the man’s natural authority!
10:10 AM · Aug 4, 2024 · 4,390 Views
30 Reposts 6 Quotes 191 Likes 5 Bookmarks
Women choose courtship, men pick wives.
Women are conservative with who they date, men are conservative with who they marry.
Women are picky when it comes to sex, men are picky when it comes to commitment.
To be a wife you have to be selected.
We need Fathers to teach this.
When the news broke last week that President Joe Biden would not be seeking reelection and had endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris, Trump-loving evangelist Mario Murillo was quick to warn that “as a Christian, voting for her will be the most reckless thing you will do in your life.” Similarly, self-proclaimed Christian nationalist and unabashed Trump cultist Lance Wallnau quickly posted a video in which he warned that Harris represents “the spirit of Jezebel” and shortly thereafter proclaimed that Harris is “the devil’s choice”
Last Friday, Murillo appeared on Wallnau’s podcast, where he baselessly asserted that Harris was chosen to be the Democratic nominee because she is “devoid of anything that could possibly get in the way of their agenda,” which is a sign that “demonic power is at work”
“That’s why God spared Trump’s life, for such a time as this,” Murillo declared. “But he needs another miracle”
Wallnau agreed, asserting that Harris represents “Hillary Clinton 2.0” but “with an augmented heat seeking missile capacity” to “stir up strife and civil war.” Harris, Wallnau proclaimed, is an “aggrieved female … who will paint [herself] as a black minority against a white majority”
It is “demonic,” Wallnau warned, adding that Harris will likely pick Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg as her running mate in order to make the campaign all about “racism and sexual perversion” in order to “[pierce] the heart of the vulnerable American who doesn’t want to fight those battles”
(from a Reddit thread where the original poster wanted advice on a “friends with benefits” situation. This user started to accuse people in casual sexual relationships of being rapists; this is a collection of their quotes from throughout the thread)
No relationship is casual once you have sex. Sex has consequences whether people want to admit it or not. It's physical.
(“I have had plenty of casual relationships, mainly just having sex and maybe watching movies or whatever.”)
You raped people?
Sex by deception is a criminal act of rape.
(“You think no one can consent to casual, no strings attached sex?”)
Nope.
(“It didn't create an emotional response in him. All he led her to believe is that he was down to nut, just like her. She shouldn't have led him to believe she wouldn't catch feelings.”)
Take a biology class child.
(“So you're saying that sex is inherently damaging to people?”)
It is the most emotionally damaging thing that ever happens to anyone.
(“I've been the naive girl who caught feelings from a FWB situation, and you're talking bullshit.”)
You "caught feelings" because that's a normal human response you learned the hard way; that there is no such thing as simply FWB. You were used.
(“Chill out, dude.”)
Why, because guys can't be called out for using someone? Lying by actions? Women do this as well at times. But yes, usually men because other men tell them it's ok to do. Just like the hundreds on this sub who are supporting casual rape.
(It goes on and on like this…)
on the story of a child bride who poisoned her adult husband and his friends
The people shot in school shootings are not all (often not at all - victims of columbine shooting had not bullied the shooters, despite their claim that revenge was the cause) people who bullied the shooters. I absolutley think that a violent reaction to systematic violent bullying and abuse is understandable. Just not when you shoot people who have nothing to do with it. In this case, the "friends of the guy" who were killed make it a little less justifyable, but they were still celebrating alongside him and likely took part in / attended the marriage.
So you think that guy who just stabbed 22 people is a hero?
No. I don't think this girl is a hero either. If those 22 people had all brutally bullied and victimised that guy physically / emotionally, then you could say his reaction was understandable. That is almost certainally not the case though. Many of those people will have had nothing to do with it whatsoever. Please stop trying to twist my words
No, murder is not justifiable.
Hell, I was bullied in school. I've had my ass kicked. I've felt physical and mental pain during school. No, I definitely don't see justifiable that I stabbed or shot even the biggest bully.
Rape is an awful thing, but it just another form of physical violation. Getting hit by a fist in the face and kicked to the head, stomach and back are much more dangerous than having a penis inside your vagina.
You really don't think it's insulting to suggest 50% of Nigerian girls aren't smart enough to just run away? If only you were there to tell them that all of their problems could be solved if they hop on a bus.
Well it's insulting to suggest that all Nigerian girls are unhappy with the marriage culture there and getting forcibly married is a reason to murder people.
The mind reels with lurid possibilities. What are Vance’s “weird views on gender”? Does he think that men can magically turn into champion female swimmers and women of the year? Does he think drag queens should be sent into primary schools to teach children the glories of the latest LGBTQWTF fantasies? Does he think parents should lose custody of their children if they don’t affirm their delusions that they belong to the opposite sex?
Nah. Politico would think all that was as normal as pink hair and nose rings. What Politico finds “weird” is that Vance is “staunchly opposed to abortion” and has even compared the left’s sacramental child sacrifice to slavery, another moral evil that once enjoyed the protection of a Supreme Court ruling. Even worse, as far as Politico is concerned, is the fact that Vance has “promoted Viktor Orban’s pro-natalist policies in Hungary, which offer paybacks to married couples that scale up along with the number of children.” Good heavens! He wants people to have more children? But what about their carbon footprint?
Vance also “opposes same-sex marriage.” He had the audacity in 2022 to suggest that “the sexual revolution had made divorce too easy (people nowadays ‘shift spouses like they change their underwear’), arguing that people in unhappy marriages, and maybe even those in violent ones, should stay together for their children.” This is a canard Vance has heard before, and Politico was minimally gracious enough to include his response: “His campaign said such an insinuation was ‘preposterous,’ but you can watch the video yourself and be the judge.”
In fact you can do child friendly drag shows. I mean what people like RuPaul, Flip Wilson etc did is in many cases very child friendly. RuPaul even hosted a talk show that was very child friendly and alot of the shows she stars in have been more child friendly.
In fact I hope sexualized media causes little girls to feel bad about themselves and improve their appearance so they don't end up single and alone as feminist cat ladies. Just like boys should try to be Adonises.
Schopenhauer was extreme but he was right about a lot of things. Women behaving like adult children is one. Whether it’s wining and complaining, the inherent solipsism, the shirking of responsibility for their actions, or the overall lack of an ability to control emotions, women IN GENERAL have a childish mindset which makes sense because women are babied by our society. Obviously not all women but enough to be important enough to bring up in a discussion. Everyone these days are afraid to say anything that can been seen as negative about women because they think they’ll be labeled as misogynist, women haters, and for women “pick me’s”. The truth is women have a tendency to certain flaws just like men have a tendency to certain flaws and as free willed humans we can and I’d even venture to say should work to fix. Schopenhauer does a decent job at pointing them out. Does he seem to have some annimus towards women? Yes. Was he right about a lot of things? Also yes. Both can be true.
